2. Incisor Intrusion with Invisalign Treatment of an Adult Periodontal Patient
aligners were worn for 15 days while the last lower aligner was Discussion
each, except that a frenectomy being worn, to allow root move-
was scheduled during the sixth ments. At the end of active treat- Invisalign appliances pro-
aligner period to reshape the gin- ment, the patient wore the last set vided a viable alternative to con-
gival marginal without traction of aligners for an additional four ventional orthodontic intrusion
from the upper frenum (Fig. 3). weeks. in this patient, aligning the ex-
This aligner was worn for three The entire Invisalign treat- truded incisors in a relatively
weeks as the tissue healed. ment lasted 11 months (Fig. 4). short time with no need to re-
The last five upper aligners Fixed lingual retainers were then move the posterior prosthesis.
were changed every three weeks, placed in both arches. The post-treatment radiographs
Fig. 1 43-year-old female patient with extruded, protrusive, and labially inclined upper incisors, prosthetic
replacement of upper right posterior segment, and periodontal disease before treatment.
172 JCO/MARCH 2006
3. Turatti, Womack, and Bracco
Fig. 2 Invisalign treatment planning with ClinCheck.
Fig. 3 Frenectomy performed to reshape gingival margin without trac-
tion from upper frenum.
before
after
Fig. 4 Patient after 11 months of Invisalign treatment.
VOLUME XL NUMBER 3 173
4. Incisor Intrusion with Invisalign Treatment of an Adult Periodontal Patient
clearly showed upper incisor in- REFERENCES Assessment and description of the treat-
ment needs of adult patients for ortho-
trusion and a reduction of the in- dontic therapy, III. Characteristics of the
frabony defect. 1. Melsen, B.; Agerbaek, N.; and Marken- multiple provider group, Int. J. Adult
Moving the teeth at a rate stam, G.: Intrusion of incisors in adult Orthod. Orthog. Surg. 1:251-274, 1986.
patients with marginal bone loss, Am. J. 10. Burstone, C.J.: Deep overbite correction
of about .25mm per aligner, Orthod. 96:232-241, 1989. by intrusion, Am. J. Orthod. 72:1-22,
Invisalign applies a light, contin- 2. Cardaropoli, D.; Re, S.; Corrente, G.; 1977.
uous force.11 Attachments are and Abundo, R.: Intrusion of migrated 11. Clements, K.M.; Bollen, A.M.; Huang,
incisors with infrabony defects in adult G.; King, G.; Hujoel, P.; and Ma, T.:
bonded to the teeth adjacent to periodontal patients, Am. J. Orthod. Activation and material stiffness of
the extruded teeth to provide a 120:671-675, 2001. sequential removable orthodontic appli-
mechanical lock for the aligners 3. Wennstrom, J.L.; Stokland, B.L.; Ny- ances, Part 2: Dental improvements,
man, S.; and Thilander, B.: Periodontal Am. J. Orthod. 124:502-508, 2003.
and to allow pure sectional intru- tissue response to orthodontic move- 12. Taylor, M.G.; McGorray, S.P.; Durrett,
sion, using the same biomechan- ment of teeth with infrabony pockets, S.; Pavlov, S.; Downey, N.; Lenk, M.;
ics as the segmented-arch tech- Am. J. Orthod. 103:313-319, 1993. Oxford, E.; Dolce, C.; and Wheeler,
4. Boyd, R.L.; Leggott, P.J.; Quinn, R.S.; T.T.: Effect of Invisalign aligners on
nique. The aligner dissipates the Eakle, W.S.; and Chambers, D.: Perio- periodontal tissues, J. Dent. Res. 82
reactive force over the entire dontal implications of orthodontic treat- (Spec. Iss. A):1483, 2003.
posterior segment, which serves ment in adults with reduced or normal
periodontal tissues versus adolescents,
as the anchorage unit. Am. J. Orthod. 96:191-198, 1989.
In contrast to fixed ortho- 5. Thilander, B.: Infrabony pockets and re-
dontic appliances, the aligners duced alveolar bone height in relation to
orthodontic therapy, Semin. Orthod.
can be removed for eating and 2:55-61, 1996.
brushing, allowing optimal daily 6. Polson, A.; Caton, J.; Polson, A.P.; Ny-
hygiene.12 The comfortable, es- man, S.; Novak, J.; and Reed, B.: Perio-
dontal response after tooth movement
thetic appliances have been en- into infrabony defects, J. Periodontol.
thusiastically accepted by pa- 55:197-202, 1984.
tients. Chairtime for aligner re- 7. Boyd, R.L. and Baumrind, S.: Perio-
dontal considerations in the use of bonds
placement is minimal, and the or bands on molars in adolescents and
clinician can compare the pa- adults, Angle Orthod. 62:117-126, 1992.
tient’s results with the virtual 8. Vanarsdall, R.L. Jr.: Adjunctive ortho-
dontics for the generalist, J. Tenn. Dent.
ClinCheck images to immediate- Assoc. 59:15-18, 1979.
ly verify treatment progress. 9. Musich, D.R. and Crossetti, H.W.:
174 JCO/MARCH 2006