5. Design by Use
Changing Needs
Open Design
Un-beneficial investments
Global e-waste
Stabilised functions
Universal Design
vs.
vs.
6. Design by Use
Potential for a viable model: Post-manufacturing product
development
Low investment R&D
7. Design by Use
Potential for a viable model: Post-manufacturing product
development
Low investment R&D
Designers Users
8. Design by Use
Potential for a viable model: Post-manufacturing product
development
Low investment R&D
A shared language
Designers Users
9. Affordance as a medium
“A product in its most simplified form may be easier to modify than a more specialized
product, as hackers identify and act upon affordances that aid in modification”
Shu et al. (2015)
ikeahackers.net
14. Disassembly
Our main focus was participants
attitude towards disassembling
products to understand them.
Following the 'black box' theory of
Latour we assumed that the artefacts
presented in the workshop would be
seen as a singular whole although while
containing many elements embodying a
large network of interactions.
20. Conclusions
Damaging devices or themselves
Once exposed , every product is an
opportunity
users would cross connect products through
components to each-other to create and adopt
new products for new scenarios.
Transparency and communication
surveyed participants experience evaluation,
showed significant optimism in participants
trust and eager to be modifying products of
their own
Assigned Usage
Bare function
Potential Usage
core
primary
seconday
tertiary
no-limit
21. facebook/stackleproject
We would like to thank
Assist. Prof. Dr. Harun Kaygan
for his guidance,
Metu ID students and our team
for all their support.
stackle.org