This document provides an overview of open access and institutional repositories in Japan. It discusses the increasing number of open access papers by Japanese researchers and growth of institutional repositories in Japan supported by the National Institute of Informatics. It also outlines recent momentum and policies toward open science in Japan, including funder and institutional open access policies and guidelines on research integrity and data management. Institutional repositories are playing a role in open science by tackling research data, and library communities are conducting projects related to repository software, metadata standards, and training for research data management.
20160303_Brief Overview of OA and IRs in Japan_Purdue Mt
1. Brief Overview of Open
Access and Institutional
Repositories in Japan
Yui Nishizono
(Librarian, Kagoshima University Library)
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
1
2. Agenda
1. Brief Overview of Open Access and Institutional
Repositories in Japan
2. Momentum of Open Science in Japan
(for later discussion)
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
2
3. OA publishing (1)
• Number of open
access papers by
Japanese researchers
are increasing.
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
3
• Publishing in pure OA journals are increasing in
Japanese researchers. However, their priority in
publishing seems not necessarily to be OA.
Source: http://hdl.handle.net/11035/2964
* Statistics from WoS. Includes articles
without paying APC.
Numberofarticles
Rates
Published year
Total
number of
articles by
Japanese
researchers
Number of
OA articles
Rates of
OA articles
4. OA publishing (2)
• EJ Platform “J-Stage”
• includes over 1,900 titles published from ca.
1,000 academic societies in Japan
• nearly 90% of them are open access
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
4
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse
Source: JST
http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/gijyutu/gijyutu4/031/shiryo/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2014/12/24
/1354066_02.pdf#page=10
5. Development of Institutional
Repositories in Japan
• With support from National Institute of Informatics (NII), universities in Japan
have developed institutional repositories.
• Under NII IR program (FY 2004-2012), various collaborative projects between NII
and selected universities were carried out such as: implementation of IR
software; introduction and operation of IR; construction and operation of IR;
innovative research and development; and so on…
*One of those projects is support for the development of IR communities, such
as DRF.
• Standard metadata format “junii2”
http://www.nii.ac.jp/irp/archive/system/junii2.html (The latest version is
available only in Japanese.)
• A portal “JAIRO” to IRs, similar to OAIster, based on IRDB (Institutional
Repositories DataBase)
• NII launched a shared repository service “JAIRO Cloud” as a SaaS in April 2012
toward further expansion.
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
5
6. Number of IRs in Japan
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
6
Figure source: https://www.nii.ac.jp/irp/en/archive/statistic/irp_2015_statistic.html
NII IR Program (FY 2004 - FY 2012)
JAIRO Cloud, shared repository service by NII, has started in Apr 2012
Percentage of
Japanese University
implemented IRs
(FY 2013):
47.9%
Source: MEXT
Total number of
records in IRs in
Japan:
2,203,027
including Full Text:
1,666,505
(As of Feb 29, 2016)
Source: NII IRDB
Contents Analysis
7. March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
7
Source: http://irdb.nii.ac.jp/analysis/index_e.php (As of Feb 29, 2016)
252,095(15.1%)
78,848 (4.7%)
888,676(53.3%)
30,390 (1.8%)
6,902 (0.4%)
20,756 (1.2%)
29,514 (1.8%)
52,409 (3.1%)
51,221 (3.1%)
403 (0.0%)
4,182 (0.3%)
53,534 (3.2%)
30 (0.0%)
197,545(11.9%)
8. An Aspect of Distribution System of
Academic Information produced in Japan
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
8
Univs
NDL
(National Diet Library)
NII
IRDB
CiNii for
research data?NACSIS
-CAT/ILL
Catalog
Union catalog of Univ libs
JAIRO
CiNii
Dissertations
CiNii
Books
NII-ELS
JST
J-Stage
(EJ Platform)
CiNii
Articles
Japanese
Periodicals
Index
IRs
Catalogs
Academic
Societies
Commercial
Publishers
metadata
publish
Database of
17 million
articles
0.6 million
dissertations
9. OA policy adoption (1)
• A main approach to IR development has started to
change: from grass-roots approach by library
community to top-down approach
• Government OA policy
• MEXT mandated open access to PhD theses through
IRs in March 2013.
• Cabinet Office issued a report in March 2015,
presenting the guiding principles for promotion of
open science in Japan. It requires providing public
access to the results of publicly funded research,
including papers and research data.
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
9
MEXT: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
10. OA policy adoption (2)
• Funder’s OA policy
• JST issued a policy in Apr 2013 which recommends OA
through IR or OA journals on J-Stage (EJ platform by JST).
• JSPS/MEXT KAKENHI (Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research)
• From 2015 it recommends OA for funded research
results.
• Also it has the category of “Grant-in-Aid for Publication
of Scientific Research Results”, promoting the public
dissemination of research results, such as publishing OA
journals by academic societies.
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
10
11. OA policy adoption (3)
• Institution’s OA policy (Green OA policy)
OA policy adoption is now increasingly spreading.
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
11
• Hokkaido Univ. (2007)
• Okayama Univ. (2011)
• JAIST (2008)
• NITECH (2012)
• Kyoto Univ. (2015)
• Univ. of Tsukuba (2015)
• International Research
Center for Japanese
Studies (2015)
• Kyushu Univ. (2016)
• Univ. of Tokushima (2016)
strongly recommended
partly mandate
articles deposit in principle
articles deposit in principle
12. A Strategy for Future Development of IR
• Reorganization of IR communities/initiatives has
just started.
JASPUL
IR
IR
IR
IR
IR
IR
“JAIRO Cloud”
User Community
JANUL JAPUL
Coordinating
Committee for Japanese
University Libraries
NII
Cooperation Promotion Council
(2010-)
UnivUnivUniv
Institutional
Repositories
Promotion
Committee
(2013-) *
Future
scholarly
information
systems
committee
(2012-)
Japan
Alliance of
University
Library
Consortia
for E-
Resources
JUSTICE
(2011-)
DRF (IR managers’
community. 2006-)
shared repository
Towards a Unified Initiative
157
337
53191 85
(Nr. of members)
* See: “Toward the Establishment of a System for Sharing Knowledge
Created at Universities” http://id.nii.ac.jp/1280/00000130/
12
13. Momentum of Open Science in Japan (1)
Tipping point:
March 30, 2015
The Expert Panel on Open Science, based on Global
Perspectives, Cabinet office, Government of Japan
“Promoting Open Science in Japan—Opening up a
new era for the advancement of science—”
http://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
13
14. March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
14
15. Momentum of Open Science in Japan (2)
Scholarly Information Committee in MEXT
September 11, 2015
“For the promotion of openness of academic information
(Interim Report)” (in Japanese only)
http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/gijyutu/gijyutu4/036/
houkoku/1362564.htm
Showing specific strategic measures
• for further promotion of OA to articles through IRs/OAJ
• for (i) acceleration and efficiency of research through
utilization of research data; (ii) preservation of and OA to
research data as evidence
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
15
MEXT: Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology
16. Do you use research data (excluding “supplementary
materials” to articles and government statistics) collected in
shared repositories or websites.
SCREAL Survey 2014
More than
once a
month,
263, 27%
Used in the
past, 393,
40%
Never
used, but
want to,
238, 24%
Never
used, and
don't want
to, 92, 9%
Humani es / Social Sciences
More than
once a
month,
384, 13%
Used in the
past, 999,
34%
Never used,
but want
to, 1048,
36%
Never used,
and don't
want to,
515, 17%
Natural Sciences
This slide is cited from: Yoshinori Sato. "Acceptance and Attitude of Japanese Researchers to Open Access“
http://www.screal.jp/FreJap_OA_2015/AgendaItems_20150128_final.html
16
17. What do you think about disclosing your own
research data on repositories or websites?
*Here “shared repositories” means subject/field-specific repositories, data archives,
and/or institutional repositories that are established to publish and preserve research
data on the Internet.
Already
disclosing,
642, 22%
Disclosed in
the past,
but not
now, 197,
7%
Never
disclosed,
but now
considering
, 912, 31%
Never
disclosed,
and never
will, 1,105,
37%
Other, 90,
3%
Natural Sciences
Already
disclosing,
309, 31%
Disclosed in
the past,
but not
now, 53,
6%
Never
disclosed,
but now
considering
, 336, 34%
Never
disclosed,
and never
will, 255,
26%
Other, 33,
3%
Humani es / Social Sciences
This slide is cited from: Yoshinori Sato. "Acceptance and Attitude of Japanese Researchers to Open Access“
http://www.screal.jp/FreJap_OA_2015/AgendaItems_20150128_final.html
17
18. Research Integrity (1)
August 26, 2014
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology (MEXT)
“Guidelines for Responding to Misconduct in Research”
http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/jinzai/fusei/1359618.ht
m
Research institutions have to draw up rules requiring
researchers to preserve research data for a set period
and to disclose the data as needed, and enforce the rules
properly and effectively.
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
18
19. Research Integrity (2)
March 6, 2015
Science Council of Japan
“Towards the Improvement of Integrity in Scientific Research” (in
Japanese only)
http://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-23-k150306.pdf
• Serves as a guide for research institutions to operate the MEXT’s
guidelines.
• Showing an example for preservation period of research data and
other resources supporting articles:
• documents, numerical data and images – 10 years
• test sample, laboratory equipment – 5 years
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
19
20. The Role of IRs and librarians in Open
Science
• Tackling research data in Institutional Repositories
as OA platform? (maybe only small data?)
• Examples of ongoing projects concerning IR and
RDM in library community:
•IRPC: Revision of IR metadata format more
appropriately for research data / Development of
RDM training tools / Case study of publishing
data journal / Rescue the ‘disappearing’ datasets
•DRF: Data interview (as reported later)
March 3, 2016
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management - Brief Overview of
Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan
20
Hinweis der Redaktion
==================================
Knowledge Sharing about University Data Management
14:00-17:00. March 3, 2016
@NII
==================================
14:00-14:15 (15min.) in English
I will give a short talk before discussion for sharing some information about the situation in Japan.
First, I will give an overview of Open Access and Institutional Repositories in Japan.
After that, I will give a brief introduction to the momentum of Open Science in Japan as the background of today’s meeting.
Regarding open access publishing, number of open access papers by Japanese researchers are increasing.
Publishing in open access journals are gradually increasing in Japanese researchers. However, their priority in publishing seems not necessarily to be open access.
Total number of academic societies in Japan is approximately 2,000. ( http://gakkai.jst.go.jp/gakkai/result )
Half of them are using “J-Stage” as their publishing platform. Most articles in J-Stage are open access.
Next is about institutional repositories.
With support from National Institute of Informatics (NII), universities in Japan have developed institutional repositories. Various collaborative projects between NII and selected universities were carried out.
Also we have standard metadata format “junii2”, a portal “JAIRO” to Institutional Repositories, and shared repository service “JAIRO Cloud”.
Now the total number of institutional repositories in Japan reached nearly 600.
Almost half of Japanese universities have their repositories.
This chart shows a breakdown of IR content by resource type. Some characteristics of Institutional Repository’s contents in Japan are that more than half are department bulletin papers deposited by not researchers but librarians, and that journal articles’ deposit rate is generally low. There has been very few green Open Access mandates in Japan for a long time, and academics' awareness of self-archiving seems to be still low.
There are some deposit of data or dataset, but almost is not active research data.
For your interest, by this slide, I tried to show you one aspect of distribution system of academic information produced in Japan.
NII offers some data integration services. In case of Institutional Repository, NII is harvesting metadata of contents deposited to each repository, and running a portal of those contents. In addition, NII manages metadata passing into other services according to its resource type, such as articles, theses, and maybe research data in the future.
We library community have taken a grass-roots approach to Institutional Repository development, and achieved a measure of success, such as quantitative increase of repositories and their contents. For further growth, the main approach to Institutional Repository development has started to change from grass-roots approach to top-down approach. Policy development among various stakeholders is going on.
The latest government Open Access policy is from Cabinet Office. Its report issued in last March presents the guiding principles for promotion of open science in Japan. It requires providing public access to the results of publicly funded research, including papers and research data.
Major funders in Japan are “Japan Science and Technology Agency” (JST) and “Japan Society for the Promotion of Science” (JSPS). As of now both of them have Open Access *recommend* policy. But they will strengthen their policies to adapt to Cabinet Office’s principles I mentioned earlier.
And from last year, institutions are now increasingly adopting their own Open Access policy.
As of now, almost of these policies are covering not research data but papers.
There are three key repository communities or initiatives in Japan: “Digital Repository Federation” (DRF), which is a repository managers’ community; shared repository “JAIRO Cloud” user community; and “Institutional Repositories Promotion Committee” (IRPC), which is a nationwide framework for Institutional Repository issues.
And reorganization of these repository communities or initiatives has just started to adapt to enhanced Open Access and Open Science movement.
From here, I will give a brief introduction to the momentum of Open Science in Japan as the background of today’s meeting.
Tipping point was last March.
Cabinet Office issued a report which provided a strong direction for Open Science in Japan.
In that report, universities and research institutions are expected to formulate rules on the management of research results; and libraries, institutional repositories, data centers and NII are expected to collect research results, promote open access, store and manage shared data.
And responding to that report, Scholarly Information Committee in MEXT has discussed about how to promote openness of academic information. Interim report issued in last September shows specific strategic measures for further promotion of Open Access to articles through Institutional Repositories or Open Access Journals; and measures for (i) acceleration and efficiency of research through utilization of research data; and measures for (ii) preservation of research data and Open Access to it as evidence.
MEXT seems to expect Institutional Repositories as one of the Open Access platforms for research data.
Regarding how researchers feel about sharing research data,
one of survey conducted in 2014 shows an attitude of Japanese researchers to the use and the deposit of research data.
The result shows that a certain number of researchers use research data made by others and deposit their own data.
There is another relevant context about preservation of research data.
For research integrity, research institutions are required to make their researchers to preserve research data for a set period and to disclose the data as needed.
Responding to that guideline from MEXT, Science Council of Japan provided an example for preservation period of research data and other resources supporting articles. Documents, numerical data and images are expected to preserve ten years; and test sample and laboratory equipment are expected to preserve five years.
However, preservation and disclosure from the point of view of this research integrity is not sufficient for entire research data management.
Now is a transition period for library community. While it is still under discussion how positive library community can or should play a role in Research Data Management, we are working some projects listed in this slide.
One of the projects is conducting research data interviews with Japanese researchers, as reported later.
Now I am finishing my talk. I hope we will have a productive discussion today. Thank you very much.