Talk given at the Library Publishing Forum, Minneapolis, May 23rd 2018

1. brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com | www.ubiquitypress.com| @ubiquitypress
Researcher-led, spun out of UCL in 2012
… to be commercially viable to compete effectively
with large publishers
… to be able to grow and build a top team,
independently of funding
Privately-owned, for-profit:
Over 30 partner presses and libraries

2. brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com | www.ubiquitypress.com| @ubiquitypress
100% OPEN ACCESS
100% OPEN SOURCE
Community Charter
NO EXCLUSIVE BUNDLING

3. brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com | www.ubiquitypress.com| @ubiquitypress
Personal experience
The large legacy publishers do not operate in the
public interest.
1. As an employee of a legacy publisher
2. As a researcher at a university
3. As an open publisher
This perspective comes from three sources:

4. brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com | www.ubiquitypress.com| @ubiquitypress
The Social Contract of Academia
• Validation
• Dissemination
• Further development
Scientific Malpractice
• Data, software, hardware,
wetware…
• Results
Source: http://smbc-comics.com/comic/2003-05-01
Unconditionally Open

5. brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com | www.ubiquitypress.com| @ubiquitypress
Open Source at Our Core
PubSweet
= no platform lock-in
+ ++
Journals
Books
Repositories
Conferences
Presses
= no contract lock-in

6. brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com | www.ubiquitypress.com| @ubiquitypress
Institutional customers
Must demonstrate community
values and provide guarantees
Determine who we will integrate
and work with
STEERING BOARD
Verify that charter is upheld in
significant investment or acquisition
PARTNERSHIP RULES
Community Driven