Presentation delivered by Asko Kippo on the SAVE ENERGY Project meeting, Lulea 29-30th June.

1. SAVE ENERGY Technical Meeting – Helsinki 17th June 2009 Pilot Implementation, models, methodologies, plans Arne Gylling & Asko Kippo

2. Save EnergyWorkpackages

3. WP 6; Pilot Description Helsinki Public Schools: Pihkapuisto and Ala-Malmi Leiden Municipality Offices Lisbon Municipality Offices Luleå House of Culture Manchester Multipurpose Town Hall

5. to facilitate and stimulate the co-creation of the pilot design and planning, adopting and creating good practices (WP6)

6. to test and evaluate the five different implementations (WP7)

7. To share, discuss and co-create common elements at each pilot

8. To involve the end users and citizens (Living Lab Methodology) into the process

9. To exchange of experiences and the co-creation of new ones aiming to identify common elements in S.E. 5 pilots

10. Work Group is more horizontal than Workpackages and it should facilitate and complement the work and coordination of Workpackages

12. About 350 pupils per school

14. 45 municipality technicians

16. Catering, kitchen, staterooms, committee rooms, Level 2 the Old Town Hall

17. Staff, City Council employees, visitorsManchester Pilot

19. Group of users and designers

20. Time schedule

22. Save EnergyHelsinki Pilot Design Teachers & Pupils & Service & Administration Technical Specialists From the City of Helsinki Basic Description In Save Energy Project Plan How to develop the new Pilot application at Pihkapuisto School together with the users ? Succeeded Pilot Defination Project Requirements ISA definations Save Energy Helsinki Project Group

24. Asko Kippo, Helsinki Pilot Project Manager, Metropolia UAS

25. City of Helsinki; Pekka Hapuoja, Katri Kuusinen

26. Green Net; Lauri Hietaniemi, Anu Hassinen, Suvi Häkämies

27. HSE/CKIR; Riina Utriainen, Petra Turkama

28. Nokia; Veli-Pekka Niitamo

29. There; Sakari Seppänen

30. Technical Expert Group

31. City of Helsinki: Pekka Hapuoja, Katri Kuusinen, Kari Niittymäki, Erkki Pihkoluoma, Timo Posa, Juha Haapasaari, Toivo Sahlsten

32. Metropolia UAS; Asko Kippo

33. Final year students; Matti Olin, Ville Olkkonen, Samuli Rasinmäki, Anssi Ulmanen

34. Users’ Group at Pihkapuisto School

35. Principal Pirkko Kaskinen

36. Janitor Erkki Ortela

37. Teachers; Heikki Huurre, Anne Hyvönen, Mikko Oikarinen

38. Pupils;

39. Users’ Group at Ala-Malmi School

40. Principal Tuula Ekholm

41. Janitor Tiina Heikkinen

42. Teachers Rita Huhtala, NN1, NN2, NN3

44. Found problems

45. Users’ requirements

46. Experience from the technical expert of the buildings and HVAC

47. Brainstorming, proposals, improvements, what is possible, what is sensible

48. Detailed design of applications

49. Available historical data, conclusions

50. Earlier Energy Audits

51. New Energy Audits

52. Use of present building automation

53. Technical Drawings

54. Pilot applications

55. New wireless monitoring ICT system with intelligent sensors

56. Measurement data will be monitored via the old building automation system and using the new wireless sensor based system ( There, ISA )

57. Lab pilot scale system for PLC development

58. Data will be analysed and sent to the main server system

59. Analyse of the measurements

61. Pihkapuisto: Control of the HVAC at Gym Server in Portugal Nokia phone There router ISA router ISA display New wireless measurements by ISA and/or There Manual contol HVAC at Pihkapuisto GYM Programmable logic HVAC Frequency controller AC- machine Present measurements Display units Present (old) Building automation system LON

62. Helsinki Pilot: Time Schedule:

64. Pihkapuisto Gym

65. Pihkapuisto: Lights of Central Hall

66. Lighting measurements at classrooms

67. Energy measurements at HVAC machine

68. Some results of Energy Audits

69. What happens if we change and improve the lighting in an workplace ? Ref. Henrik Juslen, Philips

70. Dialux; Artificial and natural light with colours

71. Dialux; Artificial and natural light

72. Dialux; Artificial with wrong light in colours

73. Dialux; Artificial with wrong light

74. Dialux; Video clip of a classroom

76. Energy indicators

77. Energy audit vs. energy certificate

78. Energy audit

80. Changing the user behavior to save the energy

81. Decreasing the energy consumption

82. How to measure these changes?we need to know what to measure  what are the indicators (Task 1.2 Save Energy Concept, Task 3.3 Performace indicators…?) How to measure the pilot buildings’ energy performance Energy audits (Task 2.3 Energy audit methodologies and procedures) The measure of the user behaviour  How to measure this?

83. Energy indicators General indicators: Heat consumption kWh/rm3 Electricity consumption kWh/rm3 Water consumption m3/rm3 Water consumption l/m2 Primary energy consumption kWh/m2 CO2 consumption kg/m2 Water consumption l/m2 Carbon footprint kg CO2 Taylormade indicators for each pilot ? Kitchen energy and water consumption kWh/portion, l/portion Energy consumption of lighting kWh/m2, kWh/user Heat consumption in gym etc. kWh/m3, kWh/person

85. The result of an energy audit is energy audit report,

86. the exhaustive picture of building’s total energy consumption

87. the improvement suggestions and their energy saving potential

88. cash flow analysis of these improvements

89. Energy certificate (EPB-directive) gives the observations about the energy consumption and the saving potential and how they affect the energy efficiency factor of the building

90. In energy certificate the energy consumed so called “estate electricity” is included (HVAC systems, lighting), but the total electricity consumption of the building, meaning for example also the other electrical devises inside the building (like office equipment, TVs etc.) is not included.

93. With energy audits the most important and profitable actions to save energy can be recognized

94. Whole building energy data could provide good comparison level and indicate the consumption trend of the whole building and the changes achieved in the pilot areas.

95. How to recognize the actions where user behaviour have the most impact on? Should this be included into the auditing process?

96.  Opening and closing the doors and windows, water consumption, switching off the lights etc.

98. Group of users and designers

99. Time schedule

102. Group of users and designers

103. Time schedule

106. Group of users and designers

107. Time schedule

109. Group of users and designers

110. Time schedule

113. Arne Gylling Pilot Project Manager, CDT

114. Ulf Wikström Pilot mgr, Luleå municipality, Energy expert

115. Donald Olofsson, Luleå municipality, Electricity expert

116. Roland Marklund, Luleå municipality, adm. Mgr tech installations Kulturens Hus

117. Paula Wennberg, Mikael Börjeson CDT

118. Technical Expert Groupl

119. Lena Bengten, Luleå municipality, enviroment coordinator

120. Ulf Wikström, Luleå municipality, Energy expert

121. Donald Olofsson, Luleå municipality, Electricity expert

122. Roland Marklund, Luleå municipality, adm. Mgr tech installtions the House of culture

123. Kimmo Ylieniemi, PhD Energy, CEO KYAB AB

124. Erik Lundström, Luleå Energi

125. Jonny Johansson, CEO EISTEC AB, Mulle concept

126. Living Lab expert group

127. Anna Ståhlbröst, Dr LL, Luleå university of technology

128. Marita Holst, Dr. LL, CDT

129. Users’ Group

130. Tomas Nordin, Luleå municipality, head of staff, Kulturens hus

131. 7 section mgr, Luleå municipality, Kulturens Hus

132. People working at choosen LL

134. Part of heating & cooling system

135. Meters already installed for restaurant, cafe, some offices. Connected to the house management system

138. Group of users and designers

139. Time schedule

141. Thank you! Arne Gylling / arne.gylling@ltu.se Asko Kippo / asko.kippo@metropolia.fi www.ict4saveenergy.eu