This is a presentation at the W3C RDF Next Steps workshop, Jun 24, 2010 at Stanford.

1. Contexts and Importing in RDF
Jie Bao, Li Ding, and Deborah L. McGuinness
Tetherless World Constellation
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Troy, NY, 12180-3590, USA
{baojie,dingl, dlm}@cs.rpi.edu

2. Context Matters
- Provenance
Stanford
hasRole PostDoc
stanford:LiDing
HasAffiliation Stanford
hasRole
owl:sameAs
RPI
ResearchScientist
hasRole
rpi:LiDing
HasAffiliation RPI
6/26/2010 W3C RDF Next Steps Workshop, Stanford 2

3. Context Matters
- Assumptions
rdf:type
foaf:mbox owl:InverseFunctionalProperty
ISWC
Jie Bao foaf:mbox
baojie@cs.rpi.edu
J. Bao foaf:mbox
Foo forum
janesmith456 foaf:mbox
n/a
johnsmith123 foaf:mbox
6/26/2010 W3C RDF Next Steps Workshop, Stanford 3

4. Context Matters
- “World”
“Matrix”
“Real World”
South Park
killed
THEY Kenny
rdf:type rdf:type
Fictional People
0100010111010101010101010…
6/26/2010 W3C RDF Next Steps Workshop, Stanford 4

5. Contexts are
• Something related to the meaning of a sentence
– Provenance (who, when, where, how, etc)
– Assumptions (e.g., OWA, UNA)
– World
– …
• Claim: when a triple is published/reused/inferred,
its context should be made explicit.
6/26/2010 W3C RDF Next Steps Workshop, Stanford 5

6. Wait
• Don’t we already have
– Named graph
– C-OWL
– N3 quotation
– Contexts in AI
–…
6/26/2010 W3C RDF Next Steps Workshop, Stanford 6

7. Named Graph
Name = context
Contexts are more than
names
Graph_RPI
• One triple may be in
{:LiDing :hasRole multiple contexts
:ResearchScientist.} • One context may be
reused
• Relations between
contexts need to be
explicit, too.
6/26/2010 W3C RDF Next Steps Workshop, Stanford 7

8. C-OWL
South Park
• C-OWL provides an
People ontology mapping
language that respects
contexts.
into
• Knowledge transfer is
RealWorld controlled.
Fictional People
• Contexts are more than
mapping
6/26/2010 W3C RDF Next Steps Workshop, Stanford 8

9. N3Logic
rpi:LiDing says • Again, contexts are
{rpi:LiDing :hasRole more than quotation.
:ResearchScientist.}
6/26/2010 W3C RDF Next Steps Workshop, Stanford 9

10. Our Proposal
• Based on named graph
• Add two constructs
• rdf:context
• rdf:imports
6/26/2010 W3C RDF Next Steps Workshop, Stanford 10

11. Adding Contexts to RDF
Part I: rdf:context Part II: rdf:import
G1 rdf:imports G2.
G rdf:context C. G1 rdf:context C1.
G2 rdf:context C2.
C may give a context • Importing as citation
definition document • How knowledge G2 to G1
transferred from
C agent LiDing. can be controlled by
relations between C1 and
C semantics OWL_Full C2.
6/26/2010 W3C RDF Next Steps Workshop, Stanford 11

12. Partial Reuse
{s1 p1 o1.} rdf:imports
{s3 p3 o3.}
rdf:context C1. rdf:context C3.
{s2 p2 o2.} rdf:imports
rdf:context C2.
C3
C3 rdfc:compatibleWith C1.
C3 rdfc:incompatibleWith C2.
6/26/2010 W3C RDF Next Steps Workshop, Stanford 12

13. Reasoning with Contexts
Context relations Context rules
• Compatible • C is compatible with
• Incompatible contexts with agent
• Extend “rpi:LiDing”
• In • C is compatible with
contexts that are
compatible with C2
Can be specified in OWL,RIF
or other languages
6/26/2010 W3C RDF Next Steps Workshop, Stanford 13

14. Open Issues
• Context specification
– Provenance model?
– Context relation vocabulary?
• Formal semantics of contexts
• Default contexts
6/26/2010 W3C RDF Next Steps Workshop, Stanford 14