This document discusses legal and ethical considerations regarding internet regulation in Australia. It outlines how the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) currently regulates offensive online content by issuing takedown notices and maintaining a blacklist. There are debates around defining offensive content and whether existing offline laws can be applied online. The document also examines arguments for and against internet censorship in Australia, citing concerns from experts like Vint Cerf about the effectiveness of censorship and freedom of information.
6. Legal and Ethical Considerations in an online world âas the new activities of the digital world are immature, some of the traditional quality of old media forms is initially lost, while new rules and know-how are only being inventedâ - PhillippeAigrain 3
7. How is the internet regulated in Australia Key online regulatory body = ACMA (Australian Communications and Media Authority) Act on complaints from users about offensive content Power to issue âtakedown noticesâ Maintain a blacklist of offensive/illegal websites 4
8. Defining âoffensive contentâ 5 Offensive and prohibited content is anything that ACMA decides falls under these categories: *refused classification, or classified X18+ *classified R18+, and not protected by an adult verification system *classified MA15+ and not protected by an adult verification system, where the user has paid to access the content
9. Other types of regulation In most cases these laws have not been appropriated from an offline sense into an online world. Are they compatible? Defamation Uses the pre-existing offline State and Federal defamation legislation Hate speech Racial Discrimination Act 1975 Copyright Australia adheres to the WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) treaty 6
10. Internet censorship â an unpopular idea? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b7vdmFOxyg&feature=related 7
12. What Is âClean Feedâ? The Australian Federal Government is pushing forward with a plan to force Internet Service Providers [ISPs] to censor the Internet for all Australians. In accordance with the governmentâs plan, Stephen Conroy has announced the proposed introduction of âmandatory ISP-level filtering of Refused Classification (RC) ârated content.â
13. Why Filter ? It will limit access to some adult content by the general population. Internet users will be able to use a complaint system which will allow them to report offensive websites that can be blocked. Websites that teach crime and terrorism will be blocked.
14. This policy is an understandable desire to be protective of society, but technically I donât think itâs a very effective move. This doesn't mean however that we could not, as a society, agree that certain kinds of information are societally unacceptable." - Vint Cerf one of the founding fathers of the internet and Google's chief web evangelist
15. Do you think it should be up to a group of middle-aged, politically minded men, with noted conservative views to decide what is best for a medium used mostly by Generation X and Y? Â Surely the power of censorship should be in the hands of the user, especially since there is no argument to be made that censorship will curb the propensity of illegal material. - Samuel Webster
18. Material that is 'refused classification' (RC) includes much more than child sexual abuse material
19.
20. Internet censorship is a breach of the United Nations Universal Declaration on Human Rights â Hillary Clinton The question to ask is: âWho is putting that information out in the first place? That's the place to attack the problem.â â Vint Cerf
21. Â The antidote to bad information is more information â Esther Dyson
22. What do you think? 17 To what extent, if at all, do you think the Internet should be regulated? 2. Do you agree with the need for a compulsory Internet filter?
23. Bibliography Aigrain, P 2005, âPositive Intellectual Rights and Information Exchangesâ in R A Ghosh (ed), CODE: collaborative ownership and the digital economy, pp. 287-315, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Âź Australian Human Rights Commission 2003, âInternet regulation in Australiaâ, [Online] Accessed at: http://www.hreoc.gov.au/racial_discrimination/cyberracism/regulation.html. Deibert, R et al 2010, Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 389-406 Âź Libertus, 2010, âAustraliaâs Internet Censorship Systemâ [Online] Accessed at: http://libertus.net/censor/netcensor.html. Levin, J 2010, âInternet Censorship: the debate rages onâ, Screen Education, no. 59, pp. 46-51. Mitchell, D and Armstrong M 2001, âBroadcasting regulatory mechanisms and the internetâ, Intermedia, vol. 29, no.5-6, pp. 8-12. 18
24. Bibliography Donât Be Dirty: Why Internet Censorship is About More Than Pornography - Samuel Websterâ December 5, 2008 http://www.trespassmag.com/don%E2%80%99t-be-dirty-why-internet-censorship-is-about-more-than-pornography/ Vint Cerf's message to Australia: internet censorship isn't effective Australian IT, January 21, 2011 7 http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/vint-cerfs-message-to-australia-internet-censorship-isnt-effective/story-e6frgakx-1225992330849 NO CLEAN FEED â STOP INTERNET CENSORSHIP IN AUSTRALIA http://nocleanfeed.com/learn.html Internet Censorship - Is Australia the Next China? By mcbeanhttp://mcbean.hubpages.com/hub/Internet-Censorship-Australia-China