A review of recent developments in the use of social media and data-driven voter targeting in the 2016 election cycle. By Cloudburst Media.

1. Data, Digital, & Social:
Trends in 2016 U.S. Elections

2. Recent & Projected Growth, Digital Ad Spend
2

3. Digital Vs. Other Marketing Channels
3
• Overall advertising spend projected to reach $11.4 billion in 2016
cycle, up 20% from 2012 presidential cycle
• Digital will exceed $1.1 billion, up 700% from last presidential
cycle. Still only ~9.6% of total.
• Majority still devoted to TV/radio. Now informed by micro-
targeting. Lesson of the Romney campaign’s waste on CBS.
• 50% of overall spend on presidential race. 50% other races.

4. Data Is Not Just Digital
4
• Data applications not restricted to digital and TV micro-targeting
• Data models applied to myriad campaign functions, including
phone banks, grassroots networks, direct mail, polling, and
deployment of campaign volunteers and employees.
• Digital still small portion of the pie. Telemarketing, neighborhood
signing, and other elements of “the ground game” still receive
larger budgets than digital.

5. Key Beltway Firms
5
• Deep Root Analytics (TV micro-targeting. Bush campaign.)
• Optimus (TV micro-targeting. Rubio campaign.)
• Cambridge Analytica (Psychographic targeting. Cruz campaign.)
• Applecart (Kasich campaign.)
• Targeted Victory (Republican/right-wing.)
• Revolution Messaging (Hired by Sanders campaign.)
• HaystaqDNA (Data analytics. Sanders campaign.)
• Bully Pulpit Interactive, Blue State Digital, 270 Strategies, Smoot Tewes
Group (misc. Democratic firms founded by Obama campaign alumni)

6. Data Collectives
6
• Major advantage for Democrats. Collaborative data co-ops and digital tools
accessible to all candidates.
• Democrats: ActBlue for fundraising. Catalist for data analytics. ActBlue formed as
PAC, not a company. Regarded as an accessible “utility” for all Democrats.
• Democratic NGP VAN. All candidates contribute. Tool is refined and continually used
in elections. One-off Republican tools discarded; not maintained.
• Outside of RNC, Republicans in siloes. i360, Koch brothers data/digital company,
organized as private company. Data Trust shows promise as effort to match
Democratic “utility” structure.

7. Campaigns Vs. PACs
7
• Republicans reliant on super PACs for funding. Democrat fundraising takes
place more at campaign level.
• FCC ruling on lowest unit rate for TV ads benefits candidates that spend
through their campaign funds. Outside groups – like super PACS - pay
market/premium rates. In a crowded market, a super PAC can pay 10x the
price available to campaigns.
• Big advantage in efficiencies for Democrats on broadcast TV.
• Lack of price discrimination makes digital especially attractive to Republican
super PACS.

8. Display: Third-Party Data and DMPs
8
• Voter CRM data can be uploaded into a DMP for activation anywhere a
DSP has reach. Voter data files matched to household IP address info
are translated into registered, voted and undecided audience segments,
which can be targeted on open exchanges or specific sites/apps.
• Third-party data providers have robust data segments on political
audiences, including segments of registered Republicans, Democrats,
independents, and on-the-fence prospective voters.

9. Display: Expanding Audience Pools
9
• Shopper marketing data used by many campaigns. Relationship
between purchase behaviors and political beliefs not new. The
association has been leveraged for targeting since pre-digital direct mail
days and has been refined in many election cycles.
• In current cycle, for example, Sanders supporters twice as likely use
Kayak and fly on Spirit Airlines as Clinton supporters, who are more
likely to use Fitbit or other wearable devices.
• Look-alike modeling based on multiple purchase behaviors also key to
expanding targeting pools.

10. Facebook
10
• Voter file matching
• Political geo-fencing by congressional district and other electoral
boundaries
• Targeting at political influencers “likely to spread political
information”
• Predictive political affinities for users
• + Traditional FB marketing tools (FB pixels; conversion tracking;
demo/language targeting)
• Carson fundraising success
• Cruz’s “full-funnel” strategy in Iowa

11. YouTube
11
• In January 2016, political ads led the charts on YouTube for most
watched for the first time.
• 3 of 10 most watched ads were political.
• Unlike broadcast TV, campaigns not given special dispensation on
YouTube. No federal regulation guarantees a campaign time if other
candidates advertise on it.
• YouTube has been particularly attractive to super PACs this election
cycle due to lack of price discrimination vs. campaigns.
• Reserved inventory in first primary states sells out fast. Only available
inventory possible through non-guaranteed RTB placements.

12. Pandora
12
• “The world of playing the perfect music to people and the world
of playing perfect advertising to them are strikingly similar.”
• Zip code data for all users. Political inclinations (e.g., strong
republican) and Nielsen-like demo segments (e.g., working class
moms; hunting enthusiasts; hybrid car owners).
• Musical preferences as a form of shopper marketing affinity
• Audio channel/interface not optimal for call-to-actions

13. Snapchat
13
• According to one study*, 67% of Snapchat’s millennial users likely to vote in the 2016
election, cf. 61% of millennials overall. Relatively politically engaged for the demo.
There is engagement with political content on the platform – stories on the debates
proved popular.
• Most campaigns have Snapchat accounts - Bush teased his candidacy announcement
on Snapchat - but limited ad spend. Potential, but mostly novelty for this cycle.
• Lack of targeting tools. No voter file data match, unlike Twitter, FB, and IG.
• Only basic metrics - unique views, total views, and completion rates. Geo - only
down to state.
• No clickable call to actions - no ability to drive leads; traffic; collect an email address.
• “You can’t make the argument that you’d buy Snapchat over Facebook, with its
targeting capabilities today, but you could easily make the argument that you should
buy it over ABC prime time”
• Conundrum - platform based on privacy and providing useful data to advertisers
*Global Strategy Group

14. Twitter
14
• Can onboard voter file data
• Can upload CRM data; e.g., donor email addresses

15. Instagram
15
• Sponsored posts with call to action buttons and free, regular posts
• Recent integration (June 2015) of FB targeting tools – including voter file, gender, zip code, interests, relationship
status
• Regular posts not regulated as political advertising

16. Swing Voters
16
• As nominating season ends and Republican vs. Democrat race begins,
focus turns to swing voters in swing states. The undecided 5-10% of
people in Colorado, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia.
• The big targeting test. Two-pronged.
– Ability of campaigns to identify undecided voters
– Ability of platforms to zero in on these undecideds in specific geos
• Every platform needs to answer how they permit campaigns to target
undecideds – the people that are not in the CRM. Addressing the
known base also important but also a solved challenge.

17. Speed Counts
17
• Aside from targeting options and ROI, platforms compete on speed
of voter file matching.
• Some platforms require 1-2 weeks; too slow to keep pace with
election news cycles.

18. Sanders’ Digital Volunteers
18
• Myriad apps and tools: Bernkit.com compendium
• Reddit; Ground Control app; Bernie BNB; Slack; voteforbernie.org.
• Hillary’s cost of hierarchy vs. the efficient crowd
• The limits become manifest in southern states

19. Limitations: Earned vs. Paid
“I’m going to do something really novel. It’s called
advertising.”
-Jeb Bush
October 2015
“I’ve spent no money and I’m No. 1. Other people
have spent tens of millions of dollars and they’re
floundering and doing poorly.”
-Donald Trump
November 2015
19

20. Limitations: Data over “Product”
· “We have a database of approximately 260 million individuals with about 3,000
data points (e.g. hunting interest, magazine subscriptions, online habits, etc.). We
also have more than 30,000 tags built off of previous identification efforts and have
made hundreds of thousands of calls into early state voters.
· This data is being used to provide detailed MicroTargeting profiles of voters in key
primary states. We know exactly which Republicans are the most likely to vote and
what issues matter to them.
· We are running thousands of simulated Election Days using the data we have
collected in order to game out different scenarios and better allocate resources.”
-Bush Campaign Memo
October 2015
20

21. Future
21
• Continued promotion of earned media through paid channels
• Continued maturation of targeting capabilities on existing and new platforms
• Less broadcast TV. Huge spend = TV as medium of mutually assured destruction.
• Development of platform-specific media teams. Buzzfeed model. Instagram lead for Instagram.
• “There’s a very low ROI on the story of being the first campaign to do whatever with X
platform.”
• Candidates themselves shaped by the mediums; e.g., resonant messages for real people; less
reliance on elite donors for setting policy priorities. Communication platforms will change
expectations of candidates.
• Data will remain central to every initiative, not just digital.
• Could AI determine the perfect candidate?

22. Who We Are
21
1. Cloudburst Media leverages relationships
with niche data providers to create custom
audience segments for marketers
2. We activate those audience segments on
public and private ad exchanges, focusing
on our network of 600+ premium
publishers
3. We refine those activations in real-time for
greater insights and improved performance

23. Thank You
1150 Avenue of the Americas, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10036
+1 212 401 1975
info@cloudburstmedia.com