[Dutch] Presentatie WEB&Z bijeenkomst - 8 december 2015

1. (except logo’s)
101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication
How can libraries support changing research workflows?
Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman
presentatie WEB&Z, 8 december 2015
@MsPhelps
@jeroenbosman

2. analysis
outreach
assessmentpublication
writingdiscovery

3. Simple cyclic model of the research workflow
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery

4. Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing
and application
Iterations of
search and reading
Drafting, receiving
comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review,
rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments
and measurements

5. Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow, with
loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing
and application
Iterations of
search and reading
Drafting, receiving
comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review,
rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments
and measurements

6. A multi-cyclic, multi-ordered
model of the research workflow, with loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing
and application
Iterations of
search and reading
Drafting, receiving
comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review,
rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments
and measurements

7. A multi-cyclic, multi-ordered
model of the research workflow, with loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing
and application
Iterations of
search and reading
Drafting, receiving
comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review,
rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments
and measurements

8. Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)
• declaring competing interests
• replication & reproducibility
• meaningful assessment
• effective quality checks
• credit where it is due
• no fraud, plagiarism
• connected tools & platforms
• no publ. size restrictions
• null result publishing
• speed of publication
• (web)standards, IDs
• semantic discovery
• re-useability
• versioning
open peer review •
open (lab)notes •
plain language •
open drafting •
open access •
CC-0/BY •
good
efficient open
technical
changes &
standards
research
governance
changes
economic
& copyright
changes
researcher
funder
publisher
public
government library

9. Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)

10. Charters, manifestos and declarations
2003: Berlin Declaration
2012: San Francisco DORA
2015: Leiden Manifesto
2015: The Hague Declaration

11. 2005
2010
Analysis
Outreach

12. Database(s): scholarly communication tools
http://innoscholcomm.silk.co http://bit.ly/innoscholcomm-list

13. Survey: scholarly communication tools
http://101innovations.wordpress.com

14. Survey: scholarly communication tools

15. Survey results: Researcher profiles
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
others
MyScienceWork
ResearcherID
Academia.edu
Profile page at own institution
ORCID
Google Scholar Citations
ResearchGate
PhD student / Postdoc / Faculty (n=3481)

16. Survey results: Researcher profiles
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
others
MyScienceWork
ResearcherID
Academia.edu
Profile page at own institution
ORCID
Google Scholar Citations
ResearchGate
PhD student / Postdoc / Faculty (n=3481) Librarians (n=638)

17. Survey results: Altmetrics’ share

18. Example research workflows:
traditional to experimental

19. Example research workflows:
traditional to experimental
Add no functionality compared to print era, except online accessibility
Represent radical change, with sometimes uncertain technologies and outcomes; still
under development
Use scale and linking possibilities of the internet to increase speed and efficiency
Actually change ‘the way it’s always been done’ – e.g. user-driven, different business
models, changes in the sequence of research activities, shifting stakeholder roles

20. Compare yourself to your peer group

21. Open Science
y y y y yElsevier
Example research workflows:
company silos / open science

22. Support of Open Access / Open Science
Do you support the goal of Open Access ? Do you support the goal of Open Science ?
Yes
No
Don't know
79 %
5 %
1%
17 %
10 %
89 %Yes
No
Don’t know
88 %
3 %
1%
9 %
4 %
95 %
Medical researchers (807)
Medical librarians (313)

23. www.openlibmed.org

26. How can libraries support researchers ?
Utrecht University Library
The Netherlands

27. Custom URL - get data from your institution

28. • Keuze van tools bij informatievaardigheden-onderwijs
• Ondersteunen beslissingen t.a.v. licenties
• Voorbereiden presentaties voor groepen onderzoekers
• Vergelijken eigen instelling vs. landelijk / wereldwijd
• Houding eigen onderzoekers t.a.v. Open Access/Open Science

29. Laat zien dat je als bibliotheek met onderzoekers meedenkt,
en niet vóór hen denkt

31. 101innovations.wordpress.com