SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 54
NUCLEAR ENERGY
     Universidad Nacional de Colombia
     RenewableEnergies
     2012 – II


     Fabián Poveda
     Andrés Barreto
     Daniel Zambrano
     Hierman Galeano
CONTENTS


•   Introduction
•   Potential
•   Howitworks
•   Reactors
•   Economy




                              2
INTRODUCTION

• Nuclear energy is the energy obtained by
  manipulating the internal structure of atoms. It can
  be obtained by dividing the nucleus (nuclear fission)
  or joining two atoms (nuclear fusion)

• Nuclear energy is the only option to produce and
  supply large amounts of electricity globally

• 440 nuclear reactors produce electricity around the
  world. More than 15 countries have nuclear energy
  to produce 25% or more of their electricity needs

                                                      3
HOW IT WORKS

                 NUCLEAR FISSION
• A neutron
  traveling at high
  speed hits the
  nucleus of an
  element of high
  atomic weight

• Uranium 235                            2
• Plutonium 239                    E=m
                                     c
                                             4
HOW IT WORKS – Fuel cycle

FRONT END – Uranium mining, conversion, enrichment
               And fuel fabrication
  Uranium ore is mined by        Natural uranium U-235 must
extraction or in situ leaching   be‘enriched’ to 0.71% to 3.5%



   Small pellets of uranium       Uranium hexafluoride gas
 dioxide, a ceramic material            UF6 or‘hex’
 2 cm long , 1.5 cm diameter



Loaded intozirconium alloy or    Light Water Reactors (LWR)
stainless steel tubes 4 m long
           fuel rods                                             5
HOW IT WORKS – Fuel cycle

      SERVICE PERIOD




                            6
HOW IT WORKS – Fuel cycle

BACK END – Safety procedures either to reprocess or
           dispose of spent nuclear fuel
       Open fuel cycle                  Closed fuel cycle


Fuel is used once and then sent   After being removed from the
  to storage without further       reactor, the fuel rods go to a
           processing                reprocessing plant where
                                     they are chopped up and
                                         dissolved in acid
   US, Canada and Sweden

                                      UK, France and Japan
                                                                    7
8
Fossil fuel plants
     Nuclear powerplants

                                                    39%
NUCLEAR FISSION                                     CO2
      =                                  22%                        67%
NONE EMISSIONS                           NOx                        SO2
                                                  41%
                   FUEL CYCLE                      Hg
                         =
            just 2% of theemissions of     25 billiontonnes of CO2 are
                    fossilfuels           producedbyburningfossilfue
                                                        ls


                                                 Coal plantemissionsis 100
                                                 times higherthanthose of
                                                    9
                                                       nuclear plants
Fuel-dependentemissionfactorsfrompowerplants in EU

Pollutant               Hardcoal   Brown coal   Fueloil   Otheroil        Gas

CO2 (g/GJ)              94600      101000       77400     74100           56100

SO2 (g/GJ)              765        1361         1350      228             0,68

NOx (g/GJ)              292        183          195       129             93,3

CO (g/GJ)               89,1       89,1         15,7      15,7            14,5

No                      4,92       7,78         3,7       3,24            1,58
methaneorganiccomp
ound (g/GJ)
ParticulateMatter       1203       3254         16        191             0,1
(g/GJ)

Flue gas volume total   360        444          279       276             272
(m^3/GJ)
                                                                     10
A safety comparisonbetweenthesources of electricalenergy
Energysource     Number of       Causes           Installation      Inmediatefatali        Total        Immediatefat
                 eventswithfat                                      ties per event         immediate    alities per
                 alities                                                                   fatalities   GW/year

Coal             62              Mine disasters   Coal mines        70                     3900         0,4

Oil              160             Fire-            Refineriesplata   40                     6200         0,3
                                 explosiontrans   formtankers
                                 formationaccid
                                 ent
Gas              80              Fire-            Gas wells and     50                     3100         0,4
                                 explosion-       distribution
                                 eartquake
Hydro            20              Overtoppingfai   Dams              300                    5200         2
                                 lure
Nuclear          1               Design and       Chernobyl         31                     31           Lowerthan
                                 operation                                                              0,01


                                                                                      11
Aatmosphericpollution and solidwstefromworldwideenergy use (Million of tons)

Source      SO2         NOx           Particulates   CO       CO2         Solid waste


Coal        100         Overthan 20   500            3        9000        Overthan 300

Gas         Lowerthan   2             Lowerthan      5        4000        Minor
            0,5                       0,5
Oil         40          10            2              200      9000        15

Wood        0,2         3             100            200      5000        50

Hydro       0           0             0              0        0           0

Nuclear     0           0             0              0        0           0,04




                                                                  12
13
14
15
Sources of publicannualradiationexposure in the U.S.
                                                       16
17
18
19
20
World nuclear industry status report
Nuclear electricitygeneration in theworld (total and share of electricitygeneration)




                                                                21
World nuclear industry status report
Number of nuclear reactorsunderconstruction, 1954-2012




                                                         22
World nuclear industry status report
Relativechanges in net income of major nuclear companies 2007-2011




                                                            23
World nuclear industry status report
Global investmentdecisions in new renewables and nuclear power, 2004-2011




                                                           24
World nuclear industry status report
Nuclear, wind, and solar capacityincreasesaroundtheworld, 2000-2011




                                                            25
World nuclear industry status report

• Manycontrieslike China, Japan, Germany, Italy,
  France, USA, Russiahavestoppedtheri nuclear
  projectsbecause of thefeartoterrorism, radiation

• Evenwhencountriesincreasetheamount of nuclear
  energy, it has notkept pace withoverallincreases in
  electricitydemands


                                          26
World nuclear industry status report

• Thecurrentworld reactor fleet has a total nominal
  capacity of about 364 gigawatts

• Normalythe time thatwilltaketobuild a nuclear
  plantis 5 to 7 years. Nowdayscurrent nuclear
  projecthavebeenunderconstruction more than 20
  years


                                          27
World nuclear industry status report

• Thetoalnumbre of canceledorderstobuild nuclear
  plantswere 253 in 31 countries, many of them at
  advancedconstruccionstage. Justthe USA has
  cancleled 138 orders. French
  AtomicEnergyCommision Statics-2003

• Theaccidentsthathaveoccur in
  thelastyearslikeFukishimaDaiichi, Chernobyl,
  ThreeMile Island are responsable of thefall in nuclear
  energyindustry.                          28
1890
1
                           2005




    Alaska, Muir Glacier
Alaska,
ReidGlaci
erd
            1899




            2003
DominicanR
Haiti   epublic
C   A
H   I
A   R
I
N   P
    O
A   L
    L
    U
    T
    I
    O
    N
NUCLEAR   TE
          CH
          NO
          LO
 energy   GY

          FOR
          THE




 FUTURE
MENU




BIG reactors
Interestingfacts

Smallreactors
Interstingfacts
Advantagesanddisavantages
BIG REACTORS
INTERESTING FACTS:
                       JET
PARTICIPANTS




  ENERGY       24 MW         16 MW
 PRODUCTION                          65% OF RATIO




       1983
ITER
 INTERESTING FACTS



   PARTICIPANTS




                  50 MW          500 MW
ENERGY
                                          1000% RATIO
PRODUCTION




     2019
ONE   1000
MW
      HOME
      S
-8MW    450MW




 8000      500.000
SMALL REACTORS
TOSHIBA 4S
REACTOR
 DESAIGNER



  LIFE             THERY YEARS




                    HEAT SUPPLAY
         ADVANTA    ENERGY
         GES        STEAM
                    DESALINIZATION
83.800
 50 MW   135 MW THERMAL




33.800

 50.000
HYPERION


   DESAIGNER



   LIFE          TEN YEARS




    ADVANTAGES      HEAT SUPPLAY
                    ENERGY
                    DESALINIZATION
                    TRANSPORTATIO
                    N
42.500
 70 MW THERMAL

 25 MW   ELECTRICITY




25.000

17.500
THORIUM REACTOR
(SSTAR)




 DESAIGNER
    DESAIGNER



      LIFE        THERY YEARS




     ADVANTAGES
                  TRANSPORTATION
                  PRICE
                  LOW NUCLEAR WASTE
                  NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS
10-100 MW




100.000
P
R
O
B
L
E
MS
20.000.000.000.000
        euros




46.000.000.000
.000.000
  Colombian pesos
POLICY
ECONOMY




          52
REFERENCES

• NGRExpert. (2012). Nuclear fuel cycle and
  supporting industries
• http://www.energia-nuclear.net/




                                              53
THANKYOU




           54

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

11.50 dhr Meyer
11.50 dhr Meyer11.50 dhr Meyer
11.50 dhr MeyerThemadagen
 
Economic Analysis Of Advanced Ultra Supercritical Pulverized Coal Power
Economic Analysis Of Advanced Ultra Supercritical Pulverized Coal PowerEconomic Analysis Of Advanced Ultra Supercritical Pulverized Coal Power
Economic Analysis Of Advanced Ultra Supercritical Pulverized Coal PowerJeffrey Phillips
 
CIB TG66 South America Webinar 2010-11-04 5 Roberto Lamberts
CIB TG66 South America Webinar 2010-11-04 5 Roberto LambertsCIB TG66 South America Webinar 2010-11-04 5 Roberto Lamberts
CIB TG66 South America Webinar 2010-11-04 5 Roberto LambertsINIVE EEIG
 
Waste for recycling not for burning lt recoil pekko kohonen
Waste for recycling not for burning lt recoil pekko kohonenWaste for recycling not for burning lt recoil pekko kohonen
Waste for recycling not for burning lt recoil pekko kohonenBusiness Finland
 
LEGO Reactor - ICAPP 2008
LEGO Reactor - ICAPP 2008LEGO Reactor - ICAPP 2008
LEGO Reactor - ICAPP 2008jdbess
 
Different Energy Systems and Impacts - Qualitative Discussions
Different Energy Systems and Impacts - Qualitative DiscussionsDifferent Energy Systems and Impacts - Qualitative Discussions
Different Energy Systems and Impacts - Qualitative DiscussionsSSA KPI
 
D09.06.06.presentation
D09.06.06.presentationD09.06.06.presentation
D09.06.06.presentationRelhy project
 

Was ist angesagt? (8)

11.50 dhr Meyer
11.50 dhr Meyer11.50 dhr Meyer
11.50 dhr Meyer
 
Economic Analysis Of Advanced Ultra Supercritical Pulverized Coal Power
Economic Analysis Of Advanced Ultra Supercritical Pulverized Coal PowerEconomic Analysis Of Advanced Ultra Supercritical Pulverized Coal Power
Economic Analysis Of Advanced Ultra Supercritical Pulverized Coal Power
 
Energy
EnergyEnergy
Energy
 
CIB TG66 South America Webinar 2010-11-04 5 Roberto Lamberts
CIB TG66 South America Webinar 2010-11-04 5 Roberto LambertsCIB TG66 South America Webinar 2010-11-04 5 Roberto Lamberts
CIB TG66 South America Webinar 2010-11-04 5 Roberto Lamberts
 
Waste for recycling not for burning lt recoil pekko kohonen
Waste for recycling not for burning lt recoil pekko kohonenWaste for recycling not for burning lt recoil pekko kohonen
Waste for recycling not for burning lt recoil pekko kohonen
 
LEGO Reactor - ICAPP 2008
LEGO Reactor - ICAPP 2008LEGO Reactor - ICAPP 2008
LEGO Reactor - ICAPP 2008
 
Different Energy Systems and Impacts - Qualitative Discussions
Different Energy Systems and Impacts - Qualitative DiscussionsDifferent Energy Systems and Impacts - Qualitative Discussions
Different Energy Systems and Impacts - Qualitative Discussions
 
D09.06.06.presentation
D09.06.06.presentationD09.06.06.presentation
D09.06.06.presentation
 

Andere mochten auch

Sustainability of Pulp and Paper Sector. Winnings and Challenges
Sustainability of Pulp and Paper Sector.Winnings and Challenges Sustainability of Pulp and Paper Sector.Winnings and Challenges
Sustainability of Pulp and Paper Sector. Winnings and Challenges Pedro Toledo Piza
 
Nuclear energy
Nuclear energyNuclear energy
Nuclear energykevinknox
 
Argentina Nuclear Jinchuk2005
Argentina Nuclear Jinchuk2005Argentina Nuclear Jinchuk2005
Argentina Nuclear Jinchuk2005myatom
 
Fertilizers-Meenu -Powerpoint
Fertilizers-Meenu -PowerpointFertilizers-Meenu -Powerpoint
Fertilizers-Meenu -Powerpointmeenuvijay
 

Andere mochten auch (6)

Sustainability of Pulp and Paper Sector. Winnings and Challenges
Sustainability of Pulp and Paper Sector.Winnings and Challenges Sustainability of Pulp and Paper Sector.Winnings and Challenges
Sustainability of Pulp and Paper Sector. Winnings and Challenges
 
Nuclear energy
Nuclear energyNuclear energy
Nuclear energy
 
Argentina Nuclear Jinchuk2005
Argentina Nuclear Jinchuk2005Argentina Nuclear Jinchuk2005
Argentina Nuclear Jinchuk2005
 
Planes
PlanesPlanes
Planes
 
Colombia
ColombiaColombia
Colombia
 
Fertilizers-Meenu -Powerpoint
Fertilizers-Meenu -PowerpointFertilizers-Meenu -Powerpoint
Fertilizers-Meenu -Powerpoint
 

Ähnlich wie Nuclear energy (1)

Lectures On Nuclear technology and Environment(2008 07@The University of Tokyo)
Lectures On Nuclear technology and Environment(2008 07@The University of Tokyo)Lectures On Nuclear technology and Environment(2008 07@The University of Tokyo)
Lectures On Nuclear technology and Environment(2008 07@The University of Tokyo)ilab
 
Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be 28 jan 2011
Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be   28 jan 2011Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be   28 jan 2011
Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be 28 jan 2011mcci175
 
Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be 28 jan 2011
Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be   28 jan 2011Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be   28 jan 2011
Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be 28 jan 2011Osm Siddque
 
8 b 8.1 - mercury abatement in the us cement industry v2
8   b 8.1 - mercury abatement in the us cement industry v28   b 8.1 - mercury abatement in the us cement industry v2
8 b 8.1 - mercury abatement in the us cement industry v2John Kline
 
Nuclear energy
Nuclear energyNuclear energy
Nuclear energycdenef
 
nuclear power generation
nuclear power generationnuclear power generation
nuclear power generationAhmed Sarhan
 
07 25 08-sorensen
07 25 08-sorensen07 25 08-sorensen
07 25 08-sorensenadyaner
 
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF EMISSION OF POWER PLANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL                   IMPACT OF EMISSION OF POWER PLANTSENVIRONMENTAL                   IMPACT OF EMISSION OF POWER PLANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF EMISSION OF POWER PLANTSMr. Mrunal Raut
 
Liquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old Idea
Liquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old IdeaLiquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old Idea
Liquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old Ideaguestcee6b0
 
01 nuclear energy_overview
01 nuclear energy_overview01 nuclear energy_overview
01 nuclear energy_overviewHossam Zein
 
Jeffrey Brown – Summit Power Group – Texas Clean Energy Project: coal feedsto...
Jeffrey Brown – Summit Power Group – Texas Clean Energy Project: coal feedsto...Jeffrey Brown – Summit Power Group – Texas Clean Energy Project: coal feedsto...
Jeffrey Brown – Summit Power Group – Texas Clean Energy Project: coal feedsto...Global CCS Institute
 
xcel energy
xcel energy   xcel energy
xcel energy finance26
 
xcel energy
xcel energy  xcel energy
xcel energy finance26
 
Prasannakumar
PrasannakumarPrasannakumar
Prasannakumarvgprasad
 
Maiyalagan,Electrochemical oxidation of methanol on pt v2 o5–c composite cata...
Maiyalagan,Electrochemical oxidation of methanol on pt v2 o5–c composite cata...Maiyalagan,Electrochemical oxidation of methanol on pt v2 o5–c composite cata...
Maiyalagan,Electrochemical oxidation of methanol on pt v2 o5–c composite cata...kutty79
 

Ähnlich wie Nuclear energy (1) (20)

Lectures On Nuclear technology and Environment(2008 07@The University of Tokyo)
Lectures On Nuclear technology and Environment(2008 07@The University of Tokyo)Lectures On Nuclear technology and Environment(2008 07@The University of Tokyo)
Lectures On Nuclear technology and Environment(2008 07@The University of Tokyo)
 
Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be 28 jan 2011
Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be   28 jan 2011Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be   28 jan 2011
Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be 28 jan 2011
 
Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be 28 jan 2011
Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be   28 jan 2011Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be   28 jan 2011
Kbalu presentation on fft nuclear power to be or not to be 28 jan 2011
 
Session 23 ic2011 cheng
Session 23 ic2011 chengSession 23 ic2011 cheng
Session 23 ic2011 cheng
 
8 b 8.1 - mercury abatement in the us cement industry v2
8   b 8.1 - mercury abatement in the us cement industry v28   b 8.1 - mercury abatement in the us cement industry v2
8 b 8.1 - mercury abatement in the us cement industry v2
 
Nuclear energy
Nuclear energyNuclear energy
Nuclear energy
 
Papastefanou2010
Papastefanou2010Papastefanou2010
Papastefanou2010
 
nuclear power generation
nuclear power generationnuclear power generation
nuclear power generation
 
Energy 101
Energy 101Energy 101
Energy 101
 
07 25 08-sorensen
07 25 08-sorensen07 25 08-sorensen
07 25 08-sorensen
 
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF EMISSION OF POWER PLANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL                   IMPACT OF EMISSION OF POWER PLANTSENVIRONMENTAL                   IMPACT OF EMISSION OF POWER PLANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF EMISSION OF POWER PLANTS
 
Liquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old Idea
Liquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old IdeaLiquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old Idea
Liquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old Idea
 
01 nuclear energy_overview
01 nuclear energy_overview01 nuclear energy_overview
01 nuclear energy_overview
 
Jeffrey Brown – Summit Power Group – Texas Clean Energy Project: coal feedsto...
Jeffrey Brown – Summit Power Group – Texas Clean Energy Project: coal feedsto...Jeffrey Brown – Summit Power Group – Texas Clean Energy Project: coal feedsto...
Jeffrey Brown – Summit Power Group – Texas Clean Energy Project: coal feedsto...
 
xcel energy
xcel energy   xcel energy
xcel energy
 
xcel energy
xcel energy  xcel energy
xcel energy
 
Pp manish on nuclear power plant
Pp manish on nuclear power plantPp manish on nuclear power plant
Pp manish on nuclear power plant
 
Prasannakumar
PrasannakumarPrasannakumar
Prasannakumar
 
Maiyalagan,Electrochemical oxidation of methanol on pt v2 o5–c composite cata...
Maiyalagan,Electrochemical oxidation of methanol on pt v2 o5–c composite cata...Maiyalagan,Electrochemical oxidation of methanol on pt v2 o5–c composite cata...
Maiyalagan,Electrochemical oxidation of methanol on pt v2 o5–c composite cata...
 
Waste_Transm.ppt
Waste_Transm.pptWaste_Transm.ppt
Waste_Transm.ppt
 

Mehr von Daniel Zambrano (14)

Planta Basura ZERO
Planta Basura ZEROPlanta Basura ZERO
Planta Basura ZERO
 
Presentación1
Presentación1Presentación1
Presentación1
 
Que hago en internet
Que hago en internet Que hago en internet
Que hago en internet
 
Todo de Pakistan
Todo de PakistanTodo de Pakistan
Todo de Pakistan
 
What a large tree can do for you(1)
What a large tree can do for you(1)What a large tree can do for you(1)
What a large tree can do for you(1)
 
Marketing y ecologia
Marketing y ecologiaMarketing y ecologia
Marketing y ecologia
 
Danielz
DanielzDanielz
Danielz
 
Hola
HolaHola
Hola
 
Mila noticias
Mila noticiasMila noticias
Mila noticias
 
Landing present
Landing presentLanding present
Landing present
 
Nuclear energy present 3
Nuclear energy present 3Nuclear energy present 3
Nuclear energy present 3
 
Dani
DaniDani
Dani
 
Presentación1
Presentación1Presentación1
Presentación1
 
Educación
EducaciónEducación
Educación
 

Nuclear energy (1)

  • 1. NUCLEAR ENERGY Universidad Nacional de Colombia RenewableEnergies 2012 – II Fabián Poveda Andrés Barreto Daniel Zambrano Hierman Galeano
  • 2. CONTENTS • Introduction • Potential • Howitworks • Reactors • Economy 2
  • 3. INTRODUCTION • Nuclear energy is the energy obtained by manipulating the internal structure of atoms. It can be obtained by dividing the nucleus (nuclear fission) or joining two atoms (nuclear fusion) • Nuclear energy is the only option to produce and supply large amounts of electricity globally • 440 nuclear reactors produce electricity around the world. More than 15 countries have nuclear energy to produce 25% or more of their electricity needs 3
  • 4. HOW IT WORKS NUCLEAR FISSION • A neutron traveling at high speed hits the nucleus of an element of high atomic weight • Uranium 235 2 • Plutonium 239 E=m c 4
  • 5. HOW IT WORKS – Fuel cycle FRONT END – Uranium mining, conversion, enrichment And fuel fabrication Uranium ore is mined by Natural uranium U-235 must extraction or in situ leaching be‘enriched’ to 0.71% to 3.5% Small pellets of uranium Uranium hexafluoride gas dioxide, a ceramic material UF6 or‘hex’ 2 cm long , 1.5 cm diameter Loaded intozirconium alloy or Light Water Reactors (LWR) stainless steel tubes 4 m long fuel rods 5
  • 6. HOW IT WORKS – Fuel cycle SERVICE PERIOD 6
  • 7. HOW IT WORKS – Fuel cycle BACK END – Safety procedures either to reprocess or dispose of spent nuclear fuel Open fuel cycle Closed fuel cycle Fuel is used once and then sent After being removed from the to storage without further reactor, the fuel rods go to a processing reprocessing plant where they are chopped up and dissolved in acid US, Canada and Sweden UK, France and Japan 7
  • 8. 8
  • 9. Fossil fuel plants Nuclear powerplants 39% NUCLEAR FISSION CO2 = 22% 67% NONE EMISSIONS NOx SO2 41% FUEL CYCLE Hg = just 2% of theemissions of 25 billiontonnes of CO2 are fossilfuels producedbyburningfossilfue ls Coal plantemissionsis 100 times higherthanthose of 9 nuclear plants
  • 10. Fuel-dependentemissionfactorsfrompowerplants in EU Pollutant Hardcoal Brown coal Fueloil Otheroil Gas CO2 (g/GJ) 94600 101000 77400 74100 56100 SO2 (g/GJ) 765 1361 1350 228 0,68 NOx (g/GJ) 292 183 195 129 93,3 CO (g/GJ) 89,1 89,1 15,7 15,7 14,5 No 4,92 7,78 3,7 3,24 1,58 methaneorganiccomp ound (g/GJ) ParticulateMatter 1203 3254 16 191 0,1 (g/GJ) Flue gas volume total 360 444 279 276 272 (m^3/GJ) 10
  • 11. A safety comparisonbetweenthesources of electricalenergy Energysource Number of Causes Installation Inmediatefatali Total Immediatefat eventswithfat ties per event immediate alities per alities fatalities GW/year Coal 62 Mine disasters Coal mines 70 3900 0,4 Oil 160 Fire- Refineriesplata 40 6200 0,3 explosiontrans formtankers formationaccid ent Gas 80 Fire- Gas wells and 50 3100 0,4 explosion- distribution eartquake Hydro 20 Overtoppingfai Dams 300 5200 2 lure Nuclear 1 Design and Chernobyl 31 31 Lowerthan operation 0,01 11
  • 12. Aatmosphericpollution and solidwstefromworldwideenergy use (Million of tons) Source SO2 NOx Particulates CO CO2 Solid waste Coal 100 Overthan 20 500 3 9000 Overthan 300 Gas Lowerthan 2 Lowerthan 5 4000 Minor 0,5 0,5 Oil 40 10 2 200 9000 15 Wood 0,2 3 100 200 5000 50 Hydro 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nuclear 0 0 0 0 0 0,04 12
  • 13. 13
  • 14. 14
  • 15. 15
  • 17. 17
  • 18. 18
  • 19. 19
  • 20. 20
  • 21. World nuclear industry status report Nuclear electricitygeneration in theworld (total and share of electricitygeneration) 21
  • 22. World nuclear industry status report Number of nuclear reactorsunderconstruction, 1954-2012 22
  • 23. World nuclear industry status report Relativechanges in net income of major nuclear companies 2007-2011 23
  • 24. World nuclear industry status report Global investmentdecisions in new renewables and nuclear power, 2004-2011 24
  • 25. World nuclear industry status report Nuclear, wind, and solar capacityincreasesaroundtheworld, 2000-2011 25
  • 26. World nuclear industry status report • Manycontrieslike China, Japan, Germany, Italy, France, USA, Russiahavestoppedtheri nuclear projectsbecause of thefeartoterrorism, radiation • Evenwhencountriesincreasetheamount of nuclear energy, it has notkept pace withoverallincreases in electricitydemands 26
  • 27. World nuclear industry status report • Thecurrentworld reactor fleet has a total nominal capacity of about 364 gigawatts • Normalythe time thatwilltaketobuild a nuclear plantis 5 to 7 years. Nowdayscurrent nuclear projecthavebeenunderconstruction more than 20 years 27
  • 28. World nuclear industry status report • Thetoalnumbre of canceledorderstobuild nuclear plantswere 253 in 31 countries, many of them at advancedconstruccionstage. Justthe USA has cancleled 138 orders. French AtomicEnergyCommision Statics-2003 • Theaccidentsthathaveoccur in thelastyearslikeFukishimaDaiichi, Chernobyl, ThreeMile Island are responsable of thefall in nuclear energyindustry. 28
  • 29.
  • 30. 1890 1 2005 Alaska, Muir Glacier
  • 32. DominicanR Haiti epublic
  • 33. C A H I A R I N P O A L L U T I O N
  • 34. NUCLEAR TE CH NO LO energy GY FOR THE FUTURE
  • 37. INTERESTING FACTS: JET PARTICIPANTS ENERGY 24 MW 16 MW PRODUCTION 65% OF RATIO 1983
  • 38. ITER INTERESTING FACTS PARTICIPANTS 50 MW 500 MW ENERGY 1000% RATIO PRODUCTION 2019
  • 39. ONE 1000 MW HOME S
  • 40. -8MW 450MW 8000 500.000
  • 42. TOSHIBA 4S REACTOR DESAIGNER LIFE THERY YEARS HEAT SUPPLAY ADVANTA ENERGY GES STEAM DESALINIZATION
  • 43. 83.800 50 MW 135 MW THERMAL 33.800 50.000
  • 44. HYPERION DESAIGNER LIFE TEN YEARS ADVANTAGES HEAT SUPPLAY ENERGY DESALINIZATION TRANSPORTATIO N
  • 45. 42.500 70 MW THERMAL 25 MW ELECTRICITY 25.000 17.500
  • 46. THORIUM REACTOR (SSTAR) DESAIGNER DESAIGNER LIFE THERY YEARS ADVANTAGES TRANSPORTATION PRICE LOW NUCLEAR WASTE NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS
  • 49. 20.000.000.000.000 euros 46.000.000.000 .000.000 Colombian pesos
  • 51.
  • 52. ECONOMY 52
  • 53. REFERENCES • NGRExpert. (2012). Nuclear fuel cycle and supporting industries • http://www.energia-nuclear.net/ 53
  • 54. THANKYOU 54