WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY Course: IST7100 Case Study Analysis Student:___________________ Weighted Content:______ CT:______ Comm:______ Weighted Rubric Score:__________ Actual Score ______ ______ ______ _ Performance Unsatisfactory 1 Developing 2 Competent 3 Accomplished 4 Exemplary 5 Knowledge of Content 50% of rubric score Critical Thinking 30% of rubric score Communications Written20% of rubric score Work does not reflect the assignment purpose Work marginally reflects the assignment purpose Work reflects the assignment purpose Work is accurately detailed, and in line with course content Work stands-out as exemplary, is accurately detailed, and in line with course content Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is inferior Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is elementary, requires significant assistance Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is acceptable, requires average assistance Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is accomplished, requires little to no assistance Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is highly evolved Research sources do not relate to the case study Research sources are generalized, with minimal relationship to the case study Research sources are generalized but most are related to the case study The majority of the resources are related to the case study Research sources were well selected and relate directly to the case study Depth of research is below minimal expectations Professional references (Books and peer review sources) are minimal other reference sources are dominant Shared use of professional references and other sources… Shared use of professional references and other quality sources… Acceptably integrated into the document Shared use of professional references and other quality sources…Integrates them clearly and concisely into the document (Statements w/multiple support) Ineffective documentation of research/support …less than minimum required professional references used Uses at least minimum required professional ref to support research with poor integration Uses at least minimum required prof ref to support research with adequate integration Uses ample references and integrates them acceptably into the document Uses ample references and integrates them clearly and concisely into the document Unsatisfactory Developing Competent Accomplished Exemplary Ability to incorporate graphical data/info is lacking Ability to incorporate graphical data/info is emerging Ability to incorporate graphical data/info is basic Ability to incorporate graphical data/info & link key relationships is proficient Ability to incorporate graphical data/info & link key relationships is superior Does not demonstrates an understanding of the research to the case study .

1. WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY
Course: IST7100 Case
Study Analysis
Student:___________________ Weighted Content:______
CT:______ Comm:______ Weighted Rubric
Score:__________
Actual Score ______
______ ______
_
Performance
Unsatisfactory
1
Developing
2
Competent
3
Accomplished
4
Exemplary
5
Knowledge of Content
50% of rubric score

2. Critical Thinking
30% of rubric score

3. Communications
Written20% of rubric score
Work does not reflect the assignment purpose
Work marginally reflects the assignment purpose
Work reflects the assignment purpose
Work is accurately detailed, and in line with course content
Work stands-out as exemplary, is accurately detailed, and in
line with course content
Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is inferior
Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is elementary,
requires significant assistance
Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is acceptable,
requires average assistance
Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is accomplished,
requires little to no assistance
Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is highly evolved

4. Research sources do not relate to the case study
Research sources are generalized, with minimal relationship to
the case study
Research sources are generalized but most are related to the
case study
The majority of the resources are related to the case study
Research sources were well selected and relate directly to the
case study
Depth of research is below minimal expectations
Professional references (Books and peer review sources) are
minimal other reference sources are dominant
Shared use of professional references and other sources…
Shared use of professional references and other quality
sources… Acceptably integrated into the document
Shared use of professional references and other quality
sources…Integrates them clearly and concisely into the
document (Statements w/multiple support)
Ineffective documentation of research/support …less than
minimum required professional references used

5. Uses at least minimum required professional ref to support
research with poor integration
Uses at least minimum required prof ref to support research
with adequate integration
Uses ample references and integrates them acceptably into the
document
Uses ample references and integrates them clearly and concisely
into the document
Unsatisfactory
Developing
Competent
Accomplished
Exemplary
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info is lacking
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info is emerging
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info is basic
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info & link key

6. relationships is proficient
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info & link key
relationships is superior
Does not demonstrates an understanding of the research to the
case study
Connects relationships between the research and case study at a
minimum level
Identifies relative relationships between the research and the
case study
Identifies relative relationships between the research and the
case study and is able to compare and contrast topics
Identifies relative relationships between the research and the
case study and is able to accurately and effectively compare and
contrast topics
Fails to document critical points
Basic critical points identified
Critical point between the research and the case study are
identified
Critical point between the research and the case study are
identified and analyzed
Critical point between the research and the case study are
effectively identified and critically analyzed

7. Sentences are not well-constructed and often lack clarity.
Formats and patterns are repetitive
Sentences are somewhat clear and well constructed, but lack
variety in format& length
Most sentences are clear and well-constructed some evidence of
variety in format, length, and complexity.
Sentences are clear and well-constructed - Some evidence of
variety in format, length, and complexity
Varied well-constructed sentences are evident throughout the
document with an appropriate stylistic flair
Paper is riddled with spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical
errors
Paper contains 5 or 6 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical
errors
Paper contains 3 or 4 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical
errors

8. Paper contains 1 or 2 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical
errors
No spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily
apparent
Paper is riddled with APA errors
Paper contains 5 or 6 APA errors
Paper contains 3 or 4 APA errors
Paper contains 1 or 2 APA
errors
No APA errors are readily apparent
Appendix A

9. Organization Chart
COOGlen Vogel
IT Account MgrJenny HendersonVP MarketingCheryl
O’SheaMarketing IT
Relationship Manager
Paul GutierezCFOMichelle WrightCIOFarzadMohammedChief
ArchitectSergei GroznyNew InternJoyce Li
COO
Glen Vogel
IT Account Mgr
Jenny Henderson
VP Marketing
Cheryl O’Shea
CFO
Michelle Wright
CIO
Farzad Mohammed
Marketing IT Relationship Manager

10. Paul Gutierez
Chief Architect
Sergei Grozny
New Intern
Joyce Li