1. Dr. Amit Kapoor
Honorary Chairman, Institute for Competitiveness, India
& Professor of Strategy, MDI, Gurgaon, India
2. Poverty Concept and Definitions
Narrow vs Broader Definitions:
Nolan and Whelan define poverty in terms of the inability to participate in society
(which is broader than more ‘absolute’ definitions confined to subsistence needs),
but emphasize that what is distinctive is the ‘inability to participate owing to lack of
resources’ (1996: 188).
By implication they exclude non-material elements found in broad UN
definitions, for example: ‘lack of participation in decision-making’, ‘a violation of
human dignity’, ‘powerlessness’ and ‘susceptibility to violence’ (cited in
Langmore, 2000: 37). Similarly, they exclude some of the non-material aspects
emphasized by people in poverty themselves, such as lack of voice, respect and
self-esteem, isolation and humiliation (UKCAP, 1997; Galloway, 2002).
Source: World bank,2012
3. Poverty Concept and Definitions
Income or Living Standards:
Another source of variation in definitions of poverty, reflected in the literature on
measurement, lies in whether they are rooted in conceptualizations that are
concerned with, on the one hand, a person’s material resources, especially
income, and, on the other, with actual outcomes in terms of living standards and
activities (Nolan and Whelan, 1996).
Put simply, someone is ‘“poor” when they have both a low standard of living and
a low income’ (Gordon et al., 2000b: 91).
A. B. Atkinson makes a related, but more fundamental, distinction between a
concern with standard of living and a concern with a citizen’s ‘right to a minimum
level of resources’ (1989: 12, emphasis added).
Source: World bank,2012
4. Poverty Concept and Definitions
Income Or Capabilities:
Amartya Sen offers an alternative perspective on the role of low income in the
definition of poverty. It has been hugely influential within the international
development context, contributing to a paradigm shift in the meaning of
development away from economic growth and GDP to a focus on ‘poverty as a
denial of choices and opportunities for living a tolerable life’ (UNDP, 1997: 2;
Vizard, 2001).
The human poverty and development indices published in the annual UNDP
Human Development Report reflect Sen’s approach.
Sen takes a step backwards from both income and living standards to ask why
they matter. His answer is that they don’t matter in their own right, for they are
simply instrumental to what really matters, namely the kind of life that a person is
able to lead and the choices and opportunities open to her in leading that life. At
the heart of his approach is an understanding of living as involving ‘being and
doing’.
Source: World bank,2012
5. Poverty Concept and Definitions
Absolute and Relative Poverty:
This distinction has been central to post-war debates about how to define poverty.
Definitions deployed in the late nine- tenth and early twentieth century by Charles
Booth and Seebohm Rowntree, the pioneers of modern poverty research, were
supposedly ‘absolute’ in the sense that poverty was said to be understood as lacking
sufficient money to meet basic physical needs.
At its most basic, absolute poverty is defined in terms of survival; more commonly it
refers to subsistence, linked to a basic standard of physical capacity necessary for
production (paid work) and reproduction (the bearing and nurturing of children).
The notion of ‘relative’, which links the concepts of relative poverty and
deprivation, needs unpacking, as it embraces a number of different meanings. Broadly
these fall into two, interrelated, categories concerning, first, the nature of the
comparisons to be made in judging whether poverty exists and, second, the nature of
human needs.
Source: World bank,2012
8. Poverty headcount ratio at $2 a day (PPP) (% of population) 2011 or last year available
Nigeria 84.49
South Africa 31.33
Russian Federation 0.05
Rwanda 82.37
India 68.72
China 29.79
Brazil 10.82
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Source: World bank,2012
9. Poverty headcount ratio at $1.25 a day (PPP) (% of population) 2011 or last year
available
Nigeria 67.98
South Africa 13.77
Rwanda 63.17
Russian Federation 0
India 32.67
China 13.06
Brazil 6.14
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Source: World bank,2012
10. Gini Index 2011 or last year available
70
60
50
40
63.14
30
54.69
50.82 48.83
42.48
20 40.11
33.38
10
0
Brazil China India Russian Federation Rwanda South Africa Nigeria
Source: World bank,2012
11. Cities in India
8
KE UP
7
MH
Number of Megacities (Population > 1 Million)
6
5
GJ MP TN
4
JH RJ AP
3
CH PB WB
2
JK DL HR BH
KA
1
HP AS UK
NE OR
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Number of Class A Cities ( Population > 1 Lakh
Source: Census 2011
12. Urbanization in India
180.0
160.0 SK
Percentage Decade Growth in Urban Population
140.0
120.0
100.0 KE
TR
80.0
NA
60.0
CH MN HR
UK
BH AP JK AN GJ GA
40.0 MEUPJH KA
AS OR RJ WB
MP PB TN MZ DL
MH
HP
20.0
0.0
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0
% Share of Urban Population in Total Population
Source: Census,2011
13. Slums and Poverty ratio in India
20.00
18.00 DL
MH
16.00
% og Slum Population to Total Population
14.00 HR TN
12.00
MZ
PB
WB AN
10.00 GO MP
CH
UK
AP
ME GJ
8.00
KA
UP RJ
6.00
JK OR
NA
TR
AS
4.00 MN JH
SK
KE BH
2.00 HP
0.00
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Poverty Ratio - Urban
Source: World bank,2012
14. Households with Drinking water facilities
80
NA
BH
% of households without tapwater as major source of drinking water
70
AS
KE
60
UP
JH
50
TR CH
40 OR
MN
MP
WB
MZ
30
UK AN
HR
PB TN
20 GJ
GA RJ
AP
HP DL MH
JK KA
10
ME
SK
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
% of households with drinking water facility outside premisis (Distance >200m)
Source: World bank,2012
15. Households and Sanitation
35
CH
30 OR
BH
% of households with no sanitation facility
MP JH
25
20
TN
UP
15
RJ
JK KA
AN
GA
10 HP
HR
GJ
WB MH
PB
5 UK
NA KE DL
AS TR
ME
MZ SK AP MN
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
% of households with no bathroom facility
Source: World bank,2012
16. Households and Drainage facilities
70 TR
60
KE
% of households with no drainage facility
50
40 OR
GA MZ
MNNA
30 CH
BH AS
WB
JH TN
20 AP
AN
MP HP
KA MH
RJ
JK GJ
10 UP UK PB
HR
DL ME
SK
0
79 82 85 88 91 94 97 100
% of households with domestic use for electricity
Source: World bank,2012
17. Urban Housing Shortages
4
MH
3.5
3 TN
Urban Housng Shortage ( In Millions)
2.5 UK
WB
AN
2
GJKA
1.5 MP
DL
RJ
1
KE
PB
BH
JH OR HR
0.5 CH AS
UP JK
AP NA ME TR MZ GA HP MN
SK
0
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Per capita Floor Area ( sq m) in urban areas
Source: World bank,2012
18. Rents paid by households
2500
KA
2000
Average Rent Paid by houeholds ( In Rs)
SK
ME
DL
1500 KE GA
UK MH AN
RJ MZ
BH
UP OR
TN NA
HR GJ
1000 AS
JK HP
MP TR
MN AP
PB
JH CH
WB
500
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
% of Households living in rented dwellings
Source: World bank,2012
19. Percentage and Population of Poor in India
% age of Persons below Poverty line
Number of Persons (In Lakhs)
(Tendulkar Methodology)-2009-10
Andhra Pradesh 176.6 21.1
Arunachal Pradesh 3.5 25.9
Assam 116.4 37.9
Bihar 543.5 53.5
Chhattisgarh 121.9 48.7
Delhi 23.3 14.2
Goa 1.3 8.7
Gujarat 136.2 23
Haryana 50 20.1
Himachal Pradesh 6.4 9.5
Jammu & Kashmir 11.5 9.4
Jharkhand 126.2 39.1
Karnataka 142.3 23.6
Kerala 39.6 12
Madhya Pradesh 261.8 36.7
Maharashtra 270.8 24.5
Manipur 12.5 47.1
Meghalaya 4.9 17.1
Mizoram 2.3 21.1
Nagaland 4.1 20.9
Orissa 153.2 37
Punjab 43.5 15.9
Rajasthan 167 24.8
Sikkim 0.8 13.1
Tamil Nadu 121.8 17.1
Tripura 6.3 17.4
Uttar Pradesh 737.9 37.7
Uttarakhand 17.9 18
West Bengal 240.3 26.7
India 3546.8 20.9
21. Country Equivalents
BAHA CUBA
MAS
Source: EIU 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
22. Prosperity in India
Jammu and Kashmir
474
Himachal Pradesh
Pakistan 872 China
Punjab Uttarakhand
821
650
1056
Haryana
1652 Delhi Arunachal Pradesh
Nepal 669 553
Uttar Pradesh Sikkim
Rajasthan 320
494 Assam Nagaland
396
Bihar Meghalaya 378
571
254 Manipur
394
Gujarat Jharkhand Tripura
Mizoram
941 Madhya Pradesh 404 West Bengal 544 529
377 615
Chhattisgarh
534
Odisha
Maharashtra 487
945
Bay of Bengal
Arabian Sea
Andhra Pradesh
Goa 698
1788
Karnataka
713
Tamil Nadu
Kerala 801
933
Sri Lanka
Indian Ocean
All the figures are in dollars, The exchange rate taken for arriving at the figures was 1 US$ = 49 Rupees
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
23. Demographics of India 2011
Age Pyramid for India in 2011
80+ 4469 5163
75-79 6075 7017
70-74 8910 10034
65-69 11991 12406
60-64 16693 15712
55-59 22391 20447
50-54 28157 26038
45-49 33218 31993
40-44 36773 36691
Males
35-39 40596 40164
Female
30-34 46050 42855
25-29 54078 47877
20-24 62281 55757
15-19 63479 58248
10-14 61318 57259
5-9 60092 53394
0-4 60746 54133
80000 60000 40000 20000 0 20000 40000 60000 80000
Population of males / females in Thousands in 2011
Source: Census of India, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
24. Demographics of India 2026
Age Pyramid for India in 2026
80+ 8412 11465
75-79 9937 10644
70-74 15820 15819
65-69 22185 21982
60-64 28268 28651
55-59 32968 34124
50-54 37704 38267
45-49 43702 41361
40-44 51965 46466
Male
35-39 60313 54219
Female
30-34 61859 56739
25-29 60113 55998
20-24 59176 52410
15-19 59529 52739
10-14 59500 52734
5-9 58396 51790
0-4 55328 49256
80000 60000 40000 20000 0 20000 40000 60000 80000
Projected Population of males / females in Thousands
Source: Census of India, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
25. Overall Dependence Ratio of States
Dependence Ratios 2011 Dependence ratio 2026
West Bengal 44.58 42.35
Uttarakhand 56.39 47.88
Uttar Pradesh 66.11 55.02
Tamil Nadu 43.07 43.78
Rajasthan 60.51 46.67
Punjab 46.62 41.77
Orissa 48.47 43.43
NE States Excluding Assam 44.57 42.23
Maharashtra 48.85 42.72
Madhya Pradesh 60.18 48.37
Kerala 45.23 45.96
Karnataka 45.97 43.46
Jharkhand 55.35 47.13
Jammu & Kashmir 50.27 43.11
Himachal Pradesh 46.91 42.87
Haryana 51.12 41.24
Gujarat 48.40 43.16
Delhi 39.96 34.81
Chattisgarh 57.45 48.40
Bihar 49.71 47.67
Assam 51.97 45.14
Andhra Pradesh 45.05 42.49
80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0
Dependence ratio 2011 Dependence ratio 2026
Source: Census of India, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
26. Factors of Poverty
Disease
Ignorance Apathy
Poverty
Disease Dependency
Source: 1967, 1987, 2007 Phil Bartle
27.
28. Misery Index for states (Rural) 2009-10
West Bengal 23.87
Uttar Pradesh 19.67
Uttaranchal 19.22
Tripura 21.72
Tamil Nadu 27.07
Sikkim 19.42
Rajasthan 20.04
Punjab 23.17
Orissa 21.11
Nagaland 30.62
Mizoram 16.42
Meghalaya 12.47
Manipur 15.89
Maharashtra 25.02
Madhya Pradesh 21.08
Kerala 26.55
Karnataka 20.81
Jharkhand 21.92
Jammu and Kashmir 20.47
Himachal Pradesh 16.37
Haryana 24.17
Gujarat 23.21
Goa 20.02
Delhi 21.22
Chattisgarh 17.92
Bihar 17.51
Assam 21.90
Arunachal Pradesh 15.92
Andhra Pradesh 21.55
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00
Source: NSSO, and RBI
29. Misery Index for states (Urban) 2009-10
West Bengal 23.17
18.57
Uttaranchal 20.92
26.42
Tamil Nadu 20.97
14.92
Rajasthan 20.84
24.07
Orissa 19.31
26.32
Mizoram 18.12
17.07
Manipur 16.89
23.92
Madhya Pradesh 19.88
24.05
Karnataka 21.51
23.82
Jammu and Kashmir 22.77
18.77
Haryana 22.37
20.31
Goa 19.82
17.92
Chattisgarh 19.02
20.91
Assam 20.70
19.62
Andhra Pradesh 19.55
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00
Source: NSSO, and RBI