This document provides an overview of programme evaluation (PE) as presented by Cosme Zinsou Odjo. It defines PE as an ongoing process that examines the interaction of theory and practice in vocational education and training (VET) programmes. PE has three perspectives - planning, implementation, and conclusion/diffusion. Effective PE requires describing the subject, design, actors, and criteria. The main purposes of PE are legitimation, broadening knowledge, and promoting dialogue. PE should utilize empirical research methods and be integrated into ongoing project activities in a formative way. The document also discusses personal views on improving PE by making it more collective, relevant, and considering different evaluators, tools, and criteria.

1. REVIEW OF
PROGRAMME EVALUATION (PE)
BY LUDGER DEITMER
FROM
THE HANDBOOK OF TVET AND TRAINING RESEARCH
PRESENTED BY
Cosme Zinsou Odjo
MTVET-1st Semester

2. OUTLINE
Introduction
Definition of PE
Perspectives of PE
The design criteria for PE
Purposes of PE
Methodological development of the instruments for PE
Extending the practice of PE
PE concept of programme “new learning strategies in dual VE”
Personal standpoint
Conclusion

3. INTRODUCTION
Every programme: main objective and goals
Programme Evaluation (PE) used
make more effective reform processes in VET
increase the output and
endure the effectiveness of programme.

4. DEFINITION OF PE
Generally evaluation: ongoing process
Evaluation: judge the value of a product, a process or a
programme
In VET, PE: process which examines the interaction of
theory and practice

5. PERSPESCTICVES OF PE
PE has three general perspectives:
Planning: examine personal and financial resources
Implementation: optimization function
Conclusion and diffusion: programme effects examined

6. DESIGN OF CRITERIA FOR PE
Four general important elements for PE:
Description of the evaluation subjects
Evaluation design
Identification of evaluation actors
Definition of evaluation criteria

7. PURPOSES OF PE
Three main purposes:
Evaluation for legitimation purposes
Evaluation to broaden the knowledge
Evaluation for development and promoting dialogue

8. METHODOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE
INSTRUMENTS FOR PE
Application of empirical social research
methods/approaches
Practice research or research action with professional
work and observance of scientific principles

9. EXTENDING THE PRACTICE OF PE
PE as a medium for self-organised learning
Not only objectivity, reliability, and validity, but also
communication, intervention, transparency and
relevance as quality criteria

10. PE CONCEPT OF PROGRAMME “NEW LEARNING
STRATEGIES IN DUAL VE”
“New Learning Strategies”: main focus
Pilot projects contribution to the programme goals
PE
integrated in the ongoing activities at project level
designed to be formative.

11. PERSONAL STANDPOINT
According to my country belief, I realize that the programme
evaluation is not conducted in the same
Perform a collective evaluation, make it more relevant
Differences are about:
Evaluators:
Evaluation tools
Evaluation criteria

12. EVALUATORS
Programme designers
Programme managers
Representatives of funding agencies
Local or national government officials and
Consultants.

13. EVALUATION TOOLS
Questionnaires
Survey
Individual or collective interview,
Observation grid

14. EVALUATION CRITERIA
Effectiveness
Efficiency
Relevance
Impact
Sustainability
Progressivity

15. CONCLUSION
Evaluation: tool for improvement and for better management
and learning
Everything evaluated even our life

16. THANK YOU SO MUCH…
Any suggestion, question and contribution…?