8. What’s
below the
water
causing the
symptoms?
• We don’t tend to have
a “culture of
assessment”…
• Most “measures”
convey past
performance
• Difficult and complex
• Our “measures” don’t
align with decision-
makers
9. We’ve learned that:
• Identifying & illustrating value depends on conversations
with your stakeholders
– …the first conversation shouldn’t be when measures are
presented
• “More” isn’t necessarily better
– …in fact, “more” clouds the issue and the message
12. • No one magic measure
• Successful organizations:
• clarity of purpose
• understand their culture
• performance measurement system that
fits that culture
• “Value” is dynamic, economic,
psychological & relative to alternatives
• Identifying outcomes & especially impact
takes a long time & heavy duty analysis
14. Center for Investigative Reporting’s
Frame
Non-profit media & their funders have been
working on impact for years
4 “strands of the conversation”:
ü Standards
ü Engagement
ü Online analytics
ü Offline activities
15. Oh, those offline activities
“Because offline activities are
messy and irregular and require
staff and time to track, they are
cast aside as, at best, qualitative
data and, at worst, anecdotes. But
qualitative data is data, and it is as
valuable as quantitative data if it
is collected and analyzed using
rigorous methods.”!
16. Impact
CIR’s definition:
Change in
status quo @
macro, meso or
micro levels
“we want to understand the
relationship of convertibility
among these outcomes. We are
only beginning to think about
how to quantify these
interactions; this is not alchemy,
but science – and maybe a little
art. “
• Dissection
• App in Podio
17. Your frame
Your assumptions &
beliefs about
measurements now:
Ideas,
discomfort,
provoking
Ideas,
discomfort,
provoking
Your assumptions
&
beliefs about
measurements at
noon tomorrow: