Slides used for successful docotoral proposal defense (minus some speculative information) as part of the Doctorate of Computer Science, Emerging Media from Colorado Technical University.
1. Transformative Interactions in
Collaborative Virtual Environments:
Towards Transdisciplinarity
Barbara Truman,
Doctorate of Computer Science, Emerging Media
September 18, 2013
“The Weavers” Jeanie Tomanek http://jeanietomanek.com/
2. http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/pia17462main_8k.jpg
Exploratory Research Questions
The Voyager space probe crossed the
boundary into interstellar space
September 2013
- What is the nature of
how people use avatars
to collaborate in virtual
environments?
- What is the nature of
reflexive, self awareness
in the context of avatar
relationship?
- What is the nature of
how avatars engage in
‘dialogue’?
3. Background: Research Problem
Diverse, collective, and concerted expertise is
required to solve wicked problems and conduct
transdisciplinary research in a timely, effective, and
efficient manner.
Assessing collaboration is also a goal from
agencies such as The National Institutes of Health,
National Science Foundation, and the National Cancer
Institute that rely on Team Science.
4. Toward Transdisciplinarity
- 1985 World Congress was held
in in Portugal on
transdisciplinarity
- 1987 International Center for
Transdisciplinary Research and
Studies (CIRET)
- 1998 France UNESCO
International Meeting
- 2000- on Swiss National
Science Foundation meeting at
the Swiss Federal Institute of
Technology in Zurich,
Switzerland
- 2007 Metanexus Institute
University of Pennsylvania
http://www.metanexus.net/archive/conference2007/
Tower ruins, Abbaye de Royaumont, Val-d’oise,
France location of UNESCO sponsored
International Symposium on Transdisciplinarity,
May 1998
Creative Commons License 3.0
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Abbaye_de_Royaumont_-
_Tourelle_d'escalier_01.jpg
9. Key Literature Foundation
Virtual-
Physioception
Motivation Intersubjective
Presencing
Collaborative Virtual
Environments (CVEs)
Transdisciplinarity
Body awareness
(Mehling, Gopisetty,
Daubenmier, Price,
Hecht & Stewart)
Virtual Self (Fox &
Bailenson; Ratan;
McCreery)
Social Presence (Biocca
et al.; Blascovich)
Player Identification (Van
Looy)
Supermorphic Persona
(Young)
Metacognition Theory
(Flavell)
Being (Maslow)
Grit (Duckworth)
Generativity (McAdams)
Intrinsic (Dickey)
Intrinsic v. Extrinsic
(Finkelstien)
Volunteerism (Shye)
Avatar appearance
(Baylor)
Presencing- (Senge
et. Al; Scharmer)
Transformed Social
Interaction
(Bailenson, Beall,
Loomis, Blascovich
&Turk; Bailenson)
Presence in VWs –
(Allmendinger,
Suter)
Dialogue (Bohm)
Transformed Social
Interaction in CVEs-
(Bailenson)
CVEs- (Montoya)
WoW- (Yee)
3D Visualization (Siau,
Nah, Mennecke &
Schiller; Sonnewald)
Manifesto
(Nicolescu,
Montuori)
Team Science
(Stokols)
Team cognition
(Salas & Fiore)
Complexity Theory
(Morin)
Wicked Problems-
(Rittel; Conklin)
10. Factors that contribute to
virtual intersubjective presencing in CVEs
Collaborative
Virtual
Environment
Virtual-physioception
Shared self-representation
Somatic awareness
Supermorphic persona
Collaborative
Groups
Communities
of Practice
Guilds Towards
Transdisciplinarity
Big & open data
3D dynamic visualization
Collective intelligence
Citizen science
Crowdsourcing
Socio-Technical
Factors
12. Target Population for Study
The study will involve groups identified as
having high levels of collaboration using
CVEs.
Study subjects will be recruited from:
MOSES Community (Open Sim)
GameMOOC and Guilds (WoW)
Global Learning Forum (Second Life)
ISTE SIGVE (Second Life)
Virtual Pioneers (Second Life)
VWBPE (Multiple grids)
OpenSim Community Conference 2013
Virtual Worlds Education Roundtable
Non-Profit Commons
US Army MOSES – Intel Load
Test OpenSim 2013
13. Significance of the Study
• Exploration of what is working in
Collaborative Virtual Environments (CVEs) as
a social-technical and socio-cultural platform
using an Appreciative Inquiry approach
• Cost savings
• Scalable
• Sustainable through community
• Insights into cross-industry, virtual
communities
• Appreciation of Transdisciplinary Research
14. Assumptions and Limitations
• The Study relies upon:
– A fraction of collaborative activity in CVEs
– A fraction of the worlds available
– Self reported data of idiosyncratic experiences
– The use of qualitative and quantitative methods
that require greater finesse
– Subjective interpretation of the constructs
– The voluntary nature of collaboration studied
– The bias of the researcher
15. My Collaborative Contribution
Heuristics for transformative collaboration involving avatar
interactions within virtual environments
Introduction of virtual-physioception construct
Introduction of virtual intersubjective presencing construct
Survey instrument as part of the pilot study
16. Factors contributing between ‘ideal’
and ‘idealized’ self across virtual and
physical environments
Virtual Team Science
Physiological therapies using somatic
awareness in CVEs – intersection with
biofeedback devices
Intersection of 3D visualization with
big, open data for realistic simulation
Potential for Future Research
Northwestern University
17. Some Key References
& Giants in the Field
• David Cooperrider, Case Western Reserve University
http://appreciativeinquiry.case.edu/
• Jeremy Bailenson, Stanford University http://vhil.stanford.edu/
• Peter Senge, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, http://www.solonline.org
• Otto Scharmer, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, http://www.presencing.com
• Daniel Stokols, University of California Irvine
https://socialecology.uci.edu/faculty/dstokols
• Science of Team Science Toolkit
https://www.teamsciencetoolkit.cancer.gov/
• Basarab Nicolescu, International Center for Transdisciplinary
Research http://basarab.nicolescu.perso.sfr.fr/ciret/index_en.php
• Alfonso Montuori, California Institute of Integral Studies
http://www.ciis.edu/Academics/Graduate_Programs/Transformative_Leadership/TID_Faculty/Alfon
so_Montuori.html
18. Special Thanks
Dr. Cynthia Calongne
Colorado Technical
University
Dr. Andy Stricker
Air University
New Media Consortium Presentation
Hosted by MIT in 2012
Dr. Patsy Moskal
University of
Central Florida
Barbara Truman
Connoisseur of
Collaboration
EDUCAUSE Institutional Excellence
Award 2005
To all my advisors, colleagues, friends and precious family,
the journey continues…
Hinweis der Redaktion
Welcome and ThanksSet the stage for my research – start with this image http://jeanietomanek.com/MetaNexusInstitute article about transdisciplinarityManage some expectations- What this study is not about: Learning in virtual environmentsCollaborative learningBreadth of collaborative “activities”Designing virtual environmentsCultural and social intelligenceStart with a definition- Collaboration- is different than cooperation. Collaboration frequently requires significant investment in relationship and trust building activities. Collaboration enables the emergence of understanding and realization of shared visions in complex environments or systems. Collaboration does not necessarily require harmony. Mostly, collaboration requires commitment in addition to shared goals, trust and respect.
Listening, listening… hear anything? Phenomenological research explored individual experiences. The priority was to explore constructs developed for the study using an inductive approach while confirming the relationship of the variables using a deductive approach. Dialogue- is different than discussion, conversation, and debate. Dialogue enables one’s experience to subtly shift allowing sight through others’ eyes. Sustained dialogue often creates empathy. Possibilities open up to new insights as deep listening and understanding emerge. Dialogue builds collaboration. Not all dialogue is formal or structured. Dialogue may include improvisational exchanges with friends, family, colleagues etc.
(Transdisciplinary Tobacco Research Use Centers or TTURCs) did not include a Coordinating Center. Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer (TREC)"The science of team science encompasses an amalgam of conceptual and methodologic strategies aimed at understanding and enhancing the outcomes of large-scale collaborative research and training programs
The origins of transdisciplinarity are traced to Jean Piaget, the Swiss psychologist and philosopher who was credited in coining the term in France around 1969. Basarab Nicolescu, physicist from Romania is widely considered the father of transdisciplinarity. He founded the International Center for Transdisciplinary Research and Studies (CIRET)Three types of transdisciplinarity are described in the literature and they are: theoretical, phenomenological, and experimental. Nicolescu’s theoretical is more about the importance of becoming mindful about “being” so as to unite the inquirer with the inquiry. Typically, transdisciplinarity goes across, between and *beyond* disciplines, reality, or phenomena.Transdisciplinarity also embraces complexity.
Appreciative Inquiry is about the coevolutionary search for the best in people, their organizations, and the relevant world around them. In its broadest focus, it involves systematic discovery of what gives “life” to a living system when it is most alive, most effective, and most constructively capable in economic, ecological, and human terms. "Cultural-historical activity theory introduced the idea of human psychological functions mediated through tools, rules, roles and community. That is, “the human mind emerges, exists, and can only be understood within the context of human interaction with the world; and…this interaction, that is, activity, is socially and culturally determined (Kaptelinin, Nardi, & Macaulay, 1999, p.28)" as seen in (Suter, 2011, p. 33).The third dimension of Transformed Social Interaction (TSI) called self-representation was used as the theoretical framework. TSI was developed by Bailenson (2006) and has been shown to affect the interactions and behaviors of users in CVEs.“Transdisciplinarity is a new form of learning and problem solving involving cooperation among different parts of society and academia in order to meet complex challenges of society. Transdisciplinarity research starts from tangible, real-world problems.
What is this phenomenon? Not sure what to call it. Gaps in the literature. Refer to fancy map
Need for unstructured dialogue. More spontaneous. Between meetings as much as in meetings. The notion of playing with ideas over coffee, arguing over dinner and a bottle of wine, the excitement of sharing ideas with friends late into the night, the more convivial, everyday, unstructured processes, similar to what social philosopher and cultural critic, William Irving Thompson called “mind jazz” (Montuori, 2013, p. 219-220).
Scharmer’s new book - Leading from the Emerging Future: From Ego-System to Eco-System EconomiesFifth Discipline:Help companies, associations and groups become learning organization. Goal of the book was to communicate the research to help foster aspiration, develop reflective conversation, and understand complexityKnow when you are using dialogue that you move from seeing to sensing to presencing (uses highest Self) Scharmer says that a good indicator that you have been in dialogue is when you feel that you have become a different personIn presencing, the place where I operate is identical to the place where we operate. It emerges from the presence or the coming into being of the larger whole. Sometimes, this level of conversation occurs after many days of common work, as intentional quietness or sacred silence (Isaacs 1999). When it happens, the experience of time slows down, and the speech acts change from speaking based on reflection to speaking from what emerges in the here and now. Jaworski (1996), referring to Buber (1970), describes this level of reality experience as synchronicity, in which the boundaries between I and thou seem to completely disappear.GENERATIVE LEARNING "(Type I: learning from the experiences of the past) to generative learning (Type II: learning from emerging futures). The primary issue at this stage is the need for a sound methodology that takes a team from the reflective space (level 3) to the space of deep intention of will (level 4) (Scharmer, 2000).
3 part survey with open and closed questions on the group, avatar, and individual levels (42 items, 14 factors)Some survey items were patterned after studied performed by Ratan, McCreery, Van Looy, and the NCI’s Team Science Toolkit specifically the baseline survey for the TREC- Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer (TREC)Stokols and HallFor the qualitative methods- phenomenological research explored individual experiences, using open ended survey questions that will be interpreted using thematic analysis, thick description compared to the literature. For the quantitative methods- correlational research will assess the relationships among variables for a single group. The 14 factors are…
Participants:Sampling range are known, active, diverse collaborative groups involving volunteers that have international, cross-industry participation working toward professional, shared goals
Caution should be used to interpret findings Phenomenology as an approach requires the researcher to bracket their bias and experience when engaging in qualitative research. The use of self-reported data helps avoid bias in this case at the price of reliability (Creswell, 2012, p. 57). Transdisciplinarity suggests that the researcher is inseparable with the observed. Transdisciplinarity encourages us to learn about “being” to better experience phenomena, data collection, analysis, and interpretation to better integrate the researchers’ experience (Montuori, 2013).
Transformative cultivation of self to Self (Scharmer, 2000; Senge, Scharmer, Jaworski, & Flowers, 2005; Scharmer, 2009; Scharmer 2010)
Please accept my heartfelt thanks for all your support *smiles*Pardon me I am choked up.