Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Andere mochten auch
Andere mochten auch (11)
Ähnlich wie The pitch that never was
Ähnlich wie The pitch that never was (20)
Mehr von scrazzl
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
The pitch that never was
- 1. scrazzl connecting products publications and people This presentation was designed to be delivered live. To help you understand the content I have added these notes…..
- 3. 6,840,507,003 This is our planet, it’s small, it’s beautiful and we are killing it….all 6,840,507,003 of us.
- 4. The Problem(s) in our world Evidence of the damage that we are doing to our planet and ourselves is everywhere…
- 6. 610mm By 2100 sea levels are expected to rise 610 mm. To put this in perspective since 1870 sea levels have only risen 203 mm… Source: EPA Website
- 7. Environmental damage In England half of all Bee hives have disappeared. James Thompson’s group has linked hive decline to corresponding declines in plant pollination…
- 8. 50% Dying out over the last 20 years Source: James D. Thomson, The Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society
- 9. Obesity Unhealthy diets, lack of exercise and sedentary lifestyles are all contributing to startling levels of obesity in Western countries….
- 10. 34% Of Americans are obese Source: CDC Website
- 11. Cancer
- 12. 500,000 There is increasing prevalence of lifestyle associated diseases such as heart disease and diabetes. Cancer kills 500k Americans each year. Source: CDC Website
- 13. The Problem (s) with our science The challenges facing our world and species must be met with great science and innovation but there are some problems….
- 15. Problem 1: Of all the people working in the world, only 0.2% are working on problems that have not yet been solved. Only 0.2% work in R&D
- 17. Problem 2: The people looking for solutions to many of the worlds problems are not doing a very good job….
- 18. The Reasons The blame for bad science cannot be laid only at the door of individual scientists. The problem is systemic…
- 19. 1. Money is scarce Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D as a percentage of GDP 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Israel 4.5% Japan 3.2% United States 2.9% Germany 2.9% OECD 2.2% EU27 2.0% Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D as a percentage of GDP
- 20. 2. Incentives Job security and funding availability in science are highly dependent on publication record. There are no rewards for negative but accurate science
- 21. 3. Objectivity The objectivity of scientists is inevitably compromised by the systemic pressures to publish and get funded.
- 22. 4. Guess Work Data overload is a big problem. It is impossible for researchers to ask the right questions when there are so many answers…
- 23. Mission Our mission at scrazzl is to help scientists do better science. We build technology to….
- 24. Make Help to make experimental open access science more publishing more reproducible sustainable Make advertising Unlock collective in science more insights targeted and contained in relevant research articles
- 25. Questions? E: david.kavanagh@scrazzl.com T: +353 (0) 1 4429454 Twitter: @dkavanagh www.scrazzl.com
Hinweis der Redaktion
- This is our planet
- This is our planet
- But we have some problems
- C02 levels on the up, bla, bla, bla
- The bee story
- "This serves as a warning to other countries," said Professor James Thomson at the University of Toronto, who carried out the research. "I believe that this is the first real demonstration that pollination levels are getting worse. I believe it is a significant decline. I believe the pollination levels have dropped by as much as 50 per cent. "Bee numbers may have declined at our research site, but we suspect that a climate-driven mismatch between the times when flowers open and when bees emerge from hibernation is a more important factor." According to a previous study, England's bees are vanishing faster than anywhere else in Europe, with more than half of hives dying out over the last 20 years.
- 34% of Americans obese
- 34% of Americans obese
- The population of our plant is 6B but we have alot of problems with how we do science
- Tell story about this paper 53 “Landmark studies” unrepeatable.
- ONLY 7 repeated
- Why are there so few researcher and why is the science we do not very good?
- Reason 1: We don’t spend enough trying to solve the problems that need to solved.
- The incentives in science are brokenNeed to publish to get tenure, so pressure to publish more and more.
- Corners get cut, cherry picking of results etc
- Data overload is making it harder and harder to navigate results
- Why are there so few researcher and why is the science we do not very good?