SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 42
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Comparison of Three Different
  Geoexchange Loopfields

           Daniel W. Felten, P.E., CGD
      World Energy Engineering Conference
                  October 2011
Background
   ECS purchased abandoned
    factory in 2007.
   Terraclime Geothermal
    began business operations
    in 2009
   Redeveloped 3rd floor
    (7,000 SF) for our offices
   Needed our first
    geothermal project to get      The “Mill”
    going!!!                     Florence, MA
Geothermal Demonstration Site Design
   Industry standard “U-Loop” has been around for
    decades. It works, but…
    ◦   High drilling costs (150 to 200 ft of borehole per Ton)
    ◦   Grouting with high TC grout costly
    ◦   Land “hog” with 2 to 3 Tons (500 ft) every 20-25 ft
    ◦   Many competitors installing U-Loops
   Thermacouple and DX offered enticing claims with
    limited penetration in the market…
Thermacouple Claim:
A Thermacouple earth energy system…allows the
earth to exchange up to 5 tons of thermal energy…”
Reducing Drilling Requirements
 ◦ Kelix Thermacouple
   could reduce drilling
   depth by more than
   60% (if claim true)
 ◦ One 306 foot Kelix
   can provide “up to”
   5 Tons of
   heating/cooling
Earthlinked DX System Claim
“Typically, the earth loops are 100 feet per ton of
capacity.”
Reducing Drilling Requirements
 ◦ Direct Exchange
   (DX) uses
   refrigerant in copper
   earth loops
 ◦ One ton per 100
   feet of borehole
 ◦ 3 inch diameter
   borehole means
   quicker drilling and
   less grouting, less
   disturbance
Final Systems Configuration
   5 Tons Direct Exchange (DX)
    ◦ Single stage Cu ground loops
    ◦ Manufacturer - EarthLinked Technologies
   5 Tons Water Based “U-Loop”
   5 Tons Water Based Concentric Tube “Kelix
    Thermacouple”
   Outside water systems interchangeable
  ◦ U-Loop 2 x 500’ / Thermacouple 306’
 Water Based Manufactures: Carrier & WaterFurnace
 Data Acquisition using Web Energy Logger (WEL)
Drilling U-Loop
   Two 500-foot
    boreholes, 6”
    diameter, 1000 feet
    total
   Bentonite sand grout
   HDPE Tubing
   25% EtOH
   2.5 days to
    complete
   5 Tons Total
   $12/Ft = $12,000
Installing Loops   Damaged U-Loop




U-Loop Installation
Installing KELIX Thermacouple
             One 306-foot borehole, 6”
              diameter
             Geo Supergrout
                ◦ Cementicious TC=1.0
             4” diameter outer casing
             1.5 days to complete
                ◦ recent modifications has reduced
                  install time to 0.5 – 1 day)
             5 Tons Total
             $14/Ft X 306 ft = $4,384
             Plus, $5,500 materials
             Total Cost = $9,884
Thermacouple (Casing and Head)
Thermacouple Field Fabrication
Thermacouple – Finished Wellhead
Drilling DX Boreholes


              Five 100- foot holes, 3”
               diameter
              Geo Supergrout
              Copper Earthloops
              One day to complete
              $2000/Ton = $10,000
Smaller DX Drill Rigs
DX Earthloop (Earthlinked)
Drill Tooling and DX Earthloop




                       Copper
                       Earthloops
DX Manifolds
DX Exposed Manifold
         Manifolds




Five 100’ Earth Loops
DX Linesets (Interior)   DX Linesets (Exterior)




DX Installation (at the Mill)
Real Time Monitoring and Data
Acquisition-Web Energy Logger (WEL)
   Real Time Monitoring
    and Data Acquisition
    ◦   Temps
    ◦   Pressures
    ◦   Flows
    ◦   Watts
   Performance
    Reporting
    ◦ COP/EER
    ◦ Troubleshooting
Data Acquisition & Analysis
   Each system is instrumented at key locations
    ◦   Ground Loop (temps and flows)
    ◦   Air Handler (temps)
    ◦   Geo System (temps, pressures, amps)
    ◦   Ambient air & earth temps
   Data acquired at one minute intervals (NOTE:
    DON’T TRY THIS AT HOME!)
   Systems were started up July 2009
http://welserver.com/WEL0201/
DX System Performance Summary
         DX                   Modification Progression

COP Heat < 3         •Original installation, R407c
                     •Pressure Oscillations due to component
                     sizing mismatch, refrigerant characteristics
COP/EER Cooling      •R407c changed to R22
~3.3/11.3            •Flow control changed
Cooling capacity 5   •Glide eliminated
Tons confirmed       •System pressure losses remain due to
                     distribution & volume
DX (Direct Exchange)
Mill Systems Performance Summary
          Water Based Systems
  Water Systems                 Comments

Carrier COP/EER   •R410a Two-Stage compressor option
< 6/20+           provides max performance benefit by
                  rejecting condensing heat @ 90F into
                  ground @ 56F operating in 1st stage
WF COP/EER        •R410a & Two Stage similar max benefit
~6/20+            •North side building provides cooling
                  advantage
Water (25% Ethanol)
                                  COP
                                  3.5 – 4.1 (heating)
                                  5.5 – 6.1 (cooling)




(ground systems interchangeable
    with geothermal systems)
Thermacouple Cooling Performance
Comparative Analysis - Cooling
Normalizing Data - BTU vs. ∆ EWT
   U-Loop
    ◦   Initial EWT = 56 F
    ◦   Max EWT = 69
    ◦   Delta EWT = 13 F over 72 minutes
    ◦   Total BTU Rejected = 93,000 BTU
    ◦   Rate = 6.5 Tons

   Kelix Thermacouple
    ◦   Initial EWT = 65 F
    ◦   Max EWT = 85 F
    ◦   Delta EWT = 20 F over 72 minutes
    ◦   Total BTU Rejected = 77,000 BTU
    ◦   Rate = 5.3 Tons

50% greater EWT rise with 20% less BTU rejected
Normalizing Data
Capacity Evaluation
   Normalized to a Delta EWT = 13F
(eg., how many BTUs does it take to get a 13 degree delta)
    ◦ U-Loop:             93,000 BTU (@ 6.6 Tons)
    ◦ Kelix:              35,000 BTU (@ 5.4 Tons)
   Thermacouple Equivalent Capacity (relative to U-
    Loop) = 0.376

      Kelix Capacity = 0.376 X 6.6 Tons = 2.5 Tons
               Equivalent to 120 feet/Ton
                 U-Loop at 152 ft/Ton
         Thermacouple is ~20% more efficient?
Is this a valid analysis?


           15 minutes
                        •These two geothermal systems
                        rarely cycled for 72 minutes

                        •The majority of cycles for both
                        systems were under 15 minutes
It’s the ground, stupid…
   We can force heat into/from the ground using
    earthloop “improvements”

   The shorter the borehole, the greater the thermal
    gradient required

   The “improvements” are really about eliminating
    borehole resistance
Decreasing Borehole Resistance and
Increasing Efficiency
       Thermacouple
    ◦    Greater turbulence with lower pressure drop (reduced
         pumping penalty)
    ◦    Minimizes “cross talk” between inlet/outlet piping (PVC
         inner pipe)
    ◦    Better Grout: TC >1.0 vs 0.8
    ◦    More Conductive Casing: Fiberglass vs HDPE
       Direct Exchange
    ◦    Highly conductive copper earthloop
    ◦    Better Grout
    ◦    No pumping penalty (other penalties may apply…)
Decreasing Borehole Resistance and
Increasing Efficiency

   U-Loop systems work well and are easy to install

   DX and Thermacouple are viable alternatives for
    smaller sites and/or higher drilling costs

   The manufacturer claims should be ignored -
    ground performance drives the system design

   Need to develop equivalent models for DX and
    Thermacouple
System Comparisons

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Measured Performance of Natural Gas Tankless and Storage Water Heaters - Scho...
Measured Performance of Natural Gas Tankless and Storage Water Heaters - Scho...Measured Performance of Natural Gas Tankless and Storage Water Heaters - Scho...
Measured Performance of Natural Gas Tankless and Storage Water Heaters - Scho...Center for Energy and Environment
 
2011 expo low-ebuildings_ventilation_jm_0911
2011 expo low-ebuildings_ventilation_jm_09112011 expo low-ebuildings_ventilation_jm_0911
2011 expo low-ebuildings_ventilation_jm_0911EllieNowels
 
Waste Heat Recovery in Power Station Boilers by Greens Power Equipment
Waste Heat Recovery in Power Station Boilers by Greens Power EquipmentWaste Heat Recovery in Power Station Boilers by Greens Power Equipment
Waste Heat Recovery in Power Station Boilers by Greens Power EquipmentRonakSharma83
 
Performance and Optimization of Residential Condensing Combi Systems
Performance and Optimization of Residential Condensing Combi SystemsPerformance and Optimization of Residential Condensing Combi Systems
Performance and Optimization of Residential Condensing Combi SystemsCenter for Energy and Environment
 
HVAC Cooling Load Calculation
HVAC Cooling Load CalculationHVAC Cooling Load Calculation
HVAC Cooling Load CalculationOrange Slides
 
Data centar cooling using multiple chiller system with r134a
Data centar cooling using multiple chiller system with r134aData centar cooling using multiple chiller system with r134a
Data centar cooling using multiple chiller system with r134aUNEP OzonAction
 
Sureflow Product brochure pr1
Sureflow Product brochure pr1Sureflow Product brochure pr1
Sureflow Product brochure pr1Damian Mitchell
 
Burners and combustion system for the reheat furnaces for small and medium ro...
Burners and combustion system for the reheat furnaces for small and medium ro...Burners and combustion system for the reheat furnaces for small and medium ro...
Burners and combustion system for the reheat furnaces for small and medium ro...Shirish Karve
 
Energy transfer and heat load analysis
Energy transfer and heat load analysisEnergy transfer and heat load analysis
Energy transfer and heat load analysisSatwinder Singh
 
12 Cooling Load Calculations
12 Cooling Load Calculations12 Cooling Load Calculations
12 Cooling Load Calculationsspsu
 
Sizing of solar cooling systems
Sizing of solar cooling systemsSizing of solar cooling systems
Sizing of solar cooling systemsSolarReference
 
Energy saving by evaporative cooling in AHUs
Energy saving by evaporative cooling in AHUsEnergy saving by evaporative cooling in AHUs
Energy saving by evaporative cooling in AHUsCAREL Industries S.p.A
 
GBF2007 - RealBuildingPerformance - S.Carpenter Enermodal
GBF2007 - RealBuildingPerformance - S.Carpenter EnermodalGBF2007 - RealBuildingPerformance - S.Carpenter Enermodal
GBF2007 - RealBuildingPerformance - S.Carpenter EnermodalToronto 2030 District
 
Improving Shale Oil Crude Heater Performance- India 2018
Improving Shale Oil Crude Heater  Performance- India 2018Improving Shale Oil Crude Heater  Performance- India 2018
Improving Shale Oil Crude Heater Performance- India 2018Abhinanda Das
 
Furnace Improvements patented - Split Flow technology
Furnace Improvements patented - Split Flow technologyFurnace Improvements patented - Split Flow technology
Furnace Improvements patented - Split Flow technologyDisha Mangal
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Measured Performance of Natural Gas Tankless and Storage Water Heaters - Scho...
Measured Performance of Natural Gas Tankless and Storage Water Heaters - Scho...Measured Performance of Natural Gas Tankless and Storage Water Heaters - Scho...
Measured Performance of Natural Gas Tankless and Storage Water Heaters - Scho...
 
2011 expo low-ebuildings_ventilation_jm_0911
2011 expo low-ebuildings_ventilation_jm_09112011 expo low-ebuildings_ventilation_jm_0911
2011 expo low-ebuildings_ventilation_jm_0911
 
Waste Heat Recovery in Power Station Boilers by Greens Power Equipment
Waste Heat Recovery in Power Station Boilers by Greens Power EquipmentWaste Heat Recovery in Power Station Boilers by Greens Power Equipment
Waste Heat Recovery in Power Station Boilers by Greens Power Equipment
 
Performance and Optimization of Residential Condensing Combi Systems
Performance and Optimization of Residential Condensing Combi SystemsPerformance and Optimization of Residential Condensing Combi Systems
Performance and Optimization of Residential Condensing Combi Systems
 
2015 emc broadusa
2015 emc broadusa2015 emc broadusa
2015 emc broadusa
 
HVAC Cooling Load Calculation
HVAC Cooling Load CalculationHVAC Cooling Load Calculation
HVAC Cooling Load Calculation
 
Steam Engineering basics
Steam Engineering basicsSteam Engineering basics
Steam Engineering basics
 
District Cooling And Desalination
District Cooling And DesalinationDistrict Cooling And Desalination
District Cooling And Desalination
 
Data centar cooling using multiple chiller system with r134a
Data centar cooling using multiple chiller system with r134aData centar cooling using multiple chiller system with r134a
Data centar cooling using multiple chiller system with r134a
 
Fall2011 jalowiec
Fall2011 jalowiecFall2011 jalowiec
Fall2011 jalowiec
 
Sureflow Product brochure pr1
Sureflow Product brochure pr1Sureflow Product brochure pr1
Sureflow Product brochure pr1
 
Burners and combustion system for the reheat furnaces for small and medium ro...
Burners and combustion system for the reheat furnaces for small and medium ro...Burners and combustion system for the reheat furnaces for small and medium ro...
Burners and combustion system for the reheat furnaces for small and medium ro...
 
Energy transfer and heat load analysis
Energy transfer and heat load analysisEnergy transfer and heat load analysis
Energy transfer and heat load analysis
 
Micro-turbine - Short - HKS
Micro-turbine - Short - HKSMicro-turbine - Short - HKS
Micro-turbine - Short - HKS
 
12 Cooling Load Calculations
12 Cooling Load Calculations12 Cooling Load Calculations
12 Cooling Load Calculations
 
Sizing of solar cooling systems
Sizing of solar cooling systemsSizing of solar cooling systems
Sizing of solar cooling systems
 
Energy saving by evaporative cooling in AHUs
Energy saving by evaporative cooling in AHUsEnergy saving by evaporative cooling in AHUs
Energy saving by evaporative cooling in AHUs
 
GBF2007 - RealBuildingPerformance - S.Carpenter Enermodal
GBF2007 - RealBuildingPerformance - S.Carpenter EnermodalGBF2007 - RealBuildingPerformance - S.Carpenter Enermodal
GBF2007 - RealBuildingPerformance - S.Carpenter Enermodal
 
Improving Shale Oil Crude Heater Performance- India 2018
Improving Shale Oil Crude Heater  Performance- India 2018Improving Shale Oil Crude Heater  Performance- India 2018
Improving Shale Oil Crude Heater Performance- India 2018
 
Furnace Improvements patented - Split Flow technology
Furnace Improvements patented - Split Flow technologyFurnace Improvements patented - Split Flow technology
Furnace Improvements patented - Split Flow technology
 

Ähnlich wie Comparison of Three Geoexchange Loopfields

Erh various applications - SCME 2013
Erh various applications - SCME 2013Erh various applications - SCME 2013
Erh various applications - SCME 2013Frank Pels
 
Mechanical Engineering Seminar 2017_3
Mechanical Engineering Seminar 2017_3Mechanical Engineering Seminar 2017_3
Mechanical Engineering Seminar 2017_3Nicholas Naing
 
Geothermal / Geoexchange Systems
Geothermal /  Geoexchange SystemsGeothermal /  Geoexchange Systems
Geothermal / Geoexchange SystemsM.E. Group
 
Getting the most out of hydronic heating systems
Getting the most out of hydronic heating systemsGetting the most out of hydronic heating systems
Getting the most out of hydronic heating systemsBehrouz Safarizal
 
Adiabatic cooling tower v3 08.08
Adiabatic cooling tower v3 08.08Adiabatic cooling tower v3 08.08
Adiabatic cooling tower v3 08.08Er Ramgarhia
 
Prof. beck 'renewable energy- a short (and cynical) approach
Prof. beck  'renewable energy- a short (and cynical) approachProf. beck  'renewable energy- a short (and cynical) approach
Prof. beck 'renewable energy- a short (and cynical) approachThe Sheffield Colloqouium
 
Thermal Power Plants
Thermal Power PlantsThermal Power Plants
Thermal Power Plantspeeyush95
 
Water Efficiency in Thermal power Plant
Water Efficiency in Thermal power PlantWater Efficiency in Thermal power Plant
Water Efficiency in Thermal power PlantAtanu Maity
 
Ppt for power plant
Ppt for power plantPpt for power plant
Ppt for power plantra m
 
Concerntatini solar plant ppt
Concerntatini solar plant pptConcerntatini solar plant ppt
Concerntatini solar plant pptkarmbir saini
 
Entropic Ecology indoors: Energy Efficiency in Data Centre Design
Entropic Ecology indoors: Energy Efficiency in Data Centre Design Entropic Ecology indoors: Energy Efficiency in Data Centre Design
Entropic Ecology indoors: Energy Efficiency in Data Centre Design SustainableEnergyAut
 
DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF HELICAL TUBE IN COIL TYPE HEAT EXCHANGER
DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF HELICAL TUBE IN COIL TYPE HEAT EXCHANGERDESIGN AND FABRICATION OF HELICAL TUBE IN COIL TYPE HEAT EXCHANGER
DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF HELICAL TUBE IN COIL TYPE HEAT EXCHANGERhemantnehete
 
Ppt for power plant
Ppt for power plantPpt for power plant
Ppt for power plantra m
 
Post-combustion CO2 capture and its effects on power plants
Post-combustion CO2 capture and its effects on power plantsPost-combustion CO2 capture and its effects on power plants
Post-combustion CO2 capture and its effects on power plantsHamid Abroshan
 
Ntpc (national thermal power corporation) sipat boiler haxxo24 i~i
Ntpc (national thermal power corporation) sipat boiler haxxo24 i~iNtpc (national thermal power corporation) sipat boiler haxxo24 i~i
Ntpc (national thermal power corporation) sipat boiler haxxo24 i~ihaxxo24
 

Ähnlich wie Comparison of Three Geoexchange Loopfields (20)

Erh various applications - SCME 2013
Erh various applications - SCME 2013Erh various applications - SCME 2013
Erh various applications - SCME 2013
 
Mechanical Engineering Seminar 2017_3
Mechanical Engineering Seminar 2017_3Mechanical Engineering Seminar 2017_3
Mechanical Engineering Seminar 2017_3
 
Geothermal / Geoexchange Systems
Geothermal /  Geoexchange SystemsGeothermal /  Geoexchange Systems
Geothermal / Geoexchange Systems
 
Getting the most out of hydronic heating systems
Getting the most out of hydronic heating systemsGetting the most out of hydronic heating systems
Getting the most out of hydronic heating systems
 
Adiabatic cooling tower v3 08.08
Adiabatic cooling tower v3 08.08Adiabatic cooling tower v3 08.08
Adiabatic cooling tower v3 08.08
 
GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT
GEOTHERMAL  POWER PLANT GEOTHERMAL  POWER PLANT
GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT
 
GEOs Gas Thermal Remediation Workshop Series - Los Angeles (Nov 2014)
GEOs Gas Thermal Remediation Workshop Series - Los Angeles (Nov 2014)GEOs Gas Thermal Remediation Workshop Series - Los Angeles (Nov 2014)
GEOs Gas Thermal Remediation Workshop Series - Los Angeles (Nov 2014)
 
Prof. beck 'renewable energy- a short (and cynical) approach
Prof. beck  'renewable energy- a short (and cynical) approachProf. beck  'renewable energy- a short (and cynical) approach
Prof. beck 'renewable energy- a short (and cynical) approach
 
Cooling Towers
Cooling Towers Cooling Towers
Cooling Towers
 
Thermal Power Plants
Thermal Power PlantsThermal Power Plants
Thermal Power Plants
 
Water Efficiency in Thermal Power plants
Water Efficiency in Thermal Power plants Water Efficiency in Thermal Power plants
Water Efficiency in Thermal Power plants
 
Water Efficiency in Thermal power Plant
Water Efficiency in Thermal power PlantWater Efficiency in Thermal power Plant
Water Efficiency in Thermal power Plant
 
Ppt for power plant
Ppt for power plantPpt for power plant
Ppt for power plant
 
Concerntatini solar plant ppt
Concerntatini solar plant pptConcerntatini solar plant ppt
Concerntatini solar plant ppt
 
Tungsten
TungstenTungsten
Tungsten
 
Entropic Ecology indoors: Energy Efficiency in Data Centre Design
Entropic Ecology indoors: Energy Efficiency in Data Centre Design Entropic Ecology indoors: Energy Efficiency in Data Centre Design
Entropic Ecology indoors: Energy Efficiency in Data Centre Design
 
DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF HELICAL TUBE IN COIL TYPE HEAT EXCHANGER
DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF HELICAL TUBE IN COIL TYPE HEAT EXCHANGERDESIGN AND FABRICATION OF HELICAL TUBE IN COIL TYPE HEAT EXCHANGER
DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF HELICAL TUBE IN COIL TYPE HEAT EXCHANGER
 
Ppt for power plant
Ppt for power plantPpt for power plant
Ppt for power plant
 
Post-combustion CO2 capture and its effects on power plants
Post-combustion CO2 capture and its effects on power plantsPost-combustion CO2 capture and its effects on power plants
Post-combustion CO2 capture and its effects on power plants
 
Ntpc (national thermal power corporation) sipat boiler haxxo24 i~i
Ntpc (national thermal power corporation) sipat boiler haxxo24 i~iNtpc (national thermal power corporation) sipat boiler haxxo24 i~i
Ntpc (national thermal power corporation) sipat boiler haxxo24 i~i
 

Comparison of Three Geoexchange Loopfields

  • 1. Comparison of Three Different Geoexchange Loopfields Daniel W. Felten, P.E., CGD World Energy Engineering Conference October 2011
  • 2. Background  ECS purchased abandoned factory in 2007.  Terraclime Geothermal began business operations in 2009  Redeveloped 3rd floor (7,000 SF) for our offices  Needed our first geothermal project to get The “Mill” going!!! Florence, MA
  • 3. Geothermal Demonstration Site Design  Industry standard “U-Loop” has been around for decades. It works, but… ◦ High drilling costs (150 to 200 ft of borehole per Ton) ◦ Grouting with high TC grout costly ◦ Land “hog” with 2 to 3 Tons (500 ft) every 20-25 ft ◦ Many competitors installing U-Loops  Thermacouple and DX offered enticing claims with limited penetration in the market…
  • 4. Thermacouple Claim: A Thermacouple earth energy system…allows the earth to exchange up to 5 tons of thermal energy…”
  • 5. Reducing Drilling Requirements ◦ Kelix Thermacouple could reduce drilling depth by more than 60% (if claim true) ◦ One 306 foot Kelix can provide “up to” 5 Tons of heating/cooling
  • 6. Earthlinked DX System Claim “Typically, the earth loops are 100 feet per ton of capacity.”
  • 7. Reducing Drilling Requirements ◦ Direct Exchange (DX) uses refrigerant in copper earth loops ◦ One ton per 100 feet of borehole ◦ 3 inch diameter borehole means quicker drilling and less grouting, less disturbance
  • 8. Final Systems Configuration  5 Tons Direct Exchange (DX) ◦ Single stage Cu ground loops ◦ Manufacturer - EarthLinked Technologies  5 Tons Water Based “U-Loop”  5 Tons Water Based Concentric Tube “Kelix Thermacouple”  Outside water systems interchangeable ◦ U-Loop 2 x 500’ / Thermacouple 306’  Water Based Manufactures: Carrier & WaterFurnace  Data Acquisition using Web Energy Logger (WEL)
  • 9. Drilling U-Loop  Two 500-foot boreholes, 6” diameter, 1000 feet total  Bentonite sand grout  HDPE Tubing  25% EtOH  2.5 days to complete  5 Tons Total  $12/Ft = $12,000
  • 10. Installing Loops Damaged U-Loop U-Loop Installation
  • 11. Installing KELIX Thermacouple  One 306-foot borehole, 6” diameter  Geo Supergrout ◦ Cementicious TC=1.0  4” diameter outer casing  1.5 days to complete ◦ recent modifications has reduced install time to 0.5 – 1 day)  5 Tons Total  $14/Ft X 306 ft = $4,384  Plus, $5,500 materials  Total Cost = $9,884
  • 15. Drilling DX Boreholes  Five 100- foot holes, 3” diameter  Geo Supergrout  Copper Earthloops  One day to complete  $2000/Ton = $10,000
  • 18. Drill Tooling and DX Earthloop Copper Earthloops
  • 20. DX Exposed Manifold Manifolds Five 100’ Earth Loops
  • 21. DX Linesets (Interior) DX Linesets (Exterior) DX Installation (at the Mill)
  • 22. Real Time Monitoring and Data Acquisition-Web Energy Logger (WEL)  Real Time Monitoring and Data Acquisition ◦ Temps ◦ Pressures ◦ Flows ◦ Watts  Performance Reporting ◦ COP/EER ◦ Troubleshooting
  • 23. Data Acquisition & Analysis  Each system is instrumented at key locations ◦ Ground Loop (temps and flows) ◦ Air Handler (temps) ◦ Geo System (temps, pressures, amps) ◦ Ambient air & earth temps  Data acquired at one minute intervals (NOTE: DON’T TRY THIS AT HOME!)  Systems were started up July 2009
  • 25.
  • 26. DX System Performance Summary DX Modification Progression COP Heat < 3 •Original installation, R407c •Pressure Oscillations due to component sizing mismatch, refrigerant characteristics COP/EER Cooling •R407c changed to R22 ~3.3/11.3 •Flow control changed Cooling capacity 5 •Glide eliminated Tons confirmed •System pressure losses remain due to distribution & volume
  • 28.
  • 29. Mill Systems Performance Summary Water Based Systems Water Systems Comments Carrier COP/EER •R410a Two-Stage compressor option < 6/20+ provides max performance benefit by rejecting condensing heat @ 90F into ground @ 56F operating in 1st stage WF COP/EER •R410a & Two Stage similar max benefit ~6/20+ •North side building provides cooling advantage
  • 30. Water (25% Ethanol) COP 3.5 – 4.1 (heating) 5.5 – 6.1 (cooling) (ground systems interchangeable with geothermal systems)
  • 33. Normalizing Data - BTU vs. ∆ EWT  U-Loop ◦ Initial EWT = 56 F ◦ Max EWT = 69 ◦ Delta EWT = 13 F over 72 minutes ◦ Total BTU Rejected = 93,000 BTU ◦ Rate = 6.5 Tons  Kelix Thermacouple ◦ Initial EWT = 65 F ◦ Max EWT = 85 F ◦ Delta EWT = 20 F over 72 minutes ◦ Total BTU Rejected = 77,000 BTU ◦ Rate = 5.3 Tons 50% greater EWT rise with 20% less BTU rejected
  • 35. Capacity Evaluation  Normalized to a Delta EWT = 13F (eg., how many BTUs does it take to get a 13 degree delta) ◦ U-Loop: 93,000 BTU (@ 6.6 Tons) ◦ Kelix: 35,000 BTU (@ 5.4 Tons)  Thermacouple Equivalent Capacity (relative to U- Loop) = 0.376 Kelix Capacity = 0.376 X 6.6 Tons = 2.5 Tons Equivalent to 120 feet/Ton U-Loop at 152 ft/Ton Thermacouple is ~20% more efficient?
  • 36. Is this a valid analysis? 15 minutes •These two geothermal systems rarely cycled for 72 minutes •The majority of cycles for both systems were under 15 minutes
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39. It’s the ground, stupid…  We can force heat into/from the ground using earthloop “improvements”  The shorter the borehole, the greater the thermal gradient required  The “improvements” are really about eliminating borehole resistance
  • 40. Decreasing Borehole Resistance and Increasing Efficiency  Thermacouple ◦ Greater turbulence with lower pressure drop (reduced pumping penalty) ◦ Minimizes “cross talk” between inlet/outlet piping (PVC inner pipe) ◦ Better Grout: TC >1.0 vs 0.8 ◦ More Conductive Casing: Fiberglass vs HDPE  Direct Exchange ◦ Highly conductive copper earthloop ◦ Better Grout ◦ No pumping penalty (other penalties may apply…)
  • 41. Decreasing Borehole Resistance and Increasing Efficiency  U-Loop systems work well and are easy to install  DX and Thermacouple are viable alternatives for smaller sites and/or higher drilling costs  The manufacturer claims should be ignored - ground performance drives the system design  Need to develop equivalent models for DX and Thermacouple