SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 46
Major/Area Source
Boiler MACT Rule

Speaker:
Eric Swisher

23rd Virginia Environmental Symposium
April 11, 2012



       Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.
Overview
       Ground Rules
       Regulatory Framework
       Regulated Pollutants
       Emission Limitations
       Compliance Options
       Work Practice Standards
       Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction
       Things to Take Away

2
Ground Rules
                            NHSM
                             Rule

    Fuel is a Solid Waste            Fuel is not a Solid Waste

             CISWI                      Boiler MACT
              Rule                         Rules



                              Area                         Major



3
General Information
       Area or Major Source
       New, Reconstructed, or Existing
       Fuel Type
       Design Type




4
Comparison
    Area Source   Major Source




5
Facility Type
        Area Source              Major Source
       Not a Major Source      >10 tons per year
                                 any single HAP OR
                                > 25 tons per year of
                                 any combination of
                                 HAPs




6
Regulatory Citation
       40 CFR Part 63 – National Emission
        Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
        Source Categories (NESHAP):
        • Subpart JJJJJJ – Area Source Boiler MACT
          (ASBM)
        • Subpart DDDDD – Major Source Boiler MACT
          (MSBM)




7
History
        Area Source                               Major Source
        June 04, 2010                            January 13, 2003
    
       March 21, 2011
        • Proposed                               December 23, 2011
                                                  • Proposed
                                                  • Comments Due March 14, 2003
        • Comments Due July 19, 2010
        •Promulgated                              •Proposed
                                                 September 13, 2004
                                                  • Promulgated
       June 09, 2010                             • Compliance Date September 13, 2007
        • Comment Period Extended to August      October 31, 2005
       December 23, 2011
          03, 2010                               February 07, 2012
                                                  • Notice of Reconsideration
                                                  • Proposed Amendments
        July 22, 2010
        •Proposed Amendments                      •No Action Assurance
                                                December 28, 2005
                                                  • Final Rule (with Amendments)
        • Comment Period Extended to August       • Compliance Date September 13, 2007
          23, 2010
    
       February 21, 2012
        March 21, 2011
                                              
                                                   Letter
                                                  December 06, 2006
                                                  • Final Action on Reconsideration
                                                  June 04, 2010
        • Promulgated
                                              




        •Comments Due
                                                  • Proposed
       December 23, 2011                         • Comments Due July 19, 2010
                                                  June 09, 2010
        • Proposed Amendments
                                              

                                                  • Comment Period Extended to August 03, 2010
    
       March 13, 2012
        February 21, 2012                        July 22, 2010
                                                  • Comment Period Extended to August 23, 2010
        • Comments Due
           •No Action Assurance
             March 13, 2012
                                                 March 21, 2011
                                                  • Promulgated

               • No Action Assurance Letter
            Letter


8
Act of Congress
       March 08, 2012 Senate did not
        pass the Collins Amendment to
        the Highway Bill that would delay
        the MSBM.




9
Current Status
         Area Source               Major Source
        Effective Now            Proposed Rule
        Compliance Date           •December 23, 2011
         •March 21, 2014          Compliance Date
        No Action Assurance       •Date to Change
         Letter                   No Action Assurance
         •March 13, 2012           Letter
                                   •February 07, 2012



10
Source Applicability
          Area Source        Major Source
        Boiler            Boiler
        Exemptions        Process Heaters
                           Exemptions




11
Regulated Pollutants
         Area Source           Major Source
        Mercury (Hg)         Mercury (Hg)
                              Non-Mercury Metallic
        Non-Mercury           HAP
         Metallic HAP         Non-Metallic Inorganic
        Organic HAP           HAP
         (including POM)      Non-Dioxin Organic
                               HAP
                              Dioxins/Furans
                               (D/F)


12
Emission Limits
         Area Source              Major Source
        Mercury                 Mercury
        Carbon Monoxide         Carbon Monoxide
        Particulate Matter      Particulate Matter
                                  OR Total Selected
                                  Metals (TSM)
                                 Hydrogen Chloride



13
Compliance Options
          1. Comply with the Emission Standards

         Area Source            Major Source
        Fuel Sampling         Fuel Sampling
        Emission Testing      Emission Testing




14
Fuel Sampling
         Area Source              Major Source
        Hg                      Hg, HCl, & TSM
        Determine “Worst-       Determine “Worst-
         Case” Fuel Mixture       Case” Fuel Mixture
                                 Fuel Sampling &
                                  Analysis Plan
                                 Monthly Fuel
                                  Analyses


15
Emission Testing
         Area Source       Major Source
        PM               PM or TSM
        Hg               Hg
        CO               CO
                          HCl




16
Compliance Options
         2. Evaluate Emission Standard Alternatives

         Area Source              Major Source
        None                    Emission Averaging
                                 Output-based
                                  Emission Standard
                                  • Emission
                                    Reduction Credits



17
Emission Averaging
        PM, HCl, or Hg
        Input or Output-based Emission Standards
        Existing Boiler Only
        Subcategory Requirements
        10% Discount Factor
        Common Stack Considerations
        Emission Averaging Plan



18
Compliance Options
         3. Can Not Comply with the Emission Standards

          Area Source              Major Source
        Fuel Management          Fuel Management
        Fuel Switching           Fuel Switching
        Controls                 Controls
                                  Synthetic Minor
                                  Energy Efficiency
                                   Improvements

19
Output-based Emission Standards
        Output-based Emission Standards
         • Incentivizes implementation of energy
           efficient technologies to minimize the
           generation of emissions




20
Output-Based Emission Standards



 Fuel                                 Steam
 Input Energy (lb             Output Energy (lb
 pollutant per MMBtu        pollutant per MMBtu
 heat input)                       steam output)




21
Capital Investment
     Add-on Control    Energy Efficiency
       Device(s)          Project(s)




22
Output-Based Emission Standards
         How were they determined?
          • Boiler Efficiency
          • Heat-Input Based Limits
      Subcategory       Hg Emission         Hg Emission           Boiler
                           Limit               Limit            Efficiency
                        (lb Hg per MMBtu    (lb Hg per MMBtu       (%)
                           of heat input)    of steam output)

     Existing Boiler
     Designed to Burn      3.10E-06            3.50E-06            88.6
     Solid Fuel




23
Output-Based Emission Standards
        How are they used?
         • Determine Current Boiler Output-Based
           Emissions
         • Establish Output Energy “Benchmark”
         • Investigate Energy Efficiency Projects
         • Quantify Emission Reductions
         • Apply Percent Reduction to Current
           Boiler Output-Based Emissions


24
Energy Output Reduction Example
         Benchmark Year* = 2,175,000 MMBtu/yr
         Year After* = 1,957,500 MMBtu/yr
           Tested Hg              Tested Hg            Adjusted Hg
           Emissions              Emissions             Emissions
         (lb Hg per MMBtu of   (lb Hg per MMBtu of    (lb Hg per MMBtu of
              heat input)          steam output)          steam output)

             3.40E-06               3.84E-06
                                                           3.45E-06
           (Limit 3.10E-06)      (Limit 3.50E-06)


               *Production is assumed to be the same for both years.




25
Energy Output Reduction Example
     Subcategory       Hg Emission         Hg Adjusted         Result
                          Limit             Emissions
                       (lb Hg per MMBtu    (lb Hg per MMBtu
                        of steam output)    of steam output)
     Existing Boiler
     Designed to          3.50E-06            3.45E-06         PASS
     Burn Solid Fuel




26
Output-Based Other Considerations
        Implementation Plan
        Pollutant-by-Pollutant Applicability
        Emissions Averaging
        Shutdown Boilers
        Future Boiler Operations
        Other Permitting Requirements
        Energy Assessment



27
What is Left?
        Ground Rules
        Regulatory Framework
        Regulated Pollutants
        Emission Limitations
        Compliance Options
        Work Practice Standards
        Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction
        Things to Take Away



28
Work Practice Standards
         Area Source       Major Source
        Tune-up          Tune-up
        Energy           Energy
         Assessment        Assessment
        Startup          Good Combustion
        Shutdown          Practices
                          Startup
                          Shutdown


29
ASBM Tune-ups
                Final Rule                    Amendments
     ASBM       (March 21, 2011)   ASBM       (December 23, 2011)

        Every 2 years                Every 2 years
        March 21, 2012               Every 5 years
        No Action Assurance           (Seasonal Boilers)
         Letter                       March 21, 2013
                                      Fuel Type
                                       Requirements
                                      Common Fuel Meter


30
Tune-up Applicability
         Area Source               Major Source
      New or Existing            Limited-use Boilers
       Coal-fired Boiler <10      Natural gas, Refinery
       MMBtu/hr                    Gas or Gas 1 (Other)
      New or Existing             Boilers < 5 MMBtu/hr
       Biomass-fired Boiler       Gas 2 (Other), Light
        New or Existing           Liquid Boilers
         Oil-fired Boiler


31
Tune-up Requirements
          Area Source                       Major Source
       Burner Inspection                 Burner Inspection
     (1)Flame Pattern the
     
         As applicable, inspect         (1)Flame Pattern clean or
                                        
                                            Inspect the burner and
     burner, and clean or replace any   replace any components of the
        Inspection
     components of the burner as
                                           Inspection
                                        burner as necessary.
      Air-to-fuel system
     necessary (you may delay the        Air-to-fuel system

        Inspection
     burner inspection until the next      Inspection
     scheduled unit shutdown, but
      CO Optimization                   CO Optimization
     you must inspect each burner
      Recordkeeping
     at least once every 36 months).     Recordkeeping

      No Report Submittal               Report Submittal




32
Energy Assessment
        Why?
        When and how often?
        Who is qualified?
        What equipment or systems need to be
         included?
        What does “cost-effective” mean?
        What needs to be done?




33
Energy Assessment
                 Final Rule                     Amendments
     ASBM        (March 21, 2011)   ASBM        (December 23, 2011)

        Existing                      Existing
        ≥ 10 MMBtu/hr                 ≥ 10 MMBtu/hr
                                       Boiler System
        Boiler System
                                       Energy Use System
        Energy Use System
                                        •Onsite Only
        Qualified Personnel           Qualified Personnel
        Maximum Duration              Maximum Duration
        March 21, 2014                March 21, 2014

34
Energy Assessment
                 Major Source
                Scope
                Maximum Time
                Compliance Date
                 •Date to Change
                Emission Reduction
                 Credits



35
Good Combustion Practices
        O2 Trim Systems
         • Monitor
         • Optimize
         • Report
        Operator Training
         • Startup Procedures
         • Shutdown Procedures



36
Startup/Shutdown Periods
        Boiler MACT standards apply at all times.
        No exemptions from Boiler MACT
         standards during periods of Startup and
         Shutdown.
        U.S. EPA requires work practice standards
         for periods of Startup and Shutdown in
         lieu of numerical emission limits.




37
Startup/Shutdown
         Area Source                 Major Source
        Minimize the boiler’s      Good Combustion
         startup and                 Practices
         shutdown periods
         following the
         manufacturer’s
         recommended
         procedures.



38
Misc. Startup/Shutdown
         Area Source            Major Source
        Startup/Shutdown      Startup/Shutdown
         Definitions            Definitions
        No SSM Plans          No SSM Plans




39
Malfunction
        Malfunction means any sudden, infrequent,
         and not reasonably preventable failure of
         air pollution control and monitoring
         equipment, process equipment, or a process
         to operate in a normal or usual manner which
         causes, or has the potential to cause, the
         emission limitations in an applicable standard
         to be exceeded. Failures that are caused in
         part by poor maintenance or careless
         operation are not malfunctions.


40
Periods of Malfunction
        Boiler MACT standards apply at all times.
        No exemptions from Boiler MACT
         standards during periods of Malfunction.
        U.S. EPA determines if a facility
         demonstrated a “good faith effort” to
         minimizing emissions and correcting a
         Malfunction.




41
Malfunction Process
        Notification of a Malfunction submitted to
         U.S. EPA within two (2) business days.
        Follow-up report submitted to U.S. EPA
         within 45 business days.
        U.S. EPA evaluates the reported information
         concerning the Malfunction to determine if
         further inquiry or enforcement action is
         required.
        Facility can only use Affirmative Defense in
         response to civil penalties if notification and
         report is submitted.


42
Affirmative Defense
        To use Affirmative Defense facilities
         must show a “preponderance” of evidence
         that:
         • The excess emission was caused by a
           malfunction and was not preventable or
           reoccurring, and
         • The facility expedited repairs, actions were
           documented in signed logs, and a root-cause
           analysis was completed.



43
SSM Plan
        No SSM Plan required; however may be
         more important now than ever due to
         potential enforcement action.




44
Things to Take Away
        The current status of the Boiler MACT
         rules?
        Where do I stand now?
        What are my compliance options?
        What are my compliance plans?
        Be in action!




45
Questions?

                                               Speaker Contact Info:

                                                          Eric M. Swisher
                                                     eswisher@all4inc.com
                                                         610.933.5246 x17




     All4 Inc. - 2393 Kimberton Road - P.O. Box 299 - Kimberton, PA 19442
                         610.933.5246 - www.all4inc.com



46

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von All4 Inc.

Mehr von All4 Inc. (20)

Implementing a DAHS for Compliance with the Refinery Sector Rule
Implementing a DAHS for Compliance with the Refinery Sector RuleImplementing a DAHS for Compliance with the Refinery Sector Rule
Implementing a DAHS for Compliance with the Refinery Sector Rule
 
NSR Reform Updates
NSR Reform Updates NSR Reform Updates
NSR Reform Updates
 
Tceq recent permitting changes 4 c-2019-f_dougherty (1-31-19)
Tceq recent permitting changes 4 c-2019-f_dougherty (1-31-19)Tceq recent permitting changes 4 c-2019-f_dougherty (1-31-19)
Tceq recent permitting changes 4 c-2019-f_dougherty (1-31-19)
 
All4 impacts of recent u.s. epa region 6 guidance on cms downtime and data ...
All4   impacts of recent u.s. epa region 6 guidance on cms downtime and data ...All4   impacts of recent u.s. epa region 6 guidance on cms downtime and data ...
All4 impacts of recent u.s. epa region 6 guidance on cms downtime and data ...
 
D dix awma conference air toxics evaluation requirements 062718
D dix awma conference air toxics evaluation requirements 062718D dix awma conference air toxics evaluation requirements 062718
D dix awma conference air toxics evaluation requirements 062718
 
4 c nsr presentation 032318 all4 mccall
4 c nsr presentation 032318   all4 mccall4 c nsr presentation 032318   all4 mccall
4 c nsr presentation 032318 all4 mccall
 
All4 inc awma re-entrainment
All4 inc awma re-entrainmentAll4 inc awma re-entrainment
All4 inc awma re-entrainment
 
The complexities of nsr permitting ddix
The complexities of nsr permitting ddixThe complexities of nsr permitting ddix
The complexities of nsr permitting ddix
 
All4 tcc acit pres ipt guidance 2017
All4 tcc acit pres ipt guidance 2017All4 tcc acit pres ipt guidance 2017
All4 tcc acit pres ipt guidance 2017
 
Air Quality Compliance Training 12-8-16
Air Quality Compliance Training 12-8-16Air Quality Compliance Training 12-8-16
Air Quality Compliance Training 12-8-16
 
CEDRI-NextGen
CEDRI-NextGenCEDRI-NextGen
CEDRI-NextGen
 
understanding the validity and increased scrutiny of data used for compliance...
understanding the validity and increased scrutiny of data used for compliance...understanding the validity and increased scrutiny of data used for compliance...
understanding the validity and increased scrutiny of data used for compliance...
 
CUHMMC Presentation
CUHMMC PresentationCUHMMC Presentation
CUHMMC Presentation
 
Preview of ALL4 Air Quality Compliance - PIOGATech
Preview of ALL4 Air Quality Compliance - PIOGATechPreview of ALL4 Air Quality Compliance - PIOGATech
Preview of ALL4 Air Quality Compliance - PIOGATech
 
Top 5 Environmental Compliance Issues for Engineers and Managers
Top 5 Environmental Compliance Issues for Engineers and ManagersTop 5 Environmental Compliance Issues for Engineers and Managers
Top 5 Environmental Compliance Issues for Engineers and Managers
 
The complexities of new source review air permitting – a case study ddix 020116
The complexities of new source review air permitting – a case study ddix 020116The complexities of new source review air permitting – a case study ddix 020116
The complexities of new source review air permitting – a case study ddix 020116
 
The Good vs. Bad: The Specifics for Validating CMS Data
The Good vs. Bad: The Specifics for Validating CMS DataThe Good vs. Bad: The Specifics for Validating CMS Data
The Good vs. Bad: The Specifics for Validating CMS Data
 
Benzene Fenceline Monitoring: An Introduction and What the Regulations Don’...
Benzene Fenceline Monitoring:  An Introduction and What the Regulations Don’...Benzene Fenceline Monitoring:  An Introduction and What the Regulations Don’...
Benzene Fenceline Monitoring: An Introduction and What the Regulations Don’...
 
The Petroleum Refinery Sector Rule: What’s all the fuss about and what are th...
The Petroleum Refinery Sector Rule: What’s all the fuss about and what are th...The Petroleum Refinery Sector Rule: What’s all the fuss about and what are th...
The Petroleum Refinery Sector Rule: What’s all the fuss about and what are th...
 
US EPA's Electronic Reporting Tool and Compliance and Emissions Data Reportin...
US EPA's Electronic Reporting Tool and Compliance and Emissions Data Reportin...US EPA's Electronic Reporting Tool and Compliance and Emissions Data Reportin...
US EPA's Electronic Reporting Tool and Compliance and Emissions Data Reportin...
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Scalable LLM APIs for AI and Generative AI Applicati...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Scalable LLM APIs for AI and Generative AI Applicati...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Scalable LLM APIs for AI and Generative AI Applicati...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Scalable LLM APIs for AI and Generative AI Applicati...
 
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectorsMS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
 
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ..."I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
 
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWEREMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
 
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source Milvus
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source MilvusA Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source Milvus
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source Milvus
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
 
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
 
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingRepurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
 
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemkeProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
 
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
 
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
 
Navi Mumbai Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot Model
Navi Mumbai Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot ModelNavi Mumbai Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot Model
Navi Mumbai Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot Model
 
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps ScriptAutomating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
 
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfBoost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
 
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 

Major/Area Source Boiler MACT Rule

  • 1. Major/Area Source Boiler MACT Rule Speaker: Eric Swisher 23rd Virginia Environmental Symposium April 11, 2012 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.
  • 2. Overview  Ground Rules  Regulatory Framework  Regulated Pollutants  Emission Limitations  Compliance Options  Work Practice Standards  Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction  Things to Take Away 2
  • 3. Ground Rules NHSM Rule Fuel is a Solid Waste Fuel is not a Solid Waste CISWI Boiler MACT Rule Rules Area Major 3
  • 4. General Information  Area or Major Source  New, Reconstructed, or Existing  Fuel Type  Design Type 4
  • 5. Comparison Area Source Major Source 5
  • 6. Facility Type Area Source Major Source  Not a Major Source  >10 tons per year any single HAP OR  > 25 tons per year of any combination of HAPs 6
  • 7. Regulatory Citation  40 CFR Part 63 – National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories (NESHAP): • Subpart JJJJJJ – Area Source Boiler MACT (ASBM) • Subpart DDDDD – Major Source Boiler MACT (MSBM) 7
  • 8. History Area Source Major Source June 04, 2010  January 13, 2003   March 21, 2011 • Proposed  December 23, 2011 • Proposed • Comments Due March 14, 2003 • Comments Due July 19, 2010 •Promulgated •Proposed  September 13, 2004 • Promulgated  June 09, 2010 • Compliance Date September 13, 2007 • Comment Period Extended to August  October 31, 2005  December 23, 2011 03, 2010  February 07, 2012 • Notice of Reconsideration • Proposed Amendments July 22, 2010 •Proposed Amendments •No Action Assurance   December 28, 2005 • Final Rule (with Amendments) • Comment Period Extended to August • Compliance Date September 13, 2007 23, 2010   February 21, 2012 March 21, 2011  Letter December 06, 2006 • Final Action on Reconsideration June 04, 2010 • Promulgated  •Comments Due • Proposed  December 23, 2011 • Comments Due July 19, 2010 June 09, 2010 • Proposed Amendments  • Comment Period Extended to August 03, 2010   March 13, 2012 February 21, 2012  July 22, 2010 • Comment Period Extended to August 23, 2010 • Comments Due •No Action Assurance  March 13, 2012  March 21, 2011 • Promulgated • No Action Assurance Letter Letter 8
  • 9. Act of Congress  March 08, 2012 Senate did not pass the Collins Amendment to the Highway Bill that would delay the MSBM. 9
  • 10. Current Status Area Source Major Source  Effective Now  Proposed Rule  Compliance Date •December 23, 2011 •March 21, 2014  Compliance Date  No Action Assurance •Date to Change Letter  No Action Assurance •March 13, 2012 Letter •February 07, 2012 10
  • 11. Source Applicability Area Source Major Source  Boiler  Boiler  Exemptions  Process Heaters  Exemptions 11
  • 12. Regulated Pollutants Area Source Major Source  Mercury (Hg)  Mercury (Hg)  Non-Mercury Metallic  Non-Mercury HAP Metallic HAP  Non-Metallic Inorganic  Organic HAP HAP (including POM)  Non-Dioxin Organic HAP  Dioxins/Furans (D/F) 12
  • 13. Emission Limits Area Source Major Source  Mercury  Mercury  Carbon Monoxide  Carbon Monoxide  Particulate Matter  Particulate Matter OR Total Selected Metals (TSM)  Hydrogen Chloride 13
  • 14. Compliance Options 1. Comply with the Emission Standards Area Source Major Source  Fuel Sampling  Fuel Sampling  Emission Testing  Emission Testing 14
  • 15. Fuel Sampling Area Source Major Source  Hg  Hg, HCl, & TSM  Determine “Worst-  Determine “Worst- Case” Fuel Mixture Case” Fuel Mixture  Fuel Sampling & Analysis Plan  Monthly Fuel Analyses 15
  • 16. Emission Testing Area Source Major Source  PM  PM or TSM  Hg  Hg  CO  CO  HCl 16
  • 17. Compliance Options 2. Evaluate Emission Standard Alternatives Area Source Major Source  None  Emission Averaging  Output-based Emission Standard • Emission Reduction Credits 17
  • 18. Emission Averaging  PM, HCl, or Hg  Input or Output-based Emission Standards  Existing Boiler Only  Subcategory Requirements  10% Discount Factor  Common Stack Considerations  Emission Averaging Plan 18
  • 19. Compliance Options 3. Can Not Comply with the Emission Standards Area Source Major Source  Fuel Management  Fuel Management  Fuel Switching  Fuel Switching  Controls  Controls  Synthetic Minor  Energy Efficiency Improvements 19
  • 20. Output-based Emission Standards  Output-based Emission Standards • Incentivizes implementation of energy efficient technologies to minimize the generation of emissions 20
  • 21. Output-Based Emission Standards Fuel Steam Input Energy (lb Output Energy (lb pollutant per MMBtu pollutant per MMBtu heat input) steam output) 21
  • 22. Capital Investment Add-on Control Energy Efficiency Device(s) Project(s) 22
  • 23. Output-Based Emission Standards  How were they determined? • Boiler Efficiency • Heat-Input Based Limits Subcategory Hg Emission Hg Emission Boiler Limit Limit Efficiency (lb Hg per MMBtu (lb Hg per MMBtu (%) of heat input) of steam output) Existing Boiler Designed to Burn 3.10E-06 3.50E-06 88.6 Solid Fuel 23
  • 24. Output-Based Emission Standards  How are they used? • Determine Current Boiler Output-Based Emissions • Establish Output Energy “Benchmark” • Investigate Energy Efficiency Projects • Quantify Emission Reductions • Apply Percent Reduction to Current Boiler Output-Based Emissions 24
  • 25. Energy Output Reduction Example  Benchmark Year* = 2,175,000 MMBtu/yr  Year After* = 1,957,500 MMBtu/yr Tested Hg Tested Hg Adjusted Hg Emissions Emissions Emissions (lb Hg per MMBtu of (lb Hg per MMBtu of (lb Hg per MMBtu of heat input) steam output) steam output) 3.40E-06 3.84E-06 3.45E-06 (Limit 3.10E-06) (Limit 3.50E-06) *Production is assumed to be the same for both years. 25
  • 26. Energy Output Reduction Example Subcategory Hg Emission Hg Adjusted Result Limit Emissions (lb Hg per MMBtu (lb Hg per MMBtu of steam output) of steam output) Existing Boiler Designed to 3.50E-06 3.45E-06 PASS Burn Solid Fuel 26
  • 27. Output-Based Other Considerations  Implementation Plan  Pollutant-by-Pollutant Applicability  Emissions Averaging  Shutdown Boilers  Future Boiler Operations  Other Permitting Requirements  Energy Assessment 27
  • 28. What is Left?  Ground Rules  Regulatory Framework  Regulated Pollutants  Emission Limitations  Compliance Options  Work Practice Standards  Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction  Things to Take Away 28
  • 29. Work Practice Standards Area Source Major Source  Tune-up  Tune-up  Energy  Energy Assessment Assessment  Startup  Good Combustion  Shutdown Practices  Startup  Shutdown 29
  • 30. ASBM Tune-ups Final Rule Amendments ASBM (March 21, 2011) ASBM (December 23, 2011)  Every 2 years  Every 2 years  March 21, 2012  Every 5 years  No Action Assurance (Seasonal Boilers) Letter  March 21, 2013  Fuel Type Requirements  Common Fuel Meter 30
  • 31. Tune-up Applicability Area Source Major Source  New or Existing  Limited-use Boilers Coal-fired Boiler <10  Natural gas, Refinery MMBtu/hr Gas or Gas 1 (Other)  New or Existing Boilers < 5 MMBtu/hr Biomass-fired Boiler  Gas 2 (Other), Light  New or Existing Liquid Boilers Oil-fired Boiler 31
  • 32. Tune-up Requirements Area Source Major Source  Burner Inspection  Burner Inspection (1)Flame Pattern the  As applicable, inspect (1)Flame Pattern clean or  Inspect the burner and burner, and clean or replace any replace any components of the Inspection components of the burner as Inspection burner as necessary.  Air-to-fuel system necessary (you may delay the  Air-to-fuel system Inspection burner inspection until the next Inspection scheduled unit shutdown, but  CO Optimization  CO Optimization you must inspect each burner  Recordkeeping at least once every 36 months).  Recordkeeping  No Report Submittal  Report Submittal 32
  • 33. Energy Assessment  Why?  When and how often?  Who is qualified?  What equipment or systems need to be included?  What does “cost-effective” mean?  What needs to be done? 33
  • 34. Energy Assessment Final Rule Amendments ASBM (March 21, 2011) ASBM (December 23, 2011)  Existing  Existing  ≥ 10 MMBtu/hr  ≥ 10 MMBtu/hr  Boiler System  Boiler System  Energy Use System  Energy Use System •Onsite Only  Qualified Personnel  Qualified Personnel  Maximum Duration  Maximum Duration  March 21, 2014  March 21, 2014 34
  • 35. Energy Assessment Major Source  Scope  Maximum Time  Compliance Date •Date to Change  Emission Reduction Credits 35
  • 36. Good Combustion Practices  O2 Trim Systems • Monitor • Optimize • Report  Operator Training • Startup Procedures • Shutdown Procedures 36
  • 37. Startup/Shutdown Periods  Boiler MACT standards apply at all times.  No exemptions from Boiler MACT standards during periods of Startup and Shutdown.  U.S. EPA requires work practice standards for periods of Startup and Shutdown in lieu of numerical emission limits. 37
  • 38. Startup/Shutdown Area Source Major Source  Minimize the boiler’s  Good Combustion startup and Practices shutdown periods following the manufacturer’s recommended procedures. 38
  • 39. Misc. Startup/Shutdown Area Source Major Source  Startup/Shutdown  Startup/Shutdown Definitions Definitions  No SSM Plans  No SSM Plans 39
  • 40. Malfunction  Malfunction means any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution control and monitoring equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner which causes, or has the potential to cause, the emission limitations in an applicable standard to be exceeded. Failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions. 40
  • 41. Periods of Malfunction  Boiler MACT standards apply at all times.  No exemptions from Boiler MACT standards during periods of Malfunction.  U.S. EPA determines if a facility demonstrated a “good faith effort” to minimizing emissions and correcting a Malfunction. 41
  • 42. Malfunction Process  Notification of a Malfunction submitted to U.S. EPA within two (2) business days.  Follow-up report submitted to U.S. EPA within 45 business days.  U.S. EPA evaluates the reported information concerning the Malfunction to determine if further inquiry or enforcement action is required.  Facility can only use Affirmative Defense in response to civil penalties if notification and report is submitted. 42
  • 43. Affirmative Defense  To use Affirmative Defense facilities must show a “preponderance” of evidence that: • The excess emission was caused by a malfunction and was not preventable or reoccurring, and • The facility expedited repairs, actions were documented in signed logs, and a root-cause analysis was completed. 43
  • 44. SSM Plan  No SSM Plan required; however may be more important now than ever due to potential enforcement action. 44
  • 45. Things to Take Away  The current status of the Boiler MACT rules?  Where do I stand now?  What are my compliance options?  What are my compliance plans?  Be in action! 45
  • 46. Questions? Speaker Contact Info: Eric M. Swisher eswisher@all4inc.com 610.933.5246 x17 All4 Inc. - 2393 Kimberton Road - P.O. Box 299 - Kimberton, PA 19442 610.933.5246 - www.all4inc.com 46

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Most of you should already know if you are a major source of HAPs or not. Meaning that your facility has a potential to emit, considering controls, of 10 tons per year or more of any single HAP or 25 tons per year or more of any combination of HAPs. If you are not a major source of HAPs then you are an Area Source of HAPs.Since we will be comparing the ASBM and MSBM, I have assigned a visual representation of each rule. For the ASBM I choose the University of Virginia Cavalier and for the MSBM I have chosen the Virginia Tech University Hokie. We you see the Cavalier, it applies to the ASBM. When you see the Hokie, it applies to the MSBM. I did not have any reason for assigning these visual aids to their particular rule other than there is a lot of uncertainty of what the final MSBM is and what a Hokie is.
  2. [Slide No. X – ENERGY OUTPUT REDUCTION EXAMPLE] – ~X min
  3. [SLIDE X TUNE-UPS] – ~2.5 minWhat is required for a boiler tune-up. Let’s compare the ASBM and MSBM.[CLICK] – Burner inspections are required under the ASBM and MSBM with a distinct clarification. Let’s look at the requirement. Again, it is about the language. The ASBM has “but you must inspect each burner at least once every 36 months”. This was removed from the MSBM based on comments so that the boiler does not have to shutdown to complete the burner inspection. Area source boilers will have to shut down to perform the burner inspection.[CLICK] – Flame Pattern Inspection requirement is identical for the ASBM and MSBM. The requirement is to adjust the burner as necessary to optimize the flame patternconsistent with the manufacturer’s specifications.[CLICK] – Air-to-fuel controlling system requirement is identical for the ASBM and MSBM. The requirement is to inspect the system controlling the air-to-fuel ratio and ensurethat it is correctly calibrated and functioning properly.[CLICK] – Both the ASBM and MSBM require an CO optimization as part of the tune-up. An important note on the CO optimization requirement is that you are not trying to “lower” your CO emissions (especially if you are sacrificing NOX). The intent of the CO optimization is only for good combustion practices. This is noted in the preamble to the final ASBM and assumed that it can be applied to the MSBM. The CO and O2 concentration must be measured before and after the tune-up.[CLICK] – Both the ASBM and MSBM require information to be recorded as part of the tune-up. [CLICK] – However, only the MSBM requires the information to be submitted. NOCS.
  4. ASBM (proposed amendments)Startup means the period between the state of no combustion in the boiler to the period where the boiler first achieves 25 percent load (i.e., a cold start).Shutdown means the period that begins when the boiler last operates at 25 percent load and ending with a state of no fuel combustion in the boiler.MSBMStartup means the period between the state of no combustion in the unit to the period where the unit first achieves 25 percent load (i.e., a cold start).Shutdown means the period that begins when a unit last operates at 25 percent load and ending with a state of no fuel combustion in the unit.