SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 32
PHIL 160 PHIL 160 "Explanation"
PHIL 160 Goals of science: predictions manipulations explanations What is required for  a good explanation?
Prediction vs. Explanation PHIL 160 What will happen next? Why  did it happen? Prediction: Explanation:
PHIL 160 Why did it  have   to  happen? How is it  possible  for  this to happen? Why did  this  happen rather than something else? Why  did it happen?
Deductive-Nomological model PHIL 160 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],(from “nomos”, Greek for “law”)
Why is this bird black? PHIL 160 ,[object Object],[object Object],   This bird is black.
Deductive-Nomological model PHIL 160 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],at work in  “ intertheoretic reduction”
PHIL 160
PHIL 160
Why does the pressure of this gas sample increase? PHIL 160 ,[object Object],[object Object], The pressure of the gas sample increases.
Kinetic Theory of Gases: PHIL 160 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
PHIL 160
“ Bridge Laws” PHIL 160 Volume = space through which point particles are moving Pressure = force from collisions with walls/area Temperature = measure of the kinetic energy of the particles.
PHIL 160
PHIL 160 Volume of the gas sample  is decreased  (less space for particles to move through). Why does the pressure of this gas sample increase?
Why does the pressure of this gas sample increase? PHIL 160 Same number of particles with same kinetic energy     more frequent  collisions with walls.
PHIL 160 More frequent  collisions with walls    higher force/area  (i.e., higher pressure) Why does the pressure of this gas sample increase?
Does D-N model work for all explanations? PHIL 160 ,[object Object],[object Object]
PHIL 160    Alex didn’t get pregnant. Why didn’t Alex get pregnant? ,[object Object],[object Object]
PHIL 160
Why did the salt dissolve? PHIL 160 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],   The salt dissolved.
PHIL 160 ,[object Object],[object Object],   The salt dissolved. Hexing is not  explanatorily relevant! Why did the salt dissolve?
Why did Nancy get lung cancer? PHIL 160 ,[object Object],[object Object],   Nancy got lung cancer.
PHIL 160 Smoking 2 packs of cigarettes a day for 10 years causes lung cancer. Not for every smoker! Not a law of nature. Why did Nancy get lung cancer?
PHIL 160
Why did these camellias die? PHIL 160 ,[object Object],[object Object],   These camellias died.
Why did these camellias thrive? PHIL 160 ,[object Object],[object Object],   These camellias thrived.
Cartwright : We don’t need a law! PHIL 160 We don’t need to know a law of nature to explain the camellias dying or thriving. There might be no such law of nature!  (Explanation is still good.)
PHIL 160
Why is the flagpole’s shadow 4 meters long?  PHIL 160 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],   Shadow length = 4 m.
Good deductive argument, BAD explanation!  PHIL 160 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],   Height of pole = 3 m.
PHIL 160 What kind of explanations in science? Looking for universal regularities or statistical regularities? Possible mechanisms or how it actually happened? (Causes, or something else?)

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

P3.2 Scientific Methods
P3.2 Scientific MethodsP3.2 Scientific Methods
P3.2 Scientific Methods
mlong24
 
Natural Science versus Pseudoscience
Natural Science versus PseudoscienceNatural Science versus Pseudoscience
Natural Science versus Pseudoscience
ninasuth
 
Introduction Scientific Research
Introduction Scientific Research Introduction Scientific Research
Introduction Scientific Research
Omar Tamimi
 
Translating English to Propositional Logic
Translating English to Propositional LogicTranslating English to Propositional Logic
Translating English to Propositional Logic
Janet Stemwedel
 

Andere mochten auch (15)

P160 hempelhume
P160 hempelhumeP160 hempelhume
P160 hempelhume
 
Psychology, Science, and Pseudoscience: Class #03 (Nature of Science)
Psychology, Science, and Pseudoscience: Class #03 (Nature of Science)Psychology, Science, and Pseudoscience: Class #03 (Nature of Science)
Psychology, Science, and Pseudoscience: Class #03 (Nature of Science)
 
Epistemological development
Epistemological developmentEpistemological development
Epistemological development
 
Big Data Innovations Post-Science
Big Data Innovations Post-ScienceBig Data Innovations Post-Science
Big Data Innovations Post-Science
 
Formal Logic: Quick Outline
Formal Logic: Quick OutlineFormal Logic: Quick Outline
Formal Logic: Quick Outline
 
Hugh Ching Resume Chinese/English
Hugh Ching Resume Chinese/EnglishHugh Ching Resume Chinese/English
Hugh Ching Resume Chinese/English
 
The shaky foundations of science slides - James Fodor
The shaky foundations of science slides - James FodorThe shaky foundations of science slides - James Fodor
The shaky foundations of science slides - James Fodor
 
P3.2 Scientific Methods
P3.2 Scientific MethodsP3.2 Scientific Methods
P3.2 Scientific Methods
 
Natural Science versus Pseudoscience
Natural Science versus PseudoscienceNatural Science versus Pseudoscience
Natural Science versus Pseudoscience
 
Introduction Scientific Research
Introduction Scientific Research Introduction Scientific Research
Introduction Scientific Research
 
Theory, text and context
Theory, text and contextTheory, text and context
Theory, text and context
 
Current epistemological theory
Current epistemological theoryCurrent epistemological theory
Current epistemological theory
 
Kuhn: Paradigms and Normal Science
Kuhn: Paradigms and Normal ScienceKuhn: Paradigms and Normal Science
Kuhn: Paradigms and Normal Science
 
Meaning science
Meaning scienceMeaning science
Meaning science
 
Translating English to Propositional Logic
Translating English to Propositional LogicTranslating English to Propositional Logic
Translating English to Propositional Logic
 

Mehr von Janet Stemwedel

P160 Kuhn and his Critics
P160 Kuhn and his CriticsP160 Kuhn and his Critics
P160 Kuhn and his Critics
Janet Stemwedel
 
Lect10 Human Subjects: History
Lect10 Human Subjects: HistoryLect10 Human Subjects: History
Lect10 Human Subjects: History
Janet Stemwedel
 
Lect11 Human Subjects: Regulations
Lect11 Human Subjects: RegulationsLect11 Human Subjects: Regulations
Lect11 Human Subjects: Regulations
Janet Stemwedel
 
Lec12 Human Subjects:Global Issues
Lec12 Human Subjects:Global IssuesLec12 Human Subjects:Global Issues
Lec12 Human Subjects:Global Issues
Janet Stemwedel
 
Lec13 Scientific Papers and Communications
Lec13 Scientific Papers and CommunicationsLec13 Scientific Papers and Communications
Lec13 Scientific Papers and Communications
Janet Stemwedel
 
Lec 14 Authorship Issues
Lec 14 Authorship IssuesLec 14 Authorship Issues
Lec 14 Authorship Issues
Janet Stemwedel
 
Lec15 Patents and Intellectual Property
Lec15 Patents and Intellectual PropertyLec15 Patents and Intellectual Property
Lec15 Patents and Intellectual Property
Janet Stemwedel
 
Lec16 International Strategies for Scientific Dialogue
Lec16 International Strategies for Scientific DialogueLec16 International Strategies for Scientific Dialogue
Lec16 International Strategies for Scientific Dialogue
Janet Stemwedel
 
P160 naturalismclassroomlect
P160 naturalismclassroomlectP160 naturalismclassroomlect
P160 naturalismclassroomlect
Janet Stemwedel
 

Mehr von Janet Stemwedel (20)

P160 Kuhn and his Critics
P160 Kuhn and his CriticsP160 Kuhn and his Critics
P160 Kuhn and his Critics
 
Lect10 Human Subjects: History
Lect10 Human Subjects: HistoryLect10 Human Subjects: History
Lect10 Human Subjects: History
 
Lect11 Human Subjects: Regulations
Lect11 Human Subjects: RegulationsLect11 Human Subjects: Regulations
Lect11 Human Subjects: Regulations
 
Lec12 Human Subjects:Global Issues
Lec12 Human Subjects:Global IssuesLec12 Human Subjects:Global Issues
Lec12 Human Subjects:Global Issues
 
Lec13 Scientific Papers and Communications
Lec13 Scientific Papers and CommunicationsLec13 Scientific Papers and Communications
Lec13 Scientific Papers and Communications
 
Lec 14 Authorship Issues
Lec 14 Authorship IssuesLec 14 Authorship Issues
Lec 14 Authorship Issues
 
Lec15 Patents and Intellectual Property
Lec15 Patents and Intellectual PropertyLec15 Patents and Intellectual Property
Lec15 Patents and Intellectual Property
 
Lec16 International Strategies for Scientific Dialogue
Lec16 International Strategies for Scientific DialogueLec16 International Strategies for Scientific Dialogue
Lec16 International Strategies for Scientific Dialogue
 
P160 naturalismclassroomlect
P160 naturalismclassroomlectP160 naturalismclassroomlect
P160 naturalismclassroomlect
 
Truth table analysis
Truth table analysisTruth table analysis
Truth table analysis
 
P160 Kuhn classroom Lecture 2
P160 Kuhn classroom Lecture 2P160 Kuhn classroom Lecture 2
P160 Kuhn classroom Lecture 2
 
Propositional logic
Propositional logicPropositional logic
Propositional logic
 
Syntax and semantics of propositional logic
Syntax and semantics of propositional logicSyntax and semantics of propositional logic
Syntax and semantics of propositional logic
 
Quiz1 postmortem
Quiz1 postmortemQuiz1 postmortem
Quiz1 postmortem
 
Deductive and Inductive Arguments
Deductive and Inductive ArgumentsDeductive and Inductive Arguments
Deductive and Inductive Arguments
 
Language of Arguments
Language of ArgumentsLanguage of Arguments
Language of Arguments
 
Diagramming arguments
Diagramming argumentsDiagramming arguments
Diagramming arguments
 
Arguments (and other things)
Arguments (and other things)Arguments (and other things)
Arguments (and other things)
 
Patents and intellectual property
Patents and intellectual propertyPatents and intellectual property
Patents and intellectual property
 
Authorship Issues
Authorship IssuesAuthorship Issues
Authorship Issues
 

Explanation classroomversion

  • 1. PHIL 160 PHIL 160 "Explanation"
  • 2. PHIL 160 Goals of science: predictions manipulations explanations What is required for a good explanation?
  • 3. Prediction vs. Explanation PHIL 160 What will happen next? Why did it happen? Prediction: Explanation:
  • 4. PHIL 160 Why did it have to happen? How is it possible for this to happen? Why did this happen rather than something else? Why did it happen?
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 13. “ Bridge Laws” PHIL 160 Volume = space through which point particles are moving Pressure = force from collisions with walls/area Temperature = measure of the kinetic energy of the particles.
  • 15. PHIL 160 Volume of the gas sample is decreased (less space for particles to move through). Why does the pressure of this gas sample increase?
  • 16. Why does the pressure of this gas sample increase? PHIL 160 Same number of particles with same kinetic energy  more frequent collisions with walls.
  • 17. PHIL 160 More frequent collisions with walls  higher force/area (i.e., higher pressure) Why does the pressure of this gas sample increase?
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24. PHIL 160 Smoking 2 packs of cigarettes a day for 10 years causes lung cancer. Not for every smoker! Not a law of nature. Why did Nancy get lung cancer?
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28. Cartwright : We don’t need a law! PHIL 160 We don’t need to know a law of nature to explain the camellias dying or thriving. There might be no such law of nature! (Explanation is still good.)
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32. PHIL 160 What kind of explanations in science? Looking for universal regularities or statistical regularities? Possible mechanisms or how it actually happened? (Causes, or something else?)