Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Ähnlich wie Political Parties (15)
Mehr von Chris Thomas (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Political Parties
- 2. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
WHO GOVERNS?WHO GOVERNS?
1.1. How has America’s two-party systemHow has America’s two-party system
changed, and how does it differ fromchanged, and how does it differ from
the party systems of otherthe party systems of other
representative democracies?representative democracies?
2.2. How much do parties affect howHow much do parties affect how
Americans vote?Americans vote?
TO WHAT ENDS?TO WHAT ENDS?
1.1. Did the Founding Fathers thinkDid the Founding Fathers think
political parties were a good idea?political parties were a good idea?
2.2. How, if at all, should America’s two-How, if at all, should America’s two-
party system be reformed?party system be reformed?
- 3. Parties - Here and AbroadParties - Here and Abroad
Political Party –Political Party – A group that seeksA group that seeks
to elect candidates to public office.to elect candidates to public office.
A political party exists asA political party exists as
• A labelA label
• An organizationAn organization
• A set of leadersA set of leaders
The United States versus EuropeThe United States versus Europe
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
- 4. Figure 9.1 Decline in PartyFigure 9.1 Decline in Party
Identification, 1952-2004Identification, 1952-2004
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Source: American National Election Studies, November 2005, table 2A.1.
- 5. Election posters put up in 2005 duringElection posters put up in 2005 during
Iraq’s first free election in half a century.Iraq’s first free election in half a century.
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Wisam Ahmad/Reuters/Corbis
- 6. The Rise and the Decline of theThe Rise and the Decline of the
Political PartyPolitical Party
The FoundingThe Founding
The JacksoniansThe Jacksonians
The Civil War and SectionalismThe Civil War and Sectionalism
The Era of ReformThe Era of Reform
Party RealignmentsParty Realignments
Party DeclineParty Decline
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
- 7. When Andrew JacksonWhen Andrew Jackson
ran for president in 1828,ran for president in 1828,
over a million votes wereover a million votes were
cast for the first time incast for the first time in
American history. ThisAmerican history. This
poster, from the 1832poster, from the 1832
election, was part of theelection, was part of the
emergence of truly massemergence of truly mass
political participation.political participation.
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Tennessee Historical Society
- 8. The Election of 1828. p. 198The Election of 1828. p. 198
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
- 9. The Election of 1860. p. 199The Election of 1860. p. 199
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
- 10. The Election of 1896. p. 199The Election of 1896. p. 199
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
- 11. The Election of 1932. p. 199The Election of 1932. p. 199
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
- 12. Figure 9.2 Split-Ticket Voting forFigure 9.2 Split-Ticket Voting for
President/House, 1952–2004President/House, 1952–2004
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Source: American National Election Studies, November 2005, table 9B.2.
- 13. The National Party StructureThe National Party Structure
TodayToday
National conventionNational convention
National committeeNational committee
CongressionalCongressional
campaign committeecampaign committee
National chairpersonNational chairperson
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
- 14. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
a American Independent party.
b United We Stand American or
Reform Party.
Figure 9.3Figure 9.3
Cleavages andCleavages and
Continuity in theContinuity in the
Two-Party SystemTwo-Party System
- 15. Figure 9.4 House Challengers WhoFigure 9.4 House Challengers Who
Raised $1 Million or More (2000–2006)Raised $1 Million or More (2000–2006)
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Source: Campaign
Finance Institute,
George Washington
University, Washington,
D.C., October 19, 2006,
figure 1, summarizing
data from the Federal
Election Commission
- 16. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
The Internet is the latestThe Internet is the latest
means through which peoplemeans through which people
are becoming politicallyare becoming politically
informed and active. It hasinformed and active. It has
also become an important wayalso become an important way
to raise money for candidatesto raise money for candidates
and parties. p. 205and parties. p. 205
Supporters of John McCainSupporters of John McCain
and Sarah Palin celebrateand Sarah Palin celebrate
at the 2008 Republicanat the 2008 Republican
convention. p. 205convention. p. 205
Stan Honda/AFP/Getty Images
Democratic National Committee
- 17. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Sources: New York Times
(August 29, 2004);
CBSNEWS.COM, July
24, 2004; Boston Globe,
August 31, 2004.
- 18. State and Local PartiesState and Local Parties
The MachineThe Machine
Ideological PartiesIdeological Parties
Solidarity GroupsSolidarity Groups
Sponsored PartiesSponsored Parties
Personal FollowingPersonal Following
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Ex-Senator George
Washington Plunkitt of
Tammany Hall explains
machine politics from atop the
bootblack stand in front of the
New York County Courthouse
around 1905, p. 207
By permission of the Houghton Library/Harvard University
- 19. The personal following of former President George Bush was passed on to hisThe personal following of former President George Bush was passed on to his
sons, George W. (left) and Jeb (right), both of whom became governors of largesons, George W. (left) and Jeb (right), both of whom became governors of large
states, and the former of whom became president. p. 209states, and the former of whom became president. p. 209
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Reuters/CORBIS
- 20. The Two-Party SystemThe Two-Party System
WHY HAS THE TWO-PARTY SYSTEMWHY HAS THE TWO-PARTY SYSTEM
PERSISTED IN THE UNITED STATES?PERSISTED IN THE UNITED STATES?
Plurality SystemPlurality System
Voter OpinionVoter Opinion
State LawsState Laws
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
- 21. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Source: Data from CNN exit polls for each year.
- 22. Minor PartiesMinor Parties
IdeologicalIdeological
One-issueOne-issue
Economic-protestEconomic-protest
FactionalFactional
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
The Socialist party and the ProgressiveThe Socialist party and the Progressive
party were both minor parties, but theirparty were both minor parties, but their
origins were different. The Socialist partyorigins were different. The Socialist party
was an ideological party; the “Bullwas an ideological party; the “Bull
Moose” Progressive party split off fromMoose” Progressive party split off from
the Republicans to support Theodorethe Republicans to support Theodore
Roosevelt. p. 214Roosevelt. p. 214
Library of Congress/LC-DIG pga-01130
- 24. Nominating a PresidentNominating a President
Are the delegatesAre the delegates
representative ofrepresentative of
the voters?the voters?
Who votes inWho votes in
primaries?primaries?
Who are the newWho are the new
delegates?delegates?
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Ross Perot founded the
independent Reform party
in 1996, p. 215
Reed Saxon/APPhoto
- 25. Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
Source: New York Times/CBS News polls as reported in Katharine Q. Seeley and Marjorie Connelly,
“The Conventioneers; Delegates Leaning to the Right of G.O.P. and the Nation,” New York Times,
August 29, 2004.
- 26. M E M O R A N D U MM E M O R A N D U M
To:To: Elizabeth Bunting, All for Life presidentElizabeth Bunting, All for Life president
From:From: Ralph Marx, political consultantRalph Marx, political consultant
Subject:Subject: Upcoming presidential electionUpcoming presidential election
Without regard to your organization’s cause or issue,Without regard to your organization’s cause or issue,
I have been hired to brief you on the pros and consI have been hired to brief you on the pros and cons
of backing or beginning a third-party candidate in theof backing or beginning a third-party candidate in the
presidential election.presidential election.
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
- 27. Arguments for:Arguments for:
1. Independent and third-party candidates can garner votes for1. Independent and third-party candidates can garner votes for
president or tip an election result. In 1992, Ross Perot wonpresident or tip an election result. In 1992, Ross Perot won
nearly a fifth of the votes. In 2000, Green party candidatenearly a fifth of the votes. In 2000, Green party candidate
Ralph Nader got only 3 percent, but that included 100,000Ralph Nader got only 3 percent, but that included 100,000
votes in Florida where Republican Bush was credited with onlyvotes in Florida where Republican Bush was credited with only
600 votes more than Democrat Gore.600 votes more than Democrat Gore.
2. Third-party candidates (Eugene Debs, Robert La Follette,2. Third-party candidates (Eugene Debs, Robert La Follette,
George Wallace) can make a mark on American politics. ThirdGeorge Wallace) can make a mark on American politics. Third
parties have advocated policies later championed by the twoparties have advocated policies later championed by the two
main parties: abolishing slavery (Free-Soil party), women’smain parties: abolishing slavery (Free-Soil party), women’s
right to vote (Woman’s party), direct election of U.S. senatorsright to vote (Woman’s party), direct election of U.S. senators
(Progressive party), and many others.(Progressive party), and many others.
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
- 28. Arguments against:Arguments against:
1. It is virtually impossible to win, thanks to the winner- take-all1. It is virtually impossible to win, thanks to the winner- take-all
system of elections. Since the 1850s, over a hundred thirdsystem of elections. Since the 1850s, over a hundred third
parties have come and gone. There will be a brief media frenzyparties have come and gone. There will be a brief media frenzy
when you bolt; but, after that, you might be ignored. Better towhen you bolt; but, after that, you might be ignored. Better to
grumble but be heard inside a major party than to shout butgrumble but be heard inside a major party than to shout but
not be heard with a minor party.not be heard with a minor party.
2. Splitting off from a major party could weaken support for your2. Splitting off from a major party could weaken support for your
issue and lead one or the other major party to “resolve” it in aissue and lead one or the other major party to “resolve” it in a
watered-down way. In the 1930s, the Democrats pluckedwatered-down way. In the 1930s, the Democrats plucked
Social Security from the Socialist party’s far-reaching plan. InSocial Security from the Socialist party’s far-reaching plan. In
the 1980s, the Republicans’ position on taxes only faintlythe 1980s, the Republicans’ position on taxes only faintly
echoed the Libertarian party’s.echoed the Libertarian party’s.
Copyright ©Copyright © 2011 Cengage2011 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
- 29. Your decision:Your decision:
Back or begin a third party?Back or begin a third party?
Stay with the major party?Stay with the major party?
Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
Hinweis der Redaktion
- Replace with jpeg, p. 195
- Replace with jpeg, p. 206
- Replace with jpeg, p. 217