SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 17
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
COMPETITION LAWS AND
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY RIGHTS .

BY
ABISHEK RAMAN
Objectives of competition laws
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

•
•
•
•

I. To check anti-competitive practices
II. To prohibit abuse of dominant position
III. Regulation of combinations.
IV. To provide for the establishment of CCI, a quasijudicial body to
perform below mentioned duties:
1) Prevent practices having adverse impact on
competition
2) Promote and sustain competition in the market
3) Protect consumer interests at large
4) Ensure freedom of trade carried on by other
participants in the market and look into matters
connected therewith or incidental thereto.
Nature and intent of intellectual property
rights
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

• Intellectual Property Rights provide exclusive rights
to the holders to perform a productive or
commercial activity. But this does not
automatically include the right to exert restrictive
or monopoly power in a market.

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

• Intellectual property right is an exception to the
general rule promoting free competition. The
protection is not meant to continue even after the
objectives of Intellectual property right have been
achieved.
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

• In cases where Intellectual property right is
unable to prevent the extension of such
power beyond the realm of the intended
protection, competition laws are capable of
playing this limiting role.
• Hence the attitude of competition law to
Intellectual property right is not hostile. It
acts in a complementary manner to ensure
that the inherent purpose of the rights is
not defeated.
Application of competition laws to IPR
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

• When the Intellectual property right owner
exceeds the essential function for which the right
is granted like the protection of innovators’
achievements against free-riders and protection of
the firm’s reputation and identity, competition
laws may curtail such abuse and restrict the owner
from such exercise of his rights.
• Therefore competition laws maybe applied in the
following areas with respect to IPR’s namely:
1) Extent of derived market power
2) Abuse of such market power
3) In Licensing agreements entered by the owners
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

• Section 3(1) of the competition act refers to Anticompetitive agreements, according to this act :
No enterprise or association of enterprises or
person or association of persons shall enter into
any agreement in respect of production, supply,
distribution, storage, acquisition or control of
goods or provision of services, which causes or is
likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on
competition within India. Any agreement entered
into in contravention of the provisions contained
above shall be deemed to be void.
case law : kingfisher airlines vs. The competition
commission of India
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

Any agreement entered into between enterprises or associations of

enterprises or persons or associations of persons or between any

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

person and enterprise or practice carried on, or decision taken by, any
association of enterprises or association of persons, including cartels,
engaged in identical or similar trade of goods or provision of services,

which:
(a) directly or indirectly determines purchase or sale prices;
case law: Singhania & partners vs. Microsoft corp. pvt. ltd
(b) limits or controls production, supply, markets, technical

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

development, investment or provision of services;
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

(c) shares the market or source of production or
provision of services by way of allocation of
geographical area of market, or type of goods
or services, or number of customers in the
market or any other similar way;
(d) directly or indirectly results in bid rigging or
collusive bidding, shall be presumed to have an
appreciable adverse effect on competition.
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

• the Competition Act, 2002 deals with the
applicability of such prohibition relating to anticompetitive agreements to IPRs through section
3(5), an express provision to the section which
provides that nothing contained in this section
shall restrict• (i)The right of any person to restrain any
infringement of, or to
impose “reasonable
conditions”, as may be necessary for protecting
any of his rights which have been or may be
conferred upon him under(a) The Copyright Act, 1957;
(b) The Patents Act, 1970;
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

(c) The Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 or the
Trade Marks Act, 1999;
(d) The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration
and Protection) Act, 1999;
(e) The Designs Act, 2000;
(f ) The Semi- conductor Integrated Circuits Layout- Design
Act, 2000;
• (ii) The right of any person to export goods from India to
the extent to which the agreement relates exclusively to
the production, supply, distribution or control of goods or
provision of services for such export.
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

• Section 3(5) of the Act declares that “reasonable
conditions as may be necessary for protecting” any
intellectual property right will not attract the
implications of section 3 of the competition act,
2002.
• The expression “reasonable conditions” has not
been defined or explained in the competition act. By
implication, unreasonable conditions that attach to
an intellectual property right will attract the
implications under section 3 of the act.
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

• The following are certain types of conditions or
arrangements involved in the arena of intellectual
property rights that are considered as unreasonable
or beyond the scope of the bundle of rights that
maybe derived from such intellectual property rights:
1) Tie-in arrangements
Tie-in arrangement is a type of such restrictive
practice wherein a licensee may be required to
acquire particular goods (unpatented materials e.g.
raw materials) solely from the patentee, thus
foreclosing the opportunities of other producers.
There could be an arrangement forbidding a licensee
to compete, or to handle goods which compete with
the licensor’s interest. Such arrangements are usually
considered to hinder the spirit of completion and
hence not allowed by the competition act.
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

2) Grant back provisions
A provision in the intellectual property licensing
agreement requiring the licensee to assign any
improvements or modifications made by it, back to the
licensor is referred to as a grant back provisions. These
provisions are not unlawful per se, however such
provisions attract complications when the rights
required to be granted back are far broader than the
rights originally licensed or when such practices are
generally against the norms of the industry in question.
Such a grant back provision may hinder the incentives
of licensee to innovate due to structure of such a
provision, and hence it would amount to violation of
competition laws.
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

3) Patent pooling
This happens when the firms in a manufacturing
industry decide to pool their patents and agree not to
grant licenses to third parties, at the same time fixing
quotas and prices. They may earn extraordinary profits
and keep new entrants out of the market. In particular,
if all the technology is locked in a few hands by a
pooling agreement, it will be difficult for outsiders to
compete. Patent pooling is a restrictive practice, which
will not constitute being a part of the bundle of rights
forming part of an intellectual property right.
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

4) Package licensing
A licensee may be coerced by the licensor to take
several licenses in intellectual property even though the
former may not need all of them. This sort of practices
are resorted by licensors to ensure that even their
lesser valued or in certain cases valueless, intellectual
properties derive monetary benefits. Section 84 (7) of
the Indian patents act, 1970, mentions that such type
of coercive package licensing is to be considered as an
anti-competitive practice.
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

5) Unreasonable regulations or conditions.
a) A condition imposing quality control on the licensed
patented product beyond those necessary for guaranteeing
the effectiveness of the licensed patent may be an anticompetitive practice.
b) Restricting the right of the licensee to sell the product of
the licensed intellectual property to persons other than
those designated by the licensor may be in violation of
competition laws.
c) A condition imposed on the licensee to employ or use staff
designated by the licensor is likely to be regarded as
anticompetitive.
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821

BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400

COIMBATORE
BB1, Park Avenue,
# 48, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore - 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921

EMAIL

info@altacit.com
WEBSITE

www.altacit.com

Conclusion

Thus it can be observed that the relation between competition
laws and intellectual property rights with its intricacies and
ironies is here to stay. It’s amply clear that these two streams of
law are bound to converge and cannot be expected stay as
mutually exclusive subjects.
With the dramatic increase in trade and stronger economic ties
between nations, it is absolutely necessary for countries to
strengthen their legislative systems to ensure that they are
prepared to handle any impending crisis that may require them
to clearly distinguish the two streams of law without
compromising on any individual’s rights or public welfare as the
case may be.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Bayer vs Natco Case
Bayer vs Natco CaseBayer vs Natco Case
Bayer vs Natco Case
Manu Dhunna
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Surrender and Revocation of Patents
Surrender and Revocation of PatentsSurrender and Revocation of Patents
Surrender and Revocation of Patents
 
Passing off ppt
Passing off pptPassing off ppt
Passing off ppt
 
Trademark law ppt
Trademark law pptTrademark law ppt
Trademark law ppt
 
Deceptive similarity under trademark
Deceptive similarity under trademarkDeceptive similarity under trademark
Deceptive similarity under trademark
 
Key terms Patent Act Term#12:True and First Inventor
Key terms Patent Act Term#12:True and First InventorKey terms Patent Act Term#12:True and First Inventor
Key terms Patent Act Term#12:True and First Inventor
 
Intelectual property right and Passing Off
Intelectual property right and Passing OffIntelectual property right and Passing Off
Intelectual property right and Passing Off
 
Understanding trade secret protection in india
Understanding trade secret protection in indiaUnderstanding trade secret protection in india
Understanding trade secret protection in india
 
Bayer vs Natco Case
Bayer vs Natco CaseBayer vs Natco Case
Bayer vs Natco Case
 
TRIPS Agreement (Part-1)
TRIPS Agreement (Part-1)TRIPS Agreement (Part-1)
TRIPS Agreement (Part-1)
 
Trademark infringement and passing off remedies
Trademark infringement and passing off remediesTrademark infringement and passing off remedies
Trademark infringement and passing off remedies
 
Non patentable inventions
Non patentable inventionsNon patentable inventions
Non patentable inventions
 
Intellectual Property v. Competition Law Policy in India
Intellectual Property v. Competition Law Policy in IndiaIntellectual Property v. Competition Law Policy in India
Intellectual Property v. Competition Law Policy in India
 
Trademark Act, 1999
Trademark Act, 1999Trademark Act, 1999
Trademark Act, 1999
 
Trademark Infringement,Types of Trademark Infringements and Remedies of Infri...
Trademark Infringement,Types of Trademark Infringements and Remedies of Infri...Trademark Infringement,Types of Trademark Infringements and Remedies of Infri...
Trademark Infringement,Types of Trademark Infringements and Remedies of Infri...
 
Compulsory licensing
Compulsory licensingCompulsory licensing
Compulsory licensing
 
Trademark Registration Process
Trademark Registration ProcessTrademark Registration Process
Trademark Registration Process
 
Novartis V. Union of India (2013) 6 SCC 1.pptx
Novartis V. Union of India (2013) 6 SCC 1.pptxNovartis V. Union of India (2013) 6 SCC 1.pptx
Novartis V. Union of India (2013) 6 SCC 1.pptx
 
Compulsory licensing (patents)
Compulsory licensing (patents)Compulsory licensing (patents)
Compulsory licensing (patents)
 
Abuse of Dominance in Competition Law
Abuse of Dominance in Competition LawAbuse of Dominance in Competition Law
Abuse of Dominance in Competition Law
 
Functions of a trademark
Functions of a trademarkFunctions of a trademark
Functions of a trademark
 

Andere mochten auch

Microsoft power point comparative study of the main features of unfair comp...
Microsoft power point   comparative study of the main features of unfair comp...Microsoft power point   comparative study of the main features of unfair comp...
Microsoft power point comparative study of the main features of unfair comp...
sanjeev kumar chaswal
 
The importance of intellectual property (ip) [compatibility
The importance of intellectual property (ip) [compatibility The importance of intellectual property (ip) [compatibility
The importance of intellectual property (ip) [compatibility
Delwin Arikatt
 
Chapter 8 – Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition
Chapter 8 – Intellectual Property and Unfair CompetitionChapter 8 – Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition
Chapter 8 – Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition
UAF_BA330
 
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THEIR ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THEIR ECONOMIC IMPORTANCEINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THEIR ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THEIR ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE
Avinash Choudhary
 

Andere mochten auch (13)

Microsoft power point comparative study of the main features of unfair comp...
Microsoft power point   comparative study of the main features of unfair comp...Microsoft power point   comparative study of the main features of unfair comp...
Microsoft power point comparative study of the main features of unfair comp...
 
Interface between intellectual property rights and competition law
Interface between intellectual property rights and competition lawInterface between intellectual property rights and competition law
Interface between intellectual property rights and competition law
 
The importance of intellectual property (ip) [compatibility
The importance of intellectual property (ip) [compatibility The importance of intellectual property (ip) [compatibility
The importance of intellectual property (ip) [compatibility
 
Chapter 8 – Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition
Chapter 8 – Intellectual Property and Unfair CompetitionChapter 8 – Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition
Chapter 8 – Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition
 
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THEIR ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THEIR ECONOMIC IMPORTANCEINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THEIR ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THEIR ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE
 
Intellectual property rights
Intellectual property rightsIntellectual property rights
Intellectual property rights
 
What Makes Great Infographics
What Makes Great InfographicsWhat Makes Great Infographics
What Makes Great Infographics
 
Masters of SlideShare
Masters of SlideShareMasters of SlideShare
Masters of SlideShare
 
STOP! VIEW THIS! 10-Step Checklist When Uploading to Slideshare
STOP! VIEW THIS! 10-Step Checklist When Uploading to SlideshareSTOP! VIEW THIS! 10-Step Checklist When Uploading to Slideshare
STOP! VIEW THIS! 10-Step Checklist When Uploading to Slideshare
 
You Suck At PowerPoint!
You Suck At PowerPoint!You Suck At PowerPoint!
You Suck At PowerPoint!
 
10 Ways to Win at SlideShare SEO & Presentation Optimization
10 Ways to Win at SlideShare SEO & Presentation Optimization10 Ways to Win at SlideShare SEO & Presentation Optimization
10 Ways to Win at SlideShare SEO & Presentation Optimization
 
How To Get More From SlideShare - Super-Simple Tips For Content Marketing
How To Get More From SlideShare - Super-Simple Tips For Content MarketingHow To Get More From SlideShare - Super-Simple Tips For Content Marketing
How To Get More From SlideShare - Super-Simple Tips For Content Marketing
 
How to Make Awesome SlideShares: Tips & Tricks
How to Make Awesome SlideShares: Tips & TricksHow to Make Awesome SlideShares: Tips & Tricks
How to Make Awesome SlideShares: Tips & Tricks
 

Ähnlich wie Ipr and competition laws

Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01
Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01
Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01
AnjaliGupta437
 
Ip issues in digital libraries
Ip issues in digital librariesIp issues in digital libraries
Ip issues in digital libraries
Altacit Global
 
Business method patents
Business method patentsBusiness method patents
Business method patents
Altacit Global
 
Sexual harassment at work place
Sexual harassment at work placeSexual harassment at work place
Sexual harassment at work place
Altacit Global
 

Ähnlich wie Ipr and competition laws (20)

Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01
Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01
Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01
 
Intellectual property laws vs competition laws
Intellectual  property  laws vs competition lawsIntellectual  property  laws vs competition laws
Intellectual property laws vs competition laws
 
Minor’s rights under ip laws
Minor’s rights under ip lawsMinor’s rights under ip laws
Minor’s rights under ip laws
 
Patent pool and antitrust
Patent pool and antitrustPatent pool and antitrust
Patent pool and antitrust
 
Standard essential patent
Standard essential patentStandard essential patent
Standard essential patent
 
Non violation complaints in the wto
Non violation complaints in the wtoNon violation complaints in the wto
Non violation complaints in the wto
 
Insolvency and bankruptcy code 2016
Insolvency and bankruptcy code 2016Insolvency and bankruptcy code 2016
Insolvency and bankruptcy code 2016
 
Parallel import of patented goods
Parallel import of patented goodsParallel import of patented goods
Parallel import of patented goods
 
Ip issues in digital libraries
Ip issues in digital librariesIp issues in digital libraries
Ip issues in digital libraries
 
Field use of limitation
Field use of limitationField use of limitation
Field use of limitation
 
What is the Role of Commodity Exchange?
What is the Role of Commodity Exchange?What is the Role of Commodity Exchange?
What is the Role of Commodity Exchange?
 
Section 8 non compliance
Section 8 non complianceSection 8 non compliance
Section 8 non compliance
 
Ip and e commerce
Ip and e commerceIp and e commerce
Ip and e commerce
 
Ericsson vs intex an overview of software patenting
Ericsson vs intex an overview of software patentingEricsson vs intex an overview of software patenting
Ericsson vs intex an overview of software patenting
 
Hate speech laws in india
Hate speech laws in indiaHate speech laws in india
Hate speech laws in india
 
Ipr and software
Ipr and softwareIpr and software
Ipr and software
 
Ip risk management
Ip risk managementIp risk management
Ip risk management
 
Overlap between copyright & trademark
Overlap between copyright & trademarkOverlap between copyright & trademark
Overlap between copyright & trademark
 
Business method patents
Business method patentsBusiness method patents
Business method patents
 
Sexual harassment at work place
Sexual harassment at work placeSexual harassment at work place
Sexual harassment at work place
 

Mehr von Altacit Global

Mehr von Altacit Global (20)

Unmanned aircraft system rules, 2020
Unmanned aircraft system rules, 2020Unmanned aircraft system rules, 2020
Unmanned aircraft system rules, 2020
 
Sexual harassment during work from home
Sexual harassment during work from homeSexual harassment during work from home
Sexual harassment during work from home
 
Information technology guidelines for intermediaries and digital media ethics...
Information technology guidelines for intermediaries and digital media ethics...Information technology guidelines for intermediaries and digital media ethics...
Information technology guidelines for intermediaries and digital media ethics...
 
Returns and refunds consumer protection act
Returns and refunds  consumer protection actReturns and refunds  consumer protection act
Returns and refunds consumer protection act
 
Rights of an unborn child
Rights of an unborn childRights of an unborn child
Rights of an unborn child
 
Grounds for divorce in India
Grounds for divorce in IndiaGrounds for divorce in India
Grounds for divorce in India
 
Alimony laws in India
Alimony laws in IndiaAlimony laws in India
Alimony laws in India
 
Patent licensing
Patent licensingPatent licensing
Patent licensing
 
Surrogacy laws-in-India
Surrogacy laws-in-IndiaSurrogacy laws-in-India
Surrogacy laws-in-India
 
I r s form w-9
I r s form w-9I r s form w-9
I r s form w-9
 
Tamilnadu regulation of rights and responsibilities of landlords and tenants ...
Tamilnadu regulation of rights and responsibilities of landlords and tenants ...Tamilnadu regulation of rights and responsibilities of landlords and tenants ...
Tamilnadu regulation of rights and responsibilities of landlords and tenants ...
 
Requirements for operation of civil remotely piloted aircraft system
Requirements for operation of civil remotely piloted aircraft systemRequirements for operation of civil remotely piloted aircraft system
Requirements for operation of civil remotely piloted aircraft system
 
Rights of employees under insolvent companies
Rights of employees under insolvent companiesRights of employees under insolvent companies
Rights of employees under insolvent companies
 
Doctrine of originality copyright
Doctrine of originality copyrightDoctrine of originality copyright
Doctrine of originality copyright
 
Restoration of lapsed patents in India
Restoration of lapsed patents in IndiaRestoration of lapsed patents in India
Restoration of lapsed patents in India
 
Celebrity rights in India
Celebrity rights in IndiaCelebrity rights in India
Celebrity rights in India
 
Technology Development Board
Technology Development BoardTechnology Development Board
Technology Development Board
 
Motor accident mediation authority (MAMA)
Motor accident mediation authority (MAMA)Motor accident mediation authority (MAMA)
Motor accident mediation authority (MAMA)
 
Sebi (prohibition of insider trading) regulations, 2015
Sebi (prohibition of insider trading) regulations, 2015Sebi (prohibition of insider trading) regulations, 2015
Sebi (prohibition of insider trading) regulations, 2015
 
Legality of cryptocurrency in India
Legality of cryptocurrency in IndiaLegality of cryptocurrency in India
Legality of cryptocurrency in India
 

Ipr and competition laws

  • 1. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COMPETITION LAWS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS . BY ABISHEK RAMAN
  • 2. Objectives of competition laws CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com • • • • I. To check anti-competitive practices II. To prohibit abuse of dominant position III. Regulation of combinations. IV. To provide for the establishment of CCI, a quasijudicial body to perform below mentioned duties: 1) Prevent practices having adverse impact on competition 2) Promote and sustain competition in the market 3) Protect consumer interests at large 4) Ensure freedom of trade carried on by other participants in the market and look into matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
  • 3. Nature and intent of intellectual property rights CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 • Intellectual Property Rights provide exclusive rights to the holders to perform a productive or commercial activity. But this does not automatically include the right to exert restrictive or monopoly power in a market. COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com • Intellectual property right is an exception to the general rule promoting free competition. The protection is not meant to continue even after the objectives of Intellectual property right have been achieved.
  • 4. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com • In cases where Intellectual property right is unable to prevent the extension of such power beyond the realm of the intended protection, competition laws are capable of playing this limiting role. • Hence the attitude of competition law to Intellectual property right is not hostile. It acts in a complementary manner to ensure that the inherent purpose of the rights is not defeated.
  • 5. Application of competition laws to IPR CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com • When the Intellectual property right owner exceeds the essential function for which the right is granted like the protection of innovators’ achievements against free-riders and protection of the firm’s reputation and identity, competition laws may curtail such abuse and restrict the owner from such exercise of his rights. • Therefore competition laws maybe applied in the following areas with respect to IPR’s namely: 1) Extent of derived market power 2) Abuse of such market power 3) In Licensing agreements entered by the owners
  • 6. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com • Section 3(1) of the competition act refers to Anticompetitive agreements, according to this act : No enterprise or association of enterprises or person or association of persons shall enter into any agreement in respect of production, supply, distribution, storage, acquisition or control of goods or provision of services, which causes or is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition within India. Any agreement entered into in contravention of the provisions contained above shall be deemed to be void. case law : kingfisher airlines vs. The competition commission of India
  • 7. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 Any agreement entered into between enterprises or associations of enterprises or persons or associations of persons or between any BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 person and enterprise or practice carried on, or decision taken by, any association of enterprises or association of persons, including cartels, engaged in identical or similar trade of goods or provision of services, which: (a) directly or indirectly determines purchase or sale prices; case law: Singhania & partners vs. Microsoft corp. pvt. ltd (b) limits or controls production, supply, markets, technical EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com development, investment or provision of services;
  • 8. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com (c) shares the market or source of production or provision of services by way of allocation of geographical area of market, or type of goods or services, or number of customers in the market or any other similar way; (d) directly or indirectly results in bid rigging or collusive bidding, shall be presumed to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition.
  • 9. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com • the Competition Act, 2002 deals with the applicability of such prohibition relating to anticompetitive agreements to IPRs through section 3(5), an express provision to the section which provides that nothing contained in this section shall restrict• (i)The right of any person to restrain any infringement of, or to impose “reasonable conditions”, as may be necessary for protecting any of his rights which have been or may be conferred upon him under(a) The Copyright Act, 1957; (b) The Patents Act, 1970;
  • 10. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com (c) The Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 or the Trade Marks Act, 1999; (d) The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999; (e) The Designs Act, 2000; (f ) The Semi- conductor Integrated Circuits Layout- Design Act, 2000; • (ii) The right of any person to export goods from India to the extent to which the agreement relates exclusively to the production, supply, distribution or control of goods or provision of services for such export.
  • 11. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com • Section 3(5) of the Act declares that “reasonable conditions as may be necessary for protecting” any intellectual property right will not attract the implications of section 3 of the competition act, 2002. • The expression “reasonable conditions” has not been defined or explained in the competition act. By implication, unreasonable conditions that attach to an intellectual property right will attract the implications under section 3 of the act.
  • 12. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com • The following are certain types of conditions or arrangements involved in the arena of intellectual property rights that are considered as unreasonable or beyond the scope of the bundle of rights that maybe derived from such intellectual property rights: 1) Tie-in arrangements Tie-in arrangement is a type of such restrictive practice wherein a licensee may be required to acquire particular goods (unpatented materials e.g. raw materials) solely from the patentee, thus foreclosing the opportunities of other producers. There could be an arrangement forbidding a licensee to compete, or to handle goods which compete with the licensor’s interest. Such arrangements are usually considered to hinder the spirit of completion and hence not allowed by the competition act.
  • 13. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com 2) Grant back provisions A provision in the intellectual property licensing agreement requiring the licensee to assign any improvements or modifications made by it, back to the licensor is referred to as a grant back provisions. These provisions are not unlawful per se, however such provisions attract complications when the rights required to be granted back are far broader than the rights originally licensed or when such practices are generally against the norms of the industry in question. Such a grant back provision may hinder the incentives of licensee to innovate due to structure of such a provision, and hence it would amount to violation of competition laws.
  • 14. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com 3) Patent pooling This happens when the firms in a manufacturing industry decide to pool their patents and agree not to grant licenses to third parties, at the same time fixing quotas and prices. They may earn extraordinary profits and keep new entrants out of the market. In particular, if all the technology is locked in a few hands by a pooling agreement, it will be difficult for outsiders to compete. Patent pooling is a restrictive practice, which will not constitute being a part of the bundle of rights forming part of an intellectual property right.
  • 15. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com 4) Package licensing A licensee may be coerced by the licensor to take several licenses in intellectual property even though the former may not need all of them. This sort of practices are resorted by licensors to ensure that even their lesser valued or in certain cases valueless, intellectual properties derive monetary benefits. Section 84 (7) of the Indian patents act, 1970, mentions that such type of coercive package licensing is to be considered as an anti-competitive practice.
  • 16. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com 5) Unreasonable regulations or conditions. a) A condition imposing quality control on the licensed patented product beyond those necessary for guaranteeing the effectiveness of the licensed patent may be an anticompetitive practice. b) Restricting the right of the licensee to sell the product of the licensed intellectual property to persons other than those designated by the licensor may be in violation of competition laws. c) A condition imposed on the licensee to employ or use staff designated by the licensor is likely to be regarded as anticompetitive.
  • 17. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, ‘Creative Enclave’, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE BB1, Park Avenue, # 48, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com Conclusion Thus it can be observed that the relation between competition laws and intellectual property rights with its intricacies and ironies is here to stay. It’s amply clear that these two streams of law are bound to converge and cannot be expected stay as mutually exclusive subjects. With the dramatic increase in trade and stronger economic ties between nations, it is absolutely necessary for countries to strengthen their legislative systems to ensure that they are prepared to handle any impending crisis that may require them to clearly distinguish the two streams of law without compromising on any individual’s rights or public welfare as the case may be.