1. International Software & Productivity Engineering Institute
Today’s and Tomorrow’s ALM Solutions
Vladimir L Pavlov,
INTSPEI Chairman and Chief Strategy Officer
http://www.intspei.com

2. Agenda
Global Demand for Productivity
• How does it impact software companies?
INTSPEI P-Modeling Framework
• INTSPEI P-Modeling Framework
integrated with MSF
http://www.intspei.com 2

3. G500 Rank Company Name Revenue (USD B) Profit (USD B) Employees (K) Impact (K) Productivity (K)
1 Wal-Mart 351 11 1900 185 6
2 Exxon Mobil 347 40 106 3264 371
5 General Motors 207 -2 280 741 -7
6 Toyota 205 14 299 684 47
11 General Electric 168 21 319 528 65
12 Ford 160 -13 283 566 -45
14 Citigroup 147 22 332 442 65
39 Verizon 93 6 242 385 26
41 HP 92 6 156 588 40
42 IBM 91 9 356 257 27
87 Boeing 62 2 154 400 14
95 Vodafone 60 -10 66 906 -155
108 CNP Assurances 56 1 3 17118 443
119 Nokia 52 5 68 753 79
139 Microsoft 44 13 71 624 177
143 Motorola 44 4 66 663 55
183 Intel 35 5 94 376 54
184 PepsiCo 35 6 168 209 34
232 Cisco Systems 28 6 50 571 112
285 Coca-Cola 24 5 71 339 72
431 EnCana 17 6 5 3651 1208

4. Let’s Benchmark
Average in Global 500
41.8
Revenue , B USD
700
Profit , M USD
104
Employees , K
1160
Impact, K USD
59
Productivity, K USD
http://www.intspei.com 4

5. Global 500 Companies
Average Impact, USD Average Productivity, USD
1200000 60000
1000000 50000
800000 40000
600000 30000
400000 20000
200000 10000
0 0
2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007
http://www.intspei.com 5

6. Ideally …
People should focus on three key things:
Making decisions
Innovating
Expressing themselves emotionally and artistically
All the rest should be quot;outsourcedquot; to computers
http://www.intspei.com 6

7. Productivity Strategies
for a Software Company
Decrease Partner Ecosystem’s
Spending Productivity
Clients’ Productivity
Employees’
Increase Productivity
Outcome
http://www.intspei.com 7

8. Three Types of SDLCs
Formal Agile
• SSADM • XP
• RUP • SCRUM
• MSF-CMMi • MSF-Agile
Semantics-focused
• P-Modeling Framework
http://www.intspei.com 8

9. INTSPEI P-Modeling Framework
The most important decisions (and most
expensive mistakes) are done at the
Cost to correct a defect Cost to beginning of the project
greatly depends on how Correct
The initial amount of quality control is
early it was introduced
minimal and then grows as development
and revealed
moves forward.
This results in a costly rework (often hidden)
on the late stages of the project
INTSPEI P-Modeling Framework addresses
this problem. We enable our clients to
reduce delays between bug insertions and
bug fixes
Maintenance
With INTSPEI P-Modeling
Requirements Construction
Architecture
Framework, engineers start discovering and
Detailed Design
Detailed Design Architecture
fixing critical mistakes virtually immediately -
Construction Requirements
when introduced - not at the late phases
Phase That Phase That
where they are the most expensive to
a Defect is Created a Defect is Corrected
resolve
http://www.intspei.com 9

23. Next Steps
http://www.umljokes.com
http://www.bayviewinnovations.com
Research software development projects
Baylor I5 project
http://www.vlpavlov.com
http://www.intspei.com 23

24. International Software & Productivity Engineering Institute
http://www.intspei.com

25. International Software & Productivity Engineering Institute
This presentation was delivered on
October 18, 2007, in Yalta (Ukraine) on the
Microsoft Academic Days conference. It is
available for download from
http://www.vlpavlov.com
Backup Slides
http://www.intspei.com

26. Country GDP (B USD) Population, M Labor Force M GDP Per Capita, K USD Impact, K USD
Armenia 7 3.0 1.2 5.7 5.5
Australia 645 20.4 10.7 33.3 60.5
Austria 310 8.2 3.9 34.6 79.9
Belarus 29 9.7 4.3 8.1 6.7
Belgium 370 10.4 4.9 33.0 75.6
Brazil 967 190.0 96.3 8.8 10.0
Canada 1088 33.4 17.6 35.6 61.9
China 2518 1321.9 798.0 7.7 3.2
Denmark 257 5.5 2.9 37.0 88.4
Finland 199 5.2 2.6 33.7 76.0
France 2149 63.7 27.9 31.1 77.1
Germany 2872 82.4 43.7 31.9 65.8
India 804 1129.9 509.3 3.8 1.6
Ireland 204 4.1 2.1 44.0 96.4
Japan 4883 127.4 66.4 33.1 73.5
Netherlands 613 16.6 7.6 32.1 80.6
Poland 337 38.5 17.3 14.3 19.5
Portugal 177 10.6 5.6 19.8 31.7
Romania 80 22.3 9.3 9.1 8.6
Russia 734 141.4 73.9 12.2 9.9
Sweden 373 9.0 4.6 32.2 81.3
Ukraine 82 46.3 22.3 7.8 3.7
UK 2346 60.8 31.1 31.8 75.4
USA 13210 301.1 151.4 44.0 87.3

27. IBM Rational Unified Process
Phases
Inception Elaboration Construction Transition
Disciplines
Business Modeling
Requirements
Analysis & Design
Implementation
Test
Deployment
Configuration Mgmt
Management
Environment
Preliminary Iter. Iter. Iter. Iter. Iter. Iter. Iter.
Iteration(s) #1 #2 #n #n+1 #n+2 #m #m+1
Iterations

28. Microsoft Solutions Framework

29. eXtreme Programming

30. Iterative Development

31. Traceability Management

32. SDLC Fine Tuning: The Process
Defining Scope Of Work
• Client and INTSPEI agree on the scope of service
• 2-4 hours, pre-audit interviews with the key stakeholder(s)
Process Assessment
• Thee strengths and weaknesses of the current client’s SDLC will be evaluated
• 2-7 or more days, 1:1 audit meetings with the key people
Improvement Design
• We design improvement proposals for client’s SDLC to make it more efficient
• 1 +day(s), individual work
Improvement Implementation
• We teach client’s staff how to eliminate bottlenecks identified on the first stage
• 2-7 or more days, training/coaching for the key people
http://www.intspei.com 32