Hypocrisy Essay

Essay On Hypocrisy In Tartuffe
Moliere during his creation of Tartuffe wanted to bring to attention the underlying issues which
were occurring in society as people began to accept the change in social order and the way of doing
things. This was when the people who were lowly ranked by the aristocrats began to get the
attention they deserved because of the changes and the impact they were making in the society.
Moliere in Tartuffealso wanted to show the hypocrisy which was evident in I'm institutions like
aristocracy, church and the working class citizens. Moliere fixed opposite attributes to the characters
from the play so that they could they could represent how irrationality, hypocrisy, and corruption
could manifest themselves to the members of the society who seemed...show more content...
In Act, I scene I Madame Parnelle is irritated and irked by the servants in his son's house because
they are paying the deserved attention to her even though she is not in need of any service. Her
aristocracy upbringing demands that servants so are available to her beck and call and they
should be nearby if a need arises. The boiling point of her anger is exemplified when Dorine who
is a housemaid at Orgon's house makes a remark against the guest Tartuffe "you may see him as a
saint, but Im far less awed because I see right through him for the frauds that he is" (Moliere, p.9).
This statement works to be true in the end because Tartuffe is exposed as a conniving fraud and
Madame Parnelle words which had elevated Tartuffe proved to be false. In her defense of
Tartuffe, Madame Parnelle had called Tartuffe " a saint as we will ever find on this side of
heaven"( Moliere, p.8). This is because Tartuffe is always quoting the bible in his conversations
which make him seem pious in the eyes of the aristocrats which subscribed to religion a lot during
the neo–classical period.
Tartuffe exemplifies the desire for equality and dignity for all irrespective of the social standings
because in the midst of all the drama that was
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Penny Fielding highlights his point of view on Robert Louis Stevenson's Strange case of Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde that the novel paints 'a damning portrait of society defined by repression and
its inevitable twin, hypocrisy'. Fielding also insists later that the relation between repression and
hypocrisy is one theme of this novel that cannot be overlooked. This opinion can be approved of a
truth after reading the novel. Repression and hypocrisy run through the whole story which reflect
on descriptions of every character. In this essay, I will focus on the repression and hypocrisy that
appear to be connected in the novel by analyzing the background and main characters. Especially, I
will quote some fragments from the novel to discuss in...show more content...
Throughout the whole course of the novel, readers can identify an unbreakable connection
between Hyde and animalistic images as he was shown to be big, awkward and childlike. This
kind of figure is regarded by Stevenson as parts of human nature. It also expressed Stevenson's
repression towards hypocritical society during Victorian times. The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll
and Mr. Hyde was wrote in 18th centuries, the times that were defined as 'Gothic revival'. The
literature in this times had similar thematic elements include supernatural or 'fantastic', violent
crime (death and murder), passionate romance (often with death). The novel Strange Case of Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was considered as typical Gothic literature. Particularly, repression and
hypocrisy are highly emphasized in the novel. Repression is undoubtedly a cause of conflict
between Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. The root of this repression can be found in Victorian England
where there was no sexual appetites, no violence and no freedom of expressing emotion in the
public sphere. Everything should be restrained and people in that times all behaved solemn and
were not allowed to show their joys and sorrows. This repression can be well reflected within Dr.
Jekyll in the novel. According to quotation of Stevenson's description: "[...] I

Rhetoric Analysis Abolitionist and freed slave, Frederick Douglass, recounts his life in his book,
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, to argue that slavery is and will always be a harmful
institution. White Christian Americans in the North were his primary target to persuade join the
abolitionist movement. Within his books he details several different arguments againstslavery.
Specifically, chapter nine shows how slavery is innately unnatural and is corrupting everything
around it. Straightaway, Douglass points out his new master's, Thomas Auld, harsh treatment of his
slaves. Auld consistently fails to feed his slaves enough food which Douglass describes as, "...most
aggravated development of meanness even among slaveholders."...show more content...
In chapter nine, Thomas Auld converts to a very religious man. Any hopes that his slaves held
for him to become kinder quickly disappeared as his conversion "made him more cruel and hateful
in all ways;" (32;9). Normally, religion helps people transform into kinder and generous version
of themselves but his religion only strengthened his horrible character. Douglass uses the example
of Auld stuffing preachers at his home but starving them as a juxtaposition to highlight the
hypocrisy of Auld's change in disposition. For while he believed that he had became an
upstanding Christian he constantly committed atrocious sins against his slaves. Auld's religion
finally is shown past the point of redemption as he uses the bible as an excuse to lash a young
female slave seemingly daily. His justification was a quote from Scripture that allows for a master
to beat their slave if they do not obey them but Auld's true reason was because the girl, Henny, was
crippled from a childhood fire incident. Tragically, this newly converted man, "set her adrift to take
care of herself." (32; 9). The very idea of pious slaveholders who only own slaves to care for them as
like parents is shattered by Thomas Auld's actions. How could a someone who was like a parent
give up on a

Thomas Jefferson Hypocrisy Essay
The Hypocrisy of an Icon
At some point in a person's lifetime, whether it be through educational endeavors or everyday
conversations regarding political leanings, the name Thomas Jefferson has definitely made an
appearance in some aspect. This may be in terms of memorizing each president and their legacy or
analyzing how the actions he made in office changed today's society as whole. As a founding father,
secretary of state, vice president, and eventually then a full–fledged president, there is no doubt
Jefferson has had an incredulous impact on how the United States was created in its secession from
Britain, and even how our government today deals with political matters and new arising issues.
Though he has long since been discharged from...show more content...
Through the divide spreading in the nation, with a fair number of citizens showing extreme support
of limited federal power and a strong state government, Jefferson fought for his partisan,
Anti–Federalist views backed by those that voted for his inauguration. Given that his name was
known around the globe for influential political dealings, a simple letter sent overseas to his young
country could guide the nation's lawmakers and statesman as to how they should proceed with a
problem, even though he might be thousands of miles away from his home office. Example here.
One case of such influence was the affiliation he shamelessly formed with James Madison in order
to create the first of two separate parties, the Democratic Republicans as aforementioned.
Given the nature of the presidential duties, Jefferson was intended to be all for the people and thus
the majority's decision. In perhaps the most hypocritical example of how a world leader was meant
to act within a democratic society, he frequently went "under the table," in order to support his own
beliefs despite what the people thought. Opposition was no match to Jefferson; he was constantly
attacking his conflicting forces, through examples such as The National Gazette (https:/
/www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/11
/is–thomas–jefferson–to–blame–for–todays–partisan–politics/264376/).

Throughout all America, hypocrisy is rampant from the richest of the rich to the poorest of the
poor each one united in one way or another. This unity is shown in the smallest of daily events
from speeches given to coworkers or friends to casual conversations or even reading a book. The
best book to illustrate the hypocrisy we see all around us is The Great Gatsby by Scott Fitzgerald.
The Great Gatsby , is a phenomenally blunt example of hypocrisy. It enlightens its readers of
hippocrates inexcusable abundance throughout society.With carefully constructed characters such as
Tom Buchanan, Nick Carraway and even F Scott Fitzgerald himself, the unwritten character.
To begin the carnival of revalation is the narrow mindeed ,aragoant,haugty tom buchanan.Tom
speaks to anyone that will listen of the "idiocy " of letting women go do whatever they want
whenever they want .Yet as a aaudience we uderstand that he exibhits the same behaviors he
critisizes . ("I suppose the latest thing is to sit back and let Mr. Nobody from Nowhere make love
to your wife. Well, if that 's the idea you can count me out... (pg137)". This quote shows that Tom
is furious when regarding daisy 's affair with Gatsby,.Which is ridiculously hypocritical for a man
who so blatantly acknowledges that he has a mistress and exhibits the same behaviors he criticizes
.Whe he further recommends the idea of family solidarity but acknowledges that he will never
follow the same rules he plans to enforce on daisy

Hypocrisy In The Crucible Analysis
Aynesha Syed Christopher Broadbent English 2 Honors 15 October 2017 What role does
hypocrisy play in the first two acts of The Crucible? Hypocrisy plays an internalizing role in the
first two acts of The Crucible. It reveals the true personality of a character. Almost everyone is a
hypocrite in The Crucible, especially Parris and Abigail, but the most hypocritical is the court
and church. The puritans in The Crucible are complete hypocrites; they engage in the same
behaviors they condemn others for. All of the hypocrisy shown in the first two acts of The
Crucible revels the true natures of the characters, their internalizing roles. In The Crucible they
say lying is a sin, but it doesn't stop them from doing it. The church and the court both state that
all liars will be dammed. One of the 10 commandments is "thou shall not lie", but the court
basically asks the people to lie about being a witch or else they will kill them. Also, the 10
commandments state "thou shall not kill", but the court is hanging people for being a witch.
They sentence citizens to death for committing witchcraft. No one ever goes to court and is found
innocent. They either face death or have to lie to avoid death. The court and the church are both
hypocrites because lying and murdering people are both sins, yet they do both in the name of
god. The most hypocritical person in The Crucible is Reverend Parris, the town's minister.
Although he should be a beacon of light and grace, Parris preaches about hell and barely mentions
about the forgiveness of god. Parris is extremely hypocritical, he is greedy and wants more money
because he went to Harvard and believes he is above and more educated than everyone. "The salary
is 66 pound, Mr. Proctor! I am not some preaching farmer with a book under my arm; I am a
graduate of Harvard College." – Parris. He only cares about his reputation. "But if you trafficked
with sprits in the forest I must know, for surely my enemies will and they will ruin me with it' –
Parris. Parris's hypocrisy shows the audience what kind of a character he truly is, it reveals his
internalizing role. Abigail is also hypocritical. She says she is an innocent and honest girl but really
she's the one making false

Essay On Hypocrisy Of The Constitution
The United States Constitution partially betrayed many promises of the Declaration of
Independence. The declaration says "all men are created equal" however it took 189 years for
African American to vote. I'm not sure about you, but 189 years is not giving equality or liberty
to the people. In the Constitution it states " The House of Representatives shall be composed of
members chosen every second year by the people of the several states". Once again this is failure
to keep the promise the Declaration and Constitution made. It shows hypocrisy because you can't
say one thing and do another. When it says people in " the several states" this implies everyone of
every ethnicity, religion and gender however women and black men were excluded from...show more
content...
The Constitution did not count Native American or African American they said three black
people count for one person the Constitution did not see them as people during this time period.
This would now be considered demoralizing, inhuman and disrespectful. In article two of the
Constitution the president was given the ability to "pardon people". Pardoning people can be a
good or a bad thing depending on the crime, giving the president this power makes him seen very
similar to a monarchy for example a king would typically have this power because they are a
form of a dictator. Since America claims they are are not for monarchy and aristocracy why would
we allow our president to hold such power instead of allowing our judicial branch to take care of it.
When talking about Prohibitions against "religious tests for office" in the Constitution it says "no
religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United
States". In other words a person's religion is entirely up to them and it shall never affect the status
they are wishing to obtain or

Hypocrisy
One of the major themes in the novel Adventures of Huckleberry by Mark Twain is the hypocrisy of
a "civilized" society, which is evident in the citation for the reason being the witless act of a drunk
man causing disruption results in him being killed, however, horrendous actions such as slavery go
unpunished. Furthermore, the theme of hypocrisy of "civilized" society is evident through Sherburn
stating they are cowards for creating a mob and trying to lynch him, thus it is evident that frivolous
crimes such as the one committed by the drunk man result in extreme consequences, while on the
other hand, unacceptable pertinent actions such as slavery go unnoticed. These actions reveal that
the society there in hold degraded rules as well principles

Essay about The Hypocrisy of Religion
Religious leaders ought to be the epitome of goodness and morality and are supposed to live lives
worthy of emulation. Yet, in Voltaire's Candide and Goethe's Faust, the church is infested with
hypocrisy what with religious leaders being hypocritical characters that are corrupt, greedy and
immoral. These are seen in so many instances in both texts as will be discussed below. High–ranking
church officials, according to Voltaire, are deeply engrossed in promiscuity as depicted in the lines,
"I am infact the daughter of Pope Urban the Tenth and the Princess of Palestrina" (535). The fact
that the Pope, despite his vows of celibacy as a priest and leader of the Catholic Church, has a
mistress and a daughter (the Old Woman) is very...show more content...
Furthermore, Voltaire implies that a superior of the abbey by name reverend father Croust is gay
(543). Ironically, the church is laden with such people as this Jesuit colonel. Voltaire therefore uses
this ironic character to point out the existence of church hypocrisy and corruption in his time.
Meanwhile, man's inhumanity to man is something that should never be witnessed in Christian
communities. Yet Voltaire talks about religious leaders who carry out the so
–called "auto–da–fe"
against those who disagree with them on trivial theological issues. For example, the Inquisition
hangs Pangloss for voicing his ideas and orders for Candide to be flogged for merely "listening with
an air of approval" (529). The authorities executing Pangloss for talking and ordering the flogging of
Candide for merely listening shows that ironically, christians are the ones promoting inhumane acts
to fellow men. This, in no small measure, symbolizes the hypocrisy and corruption that is rampant in
Christian communities. In addition, Goethe also portrays hypocrisy in religion in the scene where in
response to Gretchen's question of "Do you believe in God?" Faust answers:
My darling who may say
I believe in God?
Ask priests and sages, their reply
Looks like sneers that mock and prod
The one who asked the question. (752)
The fact that Gretchen, being a christian, is easily deceived into believing

Hypocrisy Research Paper
Equality in Hypocrisy Society has trained itself to spot the flaws in celebrities, government officials,
and religious participants. In many situations religious people are accused of being largely more
scandalous without anyone thoroughly looking into the situation, unlike with celebrities or
government officials, for whom full investigations are run. A hugely popular and easily identifiable
flaw is hypocrisy, something that religious people are called out for frequently. However,religion is
not what determines the level of severity of a hypocrite, and in fact has little to do with it at all.
There is no better or worse hypocrite, regardless of religion, when it comes to identical situations,
protecting others, or even the effect it has...show more content...
Hypocrisy is something society searches for much too eagerly and investigate as little as possible.
It is easy to blame the religious because people expect more from them perhaps, or because they
watch them more closely than they watch themselves, but in any case, there is no hard evidence to
prove that either one, religious or non–religious hypocrites are better or worse than the other. Any
hypocrite can be a "bad hypocrite" or a "good hypocrite", it all depends on the outsider's perspective
and understanding of the situation, not of the personal beliefs of the hypocrite. If there can be
equality nowhere else, people should learn to see it in

Jefferson On Equality
As a country we are still moving in the right direction in our attempt to level the playing field
between people of all races, genders, and sentiments, so I must respectfully disagree with your
statement that Jefferson's vision is not attainable. Much like all of humanities evolution, time,
knowledge, reasoning, and rationality play a major role in our continuing development into a better
society. If you closely examine the history of equality, for example, and how far we have come in the
United States alone, it is easy to see that we have had more major achievements then not. It is my
belief that humanity strives to be better tomorrow then we are today. That we use new found
knowledge to enlighten others and with every step, even small ones, we will evolve into a better
society....show more content...
Conflict is itself not necessarily bad if it results in a positive change. However, it is my belief
much of our current political and social conflict is due to arrogance and entitlement. As a society
we are losing the ability to respect a difference of opinion. Instead of taking the time to listen to
why someone holds the views they do and come to an agreement that benefits both parties involved,
we close our thoughts to anything that doesn't fall in line with our own beliefs. This process
generates heated conflict and hatred. In that respect we have taken a slight evolutionary step
backwards. Perhaps this disconnect is due to technological advances and our lack of face–to–face
social interaction that encourages an egomaniacal

Thomas Jefferson: Was He A Hypocrite?
Men. What does this word mean? Today, the definition of men is an adult, human, male. But when
Jefferson wrote "all men are equal" in the Declaration of Independence, he meant white, male,
property owners. In the end, the question is, was he a hypocrite? Thomas Jefferson's father had
slaves. When he died, then it was Jefferson who inherited them. Him owning slaves was a matter that
was not questioned. However, in 1776, Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence,
"We hold these truths to be self–evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by
their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness." Jefferson had owned over 600 slaves, so him saying this...show more content...
A passage from Thomas Jefferson's draft autobiography says, "...Nothing is more certainly
written in the book of fate that these people [enslaved Africans] are to be free. Nor is it less
certain that the two races [black & white], equally free, cannot live in the same government?"
Jefferson is able to fathom that at that time and in that era, the African Americans and the
Caucasians will not be able to live in the same government as the African Americans wouldn't be
very keen to how they've been treated for many years. Also, both whites and blacks have different
and opposing views. Nothing would function right if they are in one government. Jefferson looks
ahead when talking about them living in the same government and he also looks ahead when
talking about what would happen if the slaves are freed. In a letter to Jared Sparks, Jefferson states,
"There are in the United States a million and a half of people of color in slavery. To send off the
whole of these at once, nobody conceives to be practicable for us, or expedient for them. Let us take
twenty–five years for its accomplishment, within which time they will be doubled. Their estimated
value as property, in the first place, (for actual property has been lawfully vested in that form, and
who can lawfully take it from the possessors?) at an average of two hundred dollars each, young
and old, would amount to six hundred millions of dollars, which must be paid or lost by
somebody." What he is saying here is that it will cost a lot of money and there will be debt if the
slaves are freed all at once. Jefferson calculates the amount of years it will take for the slaves to be
released and for it to not cost so much money. Six hundred million dollars is about
$15,000,000,000.00 today. That is a lot of money which Thomas, and probably all of America,
doesn't want to lose. Jefferson looked into this topic and he knows

The Pros And Cons Of Hypocrisy
Hypocrisy, when viewed in its most simple form, can be described as the facade of certain moral
standards, or belief,s that a particular individual does not actually possess; such as, "Pundits
condemning young people for being 'special snowflakes' for wanting to be sheltered from
controversial views in 'safe spaces', then having an apparent meltdown whenever they see anything
even vaguely inconsistent with their opinions(Barnett, 2016)." Actively utilizing hypocrisy is a way
for people to gain control and, most importantly, trust of others. This aspect of control is why
hypocrisy remains so heavily utilized amongst the white–collar world: "The most distinctive aspect
of white–collar deviance is the rational execution of the offense to maximize profit, along with the
use of power, influence, or respectability to minimize detection(Thio, 348, 2010)." Considering the
corporate world, "The problem with practising what you preach, or maintaining a high moral
standard, is it's work(Barnett, 2016)." Politicians, CEOs, and occupations of the like, utilize
hypocrisy because saying you'll do something or are doing something, without actually following
through with it, is significantly less work for the individual. Admittedly, "Modern politicians seem to
have grasped this fact, making big speeches about all the great things they'll do and then never doing
any of them(Barnett, 2016)." When the public receives news about a substantial white–collar crime,
we gleefully receive this

Hypocrisy and Christianity Essay
Hypocrisy and Christianity
If one were to ask the American public about their views of Christians, what response would one
receive? We can imagine that there would be a great variety of answers. However, most people
might say that, in general, Christians are not very different from everybody else. This is a problem.
There are many people who claim to be Christians whose lifestyles do not reflect their beliefs. The
problem with this situation is that it gives non–Christians the wrong impression of Christianity.
Christians need to live their lives in a way that reflects what they claim to believe.
Christianity is a lifestyle not just a set of beliefs. A Christian is not merely someone who attends
church once in a while and believes...show more content...
People are ready to sue the minute someone does something to them that they feel was uncalled
for. We can see through this that people still have a desire for truth and justice. They want to hear
and see good things. People think of Christians as good people. They expect someone who claims
to be a Christian to be a kind, moral, overall good person. It is extremely disheartening if those
who claim to have the guide to moral living are just as dishonest and coldhearted as anyone else.
It discredits Christianity's claim of having a better way. For example, let's say that it is discovered
that a person who has always attended church and openly claimed Christianity has been embezzling
funds from their company. Many people would be even more angry that he was hiding behind the
front of being a good, honest Christian than if someone who had not laid claim to those values was
discovered in the same crime. If people cannot trust Christians who claim to be moral, whom can
they trust? Is there anything that deems a person or group of people trustworthy? Hypocrisy among
Christians can cause these kinds of ideas to grow.
Christians are commanded in the Bible to take the gospel into all the world. God desires that all
people know Him. However, since He is in heaven and not on the earth now, it is up to His people
to show others the way to Him. Much of that testimony for Christ is through the way Christians lives
are lived. It is well known that

Hypocrisy In Hamlet
If one is religious they will try and act to live up to the faith. The interpretation or extent of being
religious can be different within many charters. Throughout the play, many characters are shown to
be very religious within the Christian faith. In the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, the role of
Christianity is inconsistent. Shakespeare conveys the inconsistency of Christianity for the reader to
get the effect of hypocrisy.
In Hamlet, King Claudius is portrayed as being a hypocrite about his faith. In the beginning of the
play, the readers find out by the Ghost of the old KIng Hamlet that King Hamlet was poisoned by
King Claudius. However later in the book Hamlet sees that Claudius "is a–praying". King Claudius
starts praying because...show more content...
In Hamlet, most of the main characters die at the end of the play and most of the deaths are done on
purpose. Hamlet the main character stabs Claudius with a "point envenomed too!– Then, venom, to
thy work" (5, 2, 323)and hurts Claudius. After wounding Claudius, Hamlet hands Claudius the
potions and tells him to "Drink off this potion" (5, 2, 327) which causes Claudius to die. Hamlet
throughout the beginning of the play is portrayed to be a very religious character yet commits a
murder which is against the Christian faith. Even in the beginning of the play, Hamlet comments on
the marriage of King Claudius with his mother, the Queen because he does not think its right. Hamlet
wishes "that the Everlasting had not fixed/ His canon 'gainst self–slaughter! O God, God!". (PAGE
NUMBER) He follows the Christian faith and God and as much as he wishes suicide was allowed
in his faith because the times he is in right now are bad but he follows the faith and does not
commit suicide. However, once he gets the opportunity to kill Claudius he does not go back to his
faith for he just kills Claudius. Which is very against the Christian faith since thou shalt not kill is in
the 10

Frederick Douglass Discrimination
In his autobiography, Frederick Douglass relates the horrors of slavery. Douglass endured being
ridiculed, beaten and treated like an animal, but he found strength in knowledge and the pursuit of
being free. The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass shines a light on the struggle of a slave,
opens the door to see the effects slavery had on all parties involved and inspired others to want to
make a change.
Frederick Douglass was beaten, whipped and forced to do the work of people who saw him as a tool
instead of a person. Like horses need to be broken before they can be ridden, black men need to be
"broken" to be good slaves(80). Slave owners pushed false religious ideas and hoped to keep
Douglass and others in ignorance. Hypocrisy burned at Douglass. People nearly killed slaves and
then they proclaimed the "meek and lowly Jesus" (120). Slave owners believed that if slaves were
ignorant of their condition, they would never rebel. Douglass knew that...show more content...
Discrimination is a learned behavior just like learning to read. When a person starts reading, it is
complicated, confusing and challenging. But, over time, it becomes easier. In the same way, racism
is taught and slowly becomes a habit. In Douglass's autobiography, Mrs. Sophia Auld exemplifies
this notion. When Douglass arrives in her care, she treats him like any boy, including teaching him
to read and write. As soon as her husband teaches her otherwise, Mrs. Auld feels uncomfortable.
Over time, however, she becomes "more violent in opposition than her husband himself"(66). Slave
owners needed to justify their actions. Men in the South twisted Biblical references to fit their
wants. If they beat their slaves, they could manipulate Biblical teachings to support their whipping
of humans(78). White men thought they were superior to blacks merely because blacks were
forced to slavery. Even in the free North, Douglass could not be a ship caulker because white men
refused to work with

Frederick Douglass Hypocrisy Essay
Man's Hypocrisy of Christianity
One can call it by any name, white Christianity, Religion, or even Christianity of Christ, but Jesus
called it hypocrisy, and in "The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass" Douglas compares
true Christianity and Religious hypocrisy. A hypocrite is a person who tells others to live or do a
certain thing, and then that same person lives or does the complete opposite of what they preach.
This type of behavior has existed from the time Adam took a bite of the forbidden fruit in the
Garden of Eden. In the book, The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass he expresses his
opinion between true Christianity and Christianity of white slave owners, suggesting that that people
should know a Christian not...show more content...
He describes her as "a woman of the kindest heart" (Douglass 19). She had never owned a slave
before and she treated Douglass like a human being, in a way he had never been treated before. He
learned from her, how to read, and he compared her to a gift from God stating "This good spirit was
from God, and to him I offer thanksgiving and praise" (Douglass 19). Slavery changed her, and she
had to learn how to be mean. Her husband told her she could not teach or be kind to slaves. She
could not give a slave an inch, or she would spoil him, and that the only thing a slave should be
taught to do was obey his master. Because of this false teaching, Mistress Auld became worse than
her husband and fearful she would lose her authority if she was kind and instructed her slaves.
Frederick Douglass struggled with the treatment of religious slave owners and how they treated their
slaves as animals and property, beating them, selling them and even killing them if they became
unmanageable compared to the treatment of non–religious slave owners who treated their slaves as
human beings, who had feelings, and wanted freedom. It seemed to him after having been treated as
a human being that he understood why religious Christianity of the land was just a title for ignorant
hypocrites who were fearful of losing control. When Douglass returned to the plantation to live with
Master Thomas Auld, he recounted how he was starving along with other slaves, and the rations

Examples Of Hypocrisy In The Crucible
The Crucible is a play written in 1953 by Arthur Miller. It is based off of the 1662 Salem witch
trials written as a parallel between this time period and the Red Scare, the time period in which he
was living. There are many topics explored throughout the play, but the most important is hypocrisy,
which can be seen in several characters. The most prominent expression of hypocrisy is seen in the
whole community of Salem. Everyone represents themselves as good, full–hearted Christians,
completely obedient to the Lord. However, almost everyone is more concerned about their own
reputations within the community and how they look to everyone else than they are about basic
neighborliness. The next example of hypocrisy in The Crucible is Reverend Parris's character. He
is the spiritual leader of Salem, yet Arthur Miller characterizes him as being very greedy and selfish.
He only desires money and a high status within the community. There are many places in the play
where this greed can be seen. The most im–portant example was at the very beginning, after
Reverend Parris sees that the girls were dancing in the forest, and rumors circulate that witchcraft
may have been in–volved. He says, "Abigail, I have fought here three long years to bend thee
stiff–necked people to me, and now, when some good respect is rising for me in the parish, you
compromise my very character. I have given you a home, child. I have put clothes upon your
back–now give me an upright answer." He is more

Hypocrisy, By Arthur Miller
"These people had no ritual for the washing away of sins. It is another trait we inherited from
them, and it has helped to discipline us as well as to breed hypocrisy among us." (19) These
words, which were written by Arthur Miller in 1953, in the description of John Proctor, have
given us the explanation of the hypocrisy we have today and will remain within us for a long,
perpetual time ahead. Hypocrisy is just one of various universal theme that Miller had
endeavored to illustrate while he was writing this story of notorious Salem witch trial in
Massachusetts, in the year of 1692. Obviously, Miller did not write the Crucible merely to
produce a reminiscence of a wrongful event in the past, but rather he desired to share with people
what he had experienced during the time of composing this script. As we wish to analyze the
specific point Miller is making about hypocrisy, we need to recognize the relationship between the
time and event of Miller's life around the year of 1953, when he wrote the Crucible. For a brief
biography about Arthur Miller, he was born in 1915 and passed away in 2005. Miller had lived
through the destructive years of World War I and World War II, which strengthen the existence of
communism in Europe and Asia. To preclude the expansion of communism in the country, United
States had established the House Un–American Activities Committee, which acted like the Salem
court, offering "the opportunity for confession and the grace of redemption" (xii). A

Hypocrisy In Huck Finn
Have you ever watched a trend happen or seen everybody else do something, but you chose not do
it because deep down inside you thought "that is so stupid," or "that is wrong, why is everybody
doing this?" Those thoughts are critiques of society from the perspective of those who have not
fallen under society's influence and instead follow their own morals. In Mark Twain's The
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Twain has the main character, Huckleberry Finn, encounter
characters or be put into situations that will implicitly, but on occasion explicitly, critique different
aspects of society. Twain uses the aspect of hypocrisy to critique society through the church and
people who call themselves Christians on Sundays in church, but everywhere else they are violent
and hateful. Along with hypocrisy, Twain has the average white man act toward or address the
slaves or any African American in an inhumane manner, contrasting Jim's development and Jim and
Huck's relationship throughout the book to address how society's influence has people view race as a
reason for some people to view as superior to others. Twain also portrays greed and material
possessions as evil and portrays people who are greedy with atavism and other qualities to have
the reader be disgusted with people for their greediness. Twain uses theses aspects of hypocrisy,
inhumanity, and greed to advance his purpose of showing how flawed society is, even though
society itself believes itself to be correct in all

Hypocrisy Essay

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von Best Paper Writing Services

Mehr von Best Paper Writing Services (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Hypocrisy Essay