This document summarizes key aspects of a past evaluation that could be applied to the author's own evaluation. It notes positive features like using minimal text on slides, color-coding for emphasis, breaking information into clear sections, including character slides, showing process, and using images to showcase technologies. It also calls out things to improve like avoiding spelling errors, ensuring sufficient analysis beyond just facts, and maintaining a concise yet in-depth presentation. The conclusion restates that the evaluation provided a clear structure but sometimes lacked depth, and highlights creative presentation elements like speech bubbles that the author aims to consider for their own evaluation.

1. Past Evaluation Analysis
3
Niamh McCurry

2. I particularly like how this evaluation keeps text to a minimum
on the slides
This is a good rule as it makes the presentation easier to read

3. Colours are appropriately used to highlight the
important things
This again helps with making things easier to
understand

4. There are a number of spelling errors which I must be
careful to avoid in my evaluation

5. I like how information is broken down in to sections
and laid out in a way that is easy to read

6. The comparisons with real media products are useful
in aiding understanding of how the project should be

7. One thing that none of the other evaluations have
included is a slide about characters
I liked the fact that this was used and will consider
using such a slide for my own evaluation

8. This person has also shown the process that they went through to get to
the final products
This may be something to consider for my own evaluation

9. The use of speech bubbles to
highlight audience feedback was
quite clever and made the
feedback easier to read

10. The poster was analysed using arrows and text boxes
which again made the evaluation clear and easy to
understand

11. Sometimes however; facts are stated with little
analysis
I must be sure to analyse in my own work

12. Images were well used to show technologies that
were used in the project

13. Conclusion
I liked how this evaluation was well presented in a clear
and concise manner
Sometimes it was lacking in depth, something I must be
sure does not happen in my project
I very much liked how this person did things a little
differently to other people; using speech bubbles for
example
All of these things will be considered in the creation of my
own evaluation