1. Who Controls Bibliographic Control?-Open Data as Strategy in a Cloud Based Environment Anders Söderbäck,Stockholm University Library
2. We, the participantsof ELAG 2011, holdsthesetruthsto be self-evident, that MARC must die, and thatLinkedOpen Data is the future. 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
3. cloud = internet 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
4. A library is a collectionofsources, resources, and services, and the structure in which it is housed; it is organized for use and maintained by a public body, an institution, or a private individual. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
6. Costofacquisitions at swedish research libraries, 2002 - 2009 Digital content Print content 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
8. SFX usage in the Samsökconsortia, 2006-2009 1717% 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
9. 1968: Henriette Avraminvents MARC MARC madepossibleseveralinitiatives for cooperationaroundlibrary data 1982: A report from IFLA statesthat copyright can not be usedtocontrol a global flowofbibliographicrecords 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
10. ”...ifeachof the interoperating partners adopts the same set ofagreements for interoperability solutions, eachofthemcanreap the benefitsof a single solution that is developedonce and fits the needof all.”From the EuropeanInteroperabilityFramework v. 1 (2004) 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
12. Do youremember web 2.0? 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
13. Web 2.0 is aboutcontrolling data [Web 2.0] is really about data and who owns and controls, or gives the best access to, a class of data. ... A lot of people still think, "Oh, it's about social networking. It's about blogging. It's about wikis." I think it's about the data that's created by those mechanisms, and the businesses that that data will make possible. - Tim O’Reilly, ”Web 2.0 Is About Controlling Data”,http://bit.ly/bOGCJy 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
14. Web 2.0 is aboutcontrolling data The Internet business ecosystem can thus be seen as a competition to establish monopolies over various classes of data. ... [Y]ou have to make sure that public data remains public! -Tim O’Reilly, ”Government as Platform”,http://bit.ly/a7gxrM 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
15. Convergencebetween system and content SaaS, DaaS, PaaS, IaaS, web-scale, etc. Subscription based services in“the cloud” Publishers market services that look like systems (eg. Elsevier SciVerse) System vendors market services that look a lot like what the publishers used to sell us (eg. Summon, Primo Central) Systems depend on aggregations of data License issues are more difficult than technical issues 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
18. ”Establishingopen access as a worthwhileprocedureideallyrequires the activecommitmentofeach and everyindividualproducerofscientificknowledge and holderofculturalheritage. Open access contributionsinclude original scientific research results, raw data and metadata, source materials, digital representations ofpictorial and graphical materials and scholarly multimedia material.” From the Berlin declaration on Open Access (2003) 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
19. OCLC Failedtoimplement a new policy for WorldCat data in 2008 Replacedthiswith ”WorldCatRights and Responsibilities for the OCLC Cooperative” in 2010 ”The factthat OCLC has a public purposedoes not meanthatWorldCat is a ’public good’ in the economic sense.” http://www.oclc.org/worldcat/recorduse/policy/default.htm OCLC is currentlyconsideringlicensingofWorldCatusing ODC - BY 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
20. Europeana Europeana Public Domain Charter - http://www.version1.europeana.eu/web/europeana-project/publications ”OpenMeansOpen” - http://bit.ly/drVw2Y 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
21. OKFN Working Group on OpenBibliographic Data http://openbiblio.net/principles/ http://wiki.okfn.org/wg/bibliography 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
23. ”[L]ibrarians shouldprotectthemselves by havingsome checks and balances in theirsupplychain…” - Carl Grant, ExLibris, http://bit.ly/cnmroV 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
24. ”[W]hen we’redealingwithextremelycomplexprocesses and workflows it is incrediblydifficult, evenimprobable, thatthose software modules from disparatevendorscan match the full range and richfunctionality as when all the modulesareprovided by the same vendor.” - Carl Grant, ExLibris, http://bit.ly/hiJcRC 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
25. Scenario 1 Library metadata areopenlyavailable Librariesare part of a dynamic and flexible ecologyof public institutions, private companies, individuals and parties Knowledge is accessible Purchases and procurementsaredone on an open market Bibliographiccontrol is collaborative, decentralized, international in scope, and Web-based MARC is dead 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
26. Scenario 2 Library metadata arelocked in by restrictivelicenses A feworganizationshave, throughlicensing and mergers, control over access to information resources Libraries (and the public) haveveryweakbargaining position When the monopolies no longerneedlibraries, wearelockedoutof the information ecology MARC is dead, butit doesn’tmatter 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary
28. ”Butwhen a long trainofabuses and usurpations, pursuinginvariably the same Objectevinces a design toreducethem under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is theirduty, tothrow off suchGovernment, and toprovide new guards for theirfuturesecurity.” 2011-05-26 / Anders Söderbäck, Stockholm universitylibrary