1. An Evolving
Australian Gold
Producer
JUNE 2011
TSX:CRK OTCQX:CROCF
FRANKFURT:XGC

2. Disclaimer
Forward Looking Statements TSX:CRK
This presentation contains forward-looking statements under Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to, statements with respect to the development potential and timetable of the projects; the Company’s ability to raise additional funds as
necessary; the future price of gold; the estimation of mineral resources; conclusions of economic evaluation (including scoping studies); the
realization of mineral resource estimates; the timing and amount of estimated future production, development and exploration; costs of future
activities; capital and operating expenditures; success of exploration activities; mining or processing issues; currency exchange rates; government
regulation of mining operations; and environmental risks. Generally, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”
or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”,
“would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management
as of the date such statements are made. Estimates regarding the anticipated timing, amount and cost of mining at the projects are based on
assumptions underlying mineral resource estimates and the realization of such estimates; results of previous mining activities at the projects, and
detailed research and analysis completed by independent of the Company; research and estimates regarding the timing of delivery for long-lead
items; knowledge regarding the factors consultants and management involved in building a mine and other factors described in the technical
reports and Annual Information Form filed under the profile of the Company on SEDAR. Capital and operating cost estimates are based on results
of previous mining activities, research of the Company and independent consultants, recent estimates of construction and mining costs and other
factors that are set out in the scoping study. Production estimates are based on mine plans and production schedules, which have been developed
by the Company’s personnel and independent consultants. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to risks related to: timing and availability of external financing
on acceptable terms; unexpected events and delays during construction, expansion and start-up; variations in ore grade and recovery rates;
receipt and revocation of government approvals; actual results of exploration and mining activities; changes in project parameters as plans
continue to be refined; future prices of gold; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and other
risks of the mining industry. Although management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated,
estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ
materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The
Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements except in accordance with applicable securities laws.
Investors are advised that National Instrument NI 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators requires that each category of mineral reserves
and mineral resources be reported separately. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Qualified Person
David Keough, MAusIMM of Crocodile Gold Australia Operations is a “qualified person” as such term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 and
has reviewed and confirmed the technical information and data included in this presentation.
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured, Indicated or Inferred Resources
The information presented uses the terms “measured”, “indicated” and “inferred” mineral resources. United States investors are advised that while
such terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize these
terms. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and as to their economic and legal feasibility. It
cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates
of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies. United States investors are cautioned not to assume
that all or any part of measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves. United States investors are also
cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.
2

3. First World Location &
Infrastructure TSX:CRK
3

4. Our Assets
TSX:CRK
Production Development Mills
Howley Trend Cosmo Union Reefs Mill
 open pit mine  underground mine  2.4 mtpy
 initial ore mined 3rd  in operation
North Point Qtr 2011
 open pit mine Tom’s Gully Mill
 oxide, low strip ratio Pine Creek-  240,000 tpy
 dry season operation International  Care and
(May – Nov)  open pit mine maintenance
 Production upon
Princess Louise receipt of permits
 open pit mine
 dry season operation
(May – Nov) Exploration Potential
>2,700 km2
4

5. Investment Advantage
TSX:CRK
 Expanding production profile, decreasing cash costs
 Outstanding potential to discover additional resources
 3.175 million ounces M&I and 2.14 million ounces Inf.
 Infrastructure replacement value = $200M (Adjacent to
major highway and utilities)
 2010 production of 82,000 ounces
 2011 production guidance: 85,000 – 100,000 ounces
5

6. 2011 – Growing Production
Throughout the Year TSX:CRK
2011 Key Catalysts
 Production from Cosmo
 Initial ore expected 3rd Qtr -2011
 Will contribute 50% of ounces at full production (800,000 t.p.a. ore).
 Production from Pine Creek- International, upon receipt of permits
 Aggressive exploration program (Brownfields and Greenfields)
 Increasing % of high grade mill feed throughout the year from Cosmo
2011 Guidance 2011 Production 2011 Major
85,000-100,000 oz Sources Capital
Cash Cost US$875-$975/oz Open Pits: Howley, Investments
Princess Louise, Pine Cosmo underground
Creek/Union Reefs area
Exploration
Underground: Cosmo,
Brocks Creek
6

7. Cosmo/Howley Area
TSX:CRK
7

8. Howley Trend Open Pit Mining
May 2011 TSX:CRK
Mottrams Pit - Looking South Mottrams Pit – Looking West
8
Howley Pit and Ore ROM Pad Mottrams Pit – Looking South

9. Cosmo – East Lode
Expansion Potential TSX:CRK
9

10. Cosmo – West Lode
Expansion Potential TSX:CRK
10

11. Cosmo Development
June 2011 TSX:CRK
Eastern
Lodes First Ore
As Constructed
Design
Western
Lodes
Potential extension
Of Western Lode
11

12. Cosmo – Dewatering
June 2011 TSX:CRK
Future Ventilation
Raise
12

13. Cosmo Underground Equipment
TSX:CRK
13

14. Mining Projects –
Cost Comparison TSX:CRK
 Cosmo development
provides leverage of
additional high-grade ore Open Pit Open Pit Open Pit Open Pit Underground
leading to significantly Example Example Example Example
Burnside Burnside Burnside Pine Creek Cosmo
lower cash costs/oz.
 Cosmo mining costs are Mining Cost per tonne $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $44.00
higher than open pits but Strip Ratio 3.0 3.0 6.5 2.5
the ounces per vertical
meter assist in lower Mining Cost per Tonne Milled $10.00 $10.00 $18.75 $8.75 $44.00
mining costs for Processing Cost
Ore Haulage
$16.00
$8.25
$16.00
$8.25
$16.00
$8.25
$16.00
$2.50
$16.00
$8.50
underground.
Site General & Administration $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50
 Cosmo will eventually
make up 40% of mill feed Total $/Tonne Milled $37.75 $37.75 $46.50 $30.75 $72.00
(50% of ounces) which will
help lower overall costs Ore Grade
Recovery
1.30
90.0%
1.50
90.0%
1.50
93.0%
1.30
80.0%
4.50
92.0%
and improve overall
production. Cost per Ounce $1,003 $870 $1,037 $920 $541
 Open Pits provide good
margin (US$400) to
current gold price.
14

15. Outside Exploration - Cosmo
Conductive/Magnetic Targets Associated
With the Cosmo Trend TSX:CRK
AEM

16. Burnside: Howley Trend
25 Kilometres of Potential TSX:CRK
16

17. Union Reefs/Pine Creek Area
TSX:CRK
17

18. Union Reefs & Pine Creek
Near Term, Low Cost Production TSX:CRK
 New targets adjacent
to Union Reefs Mill
 Potential for near
term, low cost
production
 Currently prioritizing
targets
 Potential production
mid 2011
 Pine Creek Indicated
Resources increased
from 69,600 oz to
288,600 oz
18

19. Union Reefs
TSX:CRK
Historical Production/Intercepts:
Union Reefs = 800,000 oz Au
Pine Creek = 750,000 oz Au
Significant potential to increase existing resources
Union North: Lady Alice:
3m @ 24.56 g/t Au 5m @ 31.97 g/t Au
3m @ 45.10 g/t Au
Prospect Claim:
3m @ 37.50 g/t Au
Crosscourse – “Cosmo” scale target:
11m @ 6.60g/t Au 19m @ 10.62 g/t Au
36m @ 4.10 g/t Au 9m @ 24.40 g/t Au
16m @ 6.00 g/t Au 9m @ 4.00 g/t Au
19

20. Union Reef
Crosscourse Deposit TSX:CRK
1.5 g/t Au 4 g/t Au over 30 metres
Mineralized
Quartz Veins
Crosscourse Pit Mineralization (Photo taken in base of pit at Crosscourse in
2003 looking north. Mineralization is estimated to be around 30m wide at a grade
of 4g/t plunging to the north at around 60o. Red line is showing high grade zone
20
and orange line is lower grade margin (~1.5g/t).)

21. Union Reef Development
Conceptual Cost Profile TSX:CRK
 Using previous operating
data, existing cost regime,
and projected grades, Conceptual Conceptual Conceptual
deposits show excellent Underground Underground Underground Underground
potential to deliver low cost Cosmo Prospect Prospect Crosscourse
ounces to the production
Union Reef Union Reef Union Reef
profile.
 Number 1 Exploration priority
Mining Cost per Tonne Milled $44.00 $80.00 $80.00 $44.00
 High-Grade vein targets
(Prospect & Lady Alice) Processing Cost $16.00 $16.00 $16.00 $16.00
 Bulk-Ore targets Ore Haulage $8.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
(Crosscourse- “Cosmo Site General & Administration $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50
Style”)
 Need to expand resources Total $/Tonne Milled $72.00 $99.50 $99.50 $63.50
and complete detailed mining
studies before deposits can Ore Grade 4.50 6.00 7.50 4.50
be included in any future Recovery 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0%
production forecasts.
 No guarantee that an Cost per Ounce $541 $561 $448 $477
economic resource will be
discovered to justify a
production decision.
21

22. Exploration
TSX:CRK
22

23. Massive Sulfide Deposits
TSX:CRK
MOUNT BONNIE 
Historic Production
10,000t oxide @ 9g/t Au and 250g/t Ag = Au eq
Historic Resource 15.8g
650,000t - 1.7g/t Au, 279g/t Ag  25,000t sulphide (supergene) @ 7g/t Au and
= Au eq 9.3g/t or 194,000oz 360g/t Ag = Au eq 17g
plus 9% Zn, 2% Pb, 0.5% Cu  Total production Au eq = 18,747oz
 Current Inferred Resources
3,175,000t @ 2.1g/t Au, 101g/t Ag, 3.3% Zn,
Oxide Cap previously mined 0.76% Pb, 0.19% Cu
110,000t @ 7g/t Au and 230g/t Ag  Au eq = 4.85g or 495,000oz (only Au and Ag considered)
Au eq = 13.3g/t Au or 47,000oz Au
IRON BLOW
Aeromagnetics- tilt derivative

24. Maud Creek Deposit
TSX:CRK
Resources Mined 173,600t @3.32g/t Au – 18,500oz
Indicated - 9,288,000t @3.1g/t Au for
935,000oz
Inferred - 1,072,000t @2.4g/t Au for
82,000oz using a 1.0g/t Au cut-off
 Indicated Resource -Greater than
4.5g/t Au – 3.1 Mt @ 6.3 g/t for
628,000oz
 Partially refractory – metallurgical
testing indicates 90-95% recovery by
flotation with concentrates grading 6
opt.
 Near the town of Katherine – 8km haul
road to paved highway
 Significant asset to Crocodile Gold
Cross section
 North south trending, good widths,
excellent configuration for underground
mining

25. Regional Exploration Program
(Airborne Geophysics Survey Areas) TSX:CRK
Bons Rush
Mt. Ellison
Woolwonga
Brocks Creek
 3,700 line Km’s Scheduled
for Mid June
Cosmo Mine Mt. Bonnie
 Combined AEM and
magnetometer survey
 Geotech VTEM system- state
of the art
 Includes Moline and Maud
Creek tenements 25

26. Undervalued on Equivalent/oz Au
Comparison TSX:CRK
$400
MFL
EV/oz Au Producer Average
$350 = $US 145/oz
$300 KCN
Crocodile Gold
EV/oz Au (US$/oz)
GAM
$250
HRG = $US 45/oz
TGZ AGI
$200 SMF NGD
P
$150
Average
ORA
EDV
$100 AVMAUQ
JAG ARZ
OGCGSC RSG
CLF
$50 NGX
CRK
RML
$0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000
Source: NBF Total Resources (Koz Au)
Updated on June 15, 2011 26

27. Undervalued on Price to Net
Asset Value Comparison TSX:CRK
2
1.5
1
0.5x
0.5
0
ORA CRK AGI GSC LSG YRI ANO ELD AEM
Source: Raymond James Gold Producers 27
Updated as of June 14, 2011

28. Management & Board
TSX:CRK
Management Board of Directors
Chantal Lavoie, P.Eng. Stan Bharti, P.Eng.
President and Chief Executive Officer Chairman
David Keough George Faught, CA
Chief Operating Officer
Chantal Lavoie, P.Eng.
Steve Woodhead
Chief Financial Officer Mike Hoffman, P.Eng.
Bill Nielsen, P. Geo
Vice President Exploration Bruce Humphrey, P.Eng.
Colinda Parent
Vice President Business Development Peter Tagliamonte, P.Eng.
28

29. Capital Structure
TSX:CRK
Share Structure (at May 31, 2011)
Analyst Coverage
Cormark Securities
TSX:CRK
Fraser Mackenzie
Shares Issued & 309,851,311 Raymond James
Outstanding Union Securities
Warrants 69,499,116 CRK Share Price
Options 18,441,204 $1.80
Fully Diluted 397,791,631 $1.60
$1.40
$1.20
Market Capitalization $239 Million $1.00
$0.80
(approximately, as at May 31, $0.60
2011) $0.40
$0.20
$0.00
29

30. Reserve Summary
December 31, 2010 TSX:CRK
CROCODILE GOLD MINERAL RESERVE STATEMENT -31 December, 2010
PROBABLE MINERAL RESERVE
Cut-off Gold Grade Ounces
Project Deposit Tonnes
(g/t) (g/t) Gold
Burnside Brocks Creek 7.1 34,000 8.6 9,300
Cosmo Deeps 3.1 3,100,000 4.2 420,000
Howley 1.0 340,000 1.6 18,000
North Point* 1.0 55,000 2.3 4,000
Princess Louise 1.0 200,000 1.5 9,700
Mottrams 1.0 980,000 1.2 39,000
Pine Creek Kohinoor 1.0 290,000 1.9 18,000
Cox 1.0 500,000 1.6 26,000
International 1.0 1,300,000 1.5 65,000
Gandys 1.0 480,000 1.7 26,000
South Enterprise 1.0 420,000 2.0 27,000
TOTAL 7,699,000 2.7 662,000
Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability
Gold Price: $US1000/oz
$A:$US 0.91
30

31. Resource Summary
December 31, 2010 TSX:CRK
31 December 2010
M+I Inferred
Tonnes Grade Ounces Tonnes Grade Ounces
Mt Bundy 20,241,000 1.0 664,800 10,513,000 1.0 350,800
Burnside 16,553,330 2.4 1,268,500 18,679,800 2.2 1,323,200
Union Reefs 239,000 2.4 18,200 3,740,000 1.7 204,200
Pine Creek 5,528,000 1.6 288,600 2,347,000 2.4 183,200
Maud Creek 9,288,000 3.1 935,000 1,072,000 2.4 82,000
Total 51,849,330 1.9 3,175,100 36,351,800 1.8 2,143,400
MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT (Other Commodities) - 31 December 2010
INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCE
Grade
Project Deposit Commodity Cut-off Tonnes Contained metal
(ppm)
Lead 1.0g/t Au 3,175,000 7,595 53,163,000 pounds
Iron Blow Zinc 1.0g/t Au 3,175,000 32,823 229,750,000 pounds
Burnside
Silver 1.0g/t Au 3,175,000 101 10,200,000 ounces
ThunderballC Uranium 200ppm 316,800 796 556,000 pounds
Note: C= Crocodile Gold has a 30% free carried interest in this deposit 31

32. Investor Contact Info
TSX:CRK
Chantal Lavoie www.crocgold.com
President and CEO
416-861-2964
clavoie@crocgold.com
Investor Relations
Rob Hopkins
416-861-5899
info@crocgold.com
Union Reefs Mill
A Member of the Forbes & Manhattan Group of Companies 32