5. Evaluating a
Structure
for SBDD
• 3 methods are X-ray crystallography, NMR and
Homology modelling.
• Crystal Structures should be evaluated for (i)
Resolution, (ii) Reliability (or) R-factors, (iii)
Coordinate error.
• Crystal structures determined with data
extending beyond 2.5Å ® are acceptable for
drug design purpose.
• 'R' factor ¾¾®and Rfree of a model are a
measure of correlation between model and
experimental data (i.e.) Rfree value
[ideally (Rfree < 25%)] < 28%.
6. Denovo-Drug Design
• Involves the design of Novel drug structure based on the knowledge of binding
site alone.
• This can lead to a novel lead compound successfully, which can then be a start
point of structure based drug.
• Position of atoms in crystal structure is accurate to 0.2–0.4Å.
• Flexible molecules are better than rigid as they find alternative binding
conformation
• Hit and trial.
• Chances of hitting ideal structure are poor.
• Denovo does not identify whether the structures identified will have favourable
pharmacokinetics/safety.
12. Analogue
based Drug
Design
Advantage
• The development of a pioneer drug is
extraordinarily uncertain because it’s
therapeutic use has not been validated
clinically. On the other hand, preparing an
analogue has the advantage that the
predicted therapeutic use of the analogue
has already been proved.
Disadvantage
• Many hurdles to overcome with regard of
pharmacokinetic behavior and safety. The
analogue products are often regarded as
"me-too" compounds.
13. Classification of Analogue Drugs
Structural and pharmacological analogues
• Drugs which have similar chemical structures and with a similar main pharmacological
activity.
Structural analogues
• Drugs which have a similar chemical structure but have quite different
pharmacological properties.
Pharmacological analogues
• Drugs which have a similar pharmacological activity without having any discernible
chemical or structural relationship
18. Evaluating a Structure for
SBDD
• Low coordinate error is crucial in crystal structure. [Narrow
tolerance for both angle and distance 0.2Å].
• Coordinate error measured by 2 methods.
• 1. Luzzati method
• Based on averaging coordinate error as a function of 'R'
factors that vary with expected errors are calculated based on
the temperature factor (or) 'B' factor of an atom and the
atom: reflection ratios.
• Luzzati co-ordinate error is in the range of 0.2 – 0.3 Å.
• Ideal Bond lengths should be no greater than 0.15 Å (or) 3°
for bond angles.
• At least 90% of the backbone f and Y angles should fall into
the most favoured
• regions of Ramachandran plot.
19. 2. 'B' factor and atom: reflection ratio (atom/refl) as in stroud and
fauman method.
Expected error=0.642 + 0.00852 e(B/7.88)–0.687–0.00223e(B/6.16).
e(–2) (atoms/refl)
20.
21. Example for
Structure
based Drug
Design
• COMT–Catechol 0–methyl transferase enzyme
• Ado Met: Coenzyme S–Ademosyl L–methionine.
• Ado Hcy: S–Ademosyl Homocysteine
• If R = CH2 CH2 NH 2 ® Dopamine
• If R = CH2 CH–COOH ® L–Dopa.
• |
• NH2
22. 2 distinct forms of COMT:
• ® Soluble COMT (S–COMT) 221 A. Acids.
• Membrane bound COMT (MB–COMT) 50 Human
residues.
• Physiological substrate of COMT:
• Catecholamine neurotransmitters
• Dopamine
• Nor-adrenaline
• Adrenaline & some of their metabolites
28. Structure
based drug
design
Receptor/ Active site hypothetical
picture
Receptor/ Active site prototype
picture
Receptor/ Active site actual picture
Receptor/ Active site actual picture
with and without ligands present