Ned Kelly Essay

Rand Kelly Research Paper
Ned Kelly
Ned Kelly was, as many people still think, an infamous and ruthless bushranger but he was forced
to live this way. A victim is a person who suffers misfortune, maltreatment or physical attack. This
defines Ned perfectly that is why he is a victim. Ned Kelly and his family were victimised by the
federal authorities like the police, court judges and government. Although Ned was a bushranger he
didn't really have a choice because his whole family was involved with crime and his parents were
both Irish immigrants.
Ned was a victim for many reasons that were out of his control. He was victimised because he was
raised in an Irish family and because he was the oldest male in his family he had to take up the
role of his father and it would have been hard growing up with no role model. Almost all of the
male members of his family were involved in crime. This forced Ned to become a criminal
because the police thought of him as one of the Kelly family and a criminal. Ned grew up in an
Irish family and his family were criminals this means for the rest of Ned's life he would be
victimised by the federal authorities. This makes Ned a victim of colonial society....show more
content...
They were poor selectors with not very good land for crops or farming animals they also had to
pay rent for their abhorrent land whereas squatters got their own choice of as much land as they
want for free. The Kelly's bought 41 acres of land and were growing crops on it and they thought
they might have been successful. This did not last long because Ned's father had no experience in
farming and the weather in Victoria, from drought to flood, were unfamiliar to experienced
farmers. If any of the selectors' animals wandered onto squatters' land they would take until the
selectors payed to get their animals back. This is why the Kelly family were poor and forced into
crime to find some money to pay for the growing
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Ned Kelly Quotes
Edward (Ned) Kelly was an infamous Australian bushranger of Irish descent that lived from 1854
to 1880. Black Snake is one of many pieces of literature that has been written based on Ned Kelly's
life. Black Snake is a historical fiction novel based on non – fictional events. Black Snake shows
different perspectives on what really happened, so the person could've slightly changed the story to
back up their point of view. Carole Wilkinson is an award– winning Australian author. All
throughout Australian history there has been a continual debate on whether Ned Kelly was a hero
or a villain. This debate has good evidence for both sides, so it comes down to personal
interpretation. In Black Snake, Wilkinson constructs Ned Kelly as a hero. She portrays...show more
content...
Throughout Black Snake, Ned Kelly is described, using language, in a variety of ways. Some people,
such as Superintendent Hare, felt very strongly that Ned Kelly was a villain. "Ned Kelly was a flash
ill–looking blackguard.... Notwithstanding all his boasted pluck and boasts, how game he would
die" (Pg. 127, Wilkinson, 2002). Others, such as Ned Kelly's mother (Ellen Kelly), felt very
strongly that Ned Kelly was a hero and that police mistreatment towards him and his family was
what drove him to become an outlaw. "Think what the police have done to me and mine, and then
tell me if you wonder that the boys turned and smote the ones who had so persecuted them" (Pg.
128, Wilkinson, 2002) Others, such as Constable Richards of Euroa, feel that Ned Kelly did
commit wrongdoings and did break the law, but he was standing up for people that were
struggling and didn't have a voice and helping those being mistreated. "He was a bushranger but
he was the gamest man I ever saw" (Pg. 129, Wilkinson, 2002). The language techniques included
in Black Snake are imagery and figurative language, language that can make a reader absorbed in a
book and finally, colonial words correct to that time period. In Black Snake, many words are used
that can be defined as imagery and figurative language. Imagery can be defined as the use of words
to create a vivid mental

Is Ned Kelly A Victim Or Hero?
Edward "Ned" Kelly was an Australian bushranger of Irish descent, he is a well–known Australian
legend from the 18 hundreds. Ned Kelly has done some good, bad and plain out evil things in his
life, but what if there is a reason to this? Back in the 18 hundreds things were not as great as some
might think.... And Ned Kelly and his family fell victim to many things ranging from poverty to
poor role models. No doubt about it Ned Kelly is an Australian legend who has done many things in
his short life.... But what if there is more to how he got to the point of robbing banks and shooting
Police officers? Ned Kelly was born December 1854 and lived 25 years dying in 1880. But one
question that still plays on peoples mind is he a victim, villain or hero? Here is my evidence on why
I think Ned Kelly is a victim and not a villain or hero....show more content...
Meaning that his were poor, this lead to Ned having to drop out of school to help his family to get
money after his father (John Kelly) had died. This made life a bigger struggle for the Kellys.
Growing up Ned Kelly had horrible male role models to look up too for example both his Dad and
Step Dad. This would not be such a great Childhood now would

Ned Kelly Essay
Actor Discussion About a Representation of Justice with Relation to the Character of Ned Kelly
By Oliver Friendship and Ella Dittmar
Actor 1 (Oliver): Right then Ella, let's just make sure that we are on the same page here. Our
company, 'Unearthed Voiced', tours around secondary schools, adapting texts, and their characters,
into contemporary plays. The current work we have been tasked with, is Peter Carey's 'The True
History of the Kelly Gang'. The book is written by Carey from the perspective of the main
protagonist; Ned Kelly. It is in the form of parcels of fictional letters 'written' by Carey's Kelly, to the
character's young daughter; detailing his perspective on the major events of his life.
After reading through this work, and looking...show more content...
Ned Kelly's pleas for true justice to end discrimination against poor Irish settlers eventually
opened the eyes of people, and he came to symbolise a fight by a flawed hero for justice, liberty
and the innocent. Images of Ned Kelly were even projected to a global audience during the opening
ceremony of the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. Therefore, showing Carey's Kelly as an everyday
man who was the victim of the unjust powers that be, is only logical. By doing so, we can harness
and perpetuate the existing love and admiration for Ned Kelly's legend that is present among the
contemporary Australian populous. We must definitely show Carey's Kelly, and this particular
representation of justice, within a modern adaptation of the work. It's a representation of justice that
many nowadays Australians want to hear, and will therefore connect

Ned Kelly: A True Hero
Ned Kelly is thought to be an awful murderer but in reality Ned Kelly is a thoughtful, nice, heroic
man that protects his family and saves the lives of many unfortunate people. Ned Kelly a
bushranger built into a hero, saved the many lives of family, friends and passing by individuals.
When Ned was only eleven years of age he saved Dick Shelton a young boy from drowning in a
river. Dick Shelton was a young and curious student walking to school when he fell into a river and
started to drown. Ned passing by jumped in to save the young school boy. This heroic act was held
when Ned was only eleven years of age. (In the Carol Wilkinson, Black Snake the Daring of Ned
Kelly, p 10–11 quotes 'Eleven–year–old Ned happened to be passing by and jumped

Who Is Ned Kelly: Villain, Victim Or Hero?
Villain, victim and hero. Ned Kelly, "with all that he was, and for all that he did, belongs to the true
Australia – not the Australia of the shams and the money–jugglers, but the Australia that sweats and
suffers and fights..." (IronOutlaw, Clive Turnbull's View On The Kelly Outbreak, 2016). Ned Kelly
(1854–1880) was a notorious Australian outlaw. He murdered three policemen, robbed two banks
and committed numerous other crimes. Regardless of his criminality, people claim Ned "Australia's
equivalent of Robin Hood." (UpFromAustralia, 2016). Ned Kelly was a hero, a quintessential
Australian battler. He helped the poor and fought against inequality.
Ned Kelly gave away a massive sum of money to many people who were oppressed by the police.
"Ned...show more content...
His killings of three policemen at Stringybark Creek is often considered as vicious. "Lonigan
jumped to his feet and drew his revolver but Ned Shot him dead." (IronOutlaw, 2016).
Furthermore, the siege at Glenrowan inn was considered to be brutal and people who were
injured or killed included innocent civilians. "Woman and children were screaming. There were
not only screams of fear but terrible screams of pain." (Wilkinson, 2014). Although Ned Kelly did
murder police officers at Stringybark Creek, he stated, "I was compelled to shoot them or lie down
and let them shoot me." (Shephard, 2016). Facts tell us that "two patrols of police came to the
valley, carrying leather straps – the contemporary equivalent of body bags – to take the Kellys out."
(Fitzsimons, 2016). Ned was only defending himself. At Glenrowan inn, it was actually the police
who were shooting the citizens. "In the lull in the firing, the terrified women and children tried to
escape. They called the police not to fire, but their pleas were ignored and a hail of bullets drove
them back. A bullet grazed a baby's head." (Wilkinson, 2014). Ned Kelly did do some villainous
acts. Nevertheless, these were far insignificant than how the police treated civilians and also the
excellent actions he did – the deeds of a hero.
Ned Kelly is absolutely an Australian hero. How he used his bank hold–up proceeds to support
people in need and his continuous fight for justice makes him a legend. Ned was forced to become
an outlaw after continuous harassment from police. He also only formed the Kelly Gang to show
how people could stand against injustice. Ned had shown himself a quintessential Australian battler
who stands up for his beliefs, a true

Short Story Of Ned Kelly: A Cold Blooded Murderer
Ned Kelly was a cold–blooded killer and robber. He stole cattle, generations, money and the pride
that we Australians have for our nation. Ned was a disgrace to Australia for his violent acts and
his acts of robbery, striking fear into the absolutely terrified hearts of Australia. Ned stole from
banks and local businesses, stealing thousands of pounds quicker and clever than ever before.
Imagine one day, coming home and all of your money was stolen and your deeds and mortgages
to your house were destroyed. Overnight Ned, the devious murderer, destroyed the life of
hundreds. All because of the Kelly's. Although this could look fair for the poor having justice over
squatters all Ned did was ruin the lives of hundreds of people. Ned was a cold–blooded murderer.
Picture yourself having a relaxing, beautiful afternoon grooming the horses and eating your supper.
Suddenly you have a wild man charging in and shooting your best and closest friends. In one day,
Ned Kelly widowed three women and struck fear into their children. Every night the wives lived in
fear that one day, Ned would come to them and take their lives and the lives of their children. To
insult...show more content...
He could have helped the people of his town instead of putting them into distress and striking fear
into their hearts. People say that it is not Ned's fault that he was a criminal and that he was
influenced by his family. But if we had a murderer who killed hundreds would we let him out of
prison just because of this weak excuse? Ned found it impossible to be an honourable man and
instead chose to be one of the most wanted outlaws in Australia. Ned was the worst outlaw, who
murdered viciously, that Australia has ever seen. He murdered three men, robbed two banks and
caused disruption throughout Australia. Ned was the biggest disgrace to Australia that the world has
ever seen, the most villainous person who ever lived in

English Essay
Topic: With reference to your class text, discuss how the text is representative of the Australian
Identity. You may wish to consider characters, plot, setting and themes in your response.
The film, "Ned Kelly" directed by Gregor Jordan explores the life of a man forced into outlawry and
in the process, portrays the various characteristics of the Australian identity. These include mateship
in terms of loyalty towards one's people, courage in the sense of defiance when facing injustice and
finally, the contemporary theme of the underdog. These characteristics, which will each be
elaborated on below, are successfully portrayed in this film through the use of creative
characterization, effective cinematic techniques and engaging...show more content...
His courage is introduced during the opening credits where the audience is shown a young Ned
saving another child from drowning. This emphasis on his courage continues until the very end of
the film where he endures through the pain of the bullets and the thought of his inevitable death
while persisting with the fight against what he felt was injustice. Whilst other nations praise
authority and openly embrace the bureaucratic culture, it is part of the Australian identity to steer
clear of such notions and Ned Kelly's actions, as portrayed in the film clearly encapsulate this. In
the film, he is described to have been one of the few colonial figures who stood against injustice
and police corruption. The audience is presented with direct evidence of this defiance when he and
his gang burn the Euroa and Jerilderie banks' mortgage papers in an attempt to erase the debts and
create losses for the banks. The significance of this defiance is demonstrated in the quote, "It was
like slapping Queen Victoria herself, across the face". The values of courage combined with
defiance when faced with injustice which at the time, was the caused by the establishment, is an
important aspect of the Australian identity and this film in its portrayal of Ned Kelly is successful in
representing

Ned Kelly: Villain Or Victim?
Is Ned Kelly, a hero? A, villain? Or is he a victim? Many people have a different opinion on this
topic. There is no doubt that Ned Kelly was a hero and a victim because he was one of the
Australian greatest bushranger, who not only outsmarted the police but also stood up for his
family's rights. In recent years' opinion has become much more divided on the issue of Ned Kelly a
villain or victim. There is no doubt that Ned was a victim there are many reasons to this. Firstly,
when Ned was just a boy his father died so as the oldest in the family he took the role of head of the
family for some years. Secondly, Ned was a bank robber and a thief, but do you know why? He was
a bank robber and a thief for his family, his mother who was put in jail

Ned Kelly Villain
Ned Kelly was a Villain
This man is truly the worst criminal that Australia has ever seen in its entire history. Ned Kelly
robbed banks, murdered three men and stole horses and cattle. Ned was part of the Kelly gang.
There is no doubt he was the worst of them, he schemed all the villainous plans, he was the one
who killed all three policemen and before the gang was even created he stole many farming
families horses and cattle. If you don't think this man is a villain from what I have said so far I
don't know what to say. He shot three men dead with no mercy (pg52), he attempted to derail a
police train (pg102) with no care how many men where on that train and he stole hundreds possibly
thousands of horses and cattle. (pg1).
Ned Kelly was definitely a villain. This man didn't care about anything accept himself and crime. He
lived for crime that's all he thought about robbing, stealing and murdering. If he didn't get caught
when he did, then Australia may have become extinct. Ned murdered three men, (pg52) not caring
if they had families to return home to. Ned didn't care if they were a friend or foe. They even
killed one of their best friends. (pg103) Do you think Ned cared about this or not? He didn't even
care that one of their...show more content...
If you can think of a more horrible person I would like to know who they are. Ned Kelly was
hungry, hungry for blood, human blood. He thought of the ruthless plan so far. A normal human
being wouldn't even think of this evil plan even if they tried their hardest it they wouldn't even
come close to this plan. The Kelly gang were going to attempt to derail a police train this may not
seem like much but part of the plan was to take hostages. I am not talking about 1 or 2 hostages I
am talking about 40 odd hostages. (pg105) Would you have like to have been 1 of those hostages?
Just think being locked in a room with 4 disgusting bushrangers. But Ned didn't stop at murdering he
had a different trade as

Ned Kelly, A Hero Or A Villain
Ned Kelly was certainly a villain rather a hero
Ned Kelly was certainly a villain due to his violent and bloodthirsty behavior throughout his life.
Even as a child, Ned was involved in trouble and developed an early life of crime. To contribute to
the crimes, Ned Kelly is to blame for infamous attack at Stringybark Creek. Finally Kelly was the
gang leader in the merciless shootout of the Glenrowan Siege. Kelly's trouble with the law quickly
escalated through indecent behaviour, assault and stock theft to police killer.
Ned Kelly is definitely a villain because of his development of an early endless life of crime. Kelly
did not receive a normal childhood and was instead meddling with the law. The Kelly's were
often in trouble with the police over horse and cattle theft. At the age of fourteen in 1869, Kelly
was arrested and served seven weeks in jail for the alleged assault of Ah Fook, a Chinese pig
farmer. At such a young age, Ned Kelly was already known for his crimes and explains why he is
undeniably a villain. Furthermore, as Kelly grew older his crimes started to worsen. Again in
1869, Ned was alleged of being assistant to thief turned bushranger Harry Power and was charged
for helping out during some robberies. Due to these interactions with people doing crime, Kelly
was further drawn into the world of crime. Kelly was again jailed in 1870 for three years after
assaulting a hawker (salesperson) and also being in possession of a stolen horse. Ned Kelly's
criminal actions didn't end there. On the 15th of April, 1878, Kelly shot at Constable Alexander
Fitzpatrick in the wrist after he became too friendly with his sister Kate. Kelly's crime rate was
endless.Later the Kelly gang led by their leader Ned Kelly, committed some major robberies in the
National Bank branches at Euroa and Jerilderie. At Jerilderie, the gang even held police and
civilians hostage while stealing all the money from the bank's vaults. Ned Kelly's early life was
corrupted in crime with theft and assault and added towards his increase in villainy.
Ned Kelly was certainly a villain rather than a hero due to his barbaric actions at Stringybark Creek.
Stringybark Creek was the new hiding point for the Kelly gang. On the 26th of October

Ned Kelly: A Good Role Model
Ned Kelly is Australia's most famous bushranger who was born in 1855 and got hanged in 11th of
November 1880. Some people think that he is a hero for defiance of the colonial authorities and
might did some good acts. However, evidence shows that he is definitely not a hero but a
villainous outlaw who did numerous crimes. He was certainly not a good role model to anyone
considering that he did all these acts. He was a criminal who is wrongly memorialized as an
Australian hero.

Ned Kelly: The People's Hero
Ned Kelly, born of an ex–Irish convict, is forever immortalised in Australian folk stories as the
people's hero, and the authorities' criminal. Born and raised in the Australian state of Victoria,
this figure had a hard past. Ned Kelly lost his father when he was eleven, and he and his family
were forced into a life of stealing, just to stay alive. By many he was seen as the hero, saving a
young boy when he was only eleven, and doing what he thought was right for his friends and
family. But Ned Kelly was seen, mainly by the authorities, as a criminal, stealing cattle from a
young age, robbing people, and large banks. Though like the majority of all criminals, Ned Kelly
had to pay for his crimes, and was hung at the Melbourne Gaol for three...show more content...
He believed that what he was doing was right and just, even though it was against the law. His
final words, "Such is life", suggest that he tried his hardest to do what he thought was right, to
protect his friends and family, but that happened to be the wrong thing, and got him, and his
friends killed. Ned Kelly was born in 1855, and lived until he was 25 years old, when he was hung
for the acts he committed during his life. He had two brothers and five sisters, and for most of his
life he only had his mother to look after him. He is seen by many as a hero, a good man who
protected his friends and family, but also as a villain, who killed policemen and robbed banks. Ned
Kelly was justly convicted for his crimes and paid the

Ned Kelly's Argumentative Analysis
Ned Kelly's legacy is controversial; some regard him as a villain, with homicidal tendencies and a
blatant disregard for the law, while others like to think of him as a folk hero and Australia's
counterpart of Robin Hood. He had a captivating past filled with accusations and exile. Authoritative
figures of the time saw Ned as a menace to society and a miscreant that had to be controlled.
Now–a–days however, Ned Kelly is seen diversely and many contrasting opinions have arisen on
whether or not he deserved his fate. It is interesting to note the distinction between 19th century and
modern day perspective.
Edward (Ned) Kelly's past tells a compelling tale of outlawed heroism. Ned was born in Beveridge, a
small town in the British settlement...show more content...
This is evident in the mixed reactions in the press to the Jerilderie letter. The Jerilderie letter is one
of only two original Kelly documents that is known to have survived. It is a 56–page document of
almost 8,000 words. The letter caused an upset throughout both the press and the public due to the
fact that the police did not allow it to be published. The authorities didn't want to fuel sympathy for
Ned and feared that releasing his letter might have caused more of the community to see Ned as
a hero. Furthermore, the police were worried that the public would take sides and stand behind
Ned rather than them and seek leniency for someone who had defied their authority. In the letter
Ned attempts to justify his actions, including the murder of three policemen. He describes cases
of suspected police corruption and calls for justice for poor families. Ned also admitted he was
the only one who actually shot the police officers and claimed his gang innocent. Policemen knew
the public valued honour and that this would be viewed as selfless and noble and they didn't want
people thinking any higher of him. Ned Kelly had his own moral compass. He believed that
standing up to the law because of injustice was the right thing to do. He and his gang didn't believe
they were doing the wrong thing; they just refused to accept the laws of the day. A newspaper called
the Bendigo Advertiser published an article about the Jerilderie bank robbery and Ned's letter just
after it happened. The article briefly talked about how the Kelly gang got into Jerilderie undetected
and it outlined the actions of the police once they realised the misfits were back, but mostly, it
explained what Ned's letter was about. It was clear that his letter was the predominant focus of the
piece. Policemen and powerful figures of society in the 19th Century saw the Kelly gang as an
irritation with neglect

Ned Kelly: Hero Or Villain?
In ways he is a hero and in ways he is a villain. Ned Kelly robbed banks which made him a villain
/criminal. But he didn't use the money, he gave it to friends and family. He killed 3 officers which
is the worst crime you can make in Australia because it's taking someone's life. He also tried to kill
some police. He only became a criminal because of the police they kept annoying his family for
mischief that they couldn't solve. Ned Kelly was more of a villain than hero because he stole
horses, murdered and lied. But his 'prison' wasn't to hurt people but keep them entertained so he
wasn't so much of a criminal. He also was a family man so he loved his family and would do
anything even robbing banks for their freedom, that's how he got into this

Essay about Ned Kelly-Hero or Villain?
Edward Ned Kelly was Australia's most famous bushranger; regarded by many as a hero who
fought "for the rights of the battler." Whether Ned Kelly was a hero, however, has been debated
throughout Australia's history. Evidence shows that Ned was a murderous villain who terrorised
towns and robbed wealthy pastoralists; a man who broke the law and committed an array of crimes
that were both evil and immoral. Ned Kelly was a villain; an outlaw and thief who is wrongly
immortalised as an Australian hero.
Ned Kelly was the leader of a lawbreaking group of criminals named the 'Kelly Gang;' a group
established in 1876 that included Ned, his brother Dan, and their two friends Steve Hart and Joe
Byrne. Ned was a significant figure in this gang;...show more content...
The culminating events of Ned Kelly's life led to the gruesome murder at Stringybark Creek; when
Ned knowingly murdered three innocent policemen. This incident occurred in October, 1880 when
a group of policemen were searching for Ned and his brother Dan near the Wombat Ranges. This
small contingency of officers included Sergeant Kennedy and Constables McIntyre, Lonigan and
Scalon. While searching for Dan and Ned, the officers split into two groups in order to find the
fugitives. Even though the officers were disguised as prospectors, Dan and Ned recognised them
immediately and began shooting at them. During the battle, three of the officers died; only McIntyre
managed to escape and return back to testify against Ned. Although some historians believe that the
murder of these officers at Stringybark Creek was an accident, evidence shows that Ned deliberately
shot at these innocent men. Just before leaving the crime scene, Ned stole Sergeant Kennedy's gold
watch and later stated, "What's the use of a watch to a dead man?" These evil, soulless words were
truly spoken by a cruel and deplorable villain.
Even though many consider Ned Kelly to be a significant national representative of Australian
culture and heroism, the evil deeds that Ned Kelly committed during his life were not forgotten on
the 27th of June, 1880. His criminal record was mostly overshadowed by his brave, courageous and
loyal traits that won him the love of his people

Research Paper On Ned Kelly
"A psychopathic criminal misfit who left a trail of destruction and misery in his wake." (Moor,
2013) Edward "Ned" Kelly (1854 – 1880) was a convicted murderer, horse and cattle thief and bank
robber as well as the leader of an infamous group of Australian outlaw bushrangers named the 'Kelly
Gang'. He committed a large number of major crimes, terrorised the towns of Victoria by invoking
fear and distress in citizens' hearts and endangered hundreds of civilians' lives in his many ruthless
exploits. Ned Kelly was a villain; an enemy of society who condemned the police for all his
wrongdoings.
The vast array of transgressions committed by Kelly clearly displays his strong sense of criminality.
From 1870 to 1874, Kelly was arrested for numerous charges including assault, theft and robbery
and received a total of six and a half years' imprisonment. "In 1870, Kelly was convicted of
summary offences and imprisoned for six months. Soon after release he was sentenced to three
years' imprisonment for receiving a mare knowing it to have been stolen." (Barry, 1974) In 1877,
he had stolen hundreds of stock by his own admission, claiming in the Jerilderie Letter that this was
caused by police persecution and that it was necessary to support his poverty–stricken family.
However, these crimes remain inexcusable. "No one cares that Kelly may have had a tough life.
Almost every single person in the 19th century colony of Victoria had a tough life – and they didn't
all become murdering armed

Ned Kelly Heroes
Ned Kelly was a very famous Australian Bushranger who was well known for his courage and
bravery. The character of Ned Kelly is considered as either a murderous villain or the Robin Hood
of Australia. Ned Kelly is more commonly portrayed as the Robin Hood of Australia for people
in the modern society, after considering his heritage on Australia during his life. There are many
interpretations of Ned Kelly's life and character, which help people make judgements whether he
is a murderous villain or a hero. Such interpretations include the film "Ned Kelly" (2003) as well
as the documentary "Australia is still divided over Ned Kelly". Throughout the film Ned Kelly, the
main scenes which show the character of Ned Kelly as The Robin Hood are such...show more
content...
The main reason he robs the bank is so he could give money to the less wealthy people who are in
need. To support this idea, a high camera angle is used to show Ned Kelly's expression and his
personality, as well as his desperation for helping people. Ned Kelly can go to any extent to
achieve his mission. This also highlights a quality, which helps him gain the title of the Robin
Hood of Australia. Props are used in this scene to help emphasize his point and his mission. The
props used in this scene are guns and are used to indicate how serious Ned Kelly is for completing
his mission and to describe what extent he can reach to gain success. Furthermore, a medium shot
of Steve, who is a member of the Kelly Gang, steals a watch of one of the townspeople. The
medium shot displays a greater focus on emotion and status of him. The main purpose of this
medium shot is to incorporate the setting, the characters and personalities of members of the Kelly
Gang. Ned Kelly establishes leadership in the Kelly gang, as his actions and personal qualities lead
him to his personal journey of success after achieving what he wanted. Ned Kelly takes action
against injustice and produces his own title of being represented as Robin

Ned Kelly's Stereotypes: Film Analysis
Fair dinkum, gotta love the great outdoors" is a phrase that that we like to think sums up, all of
Australian males. But does it really? Contrary to the international belief and even sometimes to
Australia's own citizens, this stereotype is almost completely wrong. The statement that portrays all
Australians as "tough Aussies who can tame a bronco, no worries mate" may have been true at one
point in the Australian culture but does not apply now.
This stereotype mainly stemmed from the legacy of the pioneers and bushrangers that once made the
majority of the Australian population. One such bushranger, though some may prefer the term
'vagabond' or 'bandit', who was extremely notorious in Australia is the ill–reputed Irishman Ned
Kelly.
Ned Kelly, the ultimate bushranger tough, masculine and unkempt, with a great knowledge of the
land. The film Ned Kelly (2003) shows this as Ned monologues, "Lying low, living in caves, you get
to learn sometimes. Eventually you can read soils and rocks like books. I've watched gravel fade,
...show more content...
Ned Kelly has this characteristic. Though most likely glorified, the film of Ned Kelly shows the
Kelly gang as strong lionhearted men who could face anything, even the stress of being wanted
men. They display this bravery and strength in many scenes. The most prominent however is in
the final showdown as Steve says, "Short life, but a merry one." And Joe says, "We're gonna give
them a good old fight aren't we?". Men are not only defined to be physically strong but also
mentally. Like the Kelly Gang, they should be able to find the dark and dry humour in a time of
drastic time like in Joe Byrne's final moments as he says "Jesus, Christ I need a drink lad". His
drink is then shot out of his hand, but he still smiles as if thinking ironically, "That'd be 'bout

Ned Kelly Cruelty
"Such is life" These words is thought to be Ned Kelly's last before he was hanged for his crimes. But
who was Ned Kelly? What did Ned do that he deserved to be hanged? Why was Ned important?
To many Ned Kelly is seen as a hero, to others he was seen as a villain but in either event he
changed what would later be Australia. WasNed Kelly good or bad? Before we understand Ned's
story we must understand Austraila before Ned. Australia was first inhabited by the Aborigonals
(the indigenous people) and was left alone by the outside world until Europeans first had set sail
for the country at around 1606. Between 1606 and 1770 an estimated 54 European ships had
came to Australia. Most of these European ships were from the Dutch East India Company and
for a small time became New Holland. It wasn't until August of 1770 that somebody officially
claimed Australia his name was Lieutenant James Cook. Cook had claimed Australia in the name
for King George the Third and renamed Australia to New South Wales. Once claimed, two fleets
came to Australia the first had eleven ships with about 1,350 people on it. The second fleet had
provided food and supplies that were badly needed but many on the second fleet were ill and many
were near death. None of the people on the second fleet were helpful to the colonies. One thing to
note is that many of the people getting sent to Australia were pervious convicts not only that, but in
1790 there was one woman to four men.This made making a new colony

Ned Kelly Essay

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von College Papers Writing Service

Mehr von College Papers Writing Service (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Ned Kelly Essay