The document discusses the goals and components of CRP6, which focuses on forests, trees and agroforestry. It aims to understand patterns of forest transition, consequences for livelihoods and the environment, and test innovative landscape management approaches. The research will be conducted across multiple countries in partnership with other organizations. Key areas of focus include understanding drivers of forest change, impacts on services like carbon and biodiversity, and developing tools for landscape planning and governance.

1. CRP6: Forests, Trees and Agroforestry: livelihoods, landscapes and governance

2. ICRAF’s GRP6 and CIFOR’s Domain 4 form the primary basis for CRP6.3: Exploiting synergy, Reducing overlap, Stimulating healthy debat where we differ in perceptions & experience

4. Building on and adding value to CIFOR Domain 4 + ICRAF GRP 6 Landscape Mosaics project In 5 countries Sustainable Rural Development through High Value Biocarbon Approaches: Building Multifunctio-nal Landscapes and Institutions in West and East Africa Supported by Finland Sustainable Sulawesi Supported by CIDA Building on a joint history: Approval expected soon Recently approved Asia, Africa, L.America; Biodi-versity work coordinated by CIFOR: integration lead by ICRAF W.Africa Starting new joint projects:

6. Forest and tree cover transitions: a unifying concept across CRP6 Temporal pattern Spatial pattern Institutional challenge X-linkage of actions in landscape

7. ilding Improving Livelihoods, Env.Serv. & Governance Landscape management options 1. Pro-duc-tion sys-tems 3. Env.Ser- vi – ces 4. Adap-ting & redu- cing emis-sions 2. Con-ser-va- tion and use ------ Livelihoods in context ------ Global actors and value chains Drivers Tree cover transitions & forest quality Local External 5. Tra-de & in- vest-ment Institutions, gender, capacity strengthening & partnerships . The 5 components of CRP6 share common goals and networked impact pathways

8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/resp1/

10. Recognition by government agencies and in public debate of tree cover and forest transitions as a basis for realistic land use and development planning and institutional reform of land use regulation Policy documents use quantitative tree cover criteria and multiple forest types , rather than merely binary 'deforestation/ reforestation' data CRP6 tools and approaches to multi-layered driver analysis are adopted for internatio-nal/ national/ local policy development Institutional support and interest in Agroforestry Policy Initiative and Forest Landscape Restoration efforts Theme-level Outcome Verifiable indicator

11. The holistic forest+tree view of the world Source: Global tree cover inside and outside forest, according to the Global Land Cover 2000 dataset, the FAO spatial data on farms versus forest, and the analysis by Zomer et al. (2009) >

12. 1. Undisturbed natural forest 2. Undisturbed + sust. logged natural forest 3. Closed canopy undisturbed + logged forest 4A. as 3 + agroforest 4B. as 3 + timber plantations 4C. as 3 + agroforest + timber plant’s + estate crops 4D as 4C + shrub Stakeholder: Rainforest foundation Conservation agency Modis data Ministry of Forestry Forest ecologist UNFCCC definition

14. In the 1990’s loss of natural cover increased the amount of ‘low C-stock’/low economic value land; tree (crop) planting was 28% of the loss of natural forest area After 2000 planting of tree (crop)s equals 90% of concurrent loss of natural forest; the amount of low C-stock/low economic value land decreases

15. Integrate Segregate Farm fo-restry, agrofo-rests Natural forest Fields, Forests & Parks Open field agriculture Plantations Fields,fallow, forest mosaic  forest modification  agroforestation  re- and afforestation deforestation 

16. Coarsening of pattern: segregate

19. Theme-level Outcome Verifiable indicator Local resource managers in tree-based multiple use landscapes use cost-effective and replicable tools and approaches to appraise likely impacts of changes in landuse on watershed functions, biodiversity and carbon stocks as well as on the economic productivity of the landscape Documented use of tools and approaches developed, tested and/or promoted by CRP6 partners Land use planners and practioners use principles and methods resulting in clearer and more transparent recognition of conservation and develpment tradeoffs in land and rights allocation, as well as adjustments to economic incentives Documented appli-cation of parti-cipatory land use planning for forest margin settings, integrated with tenurial reform

20. 1 0 1 Degradation branch Restoration branch Hysteresis domain Relative C stock Relative biodoiversity

21. Forests beyond C stocks: how do tree species richness and C stock relate at plot level? Early ASB data Indonesian NFI dataset (Murdiyarso et al., 2002 Dewi et al., in prep)

22. Crop pro-duction Tree pro-duction Watershed services Biodiversity Landscape beauty Carbon storage P crop P tree C store W sh B iod L and Convex likely Concave likely No preference Synergies be-tween functions

25. Theme-level Outcome Verifiable indicator Local and external stakehol-ders negotiate and have access to a range of conditional and performance-based arrange-ments that support the provi-sion and maintenance of envi-ronmental services and biodi-versity in productive landscapes National policy formu-lation and new action re-search undertakings refer to multiple PES paradigms that were derived from RUPES and PRESA experience Opportunities for win-win solutions in restoration contexts are fully used, while the hard tradeoffs are recognised and contest over them is replaced by negotiation Documented progress on tenure reform and nego-tiated joint management regimes in conservation and restoration contexts, that refer to CRP6 approaches and results

27. Where would you like to see more trees?

28. Participatory resource mapping followed by simulation board game with agents of change: seeking contracts for logging or oilpalm conversion, or agreements on forest protection and ecolabelling (Photographs: Grace Villamor)

29. Effort to protect/enhance ES External financial rewards 0 low medium high Baseline Schematic results of ES experiment No Medium Strong loss of social motivation Hypothesis of PES replacing social motivation to protect ES

30. Price condition for inter-genera-tional increase in altruism: ( )+( )( )> 0 Individual Benefits - Costs Social cohe- sion Group Benefits - Costs Loss of sociall cohesion (‘relatedness’) term implies shift from group to indi-vidual ‘benefit – cost’ considerations

31. Hutan Desa Partial answer to the issues of local use rights and tenure security?

32. http://www.asb.cgiar.org/

33. CGIAR Strategic Results Framework (SRF) SLO1. Reducing rural poverty SLO2. Increasing food security SLO3. Improving nutrition and health SLO4. Sustainable management of natural resources Measurables include increased income from farm and non-farm activities, per-mitting investment in health, education and other poverty-redu-cing activities. Measurables include changing levels of production, price and access to affordable food by the urban and rural poor. Measurables incluide metrics of healthy growth, particularly in children, and dietary intake, nutrient up-take and consequent health effects. Measurables are resource use per unit of production, resto-ration and conserva-tion of ecosystem services and reduced impacts of climatic change & shocks. CRP6.1 helps redu-cing rural poverty, through tree-based livelihoods; it includes poverty in forest mar-gins and of forest-dependent people CRP6.4 includes rural vulnerability to cli-mate change CRP6.5 looks at ‘ex-tensification’ and economic investment in agriculture and forestry as a driver of tree cover transitions. CRP6.1 contributes agroforestry techno-logies for food pro-duction CRP6.1 (supported by 6.2 ) has attention to fruit trees and medici-nals in various stages of domestication, as contributor to nutri-tional quality and health management CRP6.2 and CRP6.3 focus on resource (biodiversity) conser-vation and ecosystem services CRP6.4 researches ecosystem-based adaptive responses and REDD financing

34. Enlighten- Decision Negotiation ment support support No imme- Single deci- Multiple stakeholders diate use sionmaker Politics of K claims Single Multi- ple This should be the default assumption

35. Thanks details of the planned are available on file…