SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 48
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
For Official Use Only 
NASA Institute of Advanced 
Concepts (NIAC) 
Dr. Anthony J. Tether 
DARPA Director
DARPA Organization 
Director, Tony Tether 
Deputy Director, Bob Leheny 
Tactical Technology 
Steve Welby 
Steve Walker 
Air/Space/Land/Sea Platforms 
Unmanned Systems 
Space Operations 
Laser Systems 
Precision Strike 
Information Exploitation 
Bob Tenney 
Sensors 
Exploitation Systems 
Command & Control 
Strategic Technology 
Dave Honey 
Larry Stotts/Brian Pierce 
Space Sensors/Structures 
Strategic & Tactical Networks 
Information Assurance 
Underground Facility Detection 
& Characterization 
Chem/Bio Defense 
Maritime Operations 
Information Processing 
Technology 
Charlie Holland 
Barbara Yoon 
Cognitive Systems 
Computational – Perception 
Representation & Reasoning 
Learning 
Natural Communication 
Microsystems Technology 
John Zolper 
Dean Collins 
Electronics 
Photonics 
MEMS 
Algorithms 
Integrated Microsystems 
Defense Sciences 
Steve Wax 
Brett Giroir 
Physical Sciences 
Materials 
Biology 
Mathematics 
Human Effectiveness 
Bio Warfare Defense 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
Science & Technology $ (FY06) DARPA Role in Science and Technology 
NEAR MID FAR 
10B - 
5B - 
0 - 
Fundamental Research, 
Leading Edge Discovery, 
System Concept Invention 
Science and 
Technology 
Programs for the 
Armed Services 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
DARPA Role in Science and Technology 
NEAR MID FAR 
Science & Technology $ (FY06) 
DARPA 
10B - 
5B - 
0 - 
Fundamental Research, 
Leading Edge Discovery, 
System Concept Invention 
Science and 
Technology 
Programs for the 
Armed Services 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
0.3 
0.2 
0.1 
0 
FY 
94 
FY 
95 
FY 
96 
FY 
97 
FY 
98 
FY 
99 
FY 
00 
FY 
01 
FY 
02 
FY 
03 
FY 
04 
FY 
05 
FY 
06 
FY 
07 
DARPA Basic Research Funding ($B) 
Budget Activity 6.1 (“University” funding) 
Unfettered “university-like” science research without specific applications in mind 
Billions ($) 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
3.5 
3.0 
2.5 
2.0 
1.5 
1.0 
0.5 
0.0 
FY 
94 
FY 
95 
FY 
96 
FY 
97 
FY 
98 
FY 
99 
FY 
00 
FY 
01 
FY 
02 
FY 
03 
FY 
04 
FY 
05 
FY 
06 
FY 
07 
DARPA Budget ($B) 
Fiscal Year 
Billions ($) 
Note: Amounts reflected are appropriated funds 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
DoD S&T Budgets and DARPA Budget ($B) 
Total of all 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3 budget activities 
14.0 
12.0 
10.0 
8.0 
6.0 
4.0 
2.0 
0.0 
FY 
95 
DoD Appropriated 
FY 
96 
FY 
97 
FY 
98 
FY 
99 
FY 
00 
FY 
01 
FY 
02 
FY 
03 
FY 
04 
FY 
05 
FY 
06 
FY 
07 
DARPA’s Budget 
Billions ($) 
DoD PB Request 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
DARPA Accomplishments 
Command Post 
of the Future 
Autonomous 
Ground Vehicles 
SATURN 
Ground 
Surveillance 
Radar 
LSTAT 
ARPANET 
Assault Breaker 
JSTARS 
TALON GOLD 
MIMIC 
Speech 
Recognition 
X-45 
Mobile Robots 
JSF 
Engine 
Phraselator 
SSUUOO SSAASS 
MEMS 
Pegasus Launch 
Vehicle 
Global Hawk 
DARPASAT 
VELA Hotel 
ALTAIR 
Mouse 
ATACMS 
Center for 
Monitoring 
Research 
Stealth 
Fighter 
Sea Shadow 
GPS 
M-16 
Uncooled IR 
Exoskeleton 
1980 
2000 
1960 
1970 
Predator 
BAT 
1990 Advanced 
Cruise Missile 
Taurus 
Launch 
Vehicle 
Transit 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
DARPA’s Strategic Thrusts 
Investments Today for Future Capabilities 
Robust, Secure Self-Forming Networks 
Detection, Precision ID, Tracking & Destruction of Elusive Targets 
Networked Manned & Unmanned Systems 
Urban Area Operations 
Location and Characterization of Underground Structures 
Assured Use of Space 
Cognitive Systems 
Bio-Revolution 
Core Technologies (Materials/Electronics/Information Technology) 
APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 39873 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
References for DARPA Projects 
• Secretary of Defense 
• DoD Quadrennial Defense Review 
• DoD Strategic Planning Guidance 2008 – 2013 
• Combatant Commanders Integrated Priority Lists 
• DoD Joint Program Decision Memorandums 
• Meetings and Briefs throughout DoD 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
Input Sources 2005 – 2006 
DARPA Projects Reviews with Senior Pentagon Leaders, Combatant 
Commanders, Service Chiefs, Agency Directors, Operational Leaders 
• Director, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Dr. James Tegnelia 
• Vice Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Robert E. Willard 
• Director, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, LTG (Ret.) J. Clapper 
• Director, National Security Agency and Chief, Central Security Service, 
Lieutenant General Keith B. Alexander 
• Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Combating WMD & Negotiation 
Policy, Mr. Jack David 
• Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Logistics Material & Readiness, 
Jack Bell 
• Commander, 8th Air Force, Lieutenant General Kevin P. Chilton 
• Deputy Commander, U.S. Strategic Command, Lt Gen C. Robert Kehler 
• Deputy Commander, U.S. Pacific Command, Lt Gen Daniel P. Leaf 
• Deputy Commander, Joint Functional Component Command for 
Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance, U.S. Strategic Command, 
Major General Mark A. Welsh, III 
• Deputy Commander, Information Operations. 8th Air Force, Maj Gen Kozio 
• Director, Global Innovation and Strategy Center, U.S. Strategic Command, 
Dr. Kevin E. Williams 
• Director, Advanced Systems and Technology, National Reconnaissance 
Office, Dr. Pete Rustan 
• Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics 
Claude M. Bolton, Jr. 
• Commander, Air Force Research Lab, Major General Ted Bowlds 
• Deputy Commanding General for Systems of Systems Integration, Army 
Research, Development and Engineering Command, Brigadier General 
Charles A. Cartwright 
• Director, Space Acquisition, Office of the Under Secretary of the Air Force 
Major General Craig R. Cooning 
• Vice Commander, Air Combat Command, Lieutenant General William M. 
Fraser 
• Director of Requirements, Air Combat Command, Major General 
Jack J. Catton, Jr. 
• Director of Plans and Programs, Air Combat Command, Major General 
Timothy C. Jones 
• Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon R. England 
• Secretary of the Army Francis J. Harvey 
• Secretary of the Navy Dr. Donald C. Winter 
• Secretary of the Air Force Michael W. Wynne 
• USD for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Kenneth J. Krieg 
• Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Stephen A. Cambone 
• Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, ADM Edmund P. Giambastiani, Jr. 
• Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Michael G. Mullen 
• Air Force Chief of Staff General John P. Jumper 
• Commandant of the Marine Corps General Michael W. Hagee 
• Commander, U.S. Strategic Command, General James E. Cartwright 
• Commander, U.S. Special Operations Command, GEN Bryan D. Brown 
• Commander, U.S. Pacific Command, Admiral William J. Fallon 
• Commander, U.S. Northern Command, Admiral Timothy Keating 
• Commander, U.S. Joint Forces Command, General Lance L. Smith 
• Commander, U.S. Central Command, General John Abizaid 
• Commander, Air Force Space Command, General Lance Lord 
• Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet, Admiral Gary Roughead 
• Under Secretary of the Air Force Ronald M. Sega 
• Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and 
Acquisition), Dr. Delores M. Etter 
• Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Ryan Henry 
• Director, Defense Research and Engineering, John J. Young, Jr. 
• Commanding General, USMC Combat Development Command, 
Lieutenant General James N. Mattis 
• Commanding General, III Corps and Fort Hood, Lt Gen Thomas F. Metz 
• Commander, Joint Functional Component Command–Integrated Missile 
Defense, Lieutenant General Larry J. Dodgen 
• Director, Defense Info Systems Agency, Lt Gen Charles E. Croom, Jr. 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
Future Icons 
• Networks (Self-forming, Robust, Self-defending) 
• Networked Sensors – Determine, Track, and Neutralize Threat 
• Real Time, Accurate Language Translation (Defense Language Institute, III Æ IV) 
• High-Productivity Computing Systems (HPCS) 
• Air Vehicles (Fast Access, Long Loiter) 
• High Energy Liquid Laser Area Defense System (HELLADS) 
• Low-cost titanium ($2.5/lb military grade alloy) 
• Bio Warfare – Accelerate Development and Production of Therapeutics and Vaccines from 12+ years to 12 
weeks 
• Prosthetics 
• Space dominance 
•Grand Challenge 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
High-Productivity Computing Systems 
High-Productivity Computing is Critical to National 
Security 
• Develop a new generation of economically viable high-productivity computing systems for 
the national security and industrial user community (2009 – 2010) 
Impact: 
• Performance (time-to-solution): speedup critical 
national security applications by a factor of 10X to 40X 
• Programmability (idea-to-first-solution): reduce cost 
and time of developing application solutions 
• Portability (transparency): insulate research and 
operational application software from system 
• Robustness (reliability): apply all known techniques to 
protect against outside attacks, hardware faults, & 
programming errors 
060322_TT_ExDirectors Brief 
HPCS Program Focus Areas 
Fill the Critical DoD Need for: 
Intelligence/surveillance/reconnaissance, cryptanalysis, weapons design and analysis, 
airborne contaminant modeling and biotechnology 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
TTO Taaccttiiccaall Teecchhnnoollooggyy Offffiiccee 
14 
Oblique Flying Wing (OFW) 
Program Plan: 
• Develop conceptual design for 
objective OFW vehicle 
• Define, develop, and mature key 
oblique flying wing technologies 
• Conduct preliminary design of 
X-Plane demonstrator in Phase I 
• Design, build and fly OFW X-Plane 
in Phase II 
Low Speed: Unswept wing reduces 
drag due to lift and provides long 
range and endurance 
Goals: 
• Demonstrate the feasibility of a 
supersonic, tailless, variable 
sweep, oblique flying wing (OFW) 
• Provide increased flexibility for 
potential future missions requiring 
rapid deployment, long range and 
long endurance 
Supersonic: Swept wing reduces 
supersonic wave drag, improving 
supersonic range 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
Al2O3 
TiO2 
Al 
Ti 
What Was New 
TiO2 O2 
Progress 
• Demonstration of 
500ppm O2 from 
electrolytic and 
chemical routes at 
50 lbs/day scale 
Next Step 
• Scale up to 500 
lbs/day of most 
promising process 
Chemical Variation on 
O2 Removal Promises 
<$2.5/pound for Ingot 
Chemical Variation on 
O2 Removal Promises 
<$2.5/pound for Ingot 
APMTIAC Quarterly V6 No2 
Low Cost Titanium 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
DARPA’s Space Accomplishments 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
DARPA Space Projects – Five Areas 
Space Mission 
Protection 
Active and passive 
defense of space assets 
Ground- and space-based 
threats, 
especially μ-sats 
Situational Awareness of Space 
Active and passive sensing of 
space from space or ground 
Access & Infrastructure 
Rapid, flexible 
space access 
Space-Based 
Support to the 
Warfighter 
Support real-time 
tactical warfighting 
from space 
Rapid response 
in denied areas 
Space Mission 
Denial 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
DARPA Organization 
Director, Tony Tether 
Deputy Director, Bob Leheny 
Information Exploitation 
Bob Tenney 
Sensors 
Exploitation Systems 
Command & Control 
Strategic Technology 
Dave Honey 
Larry Stotts/Brian Pierce 
Space Sensors/Structures 
Strategic & Tactical Networks 
Information Assurance 
Underground Facility Detection 
& Characterization 
Chem/Bio Defense 
Maritime Operations 
Information Processing 
Technology 
Charlie Holland 
Barbara Yoon 
Cognitive Systems 
Computational – Perception 
Representation & Reasoning 
Learning 
Natural Communication 
Microsystems Technology 
John Zolper 
Dean Collins 
Electronics 
Photonics 
MEMS 
Algorithms 
Integrated Microsystems 
Defense Sciences 
Steve Wax 
Brett Giroir 
Physical Sciences 
Materials 
Biology 
Mathematics 
Human Effectiveness 
Bio Warfare Defense 
Virtual Space 
Office 
Tactical Technology 
Steve Welby 
Steve Walker 
Air/Space/Land/Sea Platforms 
Unmanned Systems 
Space Operations 
Laser Systems 
Precision Strike 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
Space Programs & Technology 
AAcccceessss aanndd IInnffrraassttrruuccttuurree 
• On demand, cost effective launch, augmentation , and 
replenishment of Space forces 
• More affordable, more responsive, net-centric 
capabilities 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
Low Cost Launch 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
Falcon 
Program Objective 
Develop and validate, in-flight, technologies that will enable a prompt 
global reach capability while at the same time, demonstrating affordable 
and responsive space lift 
Task 1 
Small Launch Vehicle (SLV) 
•Small payloads to LEO 
•Low recurring launch cost (< 
$5M) 
•New launch operations 
•Conduct an early responsive 
operations flight demonstration, 
followed by multiple risk reduction 
launches 
Task 2 
Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle 
(HCV) 
•Aircraft-like operations 
–Launch on-demand 
–Reusable 
–Recallable 
•Conduct an affordable hypersonic 
technology vehicle (HTV) building 
block demonstration to validate 
key HCV technologies 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
Falcon 
Objective:Develop a low-cost, responsive Small Launch 
Vehicle (SLV) 
–Small payloads to LEO – 1000 lb to 28.5°, circular, 100 nmi 
–Low recurring launch cost: < $5M 
–Responsive launch operations 
AirLaunch 
Technical Challenges: 
•Responsive operations 
• Self-pressurization system 
• Air launch dynamics 
•Range integration 
• Balance between reliability and 
cost efficiency 
Operational Impact: 
•Operationally responsive space 
• Low cost access to space 
• Flexible launch and basing 
SpaceX 
Affordable, Responsive, Reliable Space Access 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
Falcon 
Hypersonic Technology Vehicles (HTV’s) 
Demonstrate Key Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle Technologies through 
Hypersonic Technology Vehicles: 
HTV-1 HTV-2 HTV-3 HCV 
HCV Technical Challenges addressed by HTV’s: 
ƒ Aerodynamics 
ƒ High-Temperature Materials & Structures 
ƒ Navigation Guidance and Control 
ƒ Communications through Plasma 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
Metallic/Ceramic 
Acreage TPS Panels 
Coated Ceramic 
Leading Edges 
Fully Integrated 
Inward Turning Inlet 
“Warm” Composite 
Primary Structure 
Osculating Flowfield 
Waverider Shape 
Over-Under Turbine 
Based Combined 
Cycle Flow Path 
H2 Tankage 
58’ Dual Use 
Payload Bay 
HC Tankage 
Ceramic 
Control 
Surfaces 
Dual-Fuel Mn 9.25 Cruise 
Vision Vehicle 
Falcon 
HCV Technologies 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
HTV-2 Flight Test 
Boost Phase 
Hypersonic 
Glide 
Terminal 
Point 
Pull-up 
Flight Test Objectives: 
• Aero/thermal/flight dynamic 
performance 
– Verify aerodynamic coefficients 
and stability characteristics 
– Assess thermal response and 
thermal management 
techniques 
– Determine plasma attenuation 
effects 
• NG&C performance 
– Determine flight path precision 
– Verify control characteristics 
– Validate robustness of guidance 
algorithms 
– Assess INS/GPS navigation 
methodology and hardware 
Vandenberg Launch 
HTV-2A 
HTV-2B 
Kwajalein Impact Point 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
Orbital Express (OE) Accomplishments 
ASTRO and NextSat 
ASTRO Spacecraft NextSat Spacecraft 
Task FY02 
Q2 
FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 
SRR PDR CDR 
Program Management 
ASTRO Spacecraft 
Fluid Transfer System 
NEXTSat Spacecraft 
Robotic Arm 
Rendezvous Sensors 
System Integration 
and Test 
Launch Demo 
Complete 
Ship Bus 
to NGST 
Arm 
Assembly 
Complete 
Ship Arm 
to Boeing 
CDR 
Ship NextSat to 
Launch Site 
Integrated 
System Test 
Launch 
Ship Bus to 
NGST 
CDR 
CDR 
Receive 
FTAPS from 
NGST 
Receive FTS 
from NGST 
Receive 
Coupler from 
NGST 
Ship Sensor 
Suite to Boeing 
Ship ASTRO to 
Launch Site 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
Future, Fast, Flexible, Fractionated, Free-Flying 
Spacecraft united by Information eXchange (F6) 
• Fractionate a monolithic satellite 
into heterogeneous microsat-like 
modules 
• Microsatellite modules 
– Power 
– Telemetry & Comms 
– Computation & Data Handling 
– Demonstration Payload 
– Residual capability for Stakeholder 
Payload 
• Intra-module connectivity 
– Wireless (or over power) data 
• Inter-module connectivity 
– Wireless data 
– Wireless power to payloads System F6 Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
Motivation: Mission Benefits 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
Space Programs & Technology 
Sppaaccee Siittuuaattiioonnaall Awaarreenneessss 
• Monitoring and analysis of the Space 
environment 
• Monitoring the status of friendly, neutral, and 
adversary Space assets 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
Radiation Hardening By Design (RHBD) 
Design Fabs 
(Specialized) Rad Hard ICs 
• Use specialized processes 
• Requires dedicated foundries 
• Niche market – falling farther 
behind SOA (Currently 3-5 years) 
• DoD pays $500M every 2 years to 
maintain 
Design Fabs 
(Merchant) Rad Hard ICs 
Today: 
Futturre: 
• Design in radiation tolerance, 
e.g. by exploiting thinner 
device layers (less charge 
build up) and new isolation 
methods 
• Build devices in merchant 
foundries 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
Radiation Hard by Design (RHBD) Design 
Hardening Concepts 
•No special manufacturing 
processes 
•Prudent transistor design 
(i.e. annular, “dog-bone”, all-around) 
• Circuit design & layout 
•Substrate & dynamic biasing 
Standard Edged 
Drain 
Gate 
Annular Transistor 
Polysilicon 
Gate 
Primary Electron 
Current Flow 
Goal: Build leading-edge RH electronics at commercial State of the Art 
foundries 
source 
gate 
drain 
Transistor 
Source 
n+ Source 
n+ Drain 
Field 
Oxide 
Edge Current 
Components 
Field 
Inversion 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
HAARP 
High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project 
Program Objective: 
• A high power, high frequency transmitter 
for interactive ionospheric research 
Potential Applications: 
Submarine communications, imaging of deeply 
buried targets, radio wave propagation 
channels in the upper atmosphere 
HAARP site 
in Alaska 
Technical Challenges: 
• 3600 kW radiated power 
• 20 –31 dB antenna gain 
• Power Density: 
– 3.2 mW/m2 (@ 100 km, 3 MHz) 
– 4.0 mW/m2 (@ 250 km, 9 MHz) 
HAARP antenna array 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
HAARP IInssttrrumeentt Coomplleettiioon 
Ionospheric 
Currents 
100 km 
60 km 
ELF / VLF 
Radio Waves 
Control of Charged Particle 
Effects on Satellite Operations 
HAARP HF 
Transmitter 
Submarine Comm Imaging Buried Targets 
Buried Receiver Comm 
ELF / VLF 
Radio Waves 
ELF / VLF 
Radio Waves 
Description: 
• Increase HAARP effective radiated power by 
factor of 16 (Tx power from 960 kW to 3600 
kW; from 6X8 antenna elements (~5 acres) to 
12X15 (~22 acres) 
• Increase frequency coverage from 2.8-8 MHz 
to 2.8-10 MHz 
Objectives: 
• Demonstrate control of ionospheric charged 
particle behavior and 
subterranean/submarine signal penetration 
Status and Accomplishments 
• Antenna array size increase completed; all elements and 
ground plane frozen in place 
• Transmitter modules successfully put into serial production 
and test 
• Power plant increased to full capacity, Diesel prime movers 
improved as to emissions 
• Diagnostic instruments/radars expanded to match HAARP 
capabilities 
• Aircraft intrusion warning system being upgraded to meet FAA 
needs for safety 
Schedule 
Antenna 
completion 
Transmitters 
completed 
Power plant 
upgraded 
Utility 
Demonstrated 
FY03-05 FY06 FY07 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
Space Programs & Technology 
Sppaaccee--Baasseedd Suuppppoorrtt ttoo tthhee Waarrffiigghhtteerr 
• Small, innovative, responsive, agile, dedicated Space systems 
• Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
ISAT Demonstration Program 
Mature Key ISAT Technologies 
• Reliable deployment of huge 
space antennas 
• Real time metrology and 
calibration <1mm 
On Orbit Demonstration 
• Launch, deploy and control a 
large (~100m) space structure 
• Characterize structural modes 
• Demonstrate metrology, 
calibration techniques and 
transmit beam formation 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
Rigidizeable 
Inflatable 
Materials 
040519_MZ_DIRO Review 
ISAT Enabling Technologies 
>100:1 Linear Compaction Ratio 
Reliable Deployment 
Metrology <λ/20 error 
Optical Metrology RF Metrology 
On-board 
Beacon(s) 
(Optional) 
Star 
Tracker(s) 
Axis Coherent 
Ground 
Beacon(s) 
Antenna 
Orientation 
Calibration Coherent Transmit Beam 
Deployment Cage Kinematic Models Array Fed Reflector ESA 
Master 
Fiduciary/Elements 
Signal 
Integral 
Hinge 
Staggered 
Longerons 
55 
50 
45 
40 
35 
30 
25 
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 
degs 
dB 
55 
50 
45 
40 
35 
30 
25 
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 
degs 
dB 
ideal 
uncompensated 
compensated 
ideal 
uncompensated 
compensated 
Teepee Motion 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
Global Continuous Surface Target Tracking 
Strategic Space Based Engagement 
Mission: GMTI Surveillance “JSTARS Like” 
Required Technical Performance: 
Tactical Targeting 
“Better Than E-10” 
Tactical Surveillance 
Indications and Warning 
(large scale movement) 
Fast Movers (>4 m/s) 
• Minimum Detectable Velocity (MDV) < 4 m/s Slow Movers (<< 4 m/s) 
• Cross-Range Accuracy Poor Accuracy Good Accuracy Better Accuracy 
Low Revisit, Significant Gaps 
Good Revisit, High Revisit, “No Gaps” 
• Track Continuity Significant Gaps 
Precision, Single Target 
Tracking 
Grouped Target 
Movement 
Functional Capability Desired: 
IISSAATT 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
Integrated Sensor Is Structure (ISIS) 
Capability cannot be added 
to airship after development 
Lockheed-Martin Proprietary 
MDA Airship 
Conventional 
Airship 
Payload bay 
ISIS requires integration of 
sensor and airship 
Payload: 1.7% of system mass Payload: 30-40% of system mass 
Truly persistent detection, tracking, and fire-control for: 
- Low fliers at 600km (eg. anti-ship/cruise missiles, & aircraft) 
- Surface targets at 300km (eg. littoral small boats, ground vehicles, & dismounts) 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
Most Powerful Airborne 
GMTI/AMTI Radar & Comms Ever Conceived 
Simultaneous AMTI/GMTI Operation Via Dual Band (UHF/X-Band) Aperture 
AMTI Fire Control 
Wideband Covert UAV Downlink 
T3 (45 Mbps) real-time video @ 
600km 
Wide Area GMTI FOPEN Detection 
Targets @ 300 km 
No In-Theater Ground Support – 99% on station availability for 1+ years 
600km radar horizon at 70kft operational altitude 
<10m3 CEP @ 600km 
Wide Area GMTI Search-while-Track 
Slow targets out to 300km 
Detect and track Dismounted troops 
Wideband T3 Handset 
Communications 
T3 (45 Mbps) handsets @ 
300km line-of-sight 
High Capacity AMTI Track 
1000 Targets @ 600km 
Precision Engagement Tracking 
5000+ targets @ 300 km range 
<<100m resolution 
Direct-to-User Data Flow 
Wide Area AMTI Search 
Targets @ 600 km 
Long-Range LPD Communications 
Building/foliage penetration (low-band) 
2.5kbps voice channel with watch 
battery @ 600km 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
$2 million cash 
prize 
8 October 2005 
The best 
autonomous 
robotic vehicles 
America can 
build 
Miles of some of 
the toughest 
terrain in the 
Winner takes all 
world 
2005 Grand Challenge 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
195 Applicants 
February 2005 
Calculated RISC 
Fitchburg, WI 
Team TerraMax 
Oshkosh, WI 
Team Go It Alone 
Team Visionary Endeavor 
Appleton, WI 
Dakota Robotics 
Fargo, ND 
Team Arctic Tortoise 
Fairbanks, AK 
Mojávaton 
Grand Junction, CO 
Rob Meyer Productions 
Autonomx 
Tucson, AZ 
A.I. Motorvators 
Axion Racing 
The Golem Group/ UCLA 
Team SARA 
Go Baja 
Team Riàdeil 
Out-of-Knowhere 
Team Symcas 
Team AION 
Thortech 
Team Mark Antonelli 
Palos Verdes HS Road 
Warriors 
Team OCCAM 
Team RoboShack 
Unmanned Vehicles 
International 
Cobalt Horizons 
CyberRider 
SciAutonics/Auburn 
Engineering 
Team Caltech 
TeamDesignatedDriver 
Rogue 
COGNAV 
LIPS_MALIBU 
Team Auto-Triad 
S 
Team Robot Monster 
Team Improbability 
Team Banzai 
Alphalogix Alphaworks 
Null Set 
the Simf enterprise 
UCLA/HUJ 
Team Tormenta 
UCI DARPA Grand 
Challenge Team 
Team Philo 
Servic Machines 
Team Alice 
Hollyware Optical 
Technology v1 
Los Angeles Area, CA 
University of Washington 
Seattle, WA 
Oregon WAVE 
Corvallis, OR 
AVEngineers 
Arcadia, CA 
sapper 
Paradise, CA 
Junk yard dogs 
Salinas, CA 
Two Much Trouble 
(T.M.T.) 
North Berwick, ME 
IQ (Intelligent Quad) 
Indy Robot Racing Team 
Cakewalk 
Indianapolis, IN 
Team ET 
Kokomo, IN 
Robotic Navigation 
Greenwood, IN 
The Challengers 
Rising Sun, IN 
BJB Engineering 
Willoughby Hills, OH 
Team Jefferson 
Crozet, VA 
Team CART 
Bluefield, WV 
Team Greene 
Milton, WV 
COPERNICUS 
Larchmont, NY 
Team Cornell II 
Team Cornell 
Ithaca, NY 
Atlas Offroad 
New Haven, CT 
Highlander Racing 
Monroe, NJ 
Princeton University 
Princeton, NJ 
AutoTrek 
Moorestown, NJ 
Desert Arrow 
Manassas, VA 
The MITRE Meteorites 
McLean, VA 
Hepner Robotics 
Edinburg, VA 
McNeelly 
Port Saint Lucie, FL 
Desert Buckeyes 
Columbus, OH 
Cjase 
Bearcats 
Cincinnati, OH 
Team Wedge 
Wooster, OH 
Team Robo Knight 
South Lebanon, OH 
Team CajunBot 
Lafayette, LA 
Gray Team 
Metairie 
Green Wave 
New Orleans, LA 
Team Geochelone 
New york, NY 
Autonomous 
Ingenuity 
Rochester, NY 
Team Ruamyarti 
Queens Village, NY 
Team LoGHIQ 
Walden, NY 
T3SEA 
Cortland, NY 
G-CART@RIT 
Rochester, NY 
Team Buffalo 
Lockport, NY 
GRASP Laboratory, 
University of 
Pennsylvania 
Philadelphia, PA 
Red Team 
Red Team Too 
Pittsburgh, PA 
Team George 
Knoxville, TN 
Spurrier’s Hurriers 
Mary Esther, FL 
Planet Explorer 
Renton, WA 
Team Sleipner 
Sequim, WA 
The Prodigies 
Olympia, WA 
Vista Engineering 
Carson, WA 
Allied Forces 
Issaquah, WA 
Cyber Nav 
Bothell, WA 
Roboway 
Mercer Isalnd, WA 
Day Star 
Mc Caysville, GA 
Team ZingerBot 
Colorado Springs, CO 
Team White Cougar 
the Las Vegas Gamblers 
Las Vegas, NV 
Intelligent Vehicle Safety 
Technologies II 
Apple Valley, MN 
Team Wellington 
Danville, IL 
Team Levin 
Highland Park, IL 
Team Fast Forward 
Chicago, IL 
Team MTR 
Libertyville, IL 
Team Excelsior 
Severna Park, MD 
oxOxo 
Annapolis, MD 
Omnitech 
Queenstown, MD 
Virginia Tech 
Virginia Tech Team 
Rocky 
Blacksburg, VA 
Team ENSCO 
Springfield, VA 
Intelligent Vehicle 
Safety Technologies I 
Littleton, CO 
Utah Robotics 
Kaysville, UT 
BR Mobility 
Murray, UT 
Team Juggarnaut 
Sandy, UT 
FutureNowa 
Provo, UT 
The A Team 
Kingman, AZ 
Intelligent Machines 
K1 
Phoenix, AZ 
Team Manticore - MIT 
Cambridge, MA 
Austin Robot Technology 
Austin, TX 
Mobile Autonomous robotics 
Society 
San Antonio, TX 
MonsterMoto 
Cedar Park, TX 
Armadillo-Bot 
Bryan, TX 
Pegasus 
College Station 
New Team (160) 
2004 applicant (35) CIMAR 
Gainesville, FL 
Team UCF 
Orlando, FL 
RAV LLC 
Oviedo, FL 
Inginouity 
Kansas City, MO 
Team Phantasm 
Ballwin, MO 
Spirit of St. Louis 
Fenton, MO 
Smooth Operator 
Cape Girardeau, MO 
Relentless 
Winchester, MA 
AppIntellect 
Bellingham, MA 
Team UMass Dartmouth 
Dartmouth, Ma 
Stockbrige High School 
Stockbridge, GA 
Newbies 
Fort Gordon, GA 
Team GA 
Lyons, GA 
Patriot Robotics 
Taylor, TX 
Texas DARPA Challenge 
Conroe, TX 
Team Grand Challenger 
Rabid Ape Robotics 
Houston, TX 
Team Simple Genius 
Humble, TX 
AV Andrea Morgan 
AV Sydney Bristow 
AV Wendy Darling 
Traverse City, MI 
Sakoryat 
Oak Park, MI 
Team CrossLand 
Haslett, MI 
Insight Racing 
Cary, NC 
195 teams from 36 states 
Team 2015 
Jacksonville, FL 
Rust Bucket Racing 
Temple Terrace, FL 
TEAM LONG SHOT 
St. Petersburg, FL 
Not Shown: Autonosys, West Coast Robotics and UBC-CERM3 
Team Thunderbird – Canada, 
Grand Challenge New Zealand, Dotmobil Team –France, 
OK Rover 
Broken Arrow, OK 
TeamNOVA 
Chickasha, OK 
Team Nomad 
Ridgecrest, CA 
Autobots 
Lincoln, NE 
Team-Possible 
Seymour, TN 
Team UTC 
Chattanooga, TN 
Intrepid 
Birminigham, AL 
Trobo 
Petal, MS 
Lunatic Fringe 
Sunnyvale, CA 
Team Overbot 
Redwood City, CA 
True Vision 
Atascadero, CA 
“R” Junk Works 
Lancaster, CA 
KNetX 
Quartz Hill, CA 
Herbie Goes! 
Escondido, CA 
GP Machine Intelligence 
San Marcos, CA 
Team Underdawg 
San Jose, CA 
Autonomous Vehicle 
Systems 
Simple Solutions Inclusive 
TouchTech 
San Diego, CA 
Easy Does It 
Ventura, CA 
Mojave Lions 
Cerritos, CA 
Terra Engineering 
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 
I to the Future 
StoneWalker 
Albuquerque, NM 
Team Texas Tech 
Lubbock, TX 
Blue Team 
Berkeley, CA 
Standford Racing 
Team 
Stanford, CA 
Team Aggie Spirit 
(UC Davis) 
Davis, CA 
Team Cal Poly 
Ben Lomond, CA 
Team DAD 
Morgan Hill, CA 
D2 
Honolulu, HI 
3 High Schools / 35 Universities 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
Finalists 
Axion Racing 
SciAutonics/Auburn 
Engineering 
Team Caltech 
The Golem Group/ 
UCLA 
Los Angeles Area, CA 
Red Team 
Red Team Too 
Pittsburgh, PA 
Team Cornell 
Ithaca, NY 
Intelligent Vehicle 
Safety Technologies I 
Littleton, CO 
Team ENSCO 
Springfield, VA 
MonsterMoto 
Cedar Park, TX 
CIMAR 
Gainesville, FL 
Team TerraMax 
Oshkosh, WI 
Desert Buckeyes 
Columbus, OH 
Insight Racing 
Cary, NC 
23 teams from 13 states 
The MITRE Meteorites 
McLean, VA 
Team DAD 
Morgan Hill, CA 
Mojávaton 
Grand Junction, CO 
Blacksburg, VA 
Team CajunBot 
Lafayette, LA 
Stanford Racing Team 
Stanford, CA 
Virginia Tech 
Team Rocky 
Virginia Tech 
Blacksburg, VA 
Princeton University 
Princeton, NJ 
2004 Grand Challenge Team - 14 
2005 Grand Challenge New Entry - 9 
Gray Team 
Metairie, LA 
Universities 
Carnegie Mellon (2) 
Auburn University 
CalTech 
Stanford 
University of Louisiana 
Ohio State 
Virginia Tech (2) 
Cornell 
University of Florida 
Princeton 
Tulane University 
UCLA 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
The Course 
Narrow Underpass 
Lake Beds 
Rough Roads 
Long Tunnels 
Narrow Gates 
Start/Finish 
132 mi 
Close Obstacles 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
Beer Bottle Pass – Mile 123 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
Grand Challenge Finishers 
CMU – Highlander 
7h 14m – 18.25 mph 
CMU – Sandstorm 
7h 4m – 18.7 mph 
Stanford - Stanley 
6h 53m – 19.2 mph 
Gray Team 
7h 30m – 17.6 mph Oshkosh –Terramax 
12h 51m – 10.3 mph 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited) Overnight Operations
Urban Challenge 
Autonomous Ground Vehicles in the City 
Travel 60 miles 
in traffic in 
under 6 hrs. 
• Safe following and passage of a moving vehicle 
• Safe merge with other moving traffic 
• Safe passage through busy intersections 
• Parking in congested areas. Safe U-Turn 
• Figure out an alternate route when the primary route is impassable 
November 3, 2007 
Western U.S. 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
For Official Use Only 
Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Evolution of the indian space age
Evolution of the indian space ageEvolution of the indian space age
Evolution of the indian space age
Dr. Pranabjyoti Das
 
Mechanical Aspects in Stealth Technology
Mechanical Aspects in Stealth TechnologyMechanical Aspects in Stealth Technology
Mechanical Aspects in Stealth Technology
BipinKumarJha1
 
Drdo ballistic missile defence system, india
Drdo ballistic missile defence system, indiaDrdo ballistic missile defence system, india
Drdo ballistic missile defence system, india
hindujudaic
 
Bayraktar mini unmanned aerial vehicle, turkey
Bayraktar mini unmanned aerial vehicle, turkeyBayraktar mini unmanned aerial vehicle, turkey
Bayraktar mini unmanned aerial vehicle, turkey
hindujudaic
 
Analysis for Radar and Electronic Warfare
Analysis for Radar and Electronic WarfareAnalysis for Radar and Electronic Warfare
Analysis for Radar and Electronic Warfare
Reza Taryghat
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

ACHIEVEMENTS OF ISRO
ACHIEVEMENTS OF ISROACHIEVEMENTS OF ISRO
ACHIEVEMENTS OF ISRO
 
Launching vehicles
Launching vehiclesLaunching vehicles
Launching vehicles
 
Evolution of the indian space age
Evolution of the indian space ageEvolution of the indian space age
Evolution of the indian space age
 
Mechanical Aspects in Stealth Technology
Mechanical Aspects in Stealth TechnologyMechanical Aspects in Stealth Technology
Mechanical Aspects in Stealth Technology
 
Indian space launch vehicle
Indian space launch vehicleIndian space launch vehicle
Indian space launch vehicle
 
Fundamentals Of Rockets & Missiles
Fundamentals Of Rockets & MissilesFundamentals Of Rockets & Missiles
Fundamentals Of Rockets & Missiles
 
Planet: Imaging Earth Every Day
Planet: Imaging Earth Every DayPlanet: Imaging Earth Every Day
Planet: Imaging Earth Every Day
 
Drdo ballistic missile defence system, india
Drdo ballistic missile defence system, indiaDrdo ballistic missile defence system, india
Drdo ballistic missile defence system, india
 
ISRO
ISROISRO
ISRO
 
D.R.D.O
D.R.D.OD.R.D.O
D.R.D.O
 
Seminar on solar sail
Seminar on solar sailSeminar on solar sail
Seminar on solar sail
 
Bayraktar mini unmanned aerial vehicle, turkey
Bayraktar mini unmanned aerial vehicle, turkeyBayraktar mini unmanned aerial vehicle, turkey
Bayraktar mini unmanned aerial vehicle, turkey
 
Missile Technology
Missile TechnologyMissile Technology
Missile Technology
 
International Goals in Space, Indian Space Program
International Goals in Space, Indian Space ProgramInternational Goals in Space, Indian Space Program
International Goals in Space, Indian Space Program
 
Radio direction finder
Radio direction finderRadio direction finder
Radio direction finder
 
Small Satellite ppt by Ashish Kr. Singh
Small Satellite ppt by Ashish Kr. SinghSmall Satellite ppt by Ashish Kr. Singh
Small Satellite ppt by Ashish Kr. Singh
 
Chandrayaan I
Chandrayaan IChandrayaan I
Chandrayaan I
 
Analysis for Radar and Electronic Warfare
Analysis for Radar and Electronic WarfareAnalysis for Radar and Electronic Warfare
Analysis for Radar and Electronic Warfare
 
Curiosity (Mars Rover)
Curiosity (Mars Rover)Curiosity (Mars Rover)
Curiosity (Mars Rover)
 
ISRO
ISROISRO
ISRO
 

Ähnlich wie Tether anthony[1]

Esterly_Air_Space_Cyber_Ops
Esterly_Air_Space_Cyber_OpsEsterly_Air_Space_Cyber_Ops
Esterly_Air_Space_Cyber_Ops
Leonard Esterly
 
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CASE S
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM  SYSTEMS ENGINEERING  CASE SGLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM  SYSTEMS ENGINEERING  CASE S
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CASE S
MatthewTennant613
 
Introduction to Data Management
Introduction to Data ManagementIntroduction to Data Management
Introduction to Data Management
cunera
 

Ähnlich wie Tether anthony[1] (20)

DARPA Huntsville Space Club June 2014
DARPA Huntsville Space Club June 2014 DARPA Huntsville Space Club June 2014
DARPA Huntsville Space Club June 2014
 
SMi Group's 2nd annual MilSatCom USA 2017 conference
SMi Group's 2nd annual MilSatCom USA 2017 conferenceSMi Group's 2nd annual MilSatCom USA 2017 conference
SMi Group's 2nd annual MilSatCom USA 2017 conference
 
MilSatCom USA 2017
MilSatCom USA 2017MilSatCom USA 2017
MilSatCom USA 2017
 
Esterly resume 2013
Esterly resume 2013Esterly resume 2013
Esterly resume 2013
 
SMi Group's 3rd annual ISR conference
SMi Group's 3rd annual ISR conferenceSMi Group's 3rd annual ISR conference
SMi Group's 3rd annual ISR conference
 
Esterly Resume Mar 2012
Esterly Resume Mar 2012Esterly Resume Mar 2012
Esterly Resume Mar 2012
 
Esterly_Air_Space_Cyber_Ops
Esterly_Air_Space_Cyber_OpsEsterly_Air_Space_Cyber_Ops
Esterly_Air_Space_Cyber_Ops
 
Esterly Resume Mar 2012
Esterly Resume Mar 2012Esterly Resume Mar 2012
Esterly Resume Mar 2012
 
SMi Group's MilSatCom USA 2017
SMi Group's MilSatCom USA 2017SMi Group's MilSatCom USA 2017
SMi Group's MilSatCom USA 2017
 
Lecture 6- Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Unmanned Syst...
Lecture 6- Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Unmanned Syst...Lecture 6- Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Unmanned Syst...
Lecture 6- Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Unmanned Syst...
 
Lecture 6 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Autonomy and...
Lecture 6 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Autonomy and...Lecture 6 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Autonomy and...
Lecture 6 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Autonomy and...
 
Jwcv Jbci 2 P System Tech
Jwcv Jbci 2 P System TechJwcv Jbci 2 P System Tech
Jwcv Jbci 2 P System Tech
 
IntegratedAirMissileDefense18[593665]
IntegratedAirMissileDefense18[593665]IntegratedAirMissileDefense18[593665]
IntegratedAirMissileDefense18[593665]
 
SMi Group's 4th annual ISR 2015 conference
SMi Group's 4th annual ISR 2015 conferenceSMi Group's 4th annual ISR 2015 conference
SMi Group's 4th annual ISR 2015 conference
 
SMi Group's Future Soldier Technology USA 2020 conference
SMi Group's  Future Soldier Technology USA 2020 conferenceSMi Group's  Future Soldier Technology USA 2020 conference
SMi Group's Future Soldier Technology USA 2020 conference
 
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CASE S
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM  SYSTEMS ENGINEERING  CASE SGLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM  SYSTEMS ENGINEERING  CASE S
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CASE S
 
Viewgraphs
ViewgraphsViewgraphs
Viewgraphs
 
Introduction to Data Management
Introduction to Data ManagementIntroduction to Data Management
Introduction to Data Management
 
SMi Group's 15th annual Global MilSatCom 2013 conference & exhibition
SMi Group's 15th annual Global MilSatCom 2013 conference & exhibitionSMi Group's 15th annual Global MilSatCom 2013 conference & exhibition
SMi Group's 15th annual Global MilSatCom 2013 conference & exhibition
 
Airborne ISR & C2 Battle Management USA 2014
Airborne ISR & C2 Battle Management USA 2014Airborne ISR & C2 Battle Management USA 2014
Airborne ISR & C2 Battle Management USA 2014
 

Mehr von Clifford Stone (20)

Zubrin nov99
Zubrin nov99Zubrin nov99
Zubrin nov99
 
Xray telescopeconcept
Xray telescopeconceptXray telescopeconcept
Xray telescopeconcept
 
Xray interferometry
Xray interferometryXray interferometry
Xray interferometry
 
Wpafb blue bookdocuments
Wpafb blue bookdocumentsWpafb blue bookdocuments
Wpafb blue bookdocuments
 
What gov knows_about_ufos
What gov knows_about_ufosWhat gov knows_about_ufos
What gov knows_about_ufos
 
Welcome oct02
Welcome oct02Welcome oct02
Welcome oct02
 
Weather jun02
Weather jun02Weather jun02
Weather jun02
 
Wassersug richard[1]
Wassersug richard[1]Wassersug richard[1]
Wassersug richard[1]
 
Washington, d.c., jul 26 27, 1952
Washington, d.c., jul 26 27, 1952Washington, d.c., jul 26 27, 1952
Washington, d.c., jul 26 27, 1952
 
Wash dc jul 19 to 20 1952
Wash dc jul 19 to 20 1952Wash dc jul 19 to 20 1952
Wash dc jul 19 to 20 1952
 
Vol4ch03
Vol4ch03Vol4ch03
Vol4ch03
 
Vol4ch02
Vol4ch02Vol4ch02
Vol4ch02
 
Vol4ch01
Vol4ch01Vol4ch01
Vol4ch01
 
Vol3ch16
Vol3ch16Vol3ch16
Vol3ch16
 
Vol3ch14
Vol3ch14Vol3ch14
Vol3ch14
 
Vol3ch13
Vol3ch13Vol3ch13
Vol3ch13
 
Vol3ch12
Vol3ch12Vol3ch12
Vol3ch12
 
Vol3ch11
Vol3ch11Vol3ch11
Vol3ch11
 
Vol3ch10
Vol3ch10Vol3ch10
Vol3ch10
 
Vol3ch09
Vol3ch09Vol3ch09
Vol3ch09
 

Tether anthony[1]

  • 1. For Official Use Only NASA Institute of Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Dr. Anthony J. Tether DARPA Director
  • 2. DARPA Organization Director, Tony Tether Deputy Director, Bob Leheny Tactical Technology Steve Welby Steve Walker Air/Space/Land/Sea Platforms Unmanned Systems Space Operations Laser Systems Precision Strike Information Exploitation Bob Tenney Sensors Exploitation Systems Command & Control Strategic Technology Dave Honey Larry Stotts/Brian Pierce Space Sensors/Structures Strategic & Tactical Networks Information Assurance Underground Facility Detection & Characterization Chem/Bio Defense Maritime Operations Information Processing Technology Charlie Holland Barbara Yoon Cognitive Systems Computational – Perception Representation & Reasoning Learning Natural Communication Microsystems Technology John Zolper Dean Collins Electronics Photonics MEMS Algorithms Integrated Microsystems Defense Sciences Steve Wax Brett Giroir Physical Sciences Materials Biology Mathematics Human Effectiveness Bio Warfare Defense Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 3. Science & Technology $ (FY06) DARPA Role in Science and Technology NEAR MID FAR 10B - 5B - 0 - Fundamental Research, Leading Edge Discovery, System Concept Invention Science and Technology Programs for the Armed Services Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 4. DARPA Role in Science and Technology NEAR MID FAR Science & Technology $ (FY06) DARPA 10B - 5B - 0 - Fundamental Research, Leading Edge Discovery, System Concept Invention Science and Technology Programs for the Armed Services Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 5. 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 DARPA Basic Research Funding ($B) Budget Activity 6.1 (“University” funding) Unfettered “university-like” science research without specific applications in mind Billions ($) Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 6. 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 DARPA Budget ($B) Fiscal Year Billions ($) Note: Amounts reflected are appropriated funds Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 7. DoD S&T Budgets and DARPA Budget ($B) Total of all 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3 budget activities 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 FY 95 DoD Appropriated FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 DARPA’s Budget Billions ($) DoD PB Request Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 8. DARPA Accomplishments Command Post of the Future Autonomous Ground Vehicles SATURN Ground Surveillance Radar LSTAT ARPANET Assault Breaker JSTARS TALON GOLD MIMIC Speech Recognition X-45 Mobile Robots JSF Engine Phraselator SSUUOO SSAASS MEMS Pegasus Launch Vehicle Global Hawk DARPASAT VELA Hotel ALTAIR Mouse ATACMS Center for Monitoring Research Stealth Fighter Sea Shadow GPS M-16 Uncooled IR Exoskeleton 1980 2000 1960 1970 Predator BAT 1990 Advanced Cruise Missile Taurus Launch Vehicle Transit Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 9. DARPA’s Strategic Thrusts Investments Today for Future Capabilities Robust, Secure Self-Forming Networks Detection, Precision ID, Tracking & Destruction of Elusive Targets Networked Manned & Unmanned Systems Urban Area Operations Location and Characterization of Underground Structures Assured Use of Space Cognitive Systems Bio-Revolution Core Technologies (Materials/Electronics/Information Technology) APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 39873 Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 10. References for DARPA Projects • Secretary of Defense • DoD Quadrennial Defense Review • DoD Strategic Planning Guidance 2008 – 2013 • Combatant Commanders Integrated Priority Lists • DoD Joint Program Decision Memorandums • Meetings and Briefs throughout DoD Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 11. Input Sources 2005 – 2006 DARPA Projects Reviews with Senior Pentagon Leaders, Combatant Commanders, Service Chiefs, Agency Directors, Operational Leaders • Director, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Dr. James Tegnelia • Vice Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Robert E. Willard • Director, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, LTG (Ret.) J. Clapper • Director, National Security Agency and Chief, Central Security Service, Lieutenant General Keith B. Alexander • Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Combating WMD & Negotiation Policy, Mr. Jack David • Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Logistics Material & Readiness, Jack Bell • Commander, 8th Air Force, Lieutenant General Kevin P. Chilton • Deputy Commander, U.S. Strategic Command, Lt Gen C. Robert Kehler • Deputy Commander, U.S. Pacific Command, Lt Gen Daniel P. Leaf • Deputy Commander, Joint Functional Component Command for Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance, U.S. Strategic Command, Major General Mark A. Welsh, III • Deputy Commander, Information Operations. 8th Air Force, Maj Gen Kozio • Director, Global Innovation and Strategy Center, U.S. Strategic Command, Dr. Kevin E. Williams • Director, Advanced Systems and Technology, National Reconnaissance Office, Dr. Pete Rustan • Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Claude M. Bolton, Jr. • Commander, Air Force Research Lab, Major General Ted Bowlds • Deputy Commanding General for Systems of Systems Integration, Army Research, Development and Engineering Command, Brigadier General Charles A. Cartwright • Director, Space Acquisition, Office of the Under Secretary of the Air Force Major General Craig R. Cooning • Vice Commander, Air Combat Command, Lieutenant General William M. Fraser • Director of Requirements, Air Combat Command, Major General Jack J. Catton, Jr. • Director of Plans and Programs, Air Combat Command, Major General Timothy C. Jones • Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon R. England • Secretary of the Army Francis J. Harvey • Secretary of the Navy Dr. Donald C. Winter • Secretary of the Air Force Michael W. Wynne • USD for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Kenneth J. Krieg • Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Stephen A. Cambone • Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, ADM Edmund P. Giambastiani, Jr. • Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Michael G. Mullen • Air Force Chief of Staff General John P. Jumper • Commandant of the Marine Corps General Michael W. Hagee • Commander, U.S. Strategic Command, General James E. Cartwright • Commander, U.S. Special Operations Command, GEN Bryan D. Brown • Commander, U.S. Pacific Command, Admiral William J. Fallon • Commander, U.S. Northern Command, Admiral Timothy Keating • Commander, U.S. Joint Forces Command, General Lance L. Smith • Commander, U.S. Central Command, General John Abizaid • Commander, Air Force Space Command, General Lance Lord • Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet, Admiral Gary Roughead • Under Secretary of the Air Force Ronald M. Sega • Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition), Dr. Delores M. Etter • Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Ryan Henry • Director, Defense Research and Engineering, John J. Young, Jr. • Commanding General, USMC Combat Development Command, Lieutenant General James N. Mattis • Commanding General, III Corps and Fort Hood, Lt Gen Thomas F. Metz • Commander, Joint Functional Component Command–Integrated Missile Defense, Lieutenant General Larry J. Dodgen • Director, Defense Info Systems Agency, Lt Gen Charles E. Croom, Jr. Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 12. Future Icons • Networks (Self-forming, Robust, Self-defending) • Networked Sensors – Determine, Track, and Neutralize Threat • Real Time, Accurate Language Translation (Defense Language Institute, III Æ IV) • High-Productivity Computing Systems (HPCS) • Air Vehicles (Fast Access, Long Loiter) • High Energy Liquid Laser Area Defense System (HELLADS) • Low-cost titanium ($2.5/lb military grade alloy) • Bio Warfare – Accelerate Development and Production of Therapeutics and Vaccines from 12+ years to 12 weeks • Prosthetics • Space dominance •Grand Challenge Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 13. High-Productivity Computing Systems High-Productivity Computing is Critical to National Security • Develop a new generation of economically viable high-productivity computing systems for the national security and industrial user community (2009 – 2010) Impact: • Performance (time-to-solution): speedup critical national security applications by a factor of 10X to 40X • Programmability (idea-to-first-solution): reduce cost and time of developing application solutions • Portability (transparency): insulate research and operational application software from system • Robustness (reliability): apply all known techniques to protect against outside attacks, hardware faults, & programming errors 060322_TT_ExDirectors Brief HPCS Program Focus Areas Fill the Critical DoD Need for: Intelligence/surveillance/reconnaissance, cryptanalysis, weapons design and analysis, airborne contaminant modeling and biotechnology Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 14. TTO Taaccttiiccaall Teecchhnnoollooggyy Offffiiccee 14 Oblique Flying Wing (OFW) Program Plan: • Develop conceptual design for objective OFW vehicle • Define, develop, and mature key oblique flying wing technologies • Conduct preliminary design of X-Plane demonstrator in Phase I • Design, build and fly OFW X-Plane in Phase II Low Speed: Unswept wing reduces drag due to lift and provides long range and endurance Goals: • Demonstrate the feasibility of a supersonic, tailless, variable sweep, oblique flying wing (OFW) • Provide increased flexibility for potential future missions requiring rapid deployment, long range and long endurance Supersonic: Swept wing reduces supersonic wave drag, improving supersonic range Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 15. Al2O3 TiO2 Al Ti What Was New TiO2 O2 Progress • Demonstration of 500ppm O2 from electrolytic and chemical routes at 50 lbs/day scale Next Step • Scale up to 500 lbs/day of most promising process Chemical Variation on O2 Removal Promises <$2.5/pound for Ingot Chemical Variation on O2 Removal Promises <$2.5/pound for Ingot APMTIAC Quarterly V6 No2 Low Cost Titanium Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 16. For Official Use Only DARPA’s Space Accomplishments Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 17. For Official Use Only DARPA Space Projects – Five Areas Space Mission Protection Active and passive defense of space assets Ground- and space-based threats, especially μ-sats Situational Awareness of Space Active and passive sensing of space from space or ground Access & Infrastructure Rapid, flexible space access Space-Based Support to the Warfighter Support real-time tactical warfighting from space Rapid response in denied areas Space Mission Denial Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 18. For Official Use Only DARPA Organization Director, Tony Tether Deputy Director, Bob Leheny Information Exploitation Bob Tenney Sensors Exploitation Systems Command & Control Strategic Technology Dave Honey Larry Stotts/Brian Pierce Space Sensors/Structures Strategic & Tactical Networks Information Assurance Underground Facility Detection & Characterization Chem/Bio Defense Maritime Operations Information Processing Technology Charlie Holland Barbara Yoon Cognitive Systems Computational – Perception Representation & Reasoning Learning Natural Communication Microsystems Technology John Zolper Dean Collins Electronics Photonics MEMS Algorithms Integrated Microsystems Defense Sciences Steve Wax Brett Giroir Physical Sciences Materials Biology Mathematics Human Effectiveness Bio Warfare Defense Virtual Space Office Tactical Technology Steve Welby Steve Walker Air/Space/Land/Sea Platforms Unmanned Systems Space Operations Laser Systems Precision Strike Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 19. For Official Use Only Space Programs & Technology AAcccceessss aanndd IInnffrraassttrruuccttuurree • On demand, cost effective launch, augmentation , and replenishment of Space forces • More affordable, more responsive, net-centric capabilities Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 20. Low Cost Launch Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 21. For Official Use Only Falcon Program Objective Develop and validate, in-flight, technologies that will enable a prompt global reach capability while at the same time, demonstrating affordable and responsive space lift Task 1 Small Launch Vehicle (SLV) •Small payloads to LEO •Low recurring launch cost (< $5M) •New launch operations •Conduct an early responsive operations flight demonstration, followed by multiple risk reduction launches Task 2 Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle (HCV) •Aircraft-like operations –Launch on-demand –Reusable –Recallable •Conduct an affordable hypersonic technology vehicle (HTV) building block demonstration to validate key HCV technologies Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 22. For Official Use Only Falcon Objective:Develop a low-cost, responsive Small Launch Vehicle (SLV) –Small payloads to LEO – 1000 lb to 28.5°, circular, 100 nmi –Low recurring launch cost: < $5M –Responsive launch operations AirLaunch Technical Challenges: •Responsive operations • Self-pressurization system • Air launch dynamics •Range integration • Balance between reliability and cost efficiency Operational Impact: •Operationally responsive space • Low cost access to space • Flexible launch and basing SpaceX Affordable, Responsive, Reliable Space Access Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 23. Falcon Hypersonic Technology Vehicles (HTV’s) Demonstrate Key Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle Technologies through Hypersonic Technology Vehicles: HTV-1 HTV-2 HTV-3 HCV HCV Technical Challenges addressed by HTV’s: ƒ Aerodynamics ƒ High-Temperature Materials & Structures ƒ Navigation Guidance and Control ƒ Communications through Plasma Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 24. Metallic/Ceramic Acreage TPS Panels Coated Ceramic Leading Edges Fully Integrated Inward Turning Inlet “Warm” Composite Primary Structure Osculating Flowfield Waverider Shape Over-Under Turbine Based Combined Cycle Flow Path H2 Tankage 58’ Dual Use Payload Bay HC Tankage Ceramic Control Surfaces Dual-Fuel Mn 9.25 Cruise Vision Vehicle Falcon HCV Technologies Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 25. HTV-2 Flight Test Boost Phase Hypersonic Glide Terminal Point Pull-up Flight Test Objectives: • Aero/thermal/flight dynamic performance – Verify aerodynamic coefficients and stability characteristics – Assess thermal response and thermal management techniques – Determine plasma attenuation effects • NG&C performance – Determine flight path precision – Verify control characteristics – Validate robustness of guidance algorithms – Assess INS/GPS navigation methodology and hardware Vandenberg Launch HTV-2A HTV-2B Kwajalein Impact Point Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 26. Orbital Express (OE) Accomplishments ASTRO and NextSat ASTRO Spacecraft NextSat Spacecraft Task FY02 Q2 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 SRR PDR CDR Program Management ASTRO Spacecraft Fluid Transfer System NEXTSat Spacecraft Robotic Arm Rendezvous Sensors System Integration and Test Launch Demo Complete Ship Bus to NGST Arm Assembly Complete Ship Arm to Boeing CDR Ship NextSat to Launch Site Integrated System Test Launch Ship Bus to NGST CDR CDR Receive FTAPS from NGST Receive FTS from NGST Receive Coupler from NGST Ship Sensor Suite to Boeing Ship ASTRO to Launch Site Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 27. Future, Fast, Flexible, Fractionated, Free-Flying Spacecraft united by Information eXchange (F6) • Fractionate a monolithic satellite into heterogeneous microsat-like modules • Microsatellite modules – Power – Telemetry & Comms – Computation & Data Handling – Demonstration Payload – Residual capability for Stakeholder Payload • Intra-module connectivity – Wireless (or over power) data • Inter-module connectivity – Wireless data – Wireless power to payloads System F6 Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 28. For Official Use Only Motivation: Mission Benefits Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 29. For Official Use Only Space Programs & Technology Sppaaccee Siittuuaattiioonnaall Awaarreenneessss • Monitoring and analysis of the Space environment • Monitoring the status of friendly, neutral, and adversary Space assets Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 30. For Official Use Only Radiation Hardening By Design (RHBD) Design Fabs (Specialized) Rad Hard ICs • Use specialized processes • Requires dedicated foundries • Niche market – falling farther behind SOA (Currently 3-5 years) • DoD pays $500M every 2 years to maintain Design Fabs (Merchant) Rad Hard ICs Today: Futturre: • Design in radiation tolerance, e.g. by exploiting thinner device layers (less charge build up) and new isolation methods • Build devices in merchant foundries Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 31. For Official Use Only Radiation Hard by Design (RHBD) Design Hardening Concepts •No special manufacturing processes •Prudent transistor design (i.e. annular, “dog-bone”, all-around) • Circuit design & layout •Substrate & dynamic biasing Standard Edged Drain Gate Annular Transistor Polysilicon Gate Primary Electron Current Flow Goal: Build leading-edge RH electronics at commercial State of the Art foundries source gate drain Transistor Source n+ Source n+ Drain Field Oxide Edge Current Components Field Inversion Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 32. HAARP High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project Program Objective: • A high power, high frequency transmitter for interactive ionospheric research Potential Applications: Submarine communications, imaging of deeply buried targets, radio wave propagation channels in the upper atmosphere HAARP site in Alaska Technical Challenges: • 3600 kW radiated power • 20 –31 dB antenna gain • Power Density: – 3.2 mW/m2 (@ 100 km, 3 MHz) – 4.0 mW/m2 (@ 250 km, 9 MHz) HAARP antenna array Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 33. HAARP IInssttrrumeentt Coomplleettiioon Ionospheric Currents 100 km 60 km ELF / VLF Radio Waves Control of Charged Particle Effects on Satellite Operations HAARP HF Transmitter Submarine Comm Imaging Buried Targets Buried Receiver Comm ELF / VLF Radio Waves ELF / VLF Radio Waves Description: • Increase HAARP effective radiated power by factor of 16 (Tx power from 960 kW to 3600 kW; from 6X8 antenna elements (~5 acres) to 12X15 (~22 acres) • Increase frequency coverage from 2.8-8 MHz to 2.8-10 MHz Objectives: • Demonstrate control of ionospheric charged particle behavior and subterranean/submarine signal penetration Status and Accomplishments • Antenna array size increase completed; all elements and ground plane frozen in place • Transmitter modules successfully put into serial production and test • Power plant increased to full capacity, Diesel prime movers improved as to emissions • Diagnostic instruments/radars expanded to match HAARP capabilities • Aircraft intrusion warning system being upgraded to meet FAA needs for safety Schedule Antenna completion Transmitters completed Power plant upgraded Utility Demonstrated FY03-05 FY06 FY07 Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 34. For Official Use Only Space Programs & Technology Sppaaccee--Baasseedd Suuppppoorrtt ttoo tthhee Waarrffiigghhtteerr • Small, innovative, responsive, agile, dedicated Space systems • Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 35. For Official Use Only ISAT Demonstration Program Mature Key ISAT Technologies • Reliable deployment of huge space antennas • Real time metrology and calibration <1mm On Orbit Demonstration • Launch, deploy and control a large (~100m) space structure • Characterize structural modes • Demonstrate metrology, calibration techniques and transmit beam formation Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 36. Rigidizeable Inflatable Materials 040519_MZ_DIRO Review ISAT Enabling Technologies >100:1 Linear Compaction Ratio Reliable Deployment Metrology <λ/20 error Optical Metrology RF Metrology On-board Beacon(s) (Optional) Star Tracker(s) Axis Coherent Ground Beacon(s) Antenna Orientation Calibration Coherent Transmit Beam Deployment Cage Kinematic Models Array Fed Reflector ESA Master Fiduciary/Elements Signal Integral Hinge Staggered Longerons 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 degs dB 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 degs dB ideal uncompensated compensated ideal uncompensated compensated Teepee Motion Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 37. For Official Use Only Global Continuous Surface Target Tracking Strategic Space Based Engagement Mission: GMTI Surveillance “JSTARS Like” Required Technical Performance: Tactical Targeting “Better Than E-10” Tactical Surveillance Indications and Warning (large scale movement) Fast Movers (>4 m/s) • Minimum Detectable Velocity (MDV) < 4 m/s Slow Movers (<< 4 m/s) • Cross-Range Accuracy Poor Accuracy Good Accuracy Better Accuracy Low Revisit, Significant Gaps Good Revisit, High Revisit, “No Gaps” • Track Continuity Significant Gaps Precision, Single Target Tracking Grouped Target Movement Functional Capability Desired: IISSAATT Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 38. For Official Use Only Integrated Sensor Is Structure (ISIS) Capability cannot be added to airship after development Lockheed-Martin Proprietary MDA Airship Conventional Airship Payload bay ISIS requires integration of sensor and airship Payload: 1.7% of system mass Payload: 30-40% of system mass Truly persistent detection, tracking, and fire-control for: - Low fliers at 600km (eg. anti-ship/cruise missiles, & aircraft) - Surface targets at 300km (eg. littoral small boats, ground vehicles, & dismounts) Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 39. For Official Use Only Most Powerful Airborne GMTI/AMTI Radar & Comms Ever Conceived Simultaneous AMTI/GMTI Operation Via Dual Band (UHF/X-Band) Aperture AMTI Fire Control Wideband Covert UAV Downlink T3 (45 Mbps) real-time video @ 600km Wide Area GMTI FOPEN Detection Targets @ 300 km No In-Theater Ground Support – 99% on station availability for 1+ years 600km radar horizon at 70kft operational altitude <10m3 CEP @ 600km Wide Area GMTI Search-while-Track Slow targets out to 300km Detect and track Dismounted troops Wideband T3 Handset Communications T3 (45 Mbps) handsets @ 300km line-of-sight High Capacity AMTI Track 1000 Targets @ 600km Precision Engagement Tracking 5000+ targets @ 300 km range <<100m resolution Direct-to-User Data Flow Wide Area AMTI Search Targets @ 600 km Long-Range LPD Communications Building/foliage penetration (low-band) 2.5kbps voice channel with watch battery @ 600km Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 40. Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 41. $2 million cash prize 8 October 2005 The best autonomous robotic vehicles America can build Miles of some of the toughest terrain in the Winner takes all world 2005 Grand Challenge Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 42. 195 Applicants February 2005 Calculated RISC Fitchburg, WI Team TerraMax Oshkosh, WI Team Go It Alone Team Visionary Endeavor Appleton, WI Dakota Robotics Fargo, ND Team Arctic Tortoise Fairbanks, AK Mojávaton Grand Junction, CO Rob Meyer Productions Autonomx Tucson, AZ A.I. Motorvators Axion Racing The Golem Group/ UCLA Team SARA Go Baja Team Riàdeil Out-of-Knowhere Team Symcas Team AION Thortech Team Mark Antonelli Palos Verdes HS Road Warriors Team OCCAM Team RoboShack Unmanned Vehicles International Cobalt Horizons CyberRider SciAutonics/Auburn Engineering Team Caltech TeamDesignatedDriver Rogue COGNAV LIPS_MALIBU Team Auto-Triad S Team Robot Monster Team Improbability Team Banzai Alphalogix Alphaworks Null Set the Simf enterprise UCLA/HUJ Team Tormenta UCI DARPA Grand Challenge Team Team Philo Servic Machines Team Alice Hollyware Optical Technology v1 Los Angeles Area, CA University of Washington Seattle, WA Oregon WAVE Corvallis, OR AVEngineers Arcadia, CA sapper Paradise, CA Junk yard dogs Salinas, CA Two Much Trouble (T.M.T.) North Berwick, ME IQ (Intelligent Quad) Indy Robot Racing Team Cakewalk Indianapolis, IN Team ET Kokomo, IN Robotic Navigation Greenwood, IN The Challengers Rising Sun, IN BJB Engineering Willoughby Hills, OH Team Jefferson Crozet, VA Team CART Bluefield, WV Team Greene Milton, WV COPERNICUS Larchmont, NY Team Cornell II Team Cornell Ithaca, NY Atlas Offroad New Haven, CT Highlander Racing Monroe, NJ Princeton University Princeton, NJ AutoTrek Moorestown, NJ Desert Arrow Manassas, VA The MITRE Meteorites McLean, VA Hepner Robotics Edinburg, VA McNeelly Port Saint Lucie, FL Desert Buckeyes Columbus, OH Cjase Bearcats Cincinnati, OH Team Wedge Wooster, OH Team Robo Knight South Lebanon, OH Team CajunBot Lafayette, LA Gray Team Metairie Green Wave New Orleans, LA Team Geochelone New york, NY Autonomous Ingenuity Rochester, NY Team Ruamyarti Queens Village, NY Team LoGHIQ Walden, NY T3SEA Cortland, NY G-CART@RIT Rochester, NY Team Buffalo Lockport, NY GRASP Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA Red Team Red Team Too Pittsburgh, PA Team George Knoxville, TN Spurrier’s Hurriers Mary Esther, FL Planet Explorer Renton, WA Team Sleipner Sequim, WA The Prodigies Olympia, WA Vista Engineering Carson, WA Allied Forces Issaquah, WA Cyber Nav Bothell, WA Roboway Mercer Isalnd, WA Day Star Mc Caysville, GA Team ZingerBot Colorado Springs, CO Team White Cougar the Las Vegas Gamblers Las Vegas, NV Intelligent Vehicle Safety Technologies II Apple Valley, MN Team Wellington Danville, IL Team Levin Highland Park, IL Team Fast Forward Chicago, IL Team MTR Libertyville, IL Team Excelsior Severna Park, MD oxOxo Annapolis, MD Omnitech Queenstown, MD Virginia Tech Virginia Tech Team Rocky Blacksburg, VA Team ENSCO Springfield, VA Intelligent Vehicle Safety Technologies I Littleton, CO Utah Robotics Kaysville, UT BR Mobility Murray, UT Team Juggarnaut Sandy, UT FutureNowa Provo, UT The A Team Kingman, AZ Intelligent Machines K1 Phoenix, AZ Team Manticore - MIT Cambridge, MA Austin Robot Technology Austin, TX Mobile Autonomous robotics Society San Antonio, TX MonsterMoto Cedar Park, TX Armadillo-Bot Bryan, TX Pegasus College Station New Team (160) 2004 applicant (35) CIMAR Gainesville, FL Team UCF Orlando, FL RAV LLC Oviedo, FL Inginouity Kansas City, MO Team Phantasm Ballwin, MO Spirit of St. Louis Fenton, MO Smooth Operator Cape Girardeau, MO Relentless Winchester, MA AppIntellect Bellingham, MA Team UMass Dartmouth Dartmouth, Ma Stockbrige High School Stockbridge, GA Newbies Fort Gordon, GA Team GA Lyons, GA Patriot Robotics Taylor, TX Texas DARPA Challenge Conroe, TX Team Grand Challenger Rabid Ape Robotics Houston, TX Team Simple Genius Humble, TX AV Andrea Morgan AV Sydney Bristow AV Wendy Darling Traverse City, MI Sakoryat Oak Park, MI Team CrossLand Haslett, MI Insight Racing Cary, NC 195 teams from 36 states Team 2015 Jacksonville, FL Rust Bucket Racing Temple Terrace, FL TEAM LONG SHOT St. Petersburg, FL Not Shown: Autonosys, West Coast Robotics and UBC-CERM3 Team Thunderbird – Canada, Grand Challenge New Zealand, Dotmobil Team –France, OK Rover Broken Arrow, OK TeamNOVA Chickasha, OK Team Nomad Ridgecrest, CA Autobots Lincoln, NE Team-Possible Seymour, TN Team UTC Chattanooga, TN Intrepid Birminigham, AL Trobo Petal, MS Lunatic Fringe Sunnyvale, CA Team Overbot Redwood City, CA True Vision Atascadero, CA “R” Junk Works Lancaster, CA KNetX Quartz Hill, CA Herbie Goes! Escondido, CA GP Machine Intelligence San Marcos, CA Team Underdawg San Jose, CA Autonomous Vehicle Systems Simple Solutions Inclusive TouchTech San Diego, CA Easy Does It Ventura, CA Mojave Lions Cerritos, CA Terra Engineering Rancho Palos Verdes, CA I to the Future StoneWalker Albuquerque, NM Team Texas Tech Lubbock, TX Blue Team Berkeley, CA Standford Racing Team Stanford, CA Team Aggie Spirit (UC Davis) Davis, CA Team Cal Poly Ben Lomond, CA Team DAD Morgan Hill, CA D2 Honolulu, HI 3 High Schools / 35 Universities Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 43. Finalists Axion Racing SciAutonics/Auburn Engineering Team Caltech The Golem Group/ UCLA Los Angeles Area, CA Red Team Red Team Too Pittsburgh, PA Team Cornell Ithaca, NY Intelligent Vehicle Safety Technologies I Littleton, CO Team ENSCO Springfield, VA MonsterMoto Cedar Park, TX CIMAR Gainesville, FL Team TerraMax Oshkosh, WI Desert Buckeyes Columbus, OH Insight Racing Cary, NC 23 teams from 13 states The MITRE Meteorites McLean, VA Team DAD Morgan Hill, CA Mojávaton Grand Junction, CO Blacksburg, VA Team CajunBot Lafayette, LA Stanford Racing Team Stanford, CA Virginia Tech Team Rocky Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA Princeton University Princeton, NJ 2004 Grand Challenge Team - 14 2005 Grand Challenge New Entry - 9 Gray Team Metairie, LA Universities Carnegie Mellon (2) Auburn University CalTech Stanford University of Louisiana Ohio State Virginia Tech (2) Cornell University of Florida Princeton Tulane University UCLA Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 44. The Course Narrow Underpass Lake Beds Rough Roads Long Tunnels Narrow Gates Start/Finish 132 mi Close Obstacles Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 45. Beer Bottle Pass – Mile 123 Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 46. Grand Challenge Finishers CMU – Highlander 7h 14m – 18.25 mph CMU – Sandstorm 7h 4m – 18.7 mph Stanford - Stanley 6h 53m – 19.2 mph Gray Team 7h 30m – 17.6 mph Oshkosh –Terramax 12h 51m – 10.3 mph Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited) Overnight Operations
  • 47. Urban Challenge Autonomous Ground Vehicles in the City Travel 60 miles in traffic in under 6 hrs. • Safe following and passage of a moving vehicle • Safe merge with other moving traffic • Safe passage through busy intersections • Parking in congested areas. Safe U-Turn • Figure out an alternate route when the primary route is impassable November 3, 2007 Western U.S. Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)
  • 48. For Official Use Only Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)