Argument Essays

Argumentative Essay On English Class
What I am about to do is inform you on how to survive the ferocious English 1302 course to make
life a bit easier on you. I mean, you're at the edge of your seat dying with loads of work, starving
like a dying child, living off of pennies and the only thing that is keeping you from collapsing is
your Starbucks drink that is filled with four shots of espresso, right? Well, by the time you get to the
end of this letter, you'll thank me later for it.
When you enter your English class, you will come across many assignments. They happen to be your
annotated bibliography and your researched argument essay, or in other words RAE. The purpose of
the bibliography is to critique sources and gather enough data for you essay. It includes citations, a
summary of your topic and personal thoughts of the sources you chose. The RAE is a persuasive
essay where you attempt to create an argument that is supported with the information you gathered
in your annotated bibliography. In my RAE, I argued that children can recuperate after their parents'
separation. Its purpose was to demonstrate that if parents were to come together and realize that
...show more content...
I learned that by annotating a certain part of the reading, it helped increase my understanding. Not
only that but it helped me not miss a single bit of important information. Writing notes in the
margins of the text was really helpful because it was a summary of the entire paragraph and
whenever I would look back at my notes, it reminded me of what I read. Also, circling words I
didn't know was very accommodating because again, it helped me understand the concept a bit
more. Underlining words that seem important to you is a big tip I suggest because you are able to
use that information when you are talking about your source. You can expand that information by
linking it to another similar source. Therefore, it is important to annotate. It'll take up extra time but
it will be worth
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Arguments Against Juries
Arguments For and Against Juries
The right to a trial by jury is a tradition that goes right to the heart of the British legal system. It is a
right fiercely fought for, and fiercely defended at those times when its powers have been seen to be
under threat – as those backing reforms are finding. The tradition of being "tried by a jury of ones
peers" probably has its origins in Anglo Saxon custom, which dictated that an accused man could be
acquitted if enough people came forward to swear his innocence. Trial by jury was first enshrined in
law in what has been seen as the world's first proclamation of human rights – the Magna Carter. The
document, decreed in 1215 by King John after a rebellion by...show more content...
Minor offences, such as drunkenness, could only be tried by magistrates, and major offences, such
as murder and rape, only by jury. The government now wants to limit the number of cases which are
"triable either way".
There have been many debates throughout time about the effectivness of juries. SWR worldwide
was commisioned by The Bar Council and The Law Society to conduct research of 903 members of
the public aged between 18 and over across England. The findings were as follows;
[IMAGE]
The above chart shows a clear agreement of the general public on juries and the trust they show in
their abilities. Similarly the research showed that the public has more faith in police and juries than
others in the justice system.
В· Respondents are most likely to have confidence in the police (81%) and juries (80%) than in
other players in the justice system.
В· Most think a jury of 12 individuals rather than a judge and two magistrates would be more likely
to reflect their own (73%) and society at large's (80%) views and values.
В· In fact, two thirds (64%) say that, should they appear as a defendant in court, they would prefer
to have a jury of their peers rather than a judge and two magistrates or a judge alone decide their case.
However, the same people that make the argument against juries may criticise those who

Argumentative Essay On Gun Violence
Argumentative Essay One gun, one church, and one miserable Wednesday night. On June 17th,
2015 Dylann Roof set out for a mass killing spree killing nine victims, including a pastor. Certain
rights could uphold gun laws and make it so such things do no happen; unfortunately these tragic
things do still occur. However, people who do follow the law and do follow laws help in some of
these tragic occurrences. Although these things happen it is our God given right as United States
citizens to bear arms. Through the second amendment and other gun laws, we could live in peace
and still have our rights to bear arms. The massacre that killed nine victims happened during an
evening prayer at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal (AME) Church (Connor, 4). People ranged
from 26 to 81, and a pastor of 23 years were all victims of this massacre. Dylann illegally purchased
a .45–caliber Glock handgun for this crime (Connor, 2). The purchase was legal despite his...show
more content...
For example, in 2002 a law school shooting in Grundy, Virginia, came to an end when a student
confronted the shooter (Hunter, 1). Many cases have come up including gun violence; however
guns are not the problem, people are! A 2009 workplace shooting in Houston, Texas was stopped by
two workers who had their carried concealed handguns (Hunter, 1). People with carry–and–conceal
weapons have come to save the day in high schools, middle schools, malls, workplaces, and even
in churches. Another example was in 2012 in Aurora, Colorado, when during a church service a
shooting was stopped by a member of the congregation (Hunter, 2). It is so easy to point the
blame towards guns when guns can help us in many more ways than they can hurt us. This could
have been avoided if someone else had a carried conceal weapon or if Roof had been responsible
enough to get one or not have on at

What Is The Argument For The Seventh Man
Final Argumentative Essay Should the narrator of "The Seventh Man" forgive himself for his
failure to save K.? The narrator should definitely forgive himself. It was K.'s life not his, meaning
K should have been watching his own back. He should have known that there would be more
storm coming because they were only in the eye of the storm. K. might have been his best friend
but he shouldn't be or feel guilty for not saving his life. When K and The Seventh Man went down
to the beach, they should have known what they were getting themselves into. Down on the beach
it was windy and it was hard to hear over the waves, so when The Seventh Man tried to call out to
K, he didn't hear him. "I was sure I had yelled loud enough, but my voice did not seem to have
reached him."(Murakami, 137) Also adding to this, K should have been watching...show more
content...
He would have stayed at home. But it was his choice to leave the house, so it's his own fault for
his life being taken. "K. saw me walking down the road and came outside..." "Without a word, he
came along with me." (Murakami, 136). Earlier before it tells of K asking where his friend was
going, showing that K knew what he was getting himself into. Some may argue that The Seventh
Man should not forgive himself and should feel guilty. The Seventh Man saw the wave coming
and tried to call out to K. However, when K didn't respond, The Seventh Man saved himself and
ran for cover, leaving K behind to fend for himself. "I told myself to run over to K., grab hold of
him, and get out of there. It was the only thing to do. I knew the wave was coming, and K. didn't
know. As clearly as I knew what i ought to be doing, I found myself running the other way... running
full speed towards the dyke, alone." (Murakami, 138). Yes, The Seventh Man knew that he was
abandoning K, but K should have been focused on himself instead of the object in front of

Argumentative Essay On Refugees
Refugee Argument What do you think about refugees entering our country? Do you think that they
should have rights the same as us? How do you think refugees help are U.S economy? Do you
think they can us helpful information to keep this country safe? Giving rights and opportunities to
everyone is what the U.S is what should be known for. Imagine you're a refugee and you're
hopeless what would you think? You're fighting to get rights, you're trying your best to pay your
bills and being the best citizen you can be, but your experiences from your past life keep haunting
you. You're just trying to start over just trying to be like the rest. But still getting disrespected by
your peers. The United States Should accept refugees giving them equal rights. They can give us
helpful information, help the U.S economy. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a
declaration adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948, in Paris,
France. It was written shortly after World War II. The atrocities committed by Nazi Germany
during the Holocaust shocked the world. It pushed countries to develop a set of standards and
protections on how to treat their fellow humans. It declares that human rights are given to all
people, no matter who they are or where they live according to Universal Declaration of Human
Rights. Meaning everyone of any race, color, gender, language, religion, national or social origin,
property or birth should have the rights and freedoms in this country. Therefore, people belonging
to any country with different kinds of governments will have these rights and freedoms. Refugees
should be respected to have rights and the same respect we get as Americans. As America, we are
known for having rights for everyone. When refugees are coming here they are coming here for a
new beginning, their home country might be in war. Or they just need new opportunities and are
getting no respect. Refugees should not get disrespected from Americans because they're just trying
to get opportunities. Refugees can offer a lot to our economy. People think refugees are considered
an economic burden for the countries

In order to have a good argumentative essay, there are a few important standards of critical
thinking that is needed to be found in the essay such as the clearness, accuracy, importance or
relevance, sufficiency, depth, breath and precision that is stated by Nosich. The strength of this
argumentative essay is consider weak because it does not capture the interest of the reader and
was not persuasive enough; even though from the introduction of the argumentative essay
includes full sentences and a good opinion, the argumentative essay is all objective. The
introduction includes too much of the emotional appeals, such as when it wrote " Day after day
the number of people worshipping this icon has been growing since the birth of this creature. well
to many it may seem harmless idol but in my opinion, Mickey Mouse is an 'devil in disguise'
influencing the minds of young and old people to adopt the culture of the 'devil' which doesn't
blend will with the moral values of society and should be banned". To improve the introduction, the
writer should include of all objectives statements relative facts and appeals to the mind of people
who agree or disagree with the topic.

Many people say that an embryo is not really a person, or that it has no identity. It is a great way
to avoid the moral debate, because all you have to say is, "Well they aren't even people; they have
no individuality." I am going to shred that thought, because the simple truth is this: personal worth
and identification can not be taken away by ignorant people who do not want to face the
consequences of their actions or words! There are several arguments about what makes a personal
identity, whether you believe in body theory, memory theory, or personhood. In theperson hood
debate the main question that needs to be answered, "Is a person the same thing as a human being."
In this debate you have to face the fact that although embryos, people in vegetative states, and even
people with mental disabilities or mental illness are human beings they may not be "people."
However, one view on this argument is that when a person cares for or thinks of a thing as a
person, then it is a person. That means that once a person cares about an embryo then it is morally
constituted as a person....show more content...
If nobody cares about you, had no affection for you, then you would not be a person. Think about
that, your personhood would be taken away by ignorant people who might not know you or not
even try to get to know you. Does that sound familiar? It should because by saying that you don't
care about that child, you take away all that they could be. You take away not only their
personhood, but any chance at being a person. You don't even give them a chance to be loved, to be
given an identity or make an identity of their own by body or mind

MLA Argumentative Essay
Hey Jessica, I agree with you, MLA was once upon a time the only style the I knew. I will be just
like you always going to revisit the APA section in our library. I still hit some roadblocks but I would
have to say our professor would be the best way to clear up all questions, or better yet lead you in
the best direction to solve the issue.

Argumentative Essay On Addiction
Addiction Rough Draft Did you know that it is statistically proven that addiction is more common
than diabetes? 10% of the human population is addicted to either a drug or alcohol. A person can
be addicted to several substances, not just drugs and alcohol. By having more options of addiction,
this will increase the percentage of addicts. There is so many scenarios to addiction that anyone
around could be an addict without realizing it. Several people may believe addiction is something
that can easily fixed or they may think it is rare. What people do not know is that addiction is a
situation much more serious and goes in depth further than they may expect. It's a desire that no
one wants. It is a condition that is difficult to escape once you begin. Addicts can be so in depth
with addiction that they can not get out of it. Addiction is an action that comes with negative yet
impactful outcomes. Addiction can affect those who are around especially family members. Fit
will affect other by the actions you do. Aggression can develop and people will begin to isolate.
No one likes to be around an aggressive person. An addict can also have mood swings. Drugs or
alcohol, for example, already affect your mentally when not sober. Family members can feel like
they are the ones to be blamed. Family supports and loves one another. By seeing a family member
fall into bad habits, it would be logical that they would feel like they have failed as family. Not only
would they feel like they

Argument From Analogy Essay
The argument from analogy is an inductive argument that focuses on the problem of other minds
and aims to show that we are justified in inferring the existence of other minds. British philosopher,
Bertrand Russell, describes the argument from analogy as follows: "The behaviour of other people
is in many ways analogous to our own, and we suppose that it must have analogous causes. What
people say is what we should say if we had certain thoughts, and so we infer that they probably have
these thoughts. They give us information which we can sometimes subsequently verify" (Russell,
"Analogy", p89). Norman Malcolm argues that the argument from analogy does poorly in its
attempts to show that we are justified in inferring the existence of other minds. In assessing whether
the argument from analogy succeeds in its aims, I will raise and respond to Malcolm's objection
against the argument from analogy; Austrian–born British philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein's 'Beetle
in a Box' thought experiment; as well as Welsh philosopher H. H. Price's argument and English
philosopher Stuart Hampshire's argument in defence of the argument from analogy....show more
content...
From subjective observation, Russell claims to know that A, which is a thought or feeling,
causes B, which is a bodily act (Russell, "Analogy", p110). Russell argues that believing in the
existence of other minds requires some postulate, and describes this postulate to be "If, whenever
we can observe whether A and B are present or absent, we find that every case of B has an A as a
causal antecedent, then it is probable that most B's have A's as causal antecedents, even in cases
where observation does not enable us to know whether A is present or not" (Russell, "Analogy",

Othello : An Argumentative Essay
Othello: An Argumentative Essay
Inside each of us, there is a seed of good and evil since it is a constant struggle for us to determine
as to which one will win, so that is why one cannot exist without the other. However, there are some
whose emotions are unbalanced, which causes them to near towards one side more than the other
one ВВ and many times the side a lot of people prefer to lean on is evil. Shakespeare's play O thello
is set in 16thВcentury Venice and Cyprus.Othello, a noble black general from the Venetian army has
secretly married Desdemona, daughter of Venice senator Brabantio. Othello chooses inexperienced
Cassio to be his lieutenant, while he decides to give the ensign position to Iago, a malicious but very
experienced man who, with his stealth and knavery, will ultimately ruin almost everyone's life
since for a long time, he was desiring the position of lieutenant just like Cassio. At the end of the
play, Othello, Desdemona, Iago's wife Emilia, and his sidekick Roderigo die due to his revenge
against Cassio, for obtaining the position he wanted and Othello, for being the man who he hates
the most. The play ends with Iago being told that he will be punished and tortured for his actions.
However, despite the fact that Iago is punished at the end of the play for doing all of the malicious
things he did, he still manages to wear down Othello's relationship with Desdemona, get Cassio
demoted from his lieutenancy, and cause Othello to show his cowardness by

Mandatory Vaccination Argumentative Essay
Mandatory vaccinations have been hotly debated in the United States for over two centuries, making
the argument almost as old as the country itself. As early as 1809, Massachusetts became the first
state to mandate the world's premiere vaccine. Authorities recognized the life–saving benefits of the
smallpox vaccine. They chose to require inoculation to protect the community from further
outbreaks. Public outrage ensued as some community members feared the new vaccine and believed
they should be able to choose if they wished to receive it. The most vocal protestors formed
anti–compulsory vaccination groups and were successful in getting laws overturned in many states.
However, even the United States Supreme Court has upheld states' rights to require immunization.
(A) Vaccinations should be...show more content...
Despite significant progress in the fight against preventable disease, millions still die needlessly
each year. According to UNICEF, originally known as the United Nations International Children's
Emergency Fund, a vaccine preventable disease is responsible for 2 million fatal infections
worldwide each year. About 75% of these deaths occur in children under five years of age. (N) In
more vivid terms, UNICEF notes that vaccine–preventable diseases kill a child every 20 seconds.
(D) Due to high rates of childhood vaccination, the United States has experienced a dramatic
reduction in such deaths. A comparison of the years 1950 and 2010 clearly illustrates the benefits of
vaccinations. During this 60–year period, deaths from diphtheria reduced from 410 to 0, tetanus
from 336 to 3, pertussis from 1,118 to 26, and polio from 1,904 to 0. Measles deaths dropped from
468 in 1950 to 0 in 2008, the last year a United States death rate was recorded. It's not surprising that
vaccinations have been touted as one of the top ten health achievements of the 20th century by the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Argumentative Essay On Anxiety Disorder
Anxiety disorders are some of the most prominent mental disorders that people face. Anyone can
have them, young or old. These disorders can be extremely debilitating and exhausting for a person
to live with. Every little thing they do could evoke the symptoms of their anxiety disorders.
Everyday these various symptoms must be overcome for them to enjoy their daily activities.
Throughout the world there are many people who suffer from anxiety disorders, a few of the most
common ones are Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Panic Disorder, and Post–Traumatic Stress
Disorder. Generalized Anxiety Disorder also known as (GAD) is a typical anxiety disorder that
involves nervousness, tension, and chronic worrying. With chronic worrying every aspect of life
is affected. Generalized Anxiety Disorder is different from normal worrying, because the
worrying involved is intrusive, disruptive, persistent, and excessive. Melinda Smith, M.A., has
her Master's Degree in psychology; she has fifteen years of experience as a health writer and
editor, and Jeanne Segal, Ph.D., who was a psychologist and the cofounder of the website
helpguide.org describe GAD clearly in their article, "Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)." Their
article states, "Unlike a phobia, where your fear is connected to a specific thing or situation, the
anxiety of generalized anxiety disorder is diffused–a general feeling of dread or unease that colors
your whole life" (Smith, Segal). This statement describes

Immigration Argumentative Essay
Immigration has been a burning issue lately, particularly after Donald Trump's immigration ban in
the United States of America. It has been a topic that families discuss every morning with breakfast.
Despite many concerns related to immigration, it has several positive benefits that mostly outweighs
the negativity. People bizarrely argue when it comes to immigration, but these arguments are
primarily based on facts and ideas that are outdated or inconsistent and blindfold the positive aspect
related to immigration. Many immigrants in the United States are good workers who don't depend
upon any public welfare and mostly help in the overall development of the economy. As a country
made by immigrants, we must not forget the fact that immigrants have helped to build cities and
create a path of development form Google to iPhones (Gray & Furman, 2012). These facts are
secluded, and some related arguments with different content have been repeated for years and
continue. Immigrants have a lot to give the United States rather than to take, especially when it
comes to economic terms.
Immigration has been an essential but disruptive aspect of the people and the political state of the
United States; however, debates related to immigration and its benefits are intensified significantly.
Opposing immigration keeps ranting on how government should exercise better law to control over
the people entering into the States from the foreign land. One of the most buzzed argument is that
American citizen is unemployed because immigrants stole their jobs and disrupted the economy
(Hoban, 2017). Also, an appeal to National security and vulnerability after several terrorist attacks all
over the world and also to the government to keep track and maintain the no. of immigrants to create
a safer environment (Cafaro, 2009). However, the contrary to these arguments have often been
proven right. The pattern of the immigration shows that the contribution of the immigrants has
resulted in an economic boost that cannot be overlooked by the government.
Most of the immigrants leave their home country and migrate to the United States because they can
live in freedom, practice their religion and make the most out of their life (Arizaga 2006).

The Argument Of Arts And Culture
Culture is part of our everyday life; it can be anything from sports, food, clothing or even lifestyle.
On the onset, the support of arts and culture should not be limited to the cultural argument alone, as
one cannot deny that arts and culture is important for the growth of society. Apart from the financial
aspect of a society, arts and culture go a long way towards making the society more holistic.
With this in mind, the author will firstly examine the two different approaches to arts and culture;
namely cultural arguments as opposed to the creative industries or economic arguments. Secondly,
the author will discuss about why arts and culture should live on and be funded, without putting
creative industries approach towards it.
Throughout...show more content...
On the other hand, creative industry takes the view of economic boom of creative work such in any
type of industry. "Creative industries were defined as those activities which have their origin in
individual creativity, skill and talent and which have the potential for wealth and job creation
through the generation and exploitation of intellectual property" (DCMS, 1998) (Quoted from Ozga,
Seddon, Popkewitz, 2006)
As Paul Keating suggests,
"This cultural policy is also an economic policy. Culture creates wealth. Broadly defined, our cultural
industries generate 13 billion dollars a year. Culture [employs and] adds value; it makes an essential
contribution to innovation, marketing and design. It is a badge of our industry. The level of our
creativity substantially determines our ability to adapt to new economic imperatives. It is a valuable
export in itself and an essential accompaniment to the export of other commodities. It attracts tourists
and students. It is essential to our economic success." (Paul Keating,

Arguments Against Jury Trial
Even though a little more of felony convictions are handled by juries, some attorneys perspectives
encourage a trial by jury, arguments can be made in favor for jury trials that reinforce the risk for a
negative outcome is low. Jury trial practices have evolved depending on the state, some states permit
"jurors to take notes) (308) "Other practices, such as providing at least one written copy of
instruction and providing guidance on conducting deliberations, are also common in state
courts."(308–309. To minimize the risk of bias interpretation of judgment upon the allegedcrime,
attorneys try to play toward the juror's conscience. If they are fully aware of what their findings
mean to the defendant and they do not consider all facts by the

Over the past century, the Earth has experienced a dramatic change in temperature and we need to
work to reverse it. Politicians have debated the idea of climate change for years now and nothing has
really been done to improve the situation. Some politicians have been exposed to the facts about
climate change, while others believe in a hypothetical theory that the Earth goes through "cycles".
The government needs to stop arguing and act now, to educate the public and regulate the
phenomenon of climate change, before it is too late.
On one side of the political spectrum, politicians tend to believe that the Earth goes through natural
processes or "cycles" over time. This theory is more of an abstract idea, because there is no math or
science...show more content...
The government can subsidize companies that improve technology to eliminate fossil fuel usage,
which could be key to reversing climate change. When fossil fuels are eliminated the Earth could
reverse climate change in just years. The government should also work to educate the public
about the issue, however cannot tackle this alone. Harvard President, Drew Faust says,
"Universities have a crucial role to play, acting through research and education" (Powell). With the
help of universities, the government can educate the public about the impacts of climate change
and how to conserve energy usage. Most of the population does not know that the Ozone layer
absorbs the Sun's radiation and when it is destroyed, less radiation is absorbed and more is
released to the Earth. In a study performed by Yale, the respondents were graded based on their
knowledge of climate change; over 52% of the respondents were given an F based on what they
knew (Leiserowitz). Advertisements about climate change, that have a sentimental effect on people's
emotions, can be a great way to educate the public. Also, educate younger generations from the start
of their learning period. Teaching and building good habits, while generations are still young, could
bring change over the course of

Counter Argument Essay
My chosen audience may not be inclined to accept my argument because some of them may argue
that they do not have the time to cook. I don't think the reason for their argument is because of my
credibility, but I could see that they have higher priorities for their academics and do not want to risk
their time, money, and grades at school to begin learning how to cook. To approach my audience's
resistance, I used the argument as a counter argument earlier in my essay. I backed up my counter
argument by further defining what cooking means. It is common for people to think that cooking
requires a lot of tools and knowledge. I provided my own experiences, which is enhanced by the
fact that I relate with my audience, that I have lived on campus before

Argumentative Essay On Memorials
Memorializing events in the history of the world for any purpose has it's positives as well as the
negatives. Ranging from a memorial of a popular United States president from a loved one of a
family, memorials have generally served as a purpose of remembrance from the past of said event.
The purpose of the memorial is usually associated with a positive, uplifting feeling towards the
deceased individual or past event. While this is more or less simply defining what memorials are
for, what is the meaning behind them? What purpose do they serve besides the simplicity that they
are? Important messages from a few varied sources will give a differing viewpoint on memorials
from one to another. The first thought of memorials is the simple, generic...show more content...
Memorials are meant to be striking in the sense that you will notice said memorial and donate some
attention to it. The views of these see this attention capturing as exceedingly high for some purposes.
Some memorials are outstanding in their craftsmanship and aesthetics. This makes people wonder
what could be lurking inside the memorial, or what is near that memorial. What we've got here is a
formula, striking looks of the monument is almost guaranteed to attract some form of attention.
According to Source G, the analogy of tainting the planet with specific memorials are ridiculous, "I
imagined taking a knife and cutting into the earth, opening it up, an initial violence and pain that in
time would heal. The grass would grow back, but the initial cut would remain a pure flat surface in
the earth with a polished, mirrored surface, much like the surface on a geode when you cut it and
polish the edge. The need for the names to be on the memorial would become the memorial; there
was no need to embellish the design further. The people and their names would allow everyone to
respond and remember. The ideals of such nonsensical placements of the memorials are just irritable
at the

Argument Essays

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von College Papers Writing Service

Mehr von College Papers Writing Service (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Argument Essays