The document discusses the importance of using automated testing to prove that software is fault tolerant. It emphasizes that features without automated tests are just rumors and that you don't know if a service is truly fault tolerant unless you test for faults. It promotes using protocol level test doubles like Wiremock and stubbed databases like Cassandra to deterministically create any scenario, including unhappy paths and faults. This allows software to be tested as if it were surviving chaos monkey attacks and real world failures before being deployed to production. Examples of fault scenarios that can be tested include delays, distributed failures, timeouts and errors.