Death Penalty Essay Introduction

Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty
Introduction
The Death Penalty (DP), being also known as capital punishment, capital offence and corporal
punishment, is a sentence of death imposed on a convicted criminal (1); this essay will use all the
terms interchangeably. The DP breaches two fundamental human rights, namely the right to life and
the right to live free from torture; both rights are protected under the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights (UDHR) adopted by the United Nations in 1948, which contains a list of each human
rights that everyone is entitled to (UDHR 1948). Nevertheless, in 2016 alone at least 1,032 people
were executed in 23 countries; most executions took place in China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and
Pakistan (Amnesty International 2017).
The essay will...show more content...
cutting down a tree.
Today, 104 countries abolished the DP but the USA, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Japan still use it
as the most severe form of punishment (Amnesty International 2017); nevertheless, the execution
methods, such as the lethal injection, have become less barbaric. Still, many activists and
organisations contest the use of the DP, such as Amnesty International, which is a non–governmental
organization with a focus "to prevent and end grave abuses of human rights and to demand justice
for those whose rights have been violated" (Amnesty International 2016, &3).
II.Arguments for and against the death penalty
DP considerations involve religion, law and moral aspects to channel peoples' behaviour. Religion
brings an element of confusion with this regard. All religions believe having life is sacred;
however, they considerably differ in understanding of death penalty justification. The Bible for
example states that "The murderer shall surely be put to death" (Holy Bible, Numbers 35:16–18),
meaning that DP can be warranted whatever the motive. Religious tradition certainly suggests no
less. On the other hand, present Pope Francis declares that "no crime ever deserves the death
penalty" (Pope Fransis 2015), following teachings of the New Testament where Jesus spoke to
love one another: "A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must
love one another. 35 By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Death Penalty: A Research Report
The Death Penalty
Introduction
The first known execution in what is now the United States of America was of Captain George
Kendall who was shot by a firing squad in Jamestown in December 1607 for sowing discord and
mutiny. In 1622 the next known execution, also in the Colony of Virginia, was of Daniel Frank for the
crime of theft. Since then the death penalty has almost always been a part of the criminal justice
system (Reggie, 1997).
Proponents of capital punishment argue five purposes for its use: to remove from society someone
who would cause more harm, someone who is incapable of rehabilitation, to deter others from
committing murder, to punish the criminal, and to take retribution on behalf of the victim. Opponents
of capital punishment argue that death constitutes "cruel and unusual punishment", which is
prohibited by the eighth amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Furthermore, they contend that the
various means used by the state to kill a criminal are cruel. Another concern stems from the fact that
the death penalty is invoked disproportionally against the poor, who cannot afford expensive legal
counsel, as well as against racial, ethnic and religious minorities. Opponents also argue that the death
penalty is applied arbitrarily and inconsistently, and wrongly convicted, innocent people have
received death sentences and been executed. Additionally, they contend a rehabilitated criminal can
make a morally valuable contribution to society. Finally, many believe

A Persuasive Speech On The Death Penalty
Persuasive Speech:
Why I Believe the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Hello, everyone. My name is Devlin
O'Connell and I am going to be speaking to you today about why I believe the death penalty should
be abolished. There are three factors that I base this argument off which surround ethics, efficiency,
and expenditure. In relationship to ethics, I would like to begin with a quote by human rights
activist, Desmond Tutu, "To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice."Capital
Punishment, also known as the Death Penalty, is described as a government practice where a person
is put to death by the state as a punishment for crimes such as murder, treason, espionage, and
genocide. While it may seem unlikely that many people would be convicted of a few of the latter
crimes, there were nearly 3,000 people on death row in the last year. Of those 3,000 people, 117
were found to be innocent. It is predicted that at least 3% more of those sentenced would have been
exonerated with enough time and resources. Let that sink in. An untold number of innocent people
have been executed. As it is, many relatives of victims have said that they do not wish for their
relative's killer to be put to death. Circling back to Tutu's quote, the government is not providing
these families with justice – but with revenge.
We are "perpetuating a cycle of violence unworthy of a civilized society," to quote Bernice King,
"retribution cannot light the way to the genuine healing that

The Death Penalty In Australia
Introduction~ The death penalty has always been one of the most debated issues in Australia. In
most countries in the developed world, the death penalty is illegal. I, however believe that the death
penalty is an important way of keeping all Australians safe.
Body 1~ The crimes of rape, torture, treason, kidnapping, stealing and murder are awful. We can
prevent these from happening by bringing back the death penalty, by following this adjustment their
will be minor crimes being held. In my opinion If someone murdered an innocent victim they should
therefore, be killed there is no question about it. The death penalty can deter people from committing
serious crimes and therefore make Australia a safer country.
Body 2~ The death penalty is

Thesis Statement For Death Penalty
TITLE: Rejecting Death Penalty
Thesis Statement: Death Penalty should not be implemented here in the Philippines, because this is
not a proper way to punish having death penalty for any person made crime.
Problem: Should we legalize Death Penalty here in the Philippines.
I.Introduction: Description of Death Penalty
II.Body
Main Idea (1): Crimes Punishable Death Penalty 1.1 Murder 1.2 Rape
Main Idea (2): President view death Penalty 2.1 Improve economy 2.2 No person will kill
Main Idea (3): Rejecting Death Penalty 3.1 Jails will be use 3.2 Shall not Kill Introduction: Death
penalty if there's an efficient administration of justice in the country. The re–imposition of the death
penalty in the country had been the main argument...show more content...
This is not a proper way to punish any person. The proper way to punish any person is to put
inside the jail in no particular way to take them away. The death penalty is one of the most hotly
debated subjects in our society. Controversy surroundings the issue is emotional with proponents for
and against the death penalty arguing their position by using appeals to emotion appeals to pity and
use of expert opinion. Death penalty has been controversial issue, for many years. It was established
centuries ago and has been accepted by our society. It was put into place to punish those who had
committed an offences against laws of the institution was in the place at the time.
Recommendation: The death penalty. Some people for me feel that it is a good punishment for
some people deserve it an some people feel that the death penalty is taking away somebody's life
which is
God's job. Death penalty is justified death penalty is also known as a capital punishment or death
execution, it is a way to give a person death for his/her crime. However, there are more and more
people who think death penalty is justified have some points. Death penalty has been as high as
eighty

Pro Death Penalty Essay
Capital punishment and the practice of the death penalty is an issue that is passionately debated in
the United States. Opponents of the death penalty claim that capital punishment is unnecessary
since a life sentence accomplishes the same objective. What death penalty opponents neglect to tell
you is that convicted murders and child rapists escape from prison every year(List of prison
escapes, 2015). As I write this essay, police are searching for two convicted murders who escaped
from the Clinton Correctional Facility in Dannemora, New York on June 6th, 2015. The ONLY
punishment from which one cannot escape is the death penalty.
Opponents of the death penalty believe capital punishment is unnecessary and inappropriate in our
modern...show more content...
A fifth rationale in opposition is that the death penalty is too expensive or too costly to taxpayers
to justify its use. According to those who oppose the death penalty and certain studies, it costs
more to execute a person than to keep him or her in prison for life (Death Penalty Focus, 2015).
Finally, it is believed by some that the killing at the hands of the state is not a righteous act but
instead is on the same moral level as the murderers themselves.
According to capital punishment supporters, many of these reasons of the anti–death penalty
movement are false and are now wrongly accepted as fact. The argument that the death penalty does
not deter crime is debatable. By executing murderers you prevent them from murdering again. If
these people no longer exist then they obviously cannot commit more crimes. In addition, criminals
have admitted, in thousands of fully documented cases, that the death penalty was the specific threat
which deterred them from committing murder (Pro–Death Penalty, 2014). The opponents of capital
punishment claim that the death penalty has caused and can cause the execution of innocent people.
However, according to the supporters, no evidence indicates that innocent people have been
executed. Upon reviewing 23 years of capital sentences, a Wall Street Journal study indicated that
they were unable to find a single case in which an innocent person was executed (Eddlem, 2002).
Furthermore, advocates note that the

A Debate of the Death Penalty Essay
The death penalty raises important questions about the right to life, who has a right to life, and
under what circumstances a right to life can be taken away. I believe there are no circumstances
under which capital punishment is justified. I will proceed to defend my claim that capital
punishment is unjustified by arguing a position that killing is wrong because it deprives individuals
of valuable futures. To support my thesis that capital punishment is not justified, I will expand upon
an argument made my Don Marquis in his essay "Why Abortion is Immoral" in which he argues that
killing is immoral on the grounds that it deprives human beings of a valuable future. My argument
is as follows:
1.Killing is wrong because it deprives the...show more content...
The outside factors and conditions are irrelevant. Rather, the value is determined by how that
person perceives his or her own life and these future experiences. Thus, when someone is killed, he
or she is deprived of all the things that were of value and will be of value to him or her in the
future. Causing this loss of a valuable future is ultimately what makes killing wrong and immoral
because that individual has permanently lost the opportunity to enjoy his or her future experiences
which are valuable to him or her. My second premise states that death row criminals are in the same
moral category as other human beings with respect to the moral value of their lives. The only factor
which differentiates a criminal from a non–criminal is the fact that the criminal, usually irrefutably,
violated community standards and the law to commit a crime. In the case of a criminal on death row,
he or she would have had to have committed a serious capital crime to receive the death sentence.
Since committing a capital offense is the only reason death row criminals are different from other
human beings, death row criminals are the same as other human beings in every other respect,
including with respect to the value of their futures. Furthermore, the future of a criminal on death
row is just as valuable as the future of a human being not on death row. Any form of capital
punishment is a form of killing. It does not matter who is actually doing the

Introduction Of The Death Penalty Debate
Introduction to the Death Penalty Debate
It was said by an Iowa State Supreme Court justice in the 1840s, "Crime indicates a diseased mind
in the same manner that sickness and pain do a diseased body. And as in the one case we provide
hospitals for the treatment of severe and contagious diseases, so in the other, prisons and asylums
should be provided for similar reasons" (Banner, 2002, p.118). Individuals who have committed
crimes serve their sentences and punishments, or are "treated", in prisons. Prisons offer a state of
confinement for criminals, all of whom must undergo a proper and humane punishment in a
reasonable amount of time for the crimes in which they have committed. There are times, however,
where capital punishment takes place and the criminal faces death as their punishment for the crime.
When criminals are faced with the death penalty, controversy arises, strengthening the debate as to
whether death is a proper and justifiable form of punishment for the criminal. The death penalty
should not, under any circumstances, be acceptable in the criminal justice system since it diminishes
the purpose of prisons and sentences and provides criminals with an "easy way out."
Supreme Court Cases in regards to Capital Punishment For approximately forty years, the United
States Supreme Court has implemented efforts to regulate the application and administration of the
death penalty. Throughout this time period, there have been a number of cases that have framed an

Argument Against the Death Penalty Essay
Argument Against the Death Penalty
Life is sacred. This is an ideal that the majority of people can agree upon to a certain extent. For this
reason taking the life of another has always been considered the most deplorable of crimes, one
worthy of the harshest available punishment. Thus arises one of the great moral dilemmas of our
time. Should taking the life of one who has taken the life of others be considered an available
punishment? Is a murderer's life any less sacred than the victim's is? Can capital punishment, the
death penalty, execution, legal murder, or whatever a societywishes to call it, be morally justifiable?
The underlying question in this issue is if any kind of killing, regardless of reason, can be accepted.
In this...show more content...
Today our society is assaulted with a barrage of violent images, whether fictional or not. People no
longer think twice when they see a character die in a movie or a bullet riddled high–schooler jump
out of a second story window. The concept of human life has completely lost its meaning. Capital
punishment contributes to this problem. A convict is not thought of as a person. All humanity
associated with them is removed. This rationalization is required in order have a society where
capital punishment is legal. If a society removes humanity from convicts, characters in movies, or
people on the 6 o'clock news it will begin to remove humanity from people encountered in every day
life.
With time violence may become such a commonplace that even seemingly sane people will see no
problem murdering a store clerk, opening fire on someone that cut them off on the highway, or
killing a disobedient child. "A society that chooses violent death as a solution to a social problem
gives official sanction to a climate of violence." (Prejean, 57)
The next argument supporting the immorality of capital punishment is that the reality of it is
hidden. The majority of Americans support the death penalty, yet a very small minority of them has
actually witnessed an execution. Also, very few Americans have known an executed criminal.
These two facts contribute to the entire rationalization process. No matter how anyone looks at it, no
one can deny the fact

A Thesis Statement For Death Penalty
I.Introduction
A.Startling Statement
B.Some information and recent data with regards to the implementation of death penalty globally
will be briefly discussed.
C.Historical Background of the Death Penalty in the Philippines
D.Thesis Statement
II.Body
A.Counterarguments
1.The death penalty deters individuals from committing crimes; therefore, the crime rates decrease.
2.As a respond to society's demands for justice, the death penalty as a form of retribution is justified
because the criminal deserves the punishment fitted to the severity of the crime he or she committed.
3.The death penalty provides a more precise legal and constitutional due process that extrajudicial
killings lack.
B.Own Arguments
1.Economically, the death penalty will not benefit the country in the long run.
2.The death penalty is proven to have no deterrent effect on crimes
3.The death penalty is disadvantageous and biased towards the lower class of the society.
4.The criminal justice and judicial systems in the Philippines are proven to be flawed and
susceptible to mistakes.
III.Conclusion
A.Quotation "history will just repeat itself"
B.Summary
C.Restate the stand of the research paper
D.Challenge the readers to think rationally and...show more content...
Moreover, 2015 has the highest number of executions recorded since 1989 that accounts to 1,634
criminals executed in the span of only a year; in fact, the data do not include China that keeps the
number of executions a secret of the state. The 58 countries that continue to implement the death
penalty include Japan, North Korea, Singapore, United States of America, China, and Iraq. On the
other hand, the abolitionists in law and practice include Myanmar, Australia, Germany, United

Kingdom, Mexico, and Philippines. ("Death

Plato Death Penalty
INTRODUCTION:
Throughout history, governments have been able to use the work and thought of philosophers to
develop policies and laws to protect the citizens of the state. The United States for example,
included John Locke's ideas of the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness in the
Declaration of Independence. However, not all policies proposed by the state would be supported
by philosophers, so is the case of the death penalty, also known as the capital punishment. When
discussing the implementation of Plato's thoughts into the American political system in a type of
reform, it becomes evident that one of the main changes he would make would be to ban the death
penalty. Mainly, because Plato observes the punishment of others as...show more content...
I do consider the death penalty to be ineffective in the healing of the victim's family and find that the
death penalty does little to nothing in the suppression of crimes as those who have been sentenced to
death if found innocent at any given point will struggle with their integration to society. When Plato
discussed the idea that one shouldn't enforce harm upon someone who enforced harm upon us for
that is still unjust, it is describing the death penalty and how a person can have the right to choose
who lives and who dies based on the judgement of the harm that the person inflicted upon others.
Either way, the person deciding whether to sentence the individual to death row or not is acting
unjustly as it is inhumane to decide upon a person's life. As well, there is the idea that through the
death penalty does not suffice the crime that the individual perpetrated. Plato mentions that he can
post a bail that he can pay but he is not going to do so for the punishment would not suffice. As
mentioned by the Death Penalty Information Center, there is discrimination within the sentencing of
death row which means that some depending on their race and not their actions will be

The Cons of the Death Penalty Essay
The Cons of the Death Penalty
"...Over 600 people were falsely convicted and 35 faced death for crimes that they did not
commit..."(Johnson). The death penalty is an ineffective and expensive way of dealing justice to
the American people. It is easier and cheaper to send someone to prison for life than to have them
face the death penalty and be executed. Capital punishment is an unnecessary punishment because
criminals are already managed at prisons.
69
The death penalty can lead to the death of innocent people. For example, "...According to a new
study, serious errors occur in almost 70% of all trials leading to the death penalty..."(Leibman). This
shows that if 100 people were put on death row, 70 would have serious mistakes in their...show more
content...
The lack of proper resources during a trial can make the difference between the innocence and
guilt of a person. The death penalty does not always show the innocence or guilt of a person. It
shows how much he or she is willing to spend to help the trial go his or her way. The death penalty
is an unfair system to those who cannot afford the "evidence" they need to help free them.
224
The death penalty is a corrupt form of legal justice. For example, "...Defendants in about one–third of
the Texas cases were represented at trial by an attorney who had been or later was suspended or
otherwise sanctioned..."(Leibman). This use of fraudulent attorneys in a case can lead to enough
inaccuracies in the evidence to wrongfully execute a person. This action is against the
constitutional right given to us of equal justice for all. In addition, "...One of you two is gonna
hang for this. Since you're the nigger, you're elected..."(Texas Police Officer). A Texas police
officer said this to 2 men, one black and one white that were connected to the murder of a
17–year–old girl. Race plays a big part in the sentence of guilty or innocent. However, supporters of
the death penalty claim "...that it enforces the laws by issuing strict punishment to the
offenders..."(President George Bush). The death

Death Penalty Essay Outline
Introduction:
Today there are many injustices in this world, however some are overlooked in todays society. One
of these acts is the Death Penalty. The Death Penalty, or Capital punishment has been around for
centuries first appearing in Hamarabis code. In modern society the death penalty is often overlooked
because normally it is a criminal receiving the punishment and not your everyday good citizen.
Which is where the main argument lies for most people. The Death Penalty can affect all people,
directly or indirectly, yet most people don't see it this way. From the stoning in the late B.C. era to
the lethal injection, many modern governments, including the united States. have sentenced many to
death for years, without realizing their...show more content...
Yet, the abolitionists failed to gain a majority of the states even in modern times. Due to many of
the states having the death penalty the question lies why? Why would so many states have the
death penalty when some find it completely unecessary, and its even cheaper to imprison people for
life. ("To Execute or Not: A Question of Cost?") The problem for most states is overcrowding in the
prison system, which has gotten increasingly bigger and more of a problem each year. As it turns
out, money is not the problem at all, in fact its ten times cheaper to imprison someone then to kill
them. Death by execution is excessively expensive, and most who support it believe it is cheaper
than imprisonment. (The Gainesville Sun, on Apr. 18, 2012). The death penalty though has been
revolutionized since its beginings, which then draws more to believe it is the better solution, or so
one would think. In 1790, Thomas Bird became the first person to be executed under the United
States Constitution, he was executed by hanging. Since that time there have been many variations of
carrying out the punishment such as firing squad, electric chair, lethal gas, and finally lethal
injection the most used today. In reality, today, because the public has been more educated by
sources such as the media which instead brings drawbacks to methods like the lethal injection. In a
way many states have tried to find a more humane way of killing someone as punishment, which is
virtually

Ethical Issues Surrounding The Death Penalty
Introduction
The death penalty is a hotly debated topic in the society today. The aims of the criminal justice
system are to protect people in the society from the offenders who are not rehabilitated as well as
rehabilitate offenders. Using death penalty is one of the primary methods to reach these ends.
Nonetheless, it is the most questionable means of achieving these goals. Is it ethically right?
Whether the death penalty is morally right or not, one issue remains. With or without capital
punishment individuals in the society still, commit crimes. Therefore, the death penalty is not an
effective deterrent to crime, and it cannot be justified based on its deterrent effect.
A death penalty is a closure for a victim. Many individuals think...show more content...
Many offenses are crimes of passion that are perpetrated in situations encompassing extreme
concern or even excitement. Mostly, homicides are carried out by individuals who act impulsively
or offenders who are substance abusers. Jim Mattox stated that a lot of the criminals executed in
Texas were deterred by the existence of the capital punishment law. This is because they committed
the killings under severe alcohol and drug abuse. As such, individuals who carry out these
delinquencies are usually not in a normal state of mind. This implies that they do not consider the
consequences of their acts in a logical manner. Further, murderers may not be in a state of mind to
calmly think about the possibilities of being caught, tried as well as put to death mainly because
appeals can go on for several years. In addition, merely about half of the offenders sentenced to
death are ultimately executed. All these make it evident that criminals would not change their mind
so as to avoid the risk of execution, making the death penalty an ineffective way of deterring crime
(Bedau, 2012).
Conclusion
Finally, no human being created another and hence it is wrong to take away the life of an
individual in the name of a punishment. There are other methods that can be used in punishing
criminals. A life sentence is the best example where an individual can serve a life sentence in jail. In
jail, the jailed individuals still contribute to the economy of the State as they provide free

Outline Of Death Penalty
Death Penalty
Introduction
In America many people believed that death penalty was the constitutional ban against cruel and
unusual punishment and the guarantees of due process of law and of equal protection under the law.
Now, we believe that the state should not give itself the right to kill human beings – especially when
it kills with happiness and with ceremony, in the name of the law or in the name of its people, and
now we could vote if there could be death penalty.
Capital punishment is really embarrassing thing for the family members of the bad person as for him
/her too. The death penalty is uncivilized in theory and unfair and inequitable in practice. The
percentage of death penalty is more than we think it strive to prevent...show more content...
The reasoning is when people thought that he made the crime, he was killed. After 20 years from his
death he was found that he was innocent. So many people died for nothing. In one of my sources
I used was," I am not in a favor of the death penalty. But I am in a favor locking those people away
in maximum security units where they could never get out. They can never escape. They can never
be paroled. Lack the bad ones away. But no Death penalty." This source I picked because it goes
with my believe.
Body Paragraph Two
For my believes, life is the most valuable thing what we have. Nobody has a right to take of other
persons life. It is God's creation so if he wants he will take it. The death penalty won't help the
person to recognize their guilt. If the people will be killed many of them won't recognize their sin.
If to put them in a closed prison where no windows no people and four walls. I am against all that
stuff like death penalty. The use of food for those people, is many but it is better than death
penalty. The prove was found that many of people who were killed by death penalty were
innocent. The problem is that people that are doing the death penalty often make errors. The
prisoners that could be in prison instead of death could be for their whole life in the prison. Yes it
is not a big punishment, like death penalty, but it is saves life for the person even a really bad one.
For me death penalty is a scary system, first if a bad person kills

The Death Penalty Research Paper
Andrew Cruz
Ms. Rachel Williams
Reading
28 April 2011
Research Paper on the Death Penalty The death penalty is a capital punishment that is put into
effect for major crimes. The death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States and
throughout the world. There was a time period were the death penalty was banned for about four
years in 1972–1976. Many feel that the death penalty is justice because it is retribution toward
criminals who have committed heinous crimes. However the death penalty is inhumane and should
be abolished in the United States. The death penalty has been around since the beginning of
civilization. "Capital Punishment has been practiced in most known societies over the course of
humans history"...show more content...
It is irrational to think that the death penalty – a remote threat at best – will avert murders committed
in drug turf wars or by street–level dealers" (Bedau). This shows that the death penalty is not
stopping murders from occurring. The introduction to the death penalty conducted a survey were top
criminologists stated that the death penalty does not deter homicide rates (Introduction). "For 2009,
the average Murder Rate of Death Penalty States was 4.9 [Murder rates by the 100,000], while the
average Murder Rate of States without the Death Penalty was 2.8" (Introduction).
Not only does the death penalty not deter crime but it is also very expensive. The death penalty
costs so much because of the appeal process. The appeal process is a very long and expensive
process that can go on forever and costs the government millions. Many assume that abolishing the
death penalty is wrong because it becomes unfair to the taxpayers because they think the cost is
less than that of life in prison without parole. However life in prison is less expensive than the
death penalty (Bedau). The death penalty is actually three times more than keeping a prisoner in
prison for life without parole (Messerli). Death penalty trials are costly as well. "[S]tudies estimate
that death penalty trials cost $1

Thesis Statement For The Death Penalty
Introduction
The United States of America have always criticized countries such as China for violating the rights
where the death penalty has been practiced as punishments for crimes. There are no other violations
that could be greater than taking another human being life. The Death Penalty could be view as view
an evil concept when an individual is put to death because their acts have caused afflictions to a
community, therefore, killing the offender to prevent a repeating the same behavior brought distress
and harm accuser's' family. Therefore, the death penalty is not a consideration that will increase the
happiness of the society. (Murphy, 2007). Ordinarily, many people believed that the U.S Constitution
is an inheritance taken from British laws, and that are rooted back to the Commandments. One of
these Commandment is "You shall not kill." Therefore, the principal reasons that the ancestors fled
England were because of persecutions for their beliefs. Even though there was nothing properly
illegal to have a different approach to faith in the same God. Nevertheless, they were disobeying the
British laws which accordingly deserve the Death Penalty for their crime. They fled England to
escape death find refuge in America to become the greatest nation ever. The judicial system needs to
look back if the Forefathers have been put to death what would be the outcome of America today.
My Thesis Statement
The Death Penalty would be practical when ones were living under the eye

Essay On Should The Us Use The Death Penalty
Should the United States stop using the death penalty?
The use of the capital punishment or the "death" penalty should not stop being used in the U.S. or
declared as cruel or unusual punishment.
In many cases people slaughter multiple people without flinching and go on with their day should
these people be allowed to live anymore ask the families of those murdered people. What do you
think they would tell you? Some people say that we are getting fewer and fewer use of the death
penalty so it should be abolished. If it is being used so little these days doesn't it mean that it's
working punishment isn't only used to punish those guilty but to set an example for those thinking
of committing a similar crime. "Last year the U.S. executed 39 people fewer than the year
before."(What it means if the death penalty is dying,Richard Dieter) Crimes such as rape, torture,
treason,kidnapping, murder, larceny, and perjury would have anarchy throughout the community if
not acted on...show more content...
In saying this it costs less money than to house feed and possibly treat medical conditions of
criminals i'm not saying that it's a scapegoat for saving money to not let them live. Ask the
families of those lost of the Boston Marathon incident do those who did this horrible act be
allowed to be fed better than children at our own public schools and a roof over their head when
thousands of people in the U.S. are homeless. There are cases in which using the death penalty is
deemed unconstitutional which supports people arguments against it but it does not apply for all
cases. On the other hand other cases in which it is not used when it should be only exposes the
corruption of our seemingly perfect just system. The death penalty should not be taken away and
permanently stated as cruel and unusual

The Death Penalty Discussion Essay
The Death Penalty Discussion
In today's world terrible crimes are being committed daily. Many people believe that these criminals
deserve one fate; death. Death penalty is the maximum sentence used in punishing people who kill
another human being and is a very controversial method of punishment. Capital punishment is a legal
infliction of death penalty and since ancient times it has bee used to punish a large variety of
offences. Criminals convicted of murder or rape need to be executed because they are danger to
society and the human race. Other people still argue that one method of execution is just as brutal as
the next.
The common sense argument that death is the best deterrent of crime...show more content...
Society and its mixed feelings towards the death penalty; capital punishment is such a harsh and
uncivilised way of treating criminals, but do they look at how the criminals are acting towards
ending other human beings life. They do not care about the lives they have destroyed, or, the
families of their victims. The death penalty can never bring back loved ones back to their families.
It seems rationally to think that if potential killers are aware that if they commit serious crimes they
would be put to death for it, they are less likely to commit these crimes again.
The concept of retribution and justice should bestow to society. This is imperative for peace to be
maintained and that justice is served. If criminals were allowed to get away with such a serious
crime as taking a humans life fear and chaos would rule. Sentence for life in prison will not be
substantial enough. The government must be trusted to protect its innocent citizens from further
crimes. A vast conception concerning death penalty is that it saves society the costs of keeping
inmates imprisoned for long periods. In the act of preserving due process of justice, the court
appeals involved with the death penalty becomes a long, drawn out and a long expensive process.
Does it save its purpose? Does executing someone for crimes such as rape, murder, adultery,
homosexual behaviour, and prostitution actually prevent

A Critical Analysis of the Death Penalty
Introduction The debate on whether or not the death penalty should be abolished has been ongoing
for quite a long period of time. While there are those who believe that the death penalty does not
serve its intended purpose, proponents of the same are convinced that the relevance of the same
cannot be overstated and hence it should not be abolished. In this text, I examine the arguments for
and against the death penalty. The Death Penalty: A Brief Overview In basic terms, the death penalty
according to Stearman "is when the government takes a person's life as a punishment for
wrongdoing" (6). As the author further points out, the death penalty is regarded the most severe
form of punishment that can be dispensed to a citizen by any given government. Most jurisdictions
permit the death penalty for cases involving espionage, treason, as well as murder. Some of the
methods that have been utilized over time to put to death those convicted of crimes punishable by
death include but they are not limited to lethal injection, electrocution, death before a firing squad,
hanging, utilization of poisonous gas, etc. Those in support of the death penalty are convinced that
the same is critical when it comes to the maintenance of law and order. Indeed, one of the most
prominent arguments that have been presented in support of the death penalty is that the same acts
as an important deterrent. However, those opposed to the death penalty maintain that amongst other
things, the death

Death Penalty Essay Introduction

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von College Papers Writing Service

Mehr von College Papers Writing Service (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Death Penalty Essay Introduction