SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 4
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Particulate Characterization for Pharmaceutical Applications
by Yuriy Ososkov, Ph.D., P.Eng.
Senior Materials Scientist – Physical Characterization, Exova
Canada Inc., Materials Sciences 2395 Speakman Drive,
Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 1B3, Canada
The concepts of particle engineering and dosage form design have become dominant
themes in pharmaceutical manufacturing. This trend is not simply a reflection of the
development of new, more sophisticated manufacturing methods of particles or
dispersed systems but also recognition of the importance of quality control even in
more traditional manufacturing processes. For drug substances intended for use in
solid or suspension drug product, PSD can have a significant effect on dissolution
rates, bioavailability, and/or stability.
Crystallization is the main separation and purification step for the manufacturing of drug
substances. The PSD obtained during crystallization is influenced by a combination of
various mechanisms that occur during crystallization, such as nucleation, growth,
aggregation, attrition, breakage, etc. Control of PSD during crystallization is critical to
achieving the desired product properties. When the particle size cannot be consistently
controlled during crystallization to meet the desired specifications, an extra processing
step such as dry milling is required. The PSD obtained during the crystallization step
affects the efficiency of downstream operations such as filtration, drying, formulating,
and product effectiveness such as bioavailability and shelf life. Thus, the control of
PSD is an important objective during the operation of crystallization process.
At the manufacturing stage, PSD has a critical effect on the content uniformity of solid
dosage forms, where poor content uniformity would result if a drug powder were not
dispersed evenly throughout a mixture with excipients. A leading cause of poor content
uniformity is a mismatch of drug and excipient particle size and density leading to
segregation during sampling and manufacture, especially for low drug to excipient ratio
blends.
However, the diversity of particle treatments, methods of particle size distribution (PSD)
analysis, expression and interpretation of data, and process applications results in
complicated and sometimes confusing criteria for selection, adoption, or relevance of
the available techniques.
Essentially all automated determinations of particle size are obtained indirectly from
direct measurements of some parameter other than the complete geometry. These
parameters are associated with a physical phenomenon in which the particle is
involved. The parameter being directly measured is related to particle geometry by
some law, theory or model describing the physical phenomenon. If the particles under
test are of irregular shape, then the most probable outcome is that the results will
differ. Two particles that, for example, settle with the same velocity (therefore, are the
same Stokes size) can scatter light differently (therefore, have different Mie sizes).
Two particles that pass through the same screen mesh have the same sieve size, but
may have very different volumetric size as determined by electrozone sensing.
The apparent simplicity of particle size analysis is deceptive. Particle sizing is a poorly
posed problem. As a matter of fact, only objects of simple geometry, namely spheres,
can be unambiguously described by a single numerical descriptor. The size of
irregularly shaped particles is typically expressed in terms of equivalent spherical
diameters. However, different particle-sizing instruments use various algorithms based
on surface area, volume, or linear dimension to calculate equivalent spherical
diameters. The difficulties encountered when relating empirical information derived
using different methods would not exist if the component particles were spherical. In
the real world of pharmaceutics, particles are rarely (if ever) spherical, and
consequently it is important to understand the importance of particle shape and
morphology.
Often, manufacturers producing a particulate product need to identify and understand
the differences between batches, either for product development reasons or for quality
control purposes. For some applications particle size analysis generates enough data
for sample differences to be fully rationalized, but for applications where samples are
very close in size, measurement of subtle variations in shape may be necessary. For
instance, the PSD for two materials could be the same, but they could be clearly not
identical under the microscope. It is likely that these two materials would behave
differently during processing, or in their final product form. For example, their flow and
abrasion characteristics would be dramatically different. Therefore, particle size data
alone would not allow differentiation between them. As the result, the measurement
and expression of particle size is intimately bound with the shape and morphology of
the constituent units that make up the ensemble of particles.
Physical Characterization group at Exova Canada in Mississauga is equipped with
variety of instrumentation for complete characterization of particulate for
pharmaceutical applications, such as laser diffraction, liquid particulate counter,
specific surface area (BET), helium pycnometry, optical and electron scanning
microscopy combined with digital image analysis software.
Our technical team has wide experience in development and validation of fine particle
methodologies, and this experience and knowledge gives Exova customers a head
start when considering analytical approaches to new applications.
To inquire about our capabilities please contact . . .

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

A Systematic Approach to Overcome the Matrix Effect during LC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis
A Systematic Approach to Overcome the Matrix Effect during LC-ESI-MS/MS AnalysisA Systematic Approach to Overcome the Matrix Effect during LC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis
A Systematic Approach to Overcome the Matrix Effect during LC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis
Bhaswat Chakraborty
 
Matrix Effects In Metabolic Profiling Using Gc Lc Coupled Mass Spectrometers
Matrix Effects In Metabolic Profiling Using Gc Lc Coupled Mass SpectrometersMatrix Effects In Metabolic Profiling Using Gc Lc Coupled Mass Spectrometers
Matrix Effects In Metabolic Profiling Using Gc Lc Coupled Mass Spectrometers
beneshjoseph
 

Was ist angesagt? (14)

Rational drug design
Rational drug designRational drug design
Rational drug design
 
Cadd (Computer-Aided Drug Designing)
Cadd (Computer-Aided Drug Designing)Cadd (Computer-Aided Drug Designing)
Cadd (Computer-Aided Drug Designing)
 
pharmacophore mapping
pharmacophore mapping pharmacophore mapping
pharmacophore mapping
 
Drug design
Drug designDrug design
Drug design
 
A Systematic Approach to Overcome the Matrix Effect during LC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis
A Systematic Approach to Overcome the Matrix Effect during LC-ESI-MS/MS AnalysisA Systematic Approach to Overcome the Matrix Effect during LC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis
A Systematic Approach to Overcome the Matrix Effect during LC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis
 
EJPS-S-16-00784
EJPS-S-16-00784EJPS-S-16-00784
EJPS-S-16-00784
 
Computer aided drug design | Bioinformatics
Computer aided drug design | BioinformaticsComputer aided drug design | Bioinformatics
Computer aided drug design | Bioinformatics
 
Matrix Effects In Metabolic Profiling Using Gc Lc Coupled Mass Spectrometers
Matrix Effects In Metabolic Profiling Using Gc Lc Coupled Mass SpectrometersMatrix Effects In Metabolic Profiling Using Gc Lc Coupled Mass Spectrometers
Matrix Effects In Metabolic Profiling Using Gc Lc Coupled Mass Spectrometers
 
Laser toner cartridge test page
Laser toner cartridge test pageLaser toner cartridge test page
Laser toner cartridge test page
 
Computer Aided Drug Design
Computer Aided Drug DesignComputer Aided Drug Design
Computer Aided Drug Design
 
Computer aided drug design
Computer aided drug designComputer aided drug design
Computer aided drug design
 
Role of computer in the discovery of drugs
Role of computer in the discovery of drugsRole of computer in the discovery of drugs
Role of computer in the discovery of drugs
 
Structure based drug designing
Structure based drug designingStructure based drug designing
Structure based drug designing
 
Pharmacophore mapping in Drug Development
Pharmacophore mapping in Drug DevelopmentPharmacophore mapping in Drug Development
Pharmacophore mapping in Drug Development
 

Andere mochten auch

Mape Engineering Inc Powerpoint
Mape Engineering Inc  PowerpointMape Engineering Inc  Powerpoint
Mape Engineering Inc Powerpoint
Iraida Andrade
 
AW Certificates 2015
AW Certificates 2015AW Certificates 2015
AW Certificates 2015
Andrew Webb
 
Rivin Oleg JDE Resume
Rivin Oleg JDE ResumeRivin Oleg JDE Resume
Rivin Oleg JDE Resume
Oleg Rivin
 
magazinefinal_andria_manuel
magazinefinal_andria_manuelmagazinefinal_andria_manuel
magazinefinal_andria_manuel
Andria Manuel
 

Andere mochten auch (19)

Beyoncé
BeyoncéBeyoncé
Beyoncé
 
EI_Annual Report_2015
EI_Annual Report_2015EI_Annual Report_2015
EI_Annual Report_2015
 
Baby animals
Baby animalsBaby animals
Baby animals
 
Pitch expensas online
Pitch expensas onlinePitch expensas online
Pitch expensas online
 
Presentation1s
Presentation1sPresentation1s
Presentation1s
 
моя робота!!!
моя робота!!!моя робота!!!
моя робота!!!
 
Taunya's ppt
Taunya's pptTaunya's ppt
Taunya's ppt
 
Mape Engineering Inc Powerpoint
Mape Engineering Inc  PowerpointMape Engineering Inc  Powerpoint
Mape Engineering Inc Powerpoint
 
AW Certificates 2015
AW Certificates 2015AW Certificates 2015
AW Certificates 2015
 
Amrop Mobile Payments
Amrop Mobile PaymentsAmrop Mobile Payments
Amrop Mobile Payments
 
green bricks vashi
green bricks vashigreen bricks vashi
green bricks vashi
 
Projekt badawczy Rudzik
Projekt badawczy RudzikProjekt badawczy Rudzik
Projekt badawczy Rudzik
 
Rivin Oleg JDE Resume
Rivin Oleg JDE ResumeRivin Oleg JDE Resume
Rivin Oleg JDE Resume
 
Klasa Ia -prezentacja
Klasa Ia -prezentacjaKlasa Ia -prezentacja
Klasa Ia -prezentacja
 
Untitled Presentation
Untitled PresentationUntitled Presentation
Untitled Presentation
 
ACTIVIDADES DE INDUCCION
 ACTIVIDADES DE INDUCCION ACTIVIDADES DE INDUCCION
ACTIVIDADES DE INDUCCION
 
magazinefinal_andria_manuel
magazinefinal_andria_manuelmagazinefinal_andria_manuel
magazinefinal_andria_manuel
 
Abengoa Inabensa - Manufacturing
Abengoa Inabensa - ManufacturingAbengoa Inabensa - Manufacturing
Abengoa Inabensa - Manufacturing
 
Alur pendaftaran ppdb
Alur pendaftaran ppdbAlur pendaftaran ppdb
Alur pendaftaran ppdb
 

Ähnlich wie psdarticle2014

Medimmune_022108
Medimmune_022108Medimmune_022108
Medimmune_022108
WISBIOMED
 
In pharmaceutical engineering.docx project
In pharmaceutical engineering.docx projectIn pharmaceutical engineering.docx project
In pharmaceutical engineering.docx project
ssuser2b28e8
 
Pda Visual Inspection 2009 Aldrich
Pda Visual Inspection 2009 AldrichPda Visual Inspection 2009 Aldrich
Pda Visual Inspection 2009 Aldrich
D Scott Aldrich
 
Micromeritics unit 4 physical pharmaceutics sem.4 b.pharm
Micromeritics unit 4 physical pharmaceutics  sem.4 b.pharmMicromeritics unit 4 physical pharmaceutics  sem.4 b.pharm
Micromeritics unit 4 physical pharmaceutics sem.4 b.pharm
Darshanpatel609504
 

Ähnlich wie psdarticle2014 (20)

Structure elucidation whitepaper.docx
Structure elucidation whitepaper.docxStructure elucidation whitepaper.docx
Structure elucidation whitepaper.docx
 
Preformulation and physicochemical property of the drug
Preformulation and physicochemical property of the drugPreformulation and physicochemical property of the drug
Preformulation and physicochemical property of the drug
 
Cadd
CaddCadd
Cadd
 
Bioinformatics role in Pharmaceutical industries
Bioinformatics role in Pharmaceutical industriesBioinformatics role in Pharmaceutical industries
Bioinformatics role in Pharmaceutical industries
 
Genomics & Proteomics Based Drug Discovery
Genomics & Proteomics Based Drug DiscoveryGenomics & Proteomics Based Drug Discovery
Genomics & Proteomics Based Drug Discovery
 
Preformulation unit i uips (2)
Preformulation unit i uips (2)Preformulation unit i uips (2)
Preformulation unit i uips (2)
 
Particle Characterization Guide.docx
Particle Characterization Guide.docxParticle Characterization Guide.docx
Particle Characterization Guide.docx
 
Medimmune_022108
Medimmune_022108Medimmune_022108
Medimmune_022108
 
1. preformulation
1. preformulation1. preformulation
1. preformulation
 
Quantitative mass spec imaging
Quantitative mass spec imagingQuantitative mass spec imaging
Quantitative mass spec imaging
 
In pharmaceutical engineering.docx project
In pharmaceutical engineering.docx projectIn pharmaceutical engineering.docx project
In pharmaceutical engineering.docx project
 
1501 Refocus metabolomics
1501 Refocus metabolomics1501 Refocus metabolomics
1501 Refocus metabolomics
 
IRJET- Retinal Structure Segmentation using Adaptive Fuzzy Thresholding
IRJET- Retinal Structure Segmentation using Adaptive Fuzzy ThresholdingIRJET- Retinal Structure Segmentation using Adaptive Fuzzy Thresholding
IRJET- Retinal Structure Segmentation using Adaptive Fuzzy Thresholding
 
Mass Spectrometry Based Proteomic Analysis
Mass Spectrometry Based Proteomic Analysis Mass Spectrometry Based Proteomic Analysis
Mass Spectrometry Based Proteomic Analysis
 
Proteomics accelerates the drug discovery process
Proteomics accelerates the drug discovery processProteomics accelerates the drug discovery process
Proteomics accelerates the drug discovery process
 
Proteomics, A Major New Technology for Drug Discovery
Proteomics, A Major New Technology for Drug DiscoveryProteomics, A Major New Technology for Drug Discovery
Proteomics, A Major New Technology for Drug Discovery
 
Proteomics and pharmacoproteomics
Proteomics and pharmacoproteomicsProteomics and pharmacoproteomics
Proteomics and pharmacoproteomics
 
Pda Visual Inspection 2009 Aldrich
Pda Visual Inspection 2009 AldrichPda Visual Inspection 2009 Aldrich
Pda Visual Inspection 2009 Aldrich
 
Unit IV MICROMERITICS
Unit IV MICROMERITICSUnit IV MICROMERITICS
Unit IV MICROMERITICS
 
Micromeritics unit 4 physical pharmaceutics sem.4 b.pharm
Micromeritics unit 4 physical pharmaceutics  sem.4 b.pharmMicromeritics unit 4 physical pharmaceutics  sem.4 b.pharm
Micromeritics unit 4 physical pharmaceutics sem.4 b.pharm
 

psdarticle2014

  • 1. Particulate Characterization for Pharmaceutical Applications by Yuriy Ososkov, Ph.D., P.Eng. Senior Materials Scientist – Physical Characterization, Exova Canada Inc., Materials Sciences 2395 Speakman Drive, Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 1B3, Canada The concepts of particle engineering and dosage form design have become dominant themes in pharmaceutical manufacturing. This trend is not simply a reflection of the development of new, more sophisticated manufacturing methods of particles or dispersed systems but also recognition of the importance of quality control even in more traditional manufacturing processes. For drug substances intended for use in solid or suspension drug product, PSD can have a significant effect on dissolution rates, bioavailability, and/or stability. Crystallization is the main separation and purification step for the manufacturing of drug substances. The PSD obtained during crystallization is influenced by a combination of various mechanisms that occur during crystallization, such as nucleation, growth, aggregation, attrition, breakage, etc. Control of PSD during crystallization is critical to achieving the desired product properties. When the particle size cannot be consistently controlled during crystallization to meet the desired specifications, an extra processing step such as dry milling is required. The PSD obtained during the crystallization step
  • 2. affects the efficiency of downstream operations such as filtration, drying, formulating, and product effectiveness such as bioavailability and shelf life. Thus, the control of PSD is an important objective during the operation of crystallization process. At the manufacturing stage, PSD has a critical effect on the content uniformity of solid dosage forms, where poor content uniformity would result if a drug powder were not dispersed evenly throughout a mixture with excipients. A leading cause of poor content uniformity is a mismatch of drug and excipient particle size and density leading to segregation during sampling and manufacture, especially for low drug to excipient ratio blends. However, the diversity of particle treatments, methods of particle size distribution (PSD) analysis, expression and interpretation of data, and process applications results in complicated and sometimes confusing criteria for selection, adoption, or relevance of the available techniques. Essentially all automated determinations of particle size are obtained indirectly from direct measurements of some parameter other than the complete geometry. These parameters are associated with a physical phenomenon in which the particle is involved. The parameter being directly measured is related to particle geometry by some law, theory or model describing the physical phenomenon. If the particles under test are of irregular shape, then the most probable outcome is that the results will differ. Two particles that, for example, settle with the same velocity (therefore, are the
  • 3. same Stokes size) can scatter light differently (therefore, have different Mie sizes). Two particles that pass through the same screen mesh have the same sieve size, but may have very different volumetric size as determined by electrozone sensing. The apparent simplicity of particle size analysis is deceptive. Particle sizing is a poorly posed problem. As a matter of fact, only objects of simple geometry, namely spheres, can be unambiguously described by a single numerical descriptor. The size of irregularly shaped particles is typically expressed in terms of equivalent spherical diameters. However, different particle-sizing instruments use various algorithms based on surface area, volume, or linear dimension to calculate equivalent spherical diameters. The difficulties encountered when relating empirical information derived using different methods would not exist if the component particles were spherical. In the real world of pharmaceutics, particles are rarely (if ever) spherical, and consequently it is important to understand the importance of particle shape and morphology. Often, manufacturers producing a particulate product need to identify and understand the differences between batches, either for product development reasons or for quality control purposes. For some applications particle size analysis generates enough data for sample differences to be fully rationalized, but for applications where samples are very close in size, measurement of subtle variations in shape may be necessary. For instance, the PSD for two materials could be the same, but they could be clearly not identical under the microscope. It is likely that these two materials would behave
  • 4. differently during processing, or in their final product form. For example, their flow and abrasion characteristics would be dramatically different. Therefore, particle size data alone would not allow differentiation between them. As the result, the measurement and expression of particle size is intimately bound with the shape and morphology of the constituent units that make up the ensemble of particles. Physical Characterization group at Exova Canada in Mississauga is equipped with variety of instrumentation for complete characterization of particulate for pharmaceutical applications, such as laser diffraction, liquid particulate counter, specific surface area (BET), helium pycnometry, optical and electron scanning microscopy combined with digital image analysis software. Our technical team has wide experience in development and validation of fine particle methodologies, and this experience and knowledge gives Exova customers a head start when considering analytical approaches to new applications. To inquire about our capabilities please contact . . .