(SACON) Sudarshan Pisupati & Sahir Hidayatullah - active deception for red and blue teams
•
1 gefällt mir•2,908 views
(SACON) Sudarshan Pisupati & Sahir Hidayatullah - active deception for red and blue teams
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Ähnlich wie (SACON) Sudarshan Pisupati & Sahir Hidayatullah - active deception for red and blue teams
Ähnlich wie (SACON) Sudarshan Pisupati & Sahir Hidayatullah - active deception for red and blue teams (20)
Mehr von Priyanka Aash
Mehr von Priyanka Aash (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
(SACON) Sudarshan Pisupati & Sahir Hidayatullah - active deception for red and blue teams
- 1. Sudarshan Pisupati Principal Consultant - Smokescreen @sudartion Sahir Hidayatullah CEO - Smokescreen @sahirh ACTIVE DECEPTION FOR Red & Blue Teams
- 2. “The more you know about the past, the better prepared you are for the future.” Theodore Roosevelt
- 3. “Gauge your opponent’s mind and send it in different directions. Make him think various things, and wonder if you will be slow or quick.” Miyamoto Musashi The Book of Five Rings
- 4. “Never win by force what can be won with deception” Niccolò Machiavelli, The Discourses (paraphrased)
- 5. “Never interrupt your enemy when he’s making a mistake.” Napoléon Bonaparte
- 8. There are 3 reasons why companies get hacked…
- 9. Low visibility INITIAL INTRUSION HACKERS UNDETECTED DATA BREACH 1
- 10. Ever changing threat landscape2
- 11. Too many false positives3 13,72655,19872,61489,45296,825 = • Event fatigue • Data paralysis • Missed alerts • Game Over
- 12. Human psychology is an attacker’s greatest weapon. It’s also their greatest weakness. We’re losing. So why don’t we change the game?
- 13. 1 Deception Benefits No false positives High attacker impact Focused on intent, not tools
- 14. Deception Benefits No false positives High attacker impact Focused on intent, not tools Source: David J. Bianco, personal blog The Pyramid of Pain
- 15. 60% of attacks do not involve malware! Deception Benefits No false positives High attacker impact Focused on intent, not tools
- 16. Why does deception work?
- 19. Next-gen firewall Sandboxing Two-factor authentication DAST / SAST Network analytics Endpoint detection and response Thinking in lists v/s Thinking in graphs
- 20. Different colors, different languages… Blue Team talks about SQL injection Password cracking Phishing Port-scanning Patch management Red Team talks About Squiblydoo AS-REP roasting Hot potato attacks SPN enumeration LocalAccountTokenFilterPolicy Unquoted service paths Process hollowing OLE embedded phishing LLMNR poisoning Bloodhound / user hunting DLL side loading GPP exploitation Time-stomping
- 21. Wait a minute, how is deception different from…
- 22. Honeypots… Honeypots • Attract attacks • Public facing • Vulnerable • Network focused • Low signal / noise ratio • Poor realism • Not scalable • Useful for research
- 23. AT = Sum(RT, D, TH, IR) Red-teaming Deception Threat hunting Incident response
- 24. Good deception blankets the kill chain Internet Assets Active Directory Objects Application Credentials Files Network Traffic Endpoints People Servers Applications RECONNAISSANCE DATA EXFILTRATION PRIVILEGE ESCALATION EXPLOITATION LATERAL MOVEMENT
- 26. Chronology of an Attack - “The Double Cycle Pattern” Breach Complete Compromise targets and effect impact Privilege escalation #1 Escalated to local administrator Privilege escalation #2 Escalate to domain administrator Initial Intrusion Low privilege normal user Lateral Movement Hunt domain administrators C2 and persist Establish remote control channel
- 27. S M O K E S C R E E N sahirh@smokescreen.io | www.smokescreen.io | @sahirh WE CAN NOW TAKE QUESTIONS!