The document discusses creating sharable screencasts for Sakai at Indiana University. It explores using PowerPoint and Captivate to create screencasts and the pros and cons of each. The main points are: 1) They experimented with PowerPoint and Captivate to create screencasts focused only on Sakai content that could be shared with partners and played on portable devices. 2) PowerPoint allowed for swappable content but the timeline was difficult to manage. Captivate created more focused content but required investment and produced inaccessible SWF files. 3) They seek input from partners on screencast needs to determine the best approach going forward.