SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 19
First Speaker
  Plaintiffs and Defendants
             A. Davis
Explain Everything
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecKO_9oqtbQ

• Use the link above to help you understand the
  structure of the first speakers speech.
1. First plaintiff makes an     2. First defendant cross
opening statement and           examines the first
provides the allegation         plaintiff


2. First defendant makes        3. Second plaintiff cross
an opening statement to         examines the first
disprove the allegation.        defendant


                                4. Second defendant
3. Second plaintiff acts as     cross examines the
an expert                       second plaintiff



 4. Second defendant acts         5. Third plaintiff cross
 as an expert                     examines the second
                                  plaintiff


 5. Third plaintiff acts as
 an expert and restates           6. Third defendant cross
 the arguments                    examines the third
                                  plaintiff


6. Third defendant acts as an
expert and restates the          7. Closing                  8. Closing
argument                         argument                    argument
Link to show the order of
       proceedings

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtQ9ZJSNOlM
Structure for first speaker
          • Introduction
             o Introduce allegation
             o State what two points you will be making.
          • Body paragraph one
             o Define allegation
             o Introduce speakers and what points they will
               be making
          • Body paragraph two
             o   First point
             o   Explain
             o   Example
             o   Link
          • Body paragraph three
             o   Second point
             o   Explanation
             o   Example
             o   Link
          • Conclusion
             o Restate why the allegation is true/false and
               why your team should win
Opening speech by first
        speaker
• Three tasks
  o Define
  o Introduce
  o Substantive points
1. The first speaker needs to define the allegation to
   show what understanding they have of the case.
  o This needs to be done in a way that supports their side of the case.
2. The first speaker needs to introduce each speaker
   and needs to state what points each speaker will
   be covering.
3. The first speaker makes two points to support their
   argument. This are called substantive points
Introductions
Start your speech in an interesting way.
• Use an excellent example.
• Contrast examples from both sides- making your
  example sound more important.
• Use a compelling statistic
• Introduce your teams your teams main
  argument
• Say why it is important that your side wins.
• State what you are going to say in your speech.
1. Define- Plaintiff
• This is where you explain/ define how your teams
  interprets the allegation.
• Rephrase and explain in detail what you understand the
  allegation to mean.

• For example:
• Allegation: That zoos should be closed down due to
  cruelty to animals.
• Definition: It becomes illegal to own or operate a place
  where people pay money to view animals kept in
  captivity.
• Explanation: Animals in Zoos need to be retrained and
  released into programs which prepare them for the wild
  and people should go to game reserves or watch TV if
  the want to see animals.
1. Define- Defendant
• This is where you explain/ define how your teams
  interprets the allegation.
• Rephrase and explain in detail what you understand the
  allegation to mean.

• For example:
• Allegation: That zoos are not responsible for cruelty to
  animals
• Definition: zoos are places that protect animals.
• Explanation: That animals remain well cared for in
  captivity so that people can come and learn about
  animals so that the next generation can appreciate and
  care for animals to ensure their survival.

• You will need to cross examine points that the first
  Plaintiff has made.
2. Introduce
• Introduce each lawyer on your case.
• State what points they will be making

• Introduce what two substantive points you will be
  making.

• State why it is important that your team wins.
3. Substantive points
•   Point one-
•   Explain-
•   Example/ evidence
•   Link point back to why your team should win the
    case

•   Point one-
•   Explain-
•   Example/ evidence
•   Link point back to why
•   your team should win the case.
Example/ Evidence
• Whist acting as an expert it is important to supply
  evidence to back up your points. Nothing will stand
  up in court unless you have the correct evidence to
  back it up.

Types of examples and evidence that you can use
are
                           Make sure you have a variety of types of
  Pictures
                           evidence for your case.
  Quotes                   You will need to show these during your
  Filmed extracts          speech.
  Props/ objects           You might want to use
  Sound recordings         iMovie- Educreations- Pic collage- Key
                           note- Skitch- Noob news- Podcasts-
  News paper extracts      Audacity,- iMotion HD- Imagechef,
Closing speech
• This is done by the first defendant and then the second
  plaintiff.
• All the most important points and arguments are repeated
  along with how the other team responded to them.
• This is done in chronological order.
• This speech is written during the case.
• It is the last chance to emphasise why your side of the case
  should win.
• No new information is introduced.

   o   Our team stated that…
   o   Your team responded by saying…
   o   Your argument was flawed because…
   o   Our argument was better because…
Tips
• Use facts and statistics to back up your points.
   o Remember to say where these come from.


• Use a catch phrase or slogan that your side keeps
  repeating throughout the case.
   o   “Without Zoos animals have no hope.”
   o   “just zoo it.”
   o   “for a small fee you can see real animals before they become extinct.”
   o   “Cruel captivity and conditions ruins animals lives.”
While preparing
• Ask why questions..
• Why should we benot doing this?
• Why is this bad or good?
• What will happen if this changes?
• What will happen if this does not change?
• How will society be effected if this changes?
• How will society be effected if this does not change?
• Why is it important that a change
  does take place?
• Why is it important that we
  maintain the status quo?
Structure
• Tell us what your going to say, say it, then tell us you
  have said it.
• Sign posting – make sure everyone knows what you
  are doing.
• Signal that you have moved from your introduction
  to your cross examination to your first point, second
  point, third point conclusion.
• Signal which point you are cross examining.
• Signal which points you are making.
Cross examination
• State what point you
  are cross examining.              Pick up on when your
                                     opponents do not cross
   o You said that…..
                                     examine one of your
• Explain what is wrong              arguments.
  with this point.                  For example, we said that
   o This is wrong because…..        Zoos are needed to help
• Explain what you mean              animals because of the
                                     breeding programs they
  in detail.                         offer. Your team has
   o What this means is that……       completely overlooked
• Link the cross                     this argument .
  examination back to               Keep bringing this up.
  the allegation.                   It makes your team seem
   o So what this shows us is…..     stronger and stronger.
How to end your
             speeches.
•   Summarise what you have said.
•   Summarise at what point your case is at.
•   Summarise the problems with the other teams case.
•   Restate why it is important that you win your case.
Task
• Using a brainstorming app create a brainstorm
  organising your ideas.
• Make sure you have identified what type of evidence
  you will use in your court case.
• Write your speech using the hamburger model.
• Prepare and create your evidence
• Practice combining reading your speech whilst showing
  your evidence.

• Brain storming apps
   o   Simple mind plus
   o   iBrianstorm
   o   Mindmash
   o   Idea Ketch

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Formal Debate
Formal DebateFormal Debate
Formal Debate
Mary Star
 
Intro to debate april 2013
Intro to debate april 2013Intro to debate april 2013
Intro to debate april 2013
maureensikora
 
British parliamentary style debate
British parliamentary style debateBritish parliamentary style debate
British parliamentary style debate
Chokhuletz Batotoy
 
Rules and guidelines on debate competition
Rules and guidelines on debate competitionRules and guidelines on debate competition
Rules and guidelines on debate competition
Carla Faner
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Intro To University Debating
Intro To  University  DebatingIntro To  University  Debating
Intro To University Debating
 
Oxford oregon debate
Oxford oregon debateOxford oregon debate
Oxford oregon debate
 
Rules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
Rules and Guidelines on Debate CompetitionRules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
Rules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
 
Debating Introduction
Debating IntroductionDebating Introduction
Debating Introduction
 
Summary of debate
Summary of debateSummary of debate
Summary of debate
 
Debate
DebateDebate
Debate
 
Formal Debate
Formal DebateFormal Debate
Formal Debate
 
Philosophy of debating & argumentation
Philosophy of debating & argumentationPhilosophy of debating & argumentation
Philosophy of debating & argumentation
 
Intro to debate april 2013
Intro to debate april 2013Intro to debate april 2013
Intro to debate april 2013
 
Debate seminar
Debate seminarDebate seminar
Debate seminar
 
JCI Debating - Speak on your feet
JCI Debating - Speak on your feetJCI Debating - Speak on your feet
JCI Debating - Speak on your feet
 
Basic debating skills
Basic debating skillsBasic debating skills
Basic debating skills
 
Debate 2012 july (1)
Debate 2012 july (1)Debate 2012 july (1)
Debate 2012 july (1)
 
Argumentation and debate
Argumentation and debateArgumentation and debate
Argumentation and debate
 
Debate
DebateDebate
Debate
 
British parliamentary style debate
British parliamentary style debateBritish parliamentary style debate
British parliamentary style debate
 
Debate
DebateDebate
Debate
 
Colette - Introduction to BP
Colette - Introduction to BPColette - Introduction to BP
Colette - Introduction to BP
 
English Debate
English DebateEnglish Debate
English Debate
 
Rules and guidelines on debate competition
Rules and guidelines on debate competitionRules and guidelines on debate competition
Rules and guidelines on debate competition
 

Ähnlich wie First speaker speech

Argumentative Essays ©Tutoring and Learning Centre, Georg.docx
Argumentative Essays  ©Tutoring and Learning Centre, Georg.docxArgumentative Essays  ©Tutoring and Learning Centre, Georg.docx
Argumentative Essays ©Tutoring and Learning Centre, Georg.docx
justine1simpson78276
 
03. intro to argument, informal fallacies
03. intro to argument, informal fallacies03. intro to argument, informal fallacies
03. intro to argument, informal fallacies
Justin Morris
 
Oxford – Oregon Debate (How to's and tips)
Oxford – Oregon Debate (How to's and tips)Oxford – Oregon Debate (How to's and tips)
Oxford – Oregon Debate (How to's and tips)
Carmela Yasay
 
Tilbury House Newcomer Workshop BPS Debating
Tilbury House Newcomer Workshop BPS DebatingTilbury House Newcomer Workshop BPS Debating
Tilbury House Newcomer Workshop BPS Debating
Kroestoph
 
Presentation on Reading Arguments
Presentation on Reading ArgumentsPresentation on Reading Arguments
Presentation on Reading Arguments
ibrarBajwa3
 
logical-fallacies3765.pptx
logical-fallacies3765.pptxlogical-fallacies3765.pptx
logical-fallacies3765.pptx
herzeli
 
Dean r berry persuasive argument torture is just a means of fighting terrorism
Dean r berry persuasive argument torture is just a means of fighting terrorismDean r berry persuasive argument torture is just a means of fighting terrorism
Dean r berry persuasive argument torture is just a means of fighting terrorism
Riverside County Office of Education
 
Lesson 1 review doc
Lesson 1 review docLesson 1 review doc
Lesson 1 review doc
vshackley
 

Ähnlich wie First speaker speech (20)

A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154
A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154
A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154
 
Debate 07 08
Debate 07 08Debate 07 08
Debate 07 08
 
Chris Trudeau - Clear legal communication: A drafting toolkit for non-lawyers
Chris Trudeau - Clear legal communication: A drafting toolkit for non-lawyersChris Trudeau - Clear legal communication: A drafting toolkit for non-lawyers
Chris Trudeau - Clear legal communication: A drafting toolkit for non-lawyers
 
Debate Lesson for Different Roles and Styles
Debate Lesson for Different Roles and StylesDebate Lesson for Different Roles and Styles
Debate Lesson for Different Roles and Styles
 
Argumentative Essays ©Tutoring and Learning Centre, Georg.docx
Argumentative Essays  ©Tutoring and Learning Centre, Georg.docxArgumentative Essays  ©Tutoring and Learning Centre, Georg.docx
Argumentative Essays ©Tutoring and Learning Centre, Georg.docx
 
03. intro to argument, informal fallacies
03. intro to argument, informal fallacies03. intro to argument, informal fallacies
03. intro to argument, informal fallacies
 
Oxford – Oregon Debate (How to's and tips)
Oxford – Oregon Debate (How to's and tips)Oxford – Oregon Debate (How to's and tips)
Oxford – Oregon Debate (How to's and tips)
 
EAPP Position Paper Powerpoint Presentation
EAPP Position Paper Powerpoint PresentationEAPP Position Paper Powerpoint Presentation
EAPP Position Paper Powerpoint Presentation
 
Tilbury House Newcomer Workshop BPS Debating
Tilbury House Newcomer Workshop BPS DebatingTilbury House Newcomer Workshop BPS Debating
Tilbury House Newcomer Workshop BPS Debating
 
Ielts writing
Ielts writingIelts writing
Ielts writing
 
Case construction
Case constructionCase construction
Case construction
 
Logical fallacies powerpoint
Logical fallacies powerpointLogical fallacies powerpoint
Logical fallacies powerpoint
 
Presentation on Reading Arguments
Presentation on Reading ArgumentsPresentation on Reading Arguments
Presentation on Reading Arguments
 
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.pptBasic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
 
logical-fallacies3765.pptx
logical-fallacies3765.pptxlogical-fallacies3765.pptx
logical-fallacies3765.pptx
 
Dean r berry persuasive argument torture is just a means of fighting terrorism
Dean r berry persuasive argument torture is just a means of fighting terrorismDean r berry persuasive argument torture is just a means of fighting terrorism
Dean r berry persuasive argument torture is just a means of fighting terrorism
 
Lesson 1 review doc
Lesson 1 review docLesson 1 review doc
Lesson 1 review doc
 
Copy of midterm review logic 105 fall 2018.pptx
Copy of midterm review logic 105 fall 2018.pptxCopy of midterm review logic 105 fall 2018.pptx
Copy of midterm review logic 105 fall 2018.pptx
 
Debate for students and feedback final
Debate for students and feedback finalDebate for students and feedback final
Debate for students and feedback final
 
Lecture 2 - Nature and use of argument.pptx
Lecture 2 - Nature and use of argument.pptxLecture 2 - Nature and use of argument.pptx
Lecture 2 - Nature and use of argument.pptx
 

First speaker speech

  • 1. First Speaker Plaintiffs and Defendants A. Davis
  • 2. Explain Everything • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecKO_9oqtbQ • Use the link above to help you understand the structure of the first speakers speech.
  • 3. 1. First plaintiff makes an 2. First defendant cross opening statement and examines the first provides the allegation plaintiff 2. First defendant makes 3. Second plaintiff cross an opening statement to examines the first disprove the allegation. defendant 4. Second defendant 3. Second plaintiff acts as cross examines the an expert second plaintiff 4. Second defendant acts 5. Third plaintiff cross as an expert examines the second plaintiff 5. Third plaintiff acts as an expert and restates 6. Third defendant cross the arguments examines the third plaintiff 6. Third defendant acts as an expert and restates the 7. Closing 8. Closing argument argument argument
  • 4. Link to show the order of proceedings • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtQ9ZJSNOlM
  • 5. Structure for first speaker • Introduction o Introduce allegation o State what two points you will be making. • Body paragraph one o Define allegation o Introduce speakers and what points they will be making • Body paragraph two o First point o Explain o Example o Link • Body paragraph three o Second point o Explanation o Example o Link • Conclusion o Restate why the allegation is true/false and why your team should win
  • 6. Opening speech by first speaker • Three tasks o Define o Introduce o Substantive points 1. The first speaker needs to define the allegation to show what understanding they have of the case. o This needs to be done in a way that supports their side of the case. 2. The first speaker needs to introduce each speaker and needs to state what points each speaker will be covering. 3. The first speaker makes two points to support their argument. This are called substantive points
  • 7. Introductions Start your speech in an interesting way. • Use an excellent example. • Contrast examples from both sides- making your example sound more important. • Use a compelling statistic • Introduce your teams your teams main argument • Say why it is important that your side wins. • State what you are going to say in your speech.
  • 8. 1. Define- Plaintiff • This is where you explain/ define how your teams interprets the allegation. • Rephrase and explain in detail what you understand the allegation to mean. • For example: • Allegation: That zoos should be closed down due to cruelty to animals. • Definition: It becomes illegal to own or operate a place where people pay money to view animals kept in captivity. • Explanation: Animals in Zoos need to be retrained and released into programs which prepare them for the wild and people should go to game reserves or watch TV if the want to see animals.
  • 9. 1. Define- Defendant • This is where you explain/ define how your teams interprets the allegation. • Rephrase and explain in detail what you understand the allegation to mean. • For example: • Allegation: That zoos are not responsible for cruelty to animals • Definition: zoos are places that protect animals. • Explanation: That animals remain well cared for in captivity so that people can come and learn about animals so that the next generation can appreciate and care for animals to ensure their survival. • You will need to cross examine points that the first Plaintiff has made.
  • 10. 2. Introduce • Introduce each lawyer on your case. • State what points they will be making • Introduce what two substantive points you will be making. • State why it is important that your team wins.
  • 11. 3. Substantive points • Point one- • Explain- • Example/ evidence • Link point back to why your team should win the case • Point one- • Explain- • Example/ evidence • Link point back to why • your team should win the case.
  • 12. Example/ Evidence • Whist acting as an expert it is important to supply evidence to back up your points. Nothing will stand up in court unless you have the correct evidence to back it up. Types of examples and evidence that you can use are Make sure you have a variety of types of Pictures evidence for your case. Quotes You will need to show these during your Filmed extracts speech. Props/ objects You might want to use Sound recordings iMovie- Educreations- Pic collage- Key note- Skitch- Noob news- Podcasts- News paper extracts Audacity,- iMotion HD- Imagechef,
  • 13. Closing speech • This is done by the first defendant and then the second plaintiff. • All the most important points and arguments are repeated along with how the other team responded to them. • This is done in chronological order. • This speech is written during the case. • It is the last chance to emphasise why your side of the case should win. • No new information is introduced. o Our team stated that… o Your team responded by saying… o Your argument was flawed because… o Our argument was better because…
  • 14. Tips • Use facts and statistics to back up your points. o Remember to say where these come from. • Use a catch phrase or slogan that your side keeps repeating throughout the case. o “Without Zoos animals have no hope.” o “just zoo it.” o “for a small fee you can see real animals before they become extinct.” o “Cruel captivity and conditions ruins animals lives.”
  • 15. While preparing • Ask why questions.. • Why should we benot doing this? • Why is this bad or good? • What will happen if this changes? • What will happen if this does not change? • How will society be effected if this changes? • How will society be effected if this does not change? • Why is it important that a change does take place? • Why is it important that we maintain the status quo?
  • 16. Structure • Tell us what your going to say, say it, then tell us you have said it. • Sign posting – make sure everyone knows what you are doing. • Signal that you have moved from your introduction to your cross examination to your first point, second point, third point conclusion. • Signal which point you are cross examining. • Signal which points you are making.
  • 17. Cross examination • State what point you are cross examining.  Pick up on when your opponents do not cross o You said that….. examine one of your • Explain what is wrong arguments. with this point.  For example, we said that o This is wrong because….. Zoos are needed to help • Explain what you mean animals because of the breeding programs they in detail. offer. Your team has o What this means is that…… completely overlooked • Link the cross this argument . examination back to  Keep bringing this up. the allegation.  It makes your team seem o So what this shows us is….. stronger and stronger.
  • 18. How to end your speeches. • Summarise what you have said. • Summarise at what point your case is at. • Summarise the problems with the other teams case. • Restate why it is important that you win your case.
  • 19. Task • Using a brainstorming app create a brainstorm organising your ideas. • Make sure you have identified what type of evidence you will use in your court case. • Write your speech using the hamburger model. • Prepare and create your evidence • Practice combining reading your speech whilst showing your evidence. • Brain storming apps o Simple mind plus o iBrianstorm o Mindmash o Idea Ketch