Thesis presentation for a master of marine affairs from the School of Marine & Environmental Affairs, University of Washington.
Abstract: While the surface of the water always reflects the sky in any weather, the story below the surface is increasingly cloudy. Urban estuaries such as Puget Sound suffer from a heavy influx of pollution from the growing human population and human development around them. The most efficient method to interrupt the stormwater pollution process in Puget Sound is to address human behaviors. Social marketing, the application of marketing techniques to “sell” behaviors which benefit society as a whole, is a powerful tool for changing behaviors. While it has been used extensively in the public health sector, it is gaining popularity in addressing environmental issues. A communications and outreach campaign under the tagline “Puget Sound Starts Here” has been designed with strong influence from the social marketing realm to address non-point source pollution in Puget Sound. While still midstream, the campaign has great potential to positively affect the human behaviors which contribute to stormwater pollution in Puget Sound, and can serve as a model for use in other regions.
Using Environmental Social Marketing to Address Polluted Stormwater in Puget Sound
1. Using Environmental Social Marketing to Address Polluted Stormwater Runoff in Puget Sound Bonnie Loshbaugh Master’s Thesis Presentation School of Marine Affairs University of Washington 27 May 2010 Thesis committee Marc L. Miller, Ann Bostrom, Mike Sato
2. Thesis of table of contents Introduction Ch. 1 Polluted stormwater runoff in Puget Sound Ch. 2 Social Marketing as a tool for behavior change Ch. 3 The Puget Sound Starts Here campaign Conclusion
12. Seattle & Tacoma are tenth & eleventh largest seaports in the US by container traffic
13.
14. Focus on Toxic Chemicals in Puget Sound WA Dept of Ecology study Assessment of toxics entering Puget Sound Focuses on seventeen chemicals Three phases Arsenic Cadmium Copper Lead Zinc Mercury PCBs PBDEs Carcinogenic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) High Molecular Weight PAHs Low Molecular Weight PAHs Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Total Dioxin Toxic Equivalents (TEQs) Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and metabolites Triclopyr Nonylphenol Total petroleum hydrocarbons
15. Between 14 and 94 million pounds of toxics enter Puget Sound annually
18. "It's frustrating. We're adding [contaminated sites] faster than they're coming off." Michael Spencer, Environmental Specialist Washington Department of Ecology McClure, Robert, Lisa Stiffler and Lise Olsen. 2002. “Area’s defining waterway is a cesspool of pollution.” 18 November 2002. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Accessed online at http://www.seattlepi.com/local/95872_sound18.shtml 25 May 2010.
19. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
20. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
21. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
22. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
23. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
24. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
25. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
26. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
27. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
28. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
29. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
30. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
31. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
32. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
33. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
34. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
35. Percentage of Loading Rates for Entire Puget Sound Basin by Land Use Category Residential Commercial/Industrial Agricultural Forest Highway
36. Residential land is the leading contributor for all but DDT, mercury, and arsenic, and accounts for more than half of the toxic loading for ten of the chemicals. Commercial or industrial runoff has the highest concentrations of many of the toxic chemicals, but the quantity of pollutants from residential areas is larger.
39. Pollution Process Stage II Distribution Substances containing pollutants are distributed to consumers.
40. Pollution Process Stage III Watershed Introduction Pollutants are leaked, blown, dropped, defecated, etc.
41. Pollution Process Stage IV Surface Runoff Transport A rain event or other water source washes pollutants downstream.
42. Pollution Process Stage V Entrance to Puget Sound Pollutants join the marine ecosystem, may remain as suspended particulate matter, settle into sediments, and/or enter the food chain.
43. The earlier in the process that we address a problem, the more efficient the solution is. River of Babies
44. To Recap… Pollutants in Puget Sound come from stormwater. Stormwater pollutants come from residential land. There are 4.4 million residents whose behavior contributes to pollution. We need a way to change the behavior of 4.4 million people.
48. Social Marketing Term introduced in 1971 by Kotler & Zaltman Widely used in public health, and in Britain (and in British public health) Becoming better known in the environmental sector Social marketing in marine affairs: NOAA Coastal Services Center, Human Dimensions Program “Promoting Sustainable Seafood Through Social Marketing,” Jessica Quinn Smits, M.Ma. 2006 “Use of Social Marketing Concepts to Evaluate Ocean Sustainability Campaigns,” Cynthia H. Bates, Social Marketing Quarterly 16(1) Spring 2010
49. The application of marketing concepts and tools to influence the behaviour change of a target audience in ways that create net benefits for the individual, community, and society at large. Philip Kotler, 2009 p. 19 Effectively Engaging People: Interviews with social marketing experts. National Social Marketing Center, 2009.
53. Attitude and Behavior Change Model Termination Preparation Contemplation Maintenance Action Precontemplation Prochaska and DiClemente
54. Fear and guilt are unreliable motivators. Emotional appeals are ineffective. P. 39. Moser, S., and L. Dilling, 2004. Making Climate Hot: Communicating The Urgency And Challenge Of Global Climate Change, Environment, Volume 26, Number 10, pp. 32-46.
55. People and Place-related influences on behavior Maibach, Edward W., Connie Roser-Renouf, Anthony Leiserowitz. Communication and Marketing As Climate Change–Intervention Assets: A Public Health Perspective. Am J Prev Med 2008;35(5), 488-500.
56. Factors affecting spread of new behaviors Comprehensive literature review on diffusion of environmental behaviors conducted by the Brook Lindhurst firm for the British Department forEnvironment, Food and Rural Affairs
57. Factors Affecting Spread of New Behaviors Relative advantage Trialability Visibility / invisibility / observability Public / private Ease of adaptation Current norms Compatibility with existing behaviors Luxury / necessity Existing infrastructure Ease of development of commitment strategy Clustering of other new behaviors Habit or one-off Purchase or other Addition, substitution or modification Word of mouth potential State of diffusion
59. Select behaviors Uncover barriers & benefits of behaviors Develop strategies to address barriers & benefits Pilot strategy Implement broadly Steps to Create a Social Marketing Intervention McKenzie-Mohr Kotler & Lee Background, Purpose and Focus Situation Analysis Target Market Profile Marketing Objectives and Goals Target Market Barriers, Benefits, and the Competition Positioning Statement Marketing Mix Strategies (4Ps) Evaluation Plan Budget Implementation Plan
60. Bates’ components of Social Marketing Interventions Bates, Cynthia H. “Use of Social Marketing Concepts to Evaluate Ocean Sustainability Campaigns.” Social Marketing Quarterly. 16(1) Spring 2010
61. Social marketing intervention process Identify behavior-based problem Understand behaviors in problem area Audience analysis Choose target behaviors & audience Audience segmentation Identify barriers, benefits Appropriate & realistic objectives Craft & send message Message and channel design Evaluation Stakeholder involvement
62. Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Process Model for Adaptive Management Levin PS, Fogary MJ, Murawski SA, Fluharty D (2009) Integrated ecosystem assessments: Developing the scientific basis for ecosystem-based management fo the ocean. PLoSBiol 7(1):e1000014.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000014
63. Social Marketing intervention Process Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Scoping of problem Develop indicators & targets Risk Analysis Assessment of status relative to goals Strategy Evaluation Implementation of Management Action Monitoring Adaptation Identify behavior-based problem Understand behaviors in problem area Audience analysis Choose target behaviors & audience Audience segmentation Identify barriers, benefits Appropriate & realistic objectives Craft & send message Message and channel design Evaluation
70. Residents do not realize the effect of their actions. They do not understand the impact or mechanism of non-point source pollution, nor do they understand the term. Survey findings
71. Residents are more likely to blame industry for pollution than residential or neighborhood runoff. Roughly half know that stormwater runoff is untreated. Soapy water or pet waste are under-recognized as contributors to pollution Survey findings
72. Awareness may vary by demographic. Older citizens more aware of correct behaviors. Mountlake Terrace least aware in Hebert surveys. Survey findings
73. 3. Choose target behaviors & Audience Audience segmentation Identify barriers and benefits Target behaviors should include appropriate & realistic objectives
74. PSSH Target Audience Urban, suburban, and rural Homeowners and renters With and without children With and without pets Vehicle owners Primarily in the age group of sixteen or older Youth, age six to sixteen, are a secondary audience, in their capacity of influencers of adults
75. Choosing Target Behaviors Increase pervious surfaces Increase tree cover Household hazardous waste mgt Yard care Pet waste mgt Auto care
76. Fertilize sparingly Spot treatment with pesticides & herbicides Use of compost & mulch Create rain gardens Maintain tree cover Improve soil Reduce lawn size Hand pull weeds Yard Care
77. Use of commercial car washes Regular auto maintenance Wash cars on pervious surfaces Proper disposal of auto fluids Sell charity car wash tickets Choose alternative transportation Use cardboard under car to monitor fluid leaks Auto Care
79. 4. Craft and Send Message Visual design by Frause
80. Focus Groups, May 2009 A “problem-solution-hope approach” is strongest Humor a positive addition to messaging Children motivate by triggering ideas of legacy
92. So Far… Campaign launched September 16 2009 60,000 PSSH toolkits distributed around Puget Sound Video clips distributed to 16 TV stations, Viewers projected to have seen PSAs 15x, for 53 million views and 99% coverage of Puget Sound population by end of 2009.
93. 5. Evaluation Plan to use: King County Environmental Behavior Index “Independent quantitative study” custom research design to measure behavior change due to the PSSH campaign Will use social media as a distribution mechanism Web metrics
94. You may have noticed some skipped steps, there. What’s missing?
103. It’s not too late to fill these gaps. PSSH was initially funded through 2011, and funding has since doubled.
104.
105. Recommendations for further Research Follow PSSH as it continues to develop over the next year (or longer). Compare with other social marketing interventions focused on pollution prevention. Investigate the dynamics of a campaign created by a coalition, and how 60+, or 300+ stakeholders can effectively participate.
106. Bonnie Loshbaugh Queen of Social Marketing Master of Marine Affairs Social Media Ecologist Martial Artist & Knitter alaskalainen@gmail.com @alaskalainen http://www.linkedin.com/in/bloshb Social Marketing Phillip Kotler and GeralZaltman. “Social Marketing: An Approach to Planned Social Change”. Social Marketing Quarterly. Summer 1997. Vol 3, No. 3/4. Kotler, Phillip & Nancy Lee, 2008. Social marketing: influencing behaviors for good. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Social Marketing Quarterly “Use of Social Marketing Concepts to Evaluate Ocean Sustainability Campaigns,” Cynthia H. Bates, Social Marketing Quarterly 16(1) Spring 2010 Maibach, Edward W., Connie Roser-Renouf, Anthony Leiserowitz. Communication and Marketing As Climate Change–Intervention Assets: A Public Health Perspective. Am J Prev Med 2008;35(5), 488-500. Puget Sound Starts Here Puget Sound Starts Here Strategic Communications Plan. August 2009. http://www.psp.wa.gov/downloads/PSSH_Toolkit/documents/Puget%20Sound%20Starts%20Here%20commmunications%20plan,%20August%202009.pdf Elway Research, 2009. “Water Pollution in Puget Sound: The View from the Back Yard.” Elway Research, Inc. February 2009 STORM. “2009 Summary of Activities.” 2009. http://www.duvallwa.gov/departments/publicworks/2009_STORM%20annual%20report.pdf Contact info and Selected References
Hinweis der Redaktion
Bates analyzed 16 campaigns
Taking Action-You/Scoop Dog Poop It’s a common belief that animal waste is not harmful to water because it’s a natural substance. My question to you is would you bathe in a tub with animal waste in it? Of course, not! Pet waste, like dog poop, contains bacteria that are very harmful to people and to the marine life, some of which are our food sources, in Puget Sound. So what can you do? Scoop the poop. Scoop it up from your yards or dog parks, or anywhere Fido is doing his business. Scoop the poop, place it in a sealed bag, and dispose of it in your trash can.
Taking Action-You/Natural Yard Care There are so many things to boast about regarding the Pacific Northwest, and our yards are typically at or near the top of the list. The rain, of course, creates lush gardens and keeps our grass looking healthy. But most residents use some type of fertilizer or weed killer to give their lawns that extra oomph. Unfortunately, all that fertilizer and weed killer flows into Puget Sound in stormwater. We all want beautiful yards, so what’s the answer? In an ideal world, we would stop using pesticides and fertilizers completely. But if that is not an option for you, make sure to follow instructions closely to ensure you’re not overusing the product. Alternatively, consider using natural yard care products, such as organic, slow-release fertilizers. You can get these products at most home improvement stores.
Taking Action-You/Car Maintenance Throughout this presentation, I’ve been talking about how we all contribute to Puget Sound’s poor water quality. I mentioned that I would share some easy things we can do to turn Puget Sound around and help it become healthy again. First, let’s talk about cars. Did you know that when you wash your car at home, all the chemicals and the soap are swept down the drain and into the Sound? I’m talking about anti-freeze, oil, solvents…all of that is being washed into the Sound. So what can you do about that? It’s simple. Take your car to a commercial car wash. Car washes treat their water before it flows into the Sound. If you visit www.pugetsoundstartshere.org, you will find car-wash coupons to save you money. If you absolutely have to wash your car at home, make sure to wash it on the grass, which helps to filter some of the toxic chemicals. But remember, a car wash is ideal. And what about those annoying oil leaks that so many of our cars have? I suggest taking your car in for regular maintenance, to minimize leakage. The oil that leaks onto your driveways and streets gets washed into the Sound, too. Another alternative is to put a piece of cardboard in your driveway to soak up the leaks. Again, simple things we can do to protect Puget Sound.
Taking Action-You/Personal care The over-the-counter drugs, cosmetics and personal care items that we use every day are affecting the Puget Sound. While we can control what we get rid of when we go to the bathroom (and yes, the chemicals we ingest can come out when we pee), we can do a good job of disposing of unwanted products. The EPA advocates that we do not flush prescription drugs down the toilet or drain unless the label provides that instruction. You can mix them with cat litter and put them in an unmarked bag/container and then cover it in duct tape, then put it in the trash. You can also choose the other products that you purchase very carefully. Buy organic and non-toxic personal care items. By doing so, you ensure that the prescriptions products that you ingest will not show up in the systems of fish and wildlife within the area.
Taking Action-You/Septic systemsThere are 450,000 to 500,000 houses throughout the Puget region with septic systems not hooked up to sewer system. And, some of these septic tanks are aging. The result of a septic system in poor condition can be waste leaking into the ground and entering our bodies of water, such as streams, rivers and the Puget Sound. What can you do? Watch for signs of failure such as a saturated yard, odors, lush growth and backed-up toilets or drains. Install water-saving devices in your house to prolong the life of your septic drain field. Avoid putting septic tank additives, bleach, liquid drain cleaner and paint down your drain as they can damage the entire system. And, better yet, have a state licensed or health district certified service provider inspect your septic system regularly.
Contaminated Sediments Sediment is all the particles of dirt, soil, sand, etc. that settle at the bottom of a body of water. Contaminants stick to sediment and soil, causing the contaminants to concentrate or cluster. Rain can wash contaminants from the air. Contaminants on land may be washed off by runoff or wind. Some contaminants on land seep into groundwater and are discharged. Many of these contaminants eventually end up in water and sediment. There are more than 115 toxic sediment sites in Puget Sound that are highly contaminated and endanger both human health and the environment.