SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 4
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 0 54% 31 11 15 57 41% 24 19 15 58 63% 37 10 12 59
Bonham 0 63% 53 21 10 84 55% 49 23 17 89 61% 68 18 26 112
Bowie 0 38% 16 17 9 42 33% 14 16 13 43 67% 38 9 10 57
Crockett 0 81% 21 2 3 26 49% 27 18 10 55 45% 25 15 15 55
Dishman 0 53% 23 14 6 43 65% 32 14 3 49 66% 37 10 9 56
Houston 0 40% 27 24 16 67 46% 37 24 20 81 56% 32 11 14 57
Jefferson 0 47% 18 10 10 38 51% 27 11 15 53 70% 33 8 6 47
Lamar 0 48% 29 19 12 60 39% 30 23 23 76 48% 31 18 16 65
Long 0 60% 53 15 21 89 56% 47 21 16 84 56% 57 25 20 102
Means 0 53% 30 15 12 57 64% 48 17 10 75 74% 53 13 6 72
Milam 0 36% 21 10 27 58 35% 19 12 23 54 53% 25 5 17 47
Rodriguez 0 51% 42 21 20 83 40% 45 37 30 112 54% 50 15 27 92
Stuart 0 63% 59 20 14 93 65% 70 25 12 107 71% 84 27 8 119
Travis 0 49% 23 11 13 47 38% 19 15 16 50 55% 29 15 9 53
Treasure Hills 0 53% 56 28 21 105 62% 84 24 28 136 74% 104 25 11 140
Wilson 0 65% 33 11 7 51 58% 37 18 9 64 76% 53 13 4 70
Zavala 0 52% 28 10 16 54 45% 26 18 14 58 54% 29 11 14 54
3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 64% 34 14 5 53 51% 25 15 9 49 56% 28 10 12 50 All Students assessed on campus
Bonham 58% 64 34 13 111 59% 66 24 21 111 65% 62 20 13 95 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus
Bowie 65% 34 15 3 52 69% 33 6 9 48 64% 35 13 7 55 Source: Istation
Crockett 64% 39 13 9 61 42% 30 24 18 72 63% 31 8 10 49 Data pulled: 9/14/17
Dishman 63% 29 13 4 46 60% 26 5 12 43 49% 25 16 10 51 * PREK's first assessment is taken in October
Houston 57% 40 17 13 70 52% 35 20 12 67 79% 42 4 7 53 For Internal Use Only
Jefferson 75% 27 5 4 36 69% 24 6 5 35 78% 39 7 4 50
Lamar 41% 40 28 30 98 41% 47 30 39 116 55% 54 23 21 98
Long 59% 54 21 16 91 70% 70 18 12 100 64% 70 22 17 109
Means 64% 59 20 13 92 68% 61 16 13 90 73% 60 10 12 82
Milam 50% 34 18 16 68 57% 32 4 20 56 66% 43 7 15 65
Rodriguez 56% 55 19 25 99 50% 62 32 30 124 65% 65 17 18 100
Stuart 76% 94 25 5 124 75% 98 22 11 131 79% 85 16 7 108
Travis 44% 21 18 9 48 74% 34 5 7 46 64% 35 7 13 55
Treasure Hills 72% 99 24 15 138 70% 98 25 18 141 65% 86 31 16 133
Wilson 60% 44 20 9 73 53% 48 20 23 91 75% 53 10 8 71
Zavala 65% 41 13 9 63 63% 33 8 11 52 72% 39 9 6 54
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 0 25% 3 3 6 12 22% 2 3 4 9 36% 4 3 4 11
Bonham 0 0% 1 1 50% 1 1 2 26% 5 3 11 19
Bowie 0 29% 2 4 1 7 25% 2 4 2 8 43% 6 3 5 14
Crockett 0 100% 2 2 25% 5 9 6 20 44% 8 6 4 18
Dishman 0 100% 3 3 57% 4 1 2 7 56% 5 2 2 9
Houston 0 43% 3 3 1 7 45% 5 2 4 11 22% 2 1 6 9
Jefferson 0 50% 5 3 2 10 13% 2 5 8 15 78% 14 1 3 18
Lamar 0 100% 1 1 18% 4 8 10 22 30% 3 5 2 10
Long 0 25% 2 3 3 8 22% 2 3 4 9 50% 5 3 2 10
Means 0 0 100% 3 3 100% 4 4
Milam 0 31% 4 3 6 13 21% 4 1 14 19 39% 7 2 9 18
Rodriguez 0 0% 1 1 43% 3 1 3 7 29% 5 5 7 17
Stuart 0 36% 4 3 4 11 65% 11 3 3 17 67% 14 5 2 21
Travis 0 25% 2 4 2 8 6% 1 5 10 16 62% 8 2 3 13
Treasure Hills 0 44% 4 3 2 9 23% 3 1 9 13 67% 6 3 9
Wilson 0 100% 1 1 33% 2 4 6 100% 5 5
Zavala 0 50% 4 3 1 8 29% 2 4 1 7 56% 10 3 5 18
0 47% 102 35% 191 53% 223
3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 71% 5 1 1 7 17% 1 3 2 6 25% 1 2 1 4 Students with LEP Indicator (Y)
Bonham 44% 4 4 1 9 30% 3 2 5 10 20% 1 1 3 5 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus
Bowie 59% 10 6 1 17 56% 9 3 4 16 56% 5 1 3 9 Source: Istation
Crockett 57% 13 6 4 23 47% 15 11 6 32 69% 11 5 16 Data pulled: 9/14/17
Dishman 50% 6 6 12 40% 2 1 2 5 38% 5 3 5 13 For Internal Use Only
Houston 25% 2 3 3 8 38% 5 6 2 13 57% 4 1 2 7
Jefferson 80% 12 1 2 15 67% 10 2 3 15 67% 12 3 3 18
Lamar 39% 16 10 15 41 36% 12 7 14 33 44% 12 7 8 27
Long 50% 5 5 10 40% 2 2 1 5 0% 3 3 6
Means 36% 8 8 6 22 58% 11 2 6 19 71% 12 2 3 17
Milam 47% 8 1 8 17 61% 11 2 5 18 33% 6 3 9 18
Rodriguez 36% 9 9 7 25 41% 9 4 9 22 33% 6 2 10 18
Stuart 60% 6 2 2 10 25% 3 6 3 12 88% 7 1 8
Travis 40% 6 6 3 15 75% 9 1 2 12 13% 1 2 5 8
Treasure Hills 58% 7 1 4 12 63% 5 1 2 8 43% 3 1 3 7
Wilson 56% 9 6 1 16 50% 6 4 2 12 83% 10 2 12
Zavala 57% 13 5 5 23 47% 8 3 6 17 67% 6 1 2 9
51% 282 47% 255 47% 202
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for LEP
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested 3RD Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 0 56% 5 1 3 9 25% 1 3 4 100% 1 1 0
Bonham 0 67% 8 2 2 12 73% 11 2 2 15 0 0
Bowie 0 50% 1 1 2 0% 1 1 0 50% 1 1 2
Crockett 0 67% 8 4 12 0 0 0
Dishman 0 0% 1 1 0 0 100% 1 1
Houston 0 67% 6 3 9 73% 8 3 11 0 75% 3 1 4
Jefferson 0 55% 6 2 3 11 57% 8 5 1 14 0 0
Lamar 0 37% 7 5 7 19 58% 18 4 9 31 73% 11 4 15 36% 12 8 13 33
Long 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0
Means 0 36% 5 5 4 14 72% 21 5 3 29 73% 22 7 1 30 50% 1 1 2
Milam 0 29% 5 3 9 17 39% 7 5 6 18 30% 8 8 11 27 26% 9 6 20 35
Rodriguez 0 38% 5 3 5 13 33% 4 3 5 12 0 33% 1 1 1 3
Stuart 0 36% 4 2 5 11 0 0 0% 1 1
Travis 0 38% 5 1 7 13 50% 8 2 6 16 33% 1 2 3 0% 1 1
Treasure Hills 0 40% 2 1 2 5 33% 1 2 3 0% 1 1 33% 1 2 3
Wilson 0 54% 7 4 2 13 80% 8 1 1 10 0 80% 4 1 5
Zavala 0 8% 1 4 7 12 0 67% 2 1 3 0
0 42% 173 49% 164 54% 80 44% 90
~~ No students assessed in Español for September
All Students assessed in Español
Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus
Source: Istation
Data pulled: 9/14/17 For Internal Use Only
* PREK's first assessment is taken in October
Istation Reading Español SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage
Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 0 25% 1 3 4 25% 1 1 2 4 13% 1 2 5 8
Bonham 0 100% 1 1 0 33% 2 2 2 6
Bowie 0 0 0% 1 1 100% 2 2
Crockett 0 0% 1 1 0% 1 1 0% 1 4 5
Dishman 0 50% 1 1 2 100% 1 1 33% 1 2 3
Houston 0 0% 1 1 25% 1 3 4 0% 4 4
Jefferson 0 0 0% 1 1 2 40% 2 1 2 5
Lamar 0 0 25% 1 3 4 0% 1 6 7
Long 0 33% 1 2 3 17% 1 2 3 6 17% 2 1 9 12
Means 0 0 0% 3 3 67% 4 2 6
Milam 0 0% 2 2 0% 2 2 50% 1 1 2
Rodriguez 0 33% 1 2 3 17% 1 1 4 6 25% 1 3 4
Stuart 0 67% 2 1 3 20% 1 1 3 5 100% 2 2
Travis 0 0% 1 1 0% 1 1 50% 1 1 2
Treasure Hills 0 80% 4 1 5 33% 1 1 1 3 33% 1 1 1 3
Wilson 0 100% 1 1 0% 1 1 0
Zavala 0 40% 2 1 2 5 0% 3 2 5 67% 2 1 3
0 41% 32 16% 49 39% 74
3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 40% 2 1 2 5 0% 2 4 6 13% 1 1 6 8 Students with Special Education Indicator (Y)
Bonham 20% 1 2 2 5 17% 1 1 4 6 14% 1 2 4 7 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus
Bowie 0% 1 2 3 0% 1 4 5 0% 3 2 5 Source: Istation
Crockett 42% 5 7 12 0% 1 6 7 13% 1 1 6 8 Data pulled: 9/14/17
Dishman 0% 2 1 3 0% 5 5 25% 1 1 2 4 For Internal Use Only
Houston 13% 1 7 8 11% 1 2 6 9 50% 5 5 10
Jefferson 33% 1 2 3 0 0% 1 1 2
Lamar 0% 8 8 0% 9 9 0% 8 8
Long 7% 1 3 10 14 0% 3 8 11 6% 1 5 10 16
Means 0% 1 2 3 50% 1 1 2 25% 2 6 8
Milam 17% 1 2 3 6 0% 7 7 14% 1 6 7
Rodriguez 25% 2 6 8 25% 2 3 3 8 7% 1 1 12 14
Stuart 100% 1 1 33% 2 4 6 0% 1 1 2
Travis 0% 1 3 4 25% 1 3 4 11% 1 1 7 9
Treasure Hills 33% 3 1 5 9 17% 2 3 7 12 25% 1 3 4
Wilson 9% 1 5 5 11 10% 1 3 6 10 36% 4 1 6 11
Zavala 33% 1 2 3 33% 2 4 6 13% 1 3 4 8
22% 106 14% 113 15% 131
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for SPED
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von albertrodriguez5150 (20)

District calendar-2019-2020
District calendar-2019-2020District calendar-2019-2020
District calendar-2019-2020
 
Early spanish reading power point
Early spanish reading power pointEarly spanish reading power point
Early spanish reading power point
 
Esperanza update 020618
Esperanza update 020618Esperanza update 020618
Esperanza update 020618
 
Ode' to bilingual education
Ode' to bilingual educationOde' to bilingual education
Ode' to bilingual education
 
Ode' to Bilingual Education
Ode' to Bilingual EducationOde' to Bilingual Education
Ode' to Bilingual Education
 
Why garden
Why gardenWhy garden
Why garden
 
Action plan
Action planAction plan
Action plan
 
Design team 3
Design team 3Design team 3
Design team 3
 
Vocabulous jan 30
Vocabulous jan 30Vocabulous jan 30
Vocabulous jan 30
 
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
 
Iu 5 final
Iu 5 finalIu 5 final
Iu 5 final
 
Rubric
RubricRubric
Rubric
 
Rubric
RubricRubric
Rubric
 
Assessment for iu 5
Assessment for iu 5Assessment for iu 5
Assessment for iu 5
 
Rubric for iu 5
Rubric for iu 5Rubric for iu 5
Rubric for iu 5
 
Strengths in the addie model
Strengths in the addie modelStrengths in the addie model
Strengths in the addie model
 
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguezReviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
 
Tac2010 standardsetting
Tac2010 standardsettingTac2010 standardsetting
Tac2010 standardsetting
 
How the moon affects the earth
How the moon affects the earthHow the moon affects the earth
How the moon affects the earth
 
Jefferson 4th grade moon menu
Jefferson 4th grade moon menuJefferson 4th grade moon menu
Jefferson 4th grade moon menu
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
QucHHunhnh
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
 
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-IIFood Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 

Istation Report - 1 September

  • 1. PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 0 54% 31 11 15 57 41% 24 19 15 58 63% 37 10 12 59 Bonham 0 63% 53 21 10 84 55% 49 23 17 89 61% 68 18 26 112 Bowie 0 38% 16 17 9 42 33% 14 16 13 43 67% 38 9 10 57 Crockett 0 81% 21 2 3 26 49% 27 18 10 55 45% 25 15 15 55 Dishman 0 53% 23 14 6 43 65% 32 14 3 49 66% 37 10 9 56 Houston 0 40% 27 24 16 67 46% 37 24 20 81 56% 32 11 14 57 Jefferson 0 47% 18 10 10 38 51% 27 11 15 53 70% 33 8 6 47 Lamar 0 48% 29 19 12 60 39% 30 23 23 76 48% 31 18 16 65 Long 0 60% 53 15 21 89 56% 47 21 16 84 56% 57 25 20 102 Means 0 53% 30 15 12 57 64% 48 17 10 75 74% 53 13 6 72 Milam 0 36% 21 10 27 58 35% 19 12 23 54 53% 25 5 17 47 Rodriguez 0 51% 42 21 20 83 40% 45 37 30 112 54% 50 15 27 92 Stuart 0 63% 59 20 14 93 65% 70 25 12 107 71% 84 27 8 119 Travis 0 49% 23 11 13 47 38% 19 15 16 50 55% 29 15 9 53 Treasure Hills 0 53% 56 28 21 105 62% 84 24 28 136 74% 104 25 11 140 Wilson 0 65% 33 11 7 51 58% 37 18 9 64 76% 53 13 4 70 Zavala 0 52% 28 10 16 54 45% 26 18 14 58 54% 29 11 14 54 3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 64% 34 14 5 53 51% 25 15 9 49 56% 28 10 12 50 All Students assessed on campus Bonham 58% 64 34 13 111 59% 66 24 21 111 65% 62 20 13 95 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Bowie 65% 34 15 3 52 69% 33 6 9 48 64% 35 13 7 55 Source: Istation Crockett 64% 39 13 9 61 42% 30 24 18 72 63% 31 8 10 49 Data pulled: 9/14/17 Dishman 63% 29 13 4 46 60% 26 5 12 43 49% 25 16 10 51 * PREK's first assessment is taken in October Houston 57% 40 17 13 70 52% 35 20 12 67 79% 42 4 7 53 For Internal Use Only Jefferson 75% 27 5 4 36 69% 24 6 5 35 78% 39 7 4 50 Lamar 41% 40 28 30 98 41% 47 30 39 116 55% 54 23 21 98 Long 59% 54 21 16 91 70% 70 18 12 100 64% 70 22 17 109 Means 64% 59 20 13 92 68% 61 16 13 90 73% 60 10 12 82 Milam 50% 34 18 16 68 57% 32 4 20 56 66% 43 7 15 65 Rodriguez 56% 55 19 25 99 50% 62 32 30 124 65% 65 17 18 100 Stuart 76% 94 25 5 124 75% 98 22 11 131 79% 85 16 7 108 Travis 44% 21 18 9 48 74% 34 5 7 46 64% 35 7 13 55 Treasure Hills 72% 99 24 15 138 70% 98 25 18 141 65% 86 31 16 133 Wilson 60% 44 20 9 73 53% 48 20 23 91 75% 53 10 8 71 Zavala 65% 41 13 9 63 63% 33 8 11 52 72% 39 9 6 54 Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober
  • 2. PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 0 25% 3 3 6 12 22% 2 3 4 9 36% 4 3 4 11 Bonham 0 0% 1 1 50% 1 1 2 26% 5 3 11 19 Bowie 0 29% 2 4 1 7 25% 2 4 2 8 43% 6 3 5 14 Crockett 0 100% 2 2 25% 5 9 6 20 44% 8 6 4 18 Dishman 0 100% 3 3 57% 4 1 2 7 56% 5 2 2 9 Houston 0 43% 3 3 1 7 45% 5 2 4 11 22% 2 1 6 9 Jefferson 0 50% 5 3 2 10 13% 2 5 8 15 78% 14 1 3 18 Lamar 0 100% 1 1 18% 4 8 10 22 30% 3 5 2 10 Long 0 25% 2 3 3 8 22% 2 3 4 9 50% 5 3 2 10 Means 0 0 100% 3 3 100% 4 4 Milam 0 31% 4 3 6 13 21% 4 1 14 19 39% 7 2 9 18 Rodriguez 0 0% 1 1 43% 3 1 3 7 29% 5 5 7 17 Stuart 0 36% 4 3 4 11 65% 11 3 3 17 67% 14 5 2 21 Travis 0 25% 2 4 2 8 6% 1 5 10 16 62% 8 2 3 13 Treasure Hills 0 44% 4 3 2 9 23% 3 1 9 13 67% 6 3 9 Wilson 0 100% 1 1 33% 2 4 6 100% 5 5 Zavala 0 50% 4 3 1 8 29% 2 4 1 7 56% 10 3 5 18 0 47% 102 35% 191 53% 223 3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 71% 5 1 1 7 17% 1 3 2 6 25% 1 2 1 4 Students with LEP Indicator (Y) Bonham 44% 4 4 1 9 30% 3 2 5 10 20% 1 1 3 5 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Bowie 59% 10 6 1 17 56% 9 3 4 16 56% 5 1 3 9 Source: Istation Crockett 57% 13 6 4 23 47% 15 11 6 32 69% 11 5 16 Data pulled: 9/14/17 Dishman 50% 6 6 12 40% 2 1 2 5 38% 5 3 5 13 For Internal Use Only Houston 25% 2 3 3 8 38% 5 6 2 13 57% 4 1 2 7 Jefferson 80% 12 1 2 15 67% 10 2 3 15 67% 12 3 3 18 Lamar 39% 16 10 15 41 36% 12 7 14 33 44% 12 7 8 27 Long 50% 5 5 10 40% 2 2 1 5 0% 3 3 6 Means 36% 8 8 6 22 58% 11 2 6 19 71% 12 2 3 17 Milam 47% 8 1 8 17 61% 11 2 5 18 33% 6 3 9 18 Rodriguez 36% 9 9 7 25 41% 9 4 9 22 33% 6 2 10 18 Stuart 60% 6 2 2 10 25% 3 6 3 12 88% 7 1 8 Travis 40% 6 6 3 15 75% 9 1 2 12 13% 1 2 5 8 Treasure Hills 58% 7 1 4 12 63% 5 1 2 8 43% 3 1 3 7 Wilson 56% 9 6 1 16 50% 6 4 2 12 83% 10 2 12 Zavala 57% 13 5 5 23 47% 8 3 6 17 67% 6 1 2 9 51% 282 47% 255 47% 202 Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for LEP Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
  • 3. PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested 3RD Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 0 56% 5 1 3 9 25% 1 3 4 100% 1 1 0 Bonham 0 67% 8 2 2 12 73% 11 2 2 15 0 0 Bowie 0 50% 1 1 2 0% 1 1 0 50% 1 1 2 Crockett 0 67% 8 4 12 0 0 0 Dishman 0 0% 1 1 0 0 100% 1 1 Houston 0 67% 6 3 9 73% 8 3 11 0 75% 3 1 4 Jefferson 0 55% 6 2 3 11 57% 8 5 1 14 0 0 Lamar 0 37% 7 5 7 19 58% 18 4 9 31 73% 11 4 15 36% 12 8 13 33 Long 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 Means 0 36% 5 5 4 14 72% 21 5 3 29 73% 22 7 1 30 50% 1 1 2 Milam 0 29% 5 3 9 17 39% 7 5 6 18 30% 8 8 11 27 26% 9 6 20 35 Rodriguez 0 38% 5 3 5 13 33% 4 3 5 12 0 33% 1 1 1 3 Stuart 0 36% 4 2 5 11 0 0 0% 1 1 Travis 0 38% 5 1 7 13 50% 8 2 6 16 33% 1 2 3 0% 1 1 Treasure Hills 0 40% 2 1 2 5 33% 1 2 3 0% 1 1 33% 1 2 3 Wilson 0 54% 7 4 2 13 80% 8 1 1 10 0 80% 4 1 5 Zavala 0 8% 1 4 7 12 0 67% 2 1 3 0 0 42% 173 49% 164 54% 80 44% 90 ~~ No students assessed in Español for September All Students assessed in Español Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Source: Istation Data pulled: 9/14/17 For Internal Use Only * PREK's first assessment is taken in October Istation Reading Español SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
  • 4. PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 0 25% 1 3 4 25% 1 1 2 4 13% 1 2 5 8 Bonham 0 100% 1 1 0 33% 2 2 2 6 Bowie 0 0 0% 1 1 100% 2 2 Crockett 0 0% 1 1 0% 1 1 0% 1 4 5 Dishman 0 50% 1 1 2 100% 1 1 33% 1 2 3 Houston 0 0% 1 1 25% 1 3 4 0% 4 4 Jefferson 0 0 0% 1 1 2 40% 2 1 2 5 Lamar 0 0 25% 1 3 4 0% 1 6 7 Long 0 33% 1 2 3 17% 1 2 3 6 17% 2 1 9 12 Means 0 0 0% 3 3 67% 4 2 6 Milam 0 0% 2 2 0% 2 2 50% 1 1 2 Rodriguez 0 33% 1 2 3 17% 1 1 4 6 25% 1 3 4 Stuart 0 67% 2 1 3 20% 1 1 3 5 100% 2 2 Travis 0 0% 1 1 0% 1 1 50% 1 1 2 Treasure Hills 0 80% 4 1 5 33% 1 1 1 3 33% 1 1 1 3 Wilson 0 100% 1 1 0% 1 1 0 Zavala 0 40% 2 1 2 5 0% 3 2 5 67% 2 1 3 0 41% 32 16% 49 39% 74 3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 40% 2 1 2 5 0% 2 4 6 13% 1 1 6 8 Students with Special Education Indicator (Y) Bonham 20% 1 2 2 5 17% 1 1 4 6 14% 1 2 4 7 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Bowie 0% 1 2 3 0% 1 4 5 0% 3 2 5 Source: Istation Crockett 42% 5 7 12 0% 1 6 7 13% 1 1 6 8 Data pulled: 9/14/17 Dishman 0% 2 1 3 0% 5 5 25% 1 1 2 4 For Internal Use Only Houston 13% 1 7 8 11% 1 2 6 9 50% 5 5 10 Jefferson 33% 1 2 3 0 0% 1 1 2 Lamar 0% 8 8 0% 9 9 0% 8 8 Long 7% 1 3 10 14 0% 3 8 11 6% 1 5 10 16 Means 0% 1 2 3 50% 1 1 2 25% 2 6 8 Milam 17% 1 2 3 6 0% 7 7 14% 1 6 7 Rodriguez 25% 2 6 8 25% 2 3 3 8 7% 1 1 12 14 Stuart 100% 1 1 33% 2 4 6 0% 1 1 2 Travis 0% 1 3 4 25% 1 3 4 11% 1 1 7 9 Treasure Hills 33% 3 1 5 9 17% 2 3 7 12 25% 1 3 4 Wilson 9% 1 5 5 11 10% 1 3 6 10 36% 4 1 6 11 Zavala 33% 1 2 3 33% 2 4 6 13% 1 3 4 8 22% 106 14% 113 15% 131 Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for SPED Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober