View the IDUG EMEA 2015 presentation by Gothaer Systems.

1. 1
—
Next Generation
Technology Utility
Benchmarks – Presented
by Gothaer Systems –
IDUG EMEA 2015

2. 2Internal Use Only
Next Generation Performance for the Digital Age
Modern databases require Next Generation Technology
• No external SORT
• Reduced resources
• No need to decompress
• Increased speed
• Massive Usage of zIIPs
• Performance
• Adaptable parallelism to handle extremely large objects
• Planned future improvements in existing products with integration of
the new technology
• True Adaptable Automation

3. 3Internal Use Only
Next Generation Technology Data Management
Scalability
Cognitive Autonomics
Resiliency
Full Availability
Performance

4. 4
—
Customer Benchmarks

5. 5
0
5
10
15
20
25
IBM Classic BMC NGT
REORG - Segmented TS – Segsize 32 – 2 IXs 53 M Rows –
1.74M Pages
Elapsed time 53%
Faster than IBM
with NGT
Elapsed time in Minutes

6. 6
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
IBM Classic BMC NGT
REORG - Segmented TS – Segsize 32 – 2 IXs 53 M Rows –
1.74 M Pages
CPU time 64% Less
than IBM with
NGT
CPU time in Seconds

7. 7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
IBM Classic BMC NGT
REORG - Segmented TS – Segsize 64 – 1IX 54 Million
Rows – 6.785M Pages
NGT – 37% savings
over IBM
Elapsed time in Minutes

8. 8
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
IBM Classic BMC NGT
REORG - Segmented TS – Segsize 64 – 1IX 54 Million
Rows – 6.785M Pages
NGT – 74% savings
over IBM
CPU time in Seconds

9. 9
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
IBM Classic BMC NGT
REORG - Partitioned TS – 8 Partitions – 9IX 17 Million
Rows – 596,000 Pages
NGT – 49% savings
over IBM
Elapsed time in Minutes

10. 10
REORG - Partitioned TS – 8 Partitions – 9IX 17 Million
Rows – 596,000 Pages
NGT – 60%
reduction in CPU
over IBM
CPU time in Seconds
0
50
100
150
200
250
IBM Classic BMC NGT

11. 11
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
IBM Classic BMC NGT
REORG – PBG TS – Segsize 32 – 1IX 149 Million Rows –
1.863M Pages
NGT – 65% faster
than IBM
Elapsed time in Minutes

12. 12
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
IBM Classic BMC NGT
REORG – PBG TS – Segsize 32 – 1IX 149 Million Rows –
1.863M Pages
NGT – 42% less CPU
than IBM
CPU time in Seconds

13. 13
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
IBM NGT
REORG – Partitioned TS – 60 Parts– 16IX 617 Million
Rows – 31.4M Pages
NGT – 1 hour faster
than IBM!
Elapsed time in Minutes

14. 14
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
IBM NGT
REORG – Partitioned TS – 60 Parts– 16IX 617 Million
Rows – 31.4M Pages
NGT – Saved 1 hour
and 40 minutes of CPU
time and reorganized
and validated all 16
indexes!
CPU time in Seconds

15. 15
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
IBM Classic BMC NGT
UNLOAD – Partitioned TS – 8 Parts– 612 Million Rows –
4M Pages
NGT reduced elapsed
time by 56% over IBM
Elapsed time in Minutes

16. 16
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
IBM Classic BMC NGT
UNLOAD – Partitioned TS – 8 Parts– 612 Million Rows –
4M Pages
NGT reduced CPU time
by 88% over IBM
CPU time in Seconds
IBM automatically
cancelled by JES after
800 CPU seconds! Only
87% complete!

17. 17
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
IBM NGT
UNLOAD – Partitioned TS – 9 IXs – 17 Million Rows –
596,000 Pages
NGT reduced Elapsed
time by 20% over IBM
Elapsed time in Minutes

18. 18
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
IBM NGT
UNLOAD – Partitioned TS – 9 IXs – 17 Million Rows –
596,000 Pages
NGT reduced CPU time
by 81% over IBM
CPU time in Seconds

19. 19
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
IBM NGT
NGT reduced Elapsed
time by 18% over IBM
Elapsed time in Minutes
UNLOAD – PBG TS – Segsize 32 – 1IX 149 Million Rows –
1.863M Pages

20. 20
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
IBM NGT
NGT reduced CPU time
by 72% over IBM
CPU time in Seconds
UNLOAD – PBG TS – Segsize 32 – 1IX 149 Million Rows –
1.863M Pages

21. 21
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
IBM NGT
NGT reduced Elapsed
time by 88% over IBM
Elapsed time in Minutes
LOAD – Partitioned TS – 8 Parts– 612 Million Rows – 4M
Pages

22. 22
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
IBM NGT
NGT reduced CPU time
by 19% over IBM
CPU time in Seconds
LOAD – Partitioned TS – 8 Parts– 612 Million Rows – 4M
Pages

23. 230
5
10
15
20
25
IBM NGT
NGT reduced Elapsed
time by 53% over IBM
Elapsed time in Minutes
LOAD - Segmented TS – Segsize 64 – 1IX 54 Million Rows
– 6.785M Pages

24. 24
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
IBM NGT
NGT reduced Elapsed
time by 44% over IBM
CPU time in Seconds
LOAD - Segmented TS – Segsize 64 – 1IX 54 Million Rows
– 6.785M Pages

25. 25
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
IBM NGT
NGT reduced Elapsed
time by 59% over IBM
Elapsed time in Minutes
LOAD – PBG TS – Segsize 32 – 1IX 149 Million Rows –
1.863M Pages

26. 26
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
IBM NGT
NGT reduced CPU time
by 45% over IBM
CPU time in Seconds
LOAD – PBG TS – Segsize 32 – 1IX 149 Million Rows –
1.863M Pages

27. 27
So What?
NGT utilizes sophisticated new
architecture to provide full
application availability while
automating the optimization of
application performance, regardless
of the complexity or size of the data.
This is a game changer!
BMC is revolutionizing the meaning of
data management for DB2 to meet
the demands of digital business!

28. 28
Lower overall cost of ownership of your z Systems™
Autonomic data management following every rule of the company
Data management designed around the way our customers do
business
Applications maintain peak performance at all times
Server Technology for superior throughput. A handful of jobs
replaces the customer’s entire utility process.
Other companies have basic utilities. Only BMC has Next
Generation Technology Data Management Solutions!
This is a game changer!