Regression analysis: Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear Regression
Out of box thinking
1.
2. Einstein once said that Imagination Is More Important Than Knowledge. He
then went about proving it by completely re-imagining the concepts of
space, time, gravity, matter, and energy
3. First of all -----
What Do You Mean By “The Box” ?
The range of thought and action in a workplace that is deemed “acceptable”.
Constraints, developed by cultures and organizations to govern behavior , to govern behavior
Professional standards and procedures determined to be “best practices”.
4. Do existing constraints preclude your options for success?
Is the thinking that has gotten you into trouble able to get you out?
Does continuous improvement require creativity?
5. Inside the box?:
Using tried and true practices
Relying on prior experiences – confidence
Having common understanding – support
Outside the box?:
Open to change - something new
Accepting increased risk
Having a vision of success in spite of problems being faced.
6. Positive:
Innovative and creative?
Progressive and forward thinking?
Negative:
Threatening to you or the organization?
Destabilizing to daily activities?
Risky? Careless?
7. Skeptical?:
A risk to stability unless controlled.
First step toward a loss of control.
Supporting the “thinker” may prompt criticism elsewhere in the
organization.
Supportive?:
Fresh approach – innovative.
Path to accelerated growth or recovery.
8. Could that be the reason why many hesitate to overtly “think outside
the box”?
9. Create a permissive environment:
You need encouragement to think outside the box.
You need to encourage thinking outside the box.
Brainstorm the impossible solution:
You need to getting others to start thinking outside the box without being at
risk.
Motivate support:
You need to provide recognition and reward for successful thinking outside
the box.
10. Can You Think of an Example?
A teacher at a class at Stanford offers each team $5 of „funding‟ in an envelope. She tells them that once they open
the envelope, they have 2 hours to make as much money as they can.
The three teams‟ approaches:
1) First team opens a free stand that offers to check peoples bike tire pressure for free, then charges $1 to inflate
if necessary. This team changes midstream to accepting donations instead of charging, and makes more
money. Lauded for rapid iteration.
2) Second team makes lots of reservations at local restaurants, and then sells them to people waiting in line for
same restaurant. Didn‟t use the $5 at all. Lauded for realizing that the $5 constraint was artificial, and that using it
constrained their thinking.
3) Third team skipped the exercise, and sold their 3 minute class presentation time as a advertisement to a local
company. Made the most money. Instead of presenting, they recruited. Lauded for realizing that the 2 hours
was also artificially hampering their thinking.
She hands out two artificial constraints, and then praises the teams who ignore the constraints. “Thinking outside
the box” is a great skill and all, but basically all these teams are doing is finding creative ways of breaking the
rules. It means the puzzle isn‟t “make the most money in 2 hours with $5″, it means the puzzle is “find out how far
you can stretch these rules without being disqualified”.
Ignore the rules that don‟t matter. Is that something holding you back real? or is it just in your head?
What artificial constraints will you chose to ignore today?
Our only limits are in our minds.
11. Colgate Increased their sales in multiples by just increasing the
diameter of the nozzle of the toothpaste tube.