SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 68
MT 610
Advanced Physical Metallurgy

   Session : Phase Transformations
             in Solids I
                         Materials Technology
               School of Energy and Materials
Contents
 Diffusional transformations
   Long-range    diffusion
      Precipitate reaction
      Eutectoid transformation

   Short-range   diffusion
      Ordering reaction
      Massive transformation

      Polymorphic transformation

 Diffusionless   transformations
   Martensitic   transformation
                                    2
Phase transformations in solids
 Mostly occurred by thermally activated
  atomic movements
 Two behaviors of atomic movements
   Diffusion-controlled  process of atoms
    (diffusional transformation)
   The other, the diffusion cannot
    take place because of some
    restrictions such as insufficient
    time for atomic diffusion,
    (diffusionless transformation)
                                       3
Atomic movements
 Diffusion-controlled
               1 interatomic spacing
                Atomic movements
 Diffusionless
   Atomic  movements are less than one
    interatomic spacing

                  1 interatomic spacing
                   Atomic movements

                                          4
Diffusional transformations
 Long-rang    diffusion
   Precipitatereaction
   Eutectoid transformation

 Short-rang   diffusion
   Ordering reaction
   Massive transformation

   Polymorphic transformation



                                 5
Precipitate reaction
 A metastable supersaturated solid
 solution of α’ transforms to two
 phases of
   More  stable solid solution phase
    of α (same crystal structure as α’)
    and
   Either stable or metastable               α’ → α + β
    precipitate phase of β

                                          6
Variation of precipitate reaction




                          7
Supersaturated solid solution
α   at To : A-8% B
 When   reached T1
 α : 100 % at A-8% B
 β : 0 %

 When   reached T2
  Att = 0, α at A-8% B becomes unstable and
   supersaturated with B solute atoms
  The unstable and supersaturated α is
   denoted as α’.                     8
β precipitates
 Equilibrium At T22,,
 metastable supersaturated
 solid solution α’ phase
   Transforms  to more
    stable α phase with
    composition of A-5% B
    (same crystal structure as α’ phase) and
   Allows precipitates of β phase to form with
    composition of A-96% B
 α’   → α +β        α matrix
                β precipitates         9
β precipitates
2 approaches of nucleation of solid β
   Homogeneous nucleation
        B atoms diffuse to form small volume of β
         composition with a critical nucleus size of
         precipitates β in a matrix of α.
   Heterogeneous       nucleation
        Nucleation sites are non-equilibrium
         defects such as excess vacancies,
         dislocations, grain boundaries, stacking
         faults, inclusions, and free surfaces.
                                          10
Homogeneous nucleation of β
α  solid solution passes solvus line
 B atoms in α matrix diffuse to form
  a small volume with β composition

 Nucleation   process

B atoms rearrange themselves to
 form β crystal structure
                                   11
Homogeneous nucleation of β
 During   nucleation process
   α/β interfaces create → leading to an
   activation energy barrier



                                            α’


                                                 α

                                       12        β
Homogeneous nucleation of β
 During
       nucleation process,
 3 components of ∆G
   Creationof β precipitates (driving force)
    - Volume free energy reduction of V∆GV
   Creation  of α/β interfaces
    - Increase of Aγ
   Misfit strain energy between
    α and β
    - Increase of V∆GS                               α

∆Ghom = (–V∆GV) + Aγ + V∆GS                          β
                                                13
Homogeneous nucleation of β
 ∆Ghom =   (–V∆GV) + Aγ + V∆GS
 Assuming      a spherical nucleus with r
  V  = (4/3) πr3
   A = 4 πr2

 Critical radius
   r*   = 2γ / (∆GV – ∆GS)
 Necessary free     energy change
   ∆G*    = 16πγ3 / 3(∆GV – ∆GS)2
                                       14
Homogeneous nucleation of β
 Critical radius
   r*   = 2γ / (∆GV – ∆GS)
 Necessary free     energy change
   ∆G*    = 16πγ3 / 3(∆GV – ∆GS)2
 For a   given undercooling,
   If r < r*, the system will lower its free energy
    by dissolving the embryos back into solid
    solution.
   If r > r*, the system will lower its free energy
    by allowing the nuclei to grow.        15
Homogeneous nucleation of β
 Concentration  of critical-sized
 nuclei per unit volume
   C*
     = Co exp(–∆G*/kT)             cluster/m3
   where Co : initial number of atoms/volume
 Homogeneous     nucleation rate
  N     = f C*                    nuclei/m3 s
     hom
   where f = ω exp (–∆Gm/kT) : how fast a
   critical nucleus can receive an atom from
   α matrix (atomic migration) and ∆Gm :
   activation energy for atomic migration
                                        16
Homogeneous nucleation of β
 Homogeneous        nucleation rate
 Nhom = ωCo exp(–∆Gm/kT) exp(–∆G*/kT)
 where ∆G* = 16πγ3 / 3(∆GV – ∆GS)2


 Assumption
     ∆Gm is constant, and ∆GS is ignored.
   Consider    ∆Gm and ∆GS

                                             17
Homogeneous nucleation rate
 Nhom = ωCo exp(–∆Gm/kT) exp(–∆G*/kT)
 where ∆G* = 16πγ3 / 3(∆GV – ∆GS)2


 Main factor controlling ∆G* is the
 driving force for precipitation ∆GV .



                                     18
Driving force for transformation
 Initial   composition Xo
    Solution    treated at T1
    Then,    quench to T2
       Alloy is supersaturated with B
       Alloy tries to precipitate β




    When   α → α+β completed,
     free energy decreases by ∆Go
         ∆Go is a driving force for transformation.
                                                  19
β precipitation
 Initially
   First nuclei of β do not
    change α composition from Xo
   Small amount of materials
    with nucleus composition βXB
    (P) is removed from α phase
   Free energy of the system
    decreases by ∆G1
    ∆G1 = αµA βXA + αµB βXB (per mol β removed)
                                         20
β precipitation
 Rearranged     into β crystals
   Freeenergy of the system
   decreases by ∆G2 (Q)
   ∆G2 = βµA βXA + βµB βXB
   (per mol β formed)
 Driving   force for nucleation
   ∆G    = ∆G2 – ∆G1 (per mol β)
      n



                                    21
β precipitation
 Volume free energy
 decrease
   ∆G  = ∆Gn/Vm
       V
    (per unit volume of β)
 For dilute solution
   ∆G ∝ ∆X
       V
    where ∆X = Xo – Xe
 Drivingforce for precipitation increases
 with increasing undercooling ∆T below Te.
                                 22
When consider ∆Gm and ∆GS
∆G* = 16πγ3 / 3(∆GV – ∆GS)2
 Taking the misfit
 strain energy term
 into account, the
 effective driving force
 become (∆GV – ∆GS)
   Equilibrium   temperature reduces from Te
    to Te’ (effective equilibrium temperature)
                                        23
Homogeneous nucleation rate
Nhom = ωCo exp(–∆Gm/kT) exp(–∆G*/kT)
 Schematically plot
  2 exponential terms
     Atomic mobility :
      exp(–∆Gm/kT)
     Potential concentration
      of nuclei
      exp(–∆G*/kT)
  Combination of 2 terms results in Nhom
                                           24
Notice
Nhom = ωCo exp(–∆Gm/kT) exp(–∆G*/kT)

 exp(–∆G*/kT) term
  is zero until ∆Tc
  (critical undercooling)
  is reached – above, β
  does not form .
 exp(–∆Gm/kT) term
  decreases rapidly as T decreases –
  atomic mobility is too small.        25
Undercooling ∆T
 If∆T < ∆Tc ,
  N is negligible
  (∆GV is too small).
N   is maximum at
  intermediate ∆T.
 If ∆T >> ∆Tc ,
  N is small or negligible
  (Diffusion becomes too slow).
                                  26
Real homogeneous nucleation
β  precipitate is not always spherical.
 The most effective way of minimizing
  ∆G* is to form nuclei with the smallest
  total interfacial energy by
   Form  the same orientation relationship
    with the matrix
   Have coherent interfaces
   Example is formation of metastable GP
    zones in the Al-Cu alloys.
                                       27
Al-Cu alloys
 The equilibrium
 consists of two
 solid phases : α4, θ
 Precipitate process
 α → α1 + GP Zone
   → α2 + θ”
   → α3 + θ’
   → α4 + θ
                        28
Heterogeneous nucleation of β
 Usually precipitate in matrix α
 Nucleation sites of nonequilibrium defects
   Excess vacancies
                     Nucleus creations
   Dislocations
                      decrease some free
   Grain boundaries
                      energy with an amount
   Stacking faults   of ∆Gd
   Inclusions       Therefore, help reducing
   Free surfaces     activation energy barrier
                                     29
Heterogeneous nucleation of β

 ∆Ghet   = ∆Ghom – ∆Gd

 ∆Ghet   = (–V∆GV) + Aγ + V∆GS – ∆Gd




                                    30
Heterogeneous nucleation of β
 At   α/α grain boundary
   Assumption   : no misfit strain energy at a
                   α/β interface
   Optimum embryo shape for nucleation is
    when total interfacial free energy is
    minimized. 2 spherical caps
   At the precipitate

          ∆Gd = Aααγαα
            r* = 2γαβ/ ∆GV
                                         31
Heterogeneous nucleation of β
 Activationenergy barrier
 ∆G*het/∆G *hom = ∆V*het/∆V *hom = S(θ)
 S(θ)is a shape factor
 S(θ) = ½ (2 + cosθ) (1 – cosθ)2
                              1.0
    ∆ G*het /∆ G*hom = S(θ)




                              0.8

                              0.6

                              0.4

                              0.2

                              0.0
                                    0.0   0.2   0.4   0.6   0.8   1.0
                                                  cos θ                 32
Heterogeneous nucleation of β
 ∆G*het/∆G                                      *hom = ∆V*het/∆V *hom = S(θ)
   ∆G*  and ∆V*het can be reduced further by
                                     het
    nucleation on
            Grain edge
            Grain corner
            1.0      Grain boundaries
    ∆ G*het /∆ G*hom = S(θ)




                                                  Grain edges
                              0.8                 Grain corners
                              0.6

                              0.4

                              0.2

                              0.0
                                    0.0    0.2   0.4 0.6
                                                   cos θ
                                                           0.8    1.0
                                                                            33
Heterogeneous nucleation of β
 When matrix and precipitate are
 compatible and allow formation of
 lower energy coherent facets, nucleus
  Will form whenever possible
  Will have an orientation
   relationship with matrix



                                  34
Interface




            35
Heterogeneous nucleation of β
 Heterogeneous         nucleation rate
 Nhet = ωC1 exp(–∆Gm/kT) exp(–∆G*/kT)
 where C1 is concentration of heterogeneous
 nucleation sites per unit volume.
     The rates can be obtained at very small driving forces.




                                                36
Heterogeneous nucleation of β
   Heterogeneous      nucleation rate
    Nhet = ωC1 exp(–∆Gm/kT) exp(–∆G*/kT)
   Homogeneous       nucleation rate
    Nhom = ωCo exp(–∆Gm/kT) exp(–∆G*/kT)


 Differences   in ω and ∆Gm are not significant
  Nhet/Nhom = C1/Co exp{(∆G*hom–∆G*het)/kT}
  where C1/Co is a ratio between the boundary thickness δ
                and the grain size D
                                              37
Heterogeneous nucleation of β
Nhet/Nhom = C1/Co exp{(∆G*hom–∆G*het)/kT}
 Nucleation at grain boundary         C1/Co
  C1/Co = δ/D                                  = 10-5
 Nucleation  at grain edge
  C1/Co = (δ/D)2                               = 10-10
 Nucleation  at grain corner
  C1/Co = (δ/D)3                               = 10-15

    δ = 0.5 nm
    D = 50 µm
                                           38
CuAl2 precipitates in Al grains
and at grain boundaries




              ASM Handbook, Vol. 9
                                  39
Growth of precipitate
 Solutes must migrate from deep within
  the parent phase.
 Solute from precipitate to
  precipitate/parent interfaces
   Long-range    diffusion controlled
       Time-dependent velocity
   Interface   controlled
       Constant velocity

                                         40
Growth of precipitate
 Nuclei will grow   on
   Direction  of smallest nucleation barrier
   Smallest critical volume

   Minimum total interfacial free energy
    (in the case of strain-free)




                                         41
Growth of precipitate
 Ifnuclei are enclosed by a combination
  of coherent and semicoherent facets,
   Incoherent     interface will have higher
       mobility, so the interface can advance
       faster.




                                           42
Growth of planar incoherent
interfaces
 Found at grain boundaries
 Depletion of solute in α
  from Co to Ce
 Form   β slab precipitate
   Solute   concentration is Cβ
   Grow  from zero thickness
   at rate of v

                                   43
Growth of planar incoherent
interfaces
β slab advances dx of
 a unit area on i/c
   Volume     of β material (1·dx)
     must be converted from
     α (Ce) to β (Cβ)
 Materials required per
 unit area = 1·dx (Cβ – Ce)
 Solute B   atoms migrate = D (dC/dx)i/c dt
                                     44
 where D is interdiff. coef. = XBDA + XADB
Growth of planar incoherent
interfaces
 Materials advancing=
 Solute atom migration
 1·dx (Cβ – Ce) = D (dC/dx)i/c dt
 v = dx/dt
     = [D/(Cβ – Ce)] (dC/dx)i/c
 Approximation (dC/dx)i/c using
 “conservation of solute”
    α Area = β Area
  ½ L ∆Co = (Cβ – Co) x
                                    45
Growth of planar incoherent
interfaces
½ L ∆Co    = (Cβ – Co) x
∆Co/L      = (∆Co)2/{2 x (Cβ – Co)}
∆Co/L      ≈ (dC/dx)i/c
(dC/dx)i/c = (∆Co)2/{2 x (Cβ – Co)}



   v = dx/dt
     = [D/(Cβ – Ce)] (dC/dx)i/c
                                        46
     = [D/(C – C )] (∆C ) /{2 x (C – C )}
                           2
Growth of planar incoherent
interfaces
v = dx/dt = D(∆Co)2/{2 x (Cβ – Ce) (Cβ – Co)}
 Assumption

    Cβ – Ce ≈ C β – Co

    Mole   fraction : ∆X = ∆C
dx/dt = D(∆Xo)2/{2 x (Xβ – Xe)2}
x dx = D(∆Xo)2/{2 x (Xβ – Xe)2} dt
x2 = Dt(∆Xo)2/(Xβ – Xe)2
x = ∆Xo/(Xβ – Xe) √(Dt) → precipitate thickening
                                        47
Growth of planar incoherent
interfaces
 Precipitatethickening
  x = ∆Xo/(Xβ – Xe) √(Dt)
  x ∝ √(Dt)
v  = dx/dt
  v = ∆Xo/2(Xβ – Xe) √(D/t)
 Supersaturation   ∆Xo before
  precipitation
  ∆Xo = Xo – Xe
                                 48
Growth of planar incoherent
interfaces
x = ∆Xo/(Xβ – Xe) √(Dt)
v = ∆Xo/2(Xβ – Xe) √(D/t)
∆Xo = Xo – Xe



 Growth rate is   low when
   Small ∆T → small ∆X
   Large ∆ T → small diffusion   49
A sink for solute
 Grain boundaries can act as a collector
 plate of a sink for solute.
   Volume  diffusion of solute to grain boundary
   Diffusion along the grain boundaries

   Diffusion along the α/β interfaces




                                       50
End of precipitate growth
 Precipitates
             stop advancing/growing
 when the matrix composition reaches Xe
 everywhere – there are no longer excess
 solute supply for precipitation.




                                 51
Growth of plates and needles
β  precipitates have a constant thickness
  and a cylindrically curved incoherent
  edge of radius r
 Growth governed by volume diffusion-
  controlled process




                                   52
Growth of plates and needles
 Concentration  gradient to drive
  diffusion through the edge is ∆C/L
  where L = kr, and k is a constant.
 v = D∆C/{kr(Cβ – Cr)}
    = D∆X/{kr(Xβ – Xr)}
  where ∆X = Xo – Xr = ∆Xo(1-r*/r) and
                         ∆Xo = Xo – Xe
 v = D ∆Xo (1-r*/r) / {kr (Xβ – Xr)}
    For spherical tip, X = X (1+2γV /RTr)
                          r    e       m
    For cylindrical tip, X = X (1+γV /RTr)
                                         53
                            r    e     m
Growth of plates and needles
 For a   constant thickness,
   Lengthening   rate v is constant with time;
    therefore, x ∝ t.
   Lengthening rate v is varied with D and r.




                                        54
Plate-like precipitate
 Observed by       a ledge mechanism
   Broad   faces are semicoherent
       Limit migration of atoms
   Atoms    will migrate and attach at the ledges
     Their interfaces are incoherent.
     Growth requires lateral motion of ledges

      achieved by diffusion
  v   = uh/λ
       = D∆Xo/{kλ(Xβ – Xe)}
       = constant                           55
Plate-like precipitate
 Widmanstätten       precipitation
   Plates   lie along {111} matrix planes.




       ASM Handbook
                                              56
Spinodal structure
 Homogenous   precipitates
 of 2-phase mixtures
 resulting from a phase
 separation that occurs
 under certain conditions
 of temperature and
 composition


                              57
Spinodal structure
 Xois solution treated at To
 Then, aged at TA
  α  tends to separate into 2-
       o
    phase mixture
   Initially, G
                 o
          Xo becomes unstable and try
           to decreases its total free
           energy by producing small
           fluctuations in composition
           resulting in A-rich and B-rich
           regions                          58
Spinodal structure
 Xo
   is unstable and try to
 decreases its total free
 energy
   Up-hill
          diffusion
   Down-hill diffusion

 until equilibrium phases
 of α1 and α2 are reached at
 compositions of X1 and X2
                               59
Spinodal structure
 α1 and
       α2 phase mixture
 occurs by continuous
 growth of initially small
 amplitude fluctuations
   Controlled by atomic
    migration and diffusion




                              60
Spinodal structure
 Xo will decay with time
  ∆X = ∆Xo exp(–t/τ)
  where τ is a relaxing time
   τ = λ2/(4π2D)
  where λ is wavelength of
  fluctuation and D is diffusion
  coefficient.



                                   61
Spinodal structure
 TEM   micrographs
 2.5 – 10 nm in metallic system
 Contrast comes mainly from
  structure factor differences

Fe-28.5 wt.% Cr-10.6 wt.% Co
    Aged at 600°C 4 h

Cu-33.5 at.% Ni-15 at.% Fe
    Aged at 775°C 15 min, λ ≈ 25 nm   ASM Handbook
                                         62
Cellular precipitate
 Precipitation
              of a second phase from a
 supersaturated solid solution
   May occur through a reaction involving the
    formation of colonies
      Consisting of a 2-phase mixture
      That grow and consume the matrix.


 The transformation      is very similar to the
 eutectoid reaction.
                                           63
Cellular precipitate
 Morphology
   Alternating  lamellae
    of precipitate phase
    and depleted matrix
   Duplex cells
   Cooperative growth
    of 2 phases
   Originate from matrix
    grain boundaries

                            64
Cellular precipitate
 Cellular fronts advance
  into the supersaturated
  matrix and spatially partitions
  the structure into transformed
  and untransformed regions.
 Composition and
  orientation of α’ phase changes discontinuously
  from Cα’ to Cα for α phase colony.


                                       65
Cellular precipitate
 Solutes to form β phase colony
  diffuse from the neighboring α
  colonies with a distance d = So/2
 Solution  redistribution occurs
  by diffusion along the interface
  at the composition
  distribution region
 Assumed
     Solute distribution is
      linear
                                      66
Cellular precipitate
 Amount of solute   rejected from α’ to form β
  plates with the rate of dm/dt
             dm/dt = Jdiff A = R(Cβ – Cα’)
  where R is the interface velocity
   Jdiff = DB(∂C/∂x) and A = λ (2 sides) = 2λ
           dm/dt = DB(∂C/∂x) 2λ = R(Cβ – Cα’)
             DB{(Cα’ – Cα)/d} 2λ = R(Cβ – Cα’)
        R = {2 DB λ/d} {(Cα’ – Cα)/(Cβ – Cα’)}
where d = (So – Sβ)/2, for small distance 67 = SoSβ/2
                                          d
Cellular precipitate
 Cellularor discontinuous
 precipitation growing out
 uniformly from the grain
 boundaries

 Fe-24.8Zn    alloy
   Aged   at 600°C 6 min


                 (W.C. Leslie)
                                 68

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Mp6 15 phase field modelling
Mp6 15 phase field modellingMp6 15 phase field modelling
Mp6 15 phase field modelling
Nguyen Hanh
 
Kirkwood-Buff Theory of Solutions and the Development of Atomistic and Coarse...
Kirkwood-Buff Theory of Solutions and the Development of Atomistic and Coarse...Kirkwood-Buff Theory of Solutions and the Development of Atomistic and Coarse...
Kirkwood-Buff Theory of Solutions and the Development of Atomistic and Coarse...
Nikos Bentenitis
 
Burin braneworld cosmological effect with induced gravity
Burin braneworld cosmological effect with induced gravityBurin braneworld cosmological effect with induced gravity
Burin braneworld cosmological effect with induced gravity
luciolucena
 
Seridonio fachini conem_draft
Seridonio fachini conem_draftSeridonio fachini conem_draft
Seridonio fachini conem_draft
Ana Seridonio
 
Ruchardt’s experiment
Ruchardt’s experimentRuchardt’s experiment
Ruchardt’s experiment
MidoOoz
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Mp6 15 phase field modelling
Mp6 15 phase field modellingMp6 15 phase field modelling
Mp6 15 phase field modelling
 
Kirkwood-Buff Theory of Solutions and the Development of Atomistic and Coarse...
Kirkwood-Buff Theory of Solutions and the Development of Atomistic and Coarse...Kirkwood-Buff Theory of Solutions and the Development of Atomistic and Coarse...
Kirkwood-Buff Theory of Solutions and the Development of Atomistic and Coarse...
 
Universe (Twin)
Universe (Twin)Universe (Twin)
Universe (Twin)
 
Dendrite Growth Model at Bonded (001) GaAs Interface
Dendrite Growth Model at Bonded (001) GaAs InterfaceDendrite Growth Model at Bonded (001) GaAs Interface
Dendrite Growth Model at Bonded (001) GaAs Interface
 
D. Mladenov - On Integrable Systems in Cosmology
D. Mladenov - On Integrable Systems in CosmologyD. Mladenov - On Integrable Systems in Cosmology
D. Mladenov - On Integrable Systems in Cosmology
 
Topic 10 kft 131
Topic 10 kft 131Topic 10 kft 131
Topic 10 kft 131
 
Burin braneworld cosmological effect with induced gravity
Burin braneworld cosmological effect with induced gravityBurin braneworld cosmological effect with induced gravity
Burin braneworld cosmological effect with induced gravity
 
Seridonio fachini conem_draft
Seridonio fachini conem_draftSeridonio fachini conem_draft
Seridonio fachini conem_draft
 
Topic 5 kft 131
Topic 5 kft 131Topic 5 kft 131
Topic 5 kft 131
 
Simulation of Steam Coal Gasifier
Simulation of Steam Coal GasifierSimulation of Steam Coal Gasifier
Simulation of Steam Coal Gasifier
 
Aerospace Engineering Seminar Series
Aerospace Engineering Seminar SeriesAerospace Engineering Seminar Series
Aerospace Engineering Seminar Series
 
G. Martinelli - From the Standard Model to Dark Matter and beyond: Symmetries...
G. Martinelli - From the Standard Model to Dark Matter and beyond: Symmetries...G. Martinelli - From the Standard Model to Dark Matter and beyond: Symmetries...
G. Martinelli - From the Standard Model to Dark Matter and beyond: Symmetries...
 
Topic 4 kft 131
Topic 4 kft 131Topic 4 kft 131
Topic 4 kft 131
 
Topic 2 kft 131
Topic 2 kft 131Topic 2 kft 131
Topic 2 kft 131
 
Topic 6 kft 131
Topic 6 kft 131Topic 6 kft 131
Topic 6 kft 131
 
"Warm tachyon matter" - N. Bilic
"Warm tachyon matter" - N. Bilic"Warm tachyon matter" - N. Bilic
"Warm tachyon matter" - N. Bilic
 
N. Bilic - Supersymmetric Dark Energy
N. Bilic - Supersymmetric Dark EnergyN. Bilic - Supersymmetric Dark Energy
N. Bilic - Supersymmetric Dark Energy
 
Ruchardt’s experiment
Ruchardt’s experimentRuchardt’s experiment
Ruchardt’s experiment
 
Sol5
Sol5Sol5
Sol5
 
Equations
EquationsEquations
Equations
 

Andere mochten auch (11)

Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_ii
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iiMt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_ii
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_ii
 
Power piont ch2 phase-transformation-in-metals (1)
Power piont   ch2 phase-transformation-in-metals (1)Power piont   ch2 phase-transformation-in-metals (1)
Power piont ch2 phase-transformation-in-metals (1)
 
Phase transformation
Phase transformationPhase transformation
Phase transformation
 
Phase Transformation.
Phase Transformation.Phase Transformation.
Phase Transformation.
 
Heat Treatment
Heat TreatmentHeat Treatment
Heat Treatment
 
hardening
hardeninghardening
hardening
 
Precipitation hardening
Precipitation hardeningPrecipitation hardening
Precipitation hardening
 
Phase transformation edited.ppt1
Phase transformation edited.ppt1Phase transformation edited.ppt1
Phase transformation edited.ppt1
 
Heat treatment : the best one
Heat treatment : the best oneHeat treatment : the best one
Heat treatment : the best one
 
precipitation hardening
precipitation hardeningprecipitation hardening
precipitation hardening
 
Heat treatment process
Heat treatment processHeat treatment process
Heat treatment process
 

Ähnlich wie Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_i

BME 303 - Lesson 7 - Phase Transformation.pdf
BME 303 - Lesson 7 - Phase Transformation.pdfBME 303 - Lesson 7 - Phase Transformation.pdf
BME 303 - Lesson 7 - Phase Transformation.pdf
atlestmunni
 
Simulating Membrane Channels, E. Tajkhorshid, Part 2
Simulating Membrane Channels, E. Tajkhorshid, Part 2Simulating Membrane Channels, E. Tajkhorshid, Part 2
Simulating Membrane Channels, E. Tajkhorshid, Part 2
TCBG
 
Presentation M2 internship rare-earth nickelates
Presentation M2 internship rare-earth nickelatesPresentation M2 internship rare-earth nickelates
Presentation M2 internship rare-earth nickelates
Yiteng Dang
 
Cluster aggregation with complete collisional fragmentation
Cluster aggregation with complete collisional fragmentationCluster aggregation with complete collisional fragmentation
Cluster aggregation with complete collisional fragmentation
Colm Connaughton
 

Ähnlich wie Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_i (20)

MS-II(Phase_transformation)(chapter 5).pptx
MS-II(Phase_transformation)(chapter 5).pptxMS-II(Phase_transformation)(chapter 5).pptx
MS-II(Phase_transformation)(chapter 5).pptx
 
BME 303 - Lesson 7 - Phase Transformation.pdf
BME 303 - Lesson 7 - Phase Transformation.pdfBME 303 - Lesson 7 - Phase Transformation.pdf
BME 303 - Lesson 7 - Phase Transformation.pdf
 
Shiba states from BdG
Shiba states from BdGShiba states from BdG
Shiba states from BdG
 
Nucleation and Growth of Crystal Phases from Amorphous Solids
Nucleation and Growth of Crystal Phases from Amorphous SolidsNucleation and Growth of Crystal Phases from Amorphous Solids
Nucleation and Growth of Crystal Phases from Amorphous Solids
 
Phase Transformations in solids.ppt
Phase Transformations in solids.pptPhase Transformations in solids.ppt
Phase Transformations in solids.ppt
 
Quark Matter 2015 poster
Quark Matter 2015 posterQuark Matter 2015 poster
Quark Matter 2015 poster
 
Serie de dyson
Serie de dysonSerie de dyson
Serie de dyson
 
Sm421 rg
Sm421 rgSm421 rg
Sm421 rg
 
Simulating Membrane Channels, E. Tajkhorshid, Part 2
Simulating Membrane Channels, E. Tajkhorshid, Part 2Simulating Membrane Channels, E. Tajkhorshid, Part 2
Simulating Membrane Channels, E. Tajkhorshid, Part 2
 
Gravity tests with neutrons
Gravity tests with neutronsGravity tests with neutrons
Gravity tests with neutrons
 
N. Bilic - "Hamiltonian Method in the Braneworld" 3/3
N. Bilic - "Hamiltonian Method in the Braneworld" 3/3N. Bilic - "Hamiltonian Method in the Braneworld" 3/3
N. Bilic - "Hamiltonian Method in the Braneworld" 3/3
 
Presentation M2 internship rare-earth nickelates
Presentation M2 internship rare-earth nickelatesPresentation M2 internship rare-earth nickelates
Presentation M2 internship rare-earth nickelates
 
"When the top is not single: a theory overview from monotop to multitops" to...
"When the top is not single: a theory overview from monotop to multitops"  to..."When the top is not single: a theory overview from monotop to multitops"  to...
"When the top is not single: a theory overview from monotop to multitops" to...
 
Mazurov ferrara2014
Mazurov ferrara2014Mazurov ferrara2014
Mazurov ferrara2014
 
Jets MET Atlas Jamboree 2011
Jets MET Atlas Jamboree 2011Jets MET Atlas Jamboree 2011
Jets MET Atlas Jamboree 2011
 
Talk given at the Workshop in Catania University
Talk given at the Workshop in Catania University Talk given at the Workshop in Catania University
Talk given at the Workshop in Catania University
 
Spectral properties of the Goldstino in supersymmetric Bose-Fermi mixtures
Spectral properties of the Goldstino in supersymmetric Bose-Fermi mixturesSpectral properties of the Goldstino in supersymmetric Bose-Fermi mixtures
Spectral properties of the Goldstino in supersymmetric Bose-Fermi mixtures
 
Nambu-Goldstone mode for supersymmetry breaking in QCD and Bose-Fermi cold at...
Nambu-Goldstone mode for supersymmetry breaking in QCD and Bose-Fermi cold at...Nambu-Goldstone mode for supersymmetry breaking in QCD and Bose-Fermi cold at...
Nambu-Goldstone mode for supersymmetry breaking in QCD and Bose-Fermi cold at...
 
Two dimensional Pool Boiling
Two dimensional Pool BoilingTwo dimensional Pool Boiling
Two dimensional Pool Boiling
 
Cluster aggregation with complete collisional fragmentation
Cluster aggregation with complete collisional fragmentationCluster aggregation with complete collisional fragmentation
Cluster aggregation with complete collisional fragmentation
 

Mehr von Abhijeet Dash

Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iv
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_ivMt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iv
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iv
Abhijeet Dash
 
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iii
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iiiMt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iii
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iii
Abhijeet Dash
 

Mehr von Abhijeet Dash (20)

Global sourcing
Global sourcingGlobal sourcing
Global sourcing
 
Hershey
HersheyHershey
Hershey
 
Tractor industry overview
Tractor industry overviewTractor industry overview
Tractor industry overview
 
Operations management ii
Operations management   iiOperations management   ii
Operations management ii
 
Be group 1
Be group 1Be group 1
Be group 1
 
Srm assignment2 group1
Srm assignment2 group1Srm assignment2 group1
Srm assignment2 group1
 
Parle agro grp4 (1) (1)
Parle agro grp4 (1) (1)Parle agro grp4 (1) (1)
Parle agro grp4 (1) (1)
 
Bis grp6
Bis grp6Bis grp6
Bis grp6
 
Sales order processing sec a_grp1
Sales order processing sec a_grp1Sales order processing sec a_grp1
Sales order processing sec a_grp1
 
Srm group1 sec_a_ppt
Srm group1 sec_a_pptSrm group1 sec_a_ppt
Srm group1 sec_a_ppt
 
Osd grp1 final (1)
Osd grp1 final (1)Osd grp1 final (1)
Osd grp1 final (1)
 
Final
FinalFinal
Final
 
Om presentation group 10 sec a
Om presentation group 10 sec aOm presentation group 10 sec a
Om presentation group 10 sec a
 
Mm3 project ppt group 1_section a
Mm3 project ppt group 1_section aMm3 project ppt group 1_section a
Mm3 project ppt group 1_section a
 
Ob personality group 1
Ob personality group 1Ob personality group 1
Ob personality group 1
 
Xerox npp bpr case (1)
Xerox npp bpr case (1)Xerox npp bpr case (1)
Xerox npp bpr case (1)
 
Mc presentation (1)
Mc presentation (1)Mc presentation (1)
Mc presentation (1)
 
corrosion
corrosioncorrosion
corrosion
 
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iv
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_ivMt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iv
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iv
 
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iii
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iiiMt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iii
Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_iii
 

Mt 610 phasetransformationsinsolids_i

  • 1. MT 610 Advanced Physical Metallurgy Session : Phase Transformations in Solids I Materials Technology School of Energy and Materials
  • 2. Contents  Diffusional transformations  Long-range diffusion  Precipitate reaction  Eutectoid transformation  Short-range diffusion  Ordering reaction  Massive transformation  Polymorphic transformation  Diffusionless transformations  Martensitic transformation 2
  • 3. Phase transformations in solids  Mostly occurred by thermally activated atomic movements  Two behaviors of atomic movements  Diffusion-controlled process of atoms (diffusional transformation)  The other, the diffusion cannot take place because of some restrictions such as insufficient time for atomic diffusion, (diffusionless transformation) 3
  • 4. Atomic movements  Diffusion-controlled 1 interatomic spacing Atomic movements  Diffusionless  Atomic movements are less than one interatomic spacing 1 interatomic spacing Atomic movements 4
  • 5. Diffusional transformations  Long-rang diffusion  Precipitatereaction  Eutectoid transformation  Short-rang diffusion  Ordering reaction  Massive transformation  Polymorphic transformation 5
  • 6. Precipitate reaction  A metastable supersaturated solid solution of α’ transforms to two phases of  More stable solid solution phase of α (same crystal structure as α’) and  Either stable or metastable α’ → α + β precipitate phase of β 6
  • 8. Supersaturated solid solution α at To : A-8% B  When reached T1 α : 100 % at A-8% B β : 0 %  When reached T2  Att = 0, α at A-8% B becomes unstable and supersaturated with B solute atoms  The unstable and supersaturated α is denoted as α’. 8
  • 9. β precipitates  Equilibrium At T22,, metastable supersaturated solid solution α’ phase  Transforms to more stable α phase with composition of A-5% B (same crystal structure as α’ phase) and  Allows precipitates of β phase to form with composition of A-96% B  α’ → α +β α matrix β precipitates 9
  • 10. β precipitates 2 approaches of nucleation of solid β  Homogeneous nucleation  B atoms diffuse to form small volume of β composition with a critical nucleus size of precipitates β in a matrix of α.  Heterogeneous nucleation  Nucleation sites are non-equilibrium defects such as excess vacancies, dislocations, grain boundaries, stacking faults, inclusions, and free surfaces. 10
  • 11. Homogeneous nucleation of β α solid solution passes solvus line  B atoms in α matrix diffuse to form a small volume with β composition  Nucleation process B atoms rearrange themselves to form β crystal structure 11
  • 12. Homogeneous nucleation of β  During nucleation process  α/β interfaces create → leading to an activation energy barrier α’ α 12 β
  • 13. Homogeneous nucleation of β  During nucleation process, 3 components of ∆G  Creationof β precipitates (driving force) - Volume free energy reduction of V∆GV  Creation of α/β interfaces - Increase of Aγ  Misfit strain energy between α and β - Increase of V∆GS α ∆Ghom = (–V∆GV) + Aγ + V∆GS β 13
  • 14. Homogeneous nucleation of β  ∆Ghom = (–V∆GV) + Aγ + V∆GS  Assuming a spherical nucleus with r V = (4/3) πr3  A = 4 πr2  Critical radius  r* = 2γ / (∆GV – ∆GS)  Necessary free energy change  ∆G* = 16πγ3 / 3(∆GV – ∆GS)2 14
  • 15. Homogeneous nucleation of β  Critical radius  r* = 2γ / (∆GV – ∆GS)  Necessary free energy change  ∆G* = 16πγ3 / 3(∆GV – ∆GS)2  For a given undercooling,  If r < r*, the system will lower its free energy by dissolving the embryos back into solid solution.  If r > r*, the system will lower its free energy by allowing the nuclei to grow. 15
  • 16. Homogeneous nucleation of β  Concentration of critical-sized nuclei per unit volume  C* = Co exp(–∆G*/kT) cluster/m3 where Co : initial number of atoms/volume  Homogeneous nucleation rate N = f C* nuclei/m3 s hom where f = ω exp (–∆Gm/kT) : how fast a critical nucleus can receive an atom from α matrix (atomic migration) and ∆Gm : activation energy for atomic migration 16
  • 17. Homogeneous nucleation of β  Homogeneous nucleation rate Nhom = ωCo exp(–∆Gm/kT) exp(–∆G*/kT) where ∆G* = 16πγ3 / 3(∆GV – ∆GS)2  Assumption  ∆Gm is constant, and ∆GS is ignored.  Consider ∆Gm and ∆GS 17
  • 18. Homogeneous nucleation rate Nhom = ωCo exp(–∆Gm/kT) exp(–∆G*/kT) where ∆G* = 16πγ3 / 3(∆GV – ∆GS)2  Main factor controlling ∆G* is the driving force for precipitation ∆GV . 18
  • 19. Driving force for transformation  Initial composition Xo  Solution treated at T1  Then, quench to T2  Alloy is supersaturated with B  Alloy tries to precipitate β  When α → α+β completed, free energy decreases by ∆Go  ∆Go is a driving force for transformation. 19
  • 20. β precipitation  Initially  First nuclei of β do not change α composition from Xo  Small amount of materials with nucleus composition βXB (P) is removed from α phase  Free energy of the system decreases by ∆G1 ∆G1 = αµA βXA + αµB βXB (per mol β removed) 20
  • 21. β precipitation  Rearranged into β crystals  Freeenergy of the system decreases by ∆G2 (Q) ∆G2 = βµA βXA + βµB βXB (per mol β formed)  Driving force for nucleation  ∆G = ∆G2 – ∆G1 (per mol β) n 21
  • 22. β precipitation  Volume free energy decrease  ∆G = ∆Gn/Vm V (per unit volume of β)  For dilute solution  ∆G ∝ ∆X V where ∆X = Xo – Xe  Drivingforce for precipitation increases with increasing undercooling ∆T below Te. 22
  • 23. When consider ∆Gm and ∆GS ∆G* = 16πγ3 / 3(∆GV – ∆GS)2  Taking the misfit strain energy term into account, the effective driving force become (∆GV – ∆GS)  Equilibrium temperature reduces from Te to Te’ (effective equilibrium temperature) 23
  • 24. Homogeneous nucleation rate Nhom = ωCo exp(–∆Gm/kT) exp(–∆G*/kT)  Schematically plot 2 exponential terms  Atomic mobility : exp(–∆Gm/kT)  Potential concentration of nuclei exp(–∆G*/kT) Combination of 2 terms results in Nhom 24
  • 25. Notice Nhom = ωCo exp(–∆Gm/kT) exp(–∆G*/kT)  exp(–∆G*/kT) term is zero until ∆Tc (critical undercooling) is reached – above, β does not form .  exp(–∆Gm/kT) term decreases rapidly as T decreases – atomic mobility is too small. 25
  • 26. Undercooling ∆T  If∆T < ∆Tc , N is negligible (∆GV is too small). N is maximum at intermediate ∆T.  If ∆T >> ∆Tc , N is small or negligible (Diffusion becomes too slow). 26
  • 27. Real homogeneous nucleation β precipitate is not always spherical.  The most effective way of minimizing ∆G* is to form nuclei with the smallest total interfacial energy by  Form the same orientation relationship with the matrix  Have coherent interfaces  Example is formation of metastable GP zones in the Al-Cu alloys. 27
  • 28. Al-Cu alloys  The equilibrium consists of two solid phases : α4, θ  Precipitate process α → α1 + GP Zone → α2 + θ” → α3 + θ’ → α4 + θ 28
  • 29. Heterogeneous nucleation of β  Usually precipitate in matrix α  Nucleation sites of nonequilibrium defects  Excess vacancies Nucleus creations  Dislocations decrease some free  Grain boundaries energy with an amount  Stacking faults of ∆Gd  Inclusions Therefore, help reducing  Free surfaces activation energy barrier 29
  • 30. Heterogeneous nucleation of β  ∆Ghet = ∆Ghom – ∆Gd  ∆Ghet = (–V∆GV) + Aγ + V∆GS – ∆Gd 30
  • 31. Heterogeneous nucleation of β  At α/α grain boundary  Assumption : no misfit strain energy at a α/β interface  Optimum embryo shape for nucleation is when total interfacial free energy is minimized. 2 spherical caps  At the precipitate ∆Gd = Aααγαα r* = 2γαβ/ ∆GV 31
  • 32. Heterogeneous nucleation of β  Activationenergy barrier ∆G*het/∆G *hom = ∆V*het/∆V *hom = S(θ)  S(θ)is a shape factor S(θ) = ½ (2 + cosθ) (1 – cosθ)2 1.0 ∆ G*het /∆ G*hom = S(θ) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 cos θ 32
  • 33. Heterogeneous nucleation of β  ∆G*het/∆G *hom = ∆V*het/∆V *hom = S(θ)  ∆G* and ∆V*het can be reduced further by het nucleation on  Grain edge  Grain corner 1.0 Grain boundaries ∆ G*het /∆ G*hom = S(θ) Grain edges 0.8 Grain corners 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 cos θ 0.8 1.0 33
  • 34. Heterogeneous nucleation of β  When matrix and precipitate are compatible and allow formation of lower energy coherent facets, nucleus  Will form whenever possible  Will have an orientation relationship with matrix 34
  • 35. Interface 35
  • 36. Heterogeneous nucleation of β  Heterogeneous nucleation rate Nhet = ωC1 exp(–∆Gm/kT) exp(–∆G*/kT) where C1 is concentration of heterogeneous nucleation sites per unit volume.  The rates can be obtained at very small driving forces. 36
  • 37. Heterogeneous nucleation of β  Heterogeneous nucleation rate Nhet = ωC1 exp(–∆Gm/kT) exp(–∆G*/kT)  Homogeneous nucleation rate Nhom = ωCo exp(–∆Gm/kT) exp(–∆G*/kT)  Differences in ω and ∆Gm are not significant Nhet/Nhom = C1/Co exp{(∆G*hom–∆G*het)/kT} where C1/Co is a ratio between the boundary thickness δ and the grain size D 37
  • 38. Heterogeneous nucleation of β Nhet/Nhom = C1/Co exp{(∆G*hom–∆G*het)/kT}  Nucleation at grain boundary C1/Co C1/Co = δ/D = 10-5  Nucleation at grain edge C1/Co = (δ/D)2 = 10-10  Nucleation at grain corner C1/Co = (δ/D)3 = 10-15 δ = 0.5 nm D = 50 µm 38
  • 39. CuAl2 precipitates in Al grains and at grain boundaries ASM Handbook, Vol. 9 39
  • 40. Growth of precipitate  Solutes must migrate from deep within the parent phase.  Solute from precipitate to precipitate/parent interfaces  Long-range diffusion controlled  Time-dependent velocity  Interface controlled  Constant velocity 40
  • 41. Growth of precipitate  Nuclei will grow on  Direction of smallest nucleation barrier  Smallest critical volume  Minimum total interfacial free energy (in the case of strain-free) 41
  • 42. Growth of precipitate  Ifnuclei are enclosed by a combination of coherent and semicoherent facets,  Incoherent interface will have higher mobility, so the interface can advance faster. 42
  • 43. Growth of planar incoherent interfaces  Found at grain boundaries  Depletion of solute in α from Co to Ce  Form β slab precipitate  Solute concentration is Cβ  Grow from zero thickness at rate of v 43
  • 44. Growth of planar incoherent interfaces β slab advances dx of a unit area on i/c  Volume of β material (1·dx) must be converted from α (Ce) to β (Cβ)  Materials required per unit area = 1·dx (Cβ – Ce)  Solute B atoms migrate = D (dC/dx)i/c dt 44 where D is interdiff. coef. = XBDA + XADB
  • 45. Growth of planar incoherent interfaces  Materials advancing= Solute atom migration 1·dx (Cβ – Ce) = D (dC/dx)i/c dt v = dx/dt = [D/(Cβ – Ce)] (dC/dx)i/c  Approximation (dC/dx)i/c using “conservation of solute” α Area = β Area ½ L ∆Co = (Cβ – Co) x 45
  • 46. Growth of planar incoherent interfaces ½ L ∆Co = (Cβ – Co) x ∆Co/L = (∆Co)2/{2 x (Cβ – Co)} ∆Co/L ≈ (dC/dx)i/c (dC/dx)i/c = (∆Co)2/{2 x (Cβ – Co)} v = dx/dt = [D/(Cβ – Ce)] (dC/dx)i/c 46 = [D/(C – C )] (∆C ) /{2 x (C – C )} 2
  • 47. Growth of planar incoherent interfaces v = dx/dt = D(∆Co)2/{2 x (Cβ – Ce) (Cβ – Co)}  Assumption  Cβ – Ce ≈ C β – Co  Mole fraction : ∆X = ∆C dx/dt = D(∆Xo)2/{2 x (Xβ – Xe)2} x dx = D(∆Xo)2/{2 x (Xβ – Xe)2} dt x2 = Dt(∆Xo)2/(Xβ – Xe)2 x = ∆Xo/(Xβ – Xe) √(Dt) → precipitate thickening 47
  • 48. Growth of planar incoherent interfaces  Precipitatethickening x = ∆Xo/(Xβ – Xe) √(Dt) x ∝ √(Dt) v = dx/dt v = ∆Xo/2(Xβ – Xe) √(D/t)  Supersaturation ∆Xo before precipitation ∆Xo = Xo – Xe 48
  • 49. Growth of planar incoherent interfaces x = ∆Xo/(Xβ – Xe) √(Dt) v = ∆Xo/2(Xβ – Xe) √(D/t) ∆Xo = Xo – Xe  Growth rate is low when  Small ∆T → small ∆X  Large ∆ T → small diffusion 49
  • 50. A sink for solute  Grain boundaries can act as a collector plate of a sink for solute.  Volume diffusion of solute to grain boundary  Diffusion along the grain boundaries  Diffusion along the α/β interfaces 50
  • 51. End of precipitate growth  Precipitates stop advancing/growing when the matrix composition reaches Xe everywhere – there are no longer excess solute supply for precipitation. 51
  • 52. Growth of plates and needles β precipitates have a constant thickness and a cylindrically curved incoherent edge of radius r  Growth governed by volume diffusion- controlled process 52
  • 53. Growth of plates and needles  Concentration gradient to drive diffusion through the edge is ∆C/L where L = kr, and k is a constant.  v = D∆C/{kr(Cβ – Cr)} = D∆X/{kr(Xβ – Xr)} where ∆X = Xo – Xr = ∆Xo(1-r*/r) and ∆Xo = Xo – Xe  v = D ∆Xo (1-r*/r) / {kr (Xβ – Xr)}  For spherical tip, X = X (1+2γV /RTr) r e m  For cylindrical tip, X = X (1+γV /RTr) 53 r e m
  • 54. Growth of plates and needles  For a constant thickness,  Lengthening rate v is constant with time; therefore, x ∝ t.  Lengthening rate v is varied with D and r. 54
  • 55. Plate-like precipitate  Observed by a ledge mechanism  Broad faces are semicoherent  Limit migration of atoms  Atoms will migrate and attach at the ledges  Their interfaces are incoherent.  Growth requires lateral motion of ledges achieved by diffusion v = uh/λ = D∆Xo/{kλ(Xβ – Xe)} = constant 55
  • 56. Plate-like precipitate  Widmanstätten precipitation  Plates lie along {111} matrix planes. ASM Handbook 56
  • 57. Spinodal structure  Homogenous precipitates of 2-phase mixtures resulting from a phase separation that occurs under certain conditions of temperature and composition 57
  • 58. Spinodal structure  Xois solution treated at To  Then, aged at TA α tends to separate into 2- o phase mixture  Initially, G o  Xo becomes unstable and try to decreases its total free energy by producing small fluctuations in composition resulting in A-rich and B-rich regions 58
  • 59. Spinodal structure  Xo is unstable and try to decreases its total free energy  Up-hill diffusion  Down-hill diffusion until equilibrium phases of α1 and α2 are reached at compositions of X1 and X2 59
  • 60. Spinodal structure  α1 and α2 phase mixture occurs by continuous growth of initially small amplitude fluctuations  Controlled by atomic migration and diffusion 60
  • 61. Spinodal structure  Xo will decay with time ∆X = ∆Xo exp(–t/τ) where τ is a relaxing time τ = λ2/(4π2D) where λ is wavelength of fluctuation and D is diffusion coefficient. 61
  • 62. Spinodal structure  TEM micrographs  2.5 – 10 nm in metallic system  Contrast comes mainly from structure factor differences Fe-28.5 wt.% Cr-10.6 wt.% Co  Aged at 600°C 4 h Cu-33.5 at.% Ni-15 at.% Fe  Aged at 775°C 15 min, λ ≈ 25 nm ASM Handbook 62
  • 63. Cellular precipitate  Precipitation of a second phase from a supersaturated solid solution  May occur through a reaction involving the formation of colonies  Consisting of a 2-phase mixture  That grow and consume the matrix.  The transformation is very similar to the eutectoid reaction. 63
  • 64. Cellular precipitate  Morphology  Alternating lamellae of precipitate phase and depleted matrix  Duplex cells  Cooperative growth of 2 phases  Originate from matrix grain boundaries 64
  • 65. Cellular precipitate  Cellular fronts advance into the supersaturated matrix and spatially partitions the structure into transformed and untransformed regions.  Composition and orientation of α’ phase changes discontinuously from Cα’ to Cα for α phase colony. 65
  • 66. Cellular precipitate  Solutes to form β phase colony diffuse from the neighboring α colonies with a distance d = So/2  Solution redistribution occurs by diffusion along the interface at the composition distribution region  Assumed  Solute distribution is linear 66
  • 67. Cellular precipitate  Amount of solute rejected from α’ to form β plates with the rate of dm/dt dm/dt = Jdiff A = R(Cβ – Cα’) where R is the interface velocity Jdiff = DB(∂C/∂x) and A = λ (2 sides) = 2λ dm/dt = DB(∂C/∂x) 2λ = R(Cβ – Cα’) DB{(Cα’ – Cα)/d} 2λ = R(Cβ – Cα’) R = {2 DB λ/d} {(Cα’ – Cα)/(Cβ – Cα’)} where d = (So – Sβ)/2, for small distance 67 = SoSβ/2 d
  • 68. Cellular precipitate  Cellularor discontinuous precipitation growing out uniformly from the grain boundaries  Fe-24.8Zn alloy  Aged at 600°C 6 min (W.C. Leslie) 68