SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 32
Selecting a Patent Suit Venue Ann G. Fort July 27, 2011
GENERALLY RECOGNIZED FACTORS IN SELECTING A VENUE FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
PATENT VENUE: 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER  OUT-OF-STATE DEFENDANT ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
TYPICAL GROUNDS FOR PERSONAL JURISDICTION ,[object Object],[object Object]
STREAM OF COMMERCE ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
TRADE SHOW JURISDICTION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
NON-U.S. DEFENDANTS ,[object Object],[object Object]
PLAINTIFF’S “HOME COURT ADVANTAGE” ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
TRAITS OF “PRO-PATENT” VENUE ,[object Object],[object Object]
TRAITS OF A WINNING JURISDICTION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
SOURCES OF INFORMATION  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object]
OVERALL RESULTS IN PATENT LITIGATION, 2000-2010 ,[object Object]
MOST POPULAR VENUES 2000-2010 ,[object Object],Source: Lemley,  Where to File 519 Southern District of California 584 District of Massachusetts 600 District of Minnesota 987 District of New Jersey 1017 District of Delaware 1018 Southern District of New York 1024 Eastern District of Texas 1233 Northern District of Illinois 1424 Northern District of California 2289 Central District of California Total District
MOST POPULAR VENUES 2010 ,[object Object],Source: IPO,  The IP Record 2011 69 Eastern District of Virginia 78 District of Massachusetts 80 Northern District of Ohio 132 Southern District of New York 164 District of New Jersey 184 Northern District of California 231 Central District of California 249 Northern District of Illinois 273 District of Delaware 446 Eastern District of Texas Total District
MOST POPULAR VENUES 2000-2010 – PATENTEE WIN RATE ,[object Object],Source: Lemley,  Where to File 36.3% Central District of California 37.0% Southern District of New York 38.4% District of Massachusetts 40.0% Eastern District of Missouri 40.3% Eastern District of Texas 45.2% District of Oregon 45.3% District of Delaware 46.2% District of Nevada 46.3% Middle District of Florida 55.1% Northern District of Texas Claimant Win Percentage   District
OVERALL TRIAL RATE 2000-2010 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
MOST POPULAR VENUES 2000-2010 – TRIAL RATE  ,[object Object],Source: Lemley,  Where to File 3.5% Southern District of Texas 4.0% Middle District of Florida 4.0% Western District of Texas 4.1% Eastern District of Missouri 4.4% Southern District of Florida 6.2% District of Massachusetts 6.4% Eastern District of Virginia 7.4% Western District of Wisconsin 8.0% Eastern District of Texas 11.8% District of Delaware Percentage to Trial District
MOST POPULAR VENUES 2000-2010 – TIME TO TRIAL  ,[object Object],Source: Lemley,  Where to File 2.26 Northern District of Texas 2.22 District of Maryland 2.19 Western District of Washington 2.13 Eastern District of Texas 2.07 District of Oregon 2.03 District of Delaware 2.00 Middle District of Florida 1.66 Southern District of Florida 0.96 Eastern District of Virginia 0.67 Western District of Wisconsin Time to Trial (years) District
“ BEST” VENUES 2000-2010 – AGGREGATED FACTORS  ,[object Object],Source: Lemley,  Where to File 7 5 11 6 1 28 18 4 14 2 Claimant Win Percentage Ranking 7 11 8 2 17 3 6 1 4 9 Percent to Trial Ranking 18 25 11 28 10 1 4 15 2 6 Time to Resolution Ranking 15 6 16 7 10 1 3 5 2 4 Time to Trial Ranking 47 Eastern District of Missouri 47 District of Oregon 46 Western District of Texas 43 Eastern District of Texas 38 Northern District of Texas 33 Western District of Wisconsin 31 Southern District of Florida 25 District of Delaware 22 Eastern District of Virginia 21 Middle District of Florida Aggregate Ranking District
DAMAGE AWARDS ,[object Object],Source: Patstats.org 1 District of Rhode Island 1 District of Oregon 1 Northern District of New York 1 District of Kansas 1 District of Arizona 2 District of Massachusetts 2 District of Delaware 2 Southern District of California 2 Northern District of California 12 Eastern District of Texas No. of Top 25  Damage Awards   District
“ BEST” VENUES v. BIG MONEY “ Best” Venues M. D. Fla. E. D. Va. S.D. Fla. W. D. Wis. N. D. Tex. W. D. Tex. E. D. Tex (12) D. Del. (2) D. Ore. (1) Most Big $ Awards N. D. Cal. (2) S. D. Cal. (2) D. Mass. (2) D. Ariz. (1) D. Kan. (1) N. D. N. Y. (1) D. R. I. (1)
INJUNCTIONS, POST-EBAY  (5/15/2006 – 4/11/2011) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
INJUNCTIONS IN LEMLEY’S  BEST VENUES ,[object Object],Source: Patstats.org 0 3 2 19 2 1 3 11 1 3 Grants 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 7 2 2 Denials Eastern District of Missouri District of Oregon Western District of Texas Eastern District of Texas Northern District of Texas Western District of Wisconsin Southern District of Florida District of Delaware Eastern District of Virginia Middle District of Florida District
OTHER FACTORS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
PATENT PILOT PROGRAM DISTRICTS  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ONCE YOU’RE THERE,  CAN YOU STAY? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
CURRENT TRANSFER TRENDS  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
FACTORS IN TRANSFER ANALYSIS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
CONCLUSIONS? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],Please contact: Ann G. Fort at  [email_address]

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

La carrera al polo sur
La carrera al polo surLa carrera al polo sur
La carrera al polo sur
Infopaco
 
Anstey & bull chapter 2
Anstey & bull   chapter 2Anstey & bull   chapter 2
Anstey & bull chapter 2
thiagohermont
 
Receita Crepes Ao Creme De Goiaba Com Cassis
Receita Crepes Ao Creme De Goiaba Com CassisReceita Crepes Ao Creme De Goiaba Com Cassis
Receita Crepes Ao Creme De Goiaba Com Cassis
quituteira quitutes
 
SKYE MINA_CV
SKYE MINA_CVSKYE MINA_CV
SKYE MINA_CV
Skye Mina
 
Malayalam bible new testament
Malayalam bible new testamentMalayalam bible new testament
Malayalam bible new testament
WorldBibles
 
Organizadores graficos
Organizadores graficosOrganizadores graficos
Organizadores graficos
cmbsdic2412
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

La carrera al polo sur
La carrera al polo surLa carrera al polo sur
La carrera al polo sur
 
Anstey & bull chapter 2
Anstey & bull   chapter 2Anstey & bull   chapter 2
Anstey & bull chapter 2
 
Noti 2
Noti 2Noti 2
Noti 2
 
Receita Crepes Ao Creme De Goiaba Com Cassis
Receita Crepes Ao Creme De Goiaba Com CassisReceita Crepes Ao Creme De Goiaba Com Cassis
Receita Crepes Ao Creme De Goiaba Com Cassis
 
Nota Pública timbrada.pdf
Nota Pública timbrada.pdfNota Pública timbrada.pdf
Nota Pública timbrada.pdf
 
Minority-Owned Businesses 2015
Minority-Owned Businesses 2015Minority-Owned Businesses 2015
Minority-Owned Businesses 2015
 
SKYE MINA_CV
SKYE MINA_CVSKYE MINA_CV
SKYE MINA_CV
 
Gran libro sobre el cáncer. Raquel Taranilla entrevistada por Víctor Amela e...
Gran libro sobre el cáncer. Raquel Taranilla  entrevistada por Víctor Amela e...Gran libro sobre el cáncer. Raquel Taranilla  entrevistada por Víctor Amela e...
Gran libro sobre el cáncer. Raquel Taranilla entrevistada por Víctor Amela e...
 
Curriculum
CurriculumCurriculum
Curriculum
 
LUC_MEDINA_CV_2016
LUC_MEDINA_CV_2016LUC_MEDINA_CV_2016
LUC_MEDINA_CV_2016
 
Catálogo yves rocher campaña 16, 2015
Catálogo yves rocher campaña 16, 2015Catálogo yves rocher campaña 16, 2015
Catálogo yves rocher campaña 16, 2015
 
Comunicar en la empresa crea
Comunicar en la empresa creaComunicar en la empresa crea
Comunicar en la empresa crea
 
inscripción de la inmobiliaria de Warren Buffet en el BORME
inscripción de la inmobiliaria de Warren Buffet en el BORMEinscripción de la inmobiliaria de Warren Buffet en el BORME
inscripción de la inmobiliaria de Warren Buffet en el BORME
 
Malayalam bible new testament
Malayalam bible new testamentMalayalam bible new testament
Malayalam bible new testament
 
Pac Overview 2010
Pac Overview 2010Pac Overview 2010
Pac Overview 2010
 
APARATO Nutricion y aparato digestivo
APARATO Nutricion y aparato digestivoAPARATO Nutricion y aparato digestivo
APARATO Nutricion y aparato digestivo
 
Redes sociales y comunicacion 2.0 manuel alejabdro martínez
Redes sociales y comunicacion 2.0  manuel alejabdro martínezRedes sociales y comunicacion 2.0  manuel alejabdro martínez
Redes sociales y comunicacion 2.0 manuel alejabdro martínez
 
Anamnesis en el paciente Podológico/ Rangos de Signos Vitales Básicos.
Anamnesis en el paciente Podológico/ Rangos de Signos Vitales Básicos.Anamnesis en el paciente Podológico/ Rangos de Signos Vitales Básicos.
Anamnesis en el paciente Podológico/ Rangos de Signos Vitales Básicos.
 
Neural Doodle
Neural DoodleNeural Doodle
Neural Doodle
 
Organizadores graficos
Organizadores graficosOrganizadores graficos
Organizadores graficos
 

Ähnlich wie Selecting a Patent Suit Venue

10/13/11: Amicus Brief in ERF v. PG&E and Pacific Bell
10/13/11: Amicus Brief in ERF v. PG&E and Pacific Bell10/13/11: Amicus Brief in ERF v. PG&E and Pacific Bell
10/13/11: Amicus Brief in ERF v. PG&E and Pacific Bell
artba
 
Planning in the courts by Nancy Stroud, James White & David Theriaque
Planning in the courts by Nancy Stroud, James White & David TheriaquePlanning in the courts by Nancy Stroud, James White & David Theriaque
Planning in the courts by Nancy Stroud, James White & David Theriaque
APA Florida
 
United States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae Brief
United States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae BriefUnited States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae Brief
United States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae Brief
Carson J. Tucker, MSEL, JD
 
06/27/11: Response to DOJ Motion Opposing Amicus Brief
06/27/11: Response to DOJ Motion Opposing Amicus Brief06/27/11: Response to DOJ Motion Opposing Amicus Brief
06/27/11: Response to DOJ Motion Opposing Amicus Brief
artba
 
Avoiding Surprises in Cost Shifting Decisions
Avoiding Surprises in Cost Shifting DecisionsAvoiding Surprises in Cost Shifting Decisions
Avoiding Surprises in Cost Shifting Decisions
Eva Harte
 

Ähnlich wie Selecting a Patent Suit Venue (20)

Cutting Edge Employment Law Issues
Cutting Edge Employment Law IssuesCutting Edge Employment Law Issues
Cutting Edge Employment Law Issues
 
Wyoming v blm nd mtn to intervene
Wyoming v blm   nd mtn to interveneWyoming v blm   nd mtn to intervene
Wyoming v blm nd mtn to intervene
 
9/10 SAT 8:30 | Land Use Law Update - What's New
9/10 SAT 8:30 | Land Use Law Update - What's New9/10 SAT 8:30 | Land Use Law Update - What's New
9/10 SAT 8:30 | Land Use Law Update - What's New
 
10/13/11: Amicus Brief in ERF v. PG&E and Pacific Bell
10/13/11: Amicus Brief in ERF v. PG&E and Pacific Bell10/13/11: Amicus Brief in ERF v. PG&E and Pacific Bell
10/13/11: Amicus Brief in ERF v. PG&E and Pacific Bell
 
Sample motion for consolidation in unlawful detainer (eviction) in California
Sample motion for consolidation in unlawful detainer (eviction) in California Sample motion for consolidation in unlawful detainer (eviction) in California
Sample motion for consolidation in unlawful detainer (eviction) in California
 
Writing Sample - Sealing Records Memo
Writing Sample - Sealing Records MemoWriting Sample - Sealing Records Memo
Writing Sample - Sealing Records Memo
 
Planning in the courts by Nancy Stroud, James White & David Theriaque
Planning in the courts by Nancy Stroud, James White & David TheriaquePlanning in the courts by Nancy Stroud, James White & David Theriaque
Planning in the courts by Nancy Stroud, James White & David Theriaque
 
Caso de EliGio Cedeño contra Juan Felipe Lara Fernández
Caso de EliGio Cedeño contra Juan Felipe Lara FernándezCaso de EliGio Cedeño contra Juan Felipe Lara Fernández
Caso de EliGio Cedeño contra Juan Felipe Lara Fernández
 
Sample responses to form interrogatories for California divorce
Sample responses to form interrogatories for California divorceSample responses to form interrogatories for California divorce
Sample responses to form interrogatories for California divorce
 
FindLaw | GM Asset Sale Approved by Bankruptcy Court
FindLaw | GM Asset Sale Approved by Bankruptcy CourtFindLaw | GM Asset Sale Approved by Bankruptcy Court
FindLaw | GM Asset Sale Approved by Bankruptcy Court
 
Social Media And Litigation Nov 2011
Social Media And Litigation Nov 2011Social Media And Litigation Nov 2011
Social Media And Litigation Nov 2011
 
United States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae Brief
United States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae BriefUnited States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae Brief
United States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae Brief
 
Lang van v. Vng Corp - Order granting Vng's motion to dismiss
Lang van v. Vng Corp  - Order granting Vng's motion to dismissLang van v. Vng Corp  - Order granting Vng's motion to dismiss
Lang van v. Vng Corp - Order granting Vng's motion to dismiss
 
06/27/11: Response to DOJ Motion Opposing Amicus Brief
06/27/11: Response to DOJ Motion Opposing Amicus Brief06/27/11: Response to DOJ Motion Opposing Amicus Brief
06/27/11: Response to DOJ Motion Opposing Amicus Brief
 
Doc. 13 11599-e
Doc. 13 11599-eDoc. 13 11599-e
Doc. 13 11599-e
 
AMENDED Lawsuit Against JustMugshots.com, MugshotsOnline.com and BustedMugsho...
AMENDED Lawsuit Against JustMugshots.com, MugshotsOnline.com and BustedMugsho...AMENDED Lawsuit Against JustMugshots.com, MugshotsOnline.com and BustedMugsho...
AMENDED Lawsuit Against JustMugshots.com, MugshotsOnline.com and BustedMugsho...
 
Avoiding Surprises in Cost Shifting Decisions
Avoiding Surprises in Cost Shifting DecisionsAvoiding Surprises in Cost Shifting Decisions
Avoiding Surprises in Cost Shifting Decisions
 
Corte suprema de texas caso hb 1131
Corte suprema de texas caso hb 1131Corte suprema de texas caso hb 1131
Corte suprema de texas caso hb 1131
 
Sample motion for consolidation of cases in California
Sample motion for consolidation of cases in CaliforniaSample motion for consolidation of cases in California
Sample motion for consolidation of cases in California
 
MBond Resume
MBond ResumeMBond Resume
MBond Resume
 

Selecting a Patent Suit Venue

  • 1. Selecting a Patent Suit Venue Ann G. Fort July 27, 2011
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23. “ BEST” VENUES v. BIG MONEY “ Best” Venues M. D. Fla. E. D. Va. S.D. Fla. W. D. Wis. N. D. Tex. W. D. Tex. E. D. Tex (12) D. Del. (2) D. Ore. (1) Most Big $ Awards N. D. Cal. (2) S. D. Cal. (2) D. Mass. (2) D. Ariz. (1) D. Kan. (1) N. D. N. Y. (1) D. R. I. (1)
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.