This document analyzes predictions for the future of five dimensions: social, technological, economic, environmental, and political. Some key predictions include: - Privacy will continue declining with increased surveillance affecting online businesses. - Wearable technology will advance to include health-focused devices like robotic suits. This growing market will generate billions in revenue. - A two-class system will emerge with a shrinking middle class as income inequality worsens, affecting workers and the financial industry. - Water scarcity will impact utility companies and food/beverage industries as infrastructure ages and demand rises, posing financial risks. - Internal divisions within the Republican party between the Tea Party and conservatives could weaken the party's political influence.

1. The Future of STEEP
An Analysis of the Future of the Social, Technological, Economic,
Environmental, and Political Paradigms of the Future
Chartrand, Wyatt
Goldberg, Mike
Krone, Christopher
Nguyen, Hai
Usmanov, Sarvar
MGMT 311-91, Group 12

2. 1
Abstract: This research paper will analyze and project the future of five dimensions
of life: the Social dimension, the Technological dimension, the Economic
dimension, the Environmental dimension, and the Political dimension.
Summarized below are our topical predictions for each dimension:
 Social dimension: Privacy will continue to decrease, and we will emphasize
this in a business, online, and content context.
 Technological dimension: Wearable technology will reach dizzying heights
and will include mech suits. Emphasis will be on full-body technology.
 Economic dimension: Main prediction will be the development of two
classes: an underclass and an upper class. Emphasis will be on middle class
decline and the implications of this.
 Environmental: Main focus will be water scarcity, with special attention
given to the business conflicts arising from the depletion of this resource.
 Political: Political fracturing of the Republican Party will be emphasized
in this last dimension.
These projections are assumed to be roughly ten years out from the present,
although in reality they may take longer to materialize. Because the financial
industry has become such a dominant force in America today, we will also conclude
each dimension with a discussion of how each dimension will affect the financial
industry in relation to our predictions. In order to display the especial importance
of the dimension of Economics, we will also present an infographic illustrating our
primary prediction for it. The infographic was created using the website Venngage.
Works Cited are included at the end.

3. 2
Social & Social Financial Implications:
As time progresses into the future, people will have much less personal privacy than they do today.
This rapid decline in privacy will result from gradually increasing surveillance, including
surveillance in public, in the workplace, and online. Congress recently issued a new mandate that
allows the Federal Aviation Administration to use unmanned aerial drones with the intention of
providing domestic surveillance and national safety (Calo). Privacy will continue to decline in
society because of the lack of laws that prohibit these new forms of surveillance. It is continuously
becoming easier to retrieve anyone’s personal information, and this trend will have an effect on
the financial industry.
One effect on the financial industry that the decline of privacy will have is that it will alter
the way that businesses and their online practices work. One of the biggest risks a company can
face is the loss of consumer data that is collected online (The Futures Company). This information
is very valuable to companies because they use it for product targeting and special offers. However,
consumers are also becoming more aware of the value of their data as their amount of privacy
decreases. As a result, many consumers will be much more hesitant to release any informa tion
about themselves to these businesses. This will hurt many online businesses in the future; as
consumer data will become a very significant measure of a company’s success and competitive
advantage.
As a standard procedure, online companies have had to receive some type of implied
consent from consumers before they are legally able to collect and store that consumer’s
information for strategic use. The idea of implied consent insinuates that these online companies
can assume consent from the consumers, based on the consumers’ behavior as revealed by their

4. 3
browser settings. One way that this collection occurs is through the use of cookies. Cookies are
defined as “Simple uncompiled text files that help coordinate the remote website servers and your
browser to display the full range of features offered by most contemporary websites” (All About
Cookies). Cookies use form information and ad tracking to store personal information that
companies may retrieve and assume as consent. However, as society is becoming more protective
of their incessantly sought after private information, companies can no longer rely on implied user
consent. Many people are deleting their cookies so that this kind of personal information can no
longer be stored. Rather, the user consent must be explicit, meaning that the consumer must
formally give the company consent before their private information can be used. The ePrivacy
Directive, which is a 2009 amendment created by the Online Trust Alliance, has already been put
into effect with many companies conducting business within the European Union. The ePrivacy
Directive provides a new approach to obtaining explicit user consent before their information can
become attainable (Flamant).
Personal privacy is in imminent decline in today’s society, and people will continue to
respond to this trend by becoming more protective of the information that they once lent out
without fear. Online businesses will have to overcome this scarcity of information in order to retain
their competitive advantage in the financial industry.

5. 4
Technological & Technological Financial Implications:
In 10 years from now, wearable technology will be much more developed than it has ever
been. More and more developers are investing their capital in such innovative yet practical gadgets.
The market for wearable technology is predicted to triple in the next few years. Google Glass and
smart watches from companies like Sony or Samsung are currently the most talked-about wearable
devices. These offering have a significant barrier to widespread adoption, high price points. These
gadgets debuted with high hopes and many promising features but with a relatively high price.
However, in ten to fifteen years, wearable technology will focus on something that is more health-
oriented with more affordable prices that will lure in more consumers. For example, Tokyo
University in Japan is developing a robotic suit powered by pneumatic artificial muscles that help
humans with heavy work. With the control of a pair of McKibben artificial muscles, this suit
consequently provides support to the user’s back, shoulders and elbows that helps your arm easily
hold two more sacks of rice (which totals about 110 pounds) (Lai). This robotic suit itself weights
about 20 pounds and will make quite a spectacular outfit. The suit is still in the works, which
means that the design will be even better once it has actually launched. Another fascinating
wearable device that is focused on the environment is called Wristify. It is essentially a
thermoelectric bracelet that can reduce the energy needs associated with heating or cooling an
indoor environment. This MIT student-developed bracelet works on a principle that heating or
cooling the skin on one part of the body can make the entire body feel warmer or colder. The
current prototype is capable of changing the rate up to 0.4° C (0.7° F) per second (Quick). The
team that developed the device strongly believes that this little personal device could help cut
energy usage for an entire building. It allows significant savings and convenience to consumers
when they carry it at any time. Given current energy consumption patterns, this device would

6. 5
potentially cut about 16.5% of all US primary energy consumption. Still in the prototype stage,
many developments need to be made until the final product is released.
Many businesses are also reaching out to international markets. As such, something like a
portable necklet that allows translating up to 25 different languages could be very useful. This
personal translator is called SIGMO. SIGMO connects with smartphones via a Bluetooth
connection to utilize the power of web-based translator such as Google Translate or Siri on iPhones
for language conversion (Schreiner). The compact size and cool stone-like design make it look
fashionable and quite trendy. With a built-in external loudspeaker, consumers will be able to
translate simple sentences and short phases. Targeted to business consumers with limited language
skills, SIGMO will fulfill a major need when they travel internationally, although it will not replace
human translators.
The wearable technology market is on the fast track growth-wise since they provide a range
of benefits to users, from informing and entertaining, to monitoring health, to improving fitness,
to preserving the environment, to acting as personal assistants. Shipments for wearable devices are
predicted to rise 500% in 5 years from 2011 to 2016 (SEGUNDO). This could result in nearly $30
billion in revenue (according to analyst Shane Walker at IHS Global Insights). In fact, the current
Google Glass or Samsung’s Smart Gear are affecting those respective companies’ stock
substantially (Keris Alison). Each of these devices has a very promising future within the financial
industry since each segment will have unique customizations. Hence, devices that have the same
features but with different designs such as different colors could provide huge collections for
consumers to choose from. This will give consumers the opportunity to have the flexibility to buy
the products the way they want. Consumers will feel like they can buy something fashionable yet
smart and useful for personal purposes.

7. 6
Economic & Economic Financial Implications:
One of the prevailing economic forecasts is income inequality. As bad as it already is,
income inequality will be considerably worse in ten years, and this will have a host of negative
effects. The predominant effect will be the gradual erosion of the middle class, which will cause
our class system to be virtually unrecognizable in ten years. Instead of numerous class brackets,
there will be two primary economic classes: The upper-middle to upper class (which we will
simply call the “upper class”) and a lower class, or the working poor. This is corroborated by The
Huffington Post article “This Map Will Show You The Staggering Growth In Income Inequality
Over The Past 40 Years,” which explains that in between 1979 and 2007, the wealthy saw their
income go up by 275 percent, while everyone else’s income increased by only 20 percent (The
Huffington Post).
At that rate, we can infer that in ten years socio-economic stratification will have been
magnified even beyond what it is now, effectively creating a two-tier economy (upper and lower
classes). So what will this new class system mean for America? Rick Newman, in his Yahoo
Finance Article "How Americans Will Adapt to Lower Living Standards," explains that Americans
will have to adapt to lower living standards by cheapening their tastes. Three main structural
changes ten years out will become evident based on this new class system and Newman’s article:
 People will either sink to the bottom of the income ladder or rise to the top of it,
with little mobility in between.
 It will be tougher to survive without highly relevant skills, as their will no longer
be much of a middle class left to protect mid-skilled workers.

8. 7
 There will be economic wealth opportunities only for the highly skilled and
ambitious, or the lucky.
These three key points from the article suggest that in the not-too-far-off dystopian future, there
will only be winners and losers, with no middle ground (Newman).
As disturbing as this is, this is the key trend our economy is moving towards. As an aside,
it should also be noted that this two-tier class system will have one other significant side effect.
Professor Richard D. Wolff’s article “Rising Income Inequality in the US: Divisive, Depressing,
and Dangerous” presents stark evidence that income and wealth inequality will foster envy,
resentment, tension, and depression. It goes on to explain how income inequality will also initiate
a vicious cycle of frustration, blame, and destroyed self-esteems. This has created, in his words
“Harsh, mean-spirited movements that demonized and dehumanized their targets.” (Wolff). In ten
years, these problems will almost certainly have been maximized by the exacerbation of increasing
wealth inequality, almost entirely afflicting the lower class.
The effect these things will have on the financial services industry will be profound.
According to the article "The Engine Of American Inequality: The Consequences Of A Free
Wheeling, Unchecked Financial Industry" by Jim Lardner, in a nutshell, as income inequality
worsens, the financial sector will grow larger and larger as income moves towards the top and
financial institutions sit on cash, putting less and less back into the economy. Eventually, the
financial services sector will exist only to feed itself (Lardner). He ends with “If we believe in our
founding ideal of America as a land where children should start off on roughly the same footing
regardless of history or ancestry, we will all have to screw up our courage and refocus on (among
other challenges) the unfinished work of making sure we have a financial economy that serves the
real economy, not the other way around” (Lardner).

9. 8
Environmental & Environmental Financial Implications:
Water scarcity is an issue for public utility companies who use bonds to finance their
infrastructure projects. Because of the capital-intensive nature of the utilities industry, companies
issue large amounts of debt. Generally, utilities are extremely water-intensive; a moderate to severe
water shortage could seriously hinder their ability to provide some 260 million Americans with
the water they need every day (UNESCO, 2012). This coming water scarcity issue, however, is
currently not well reflected in the pricing of these bonds; and investors have insufficient
information to mitigate their exposure to water scarcity in holding such bonds. If water supplies
do run short, utility revenues might fall, causing such companies to scale back operations, and
possibly rendering them unable to fulfill their debt obligations. Investors will lose confidence and
look elsewhere to invest their money, perpetuating the problem. Without more investment into
R&D efforts such as waste management and sustainability, companies will not be able to keep up
with the growing gap between water supply and demand.
At the same time, as America’s water infrastructure continues to age, it is not uncommon
for pipes and mains to have been built over a hundred years ago. Additionally, there are roughly
240,000 water main breaks per year. The 2013 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure, an annual
report published by the American Society of Civil Engineers, placed America’s drinking water at
a D, equivalent to “poor” on the report’s scale. (ASCE, 2013) Essentially, utilities will become
undervalued and will need to look to other sources of capital if they wish to retain comparable
levels of service. This means that if consumers expect to maintain the level of service they
currently receive from utilities they are going to have to pay a higher price for their water. The

10. 9
ASCE Failure to Act report estimated that the US is at risk of losing over $400 billion in GDP by
2020 due to the increased cost of water and loss of productivity (ASCE, 2011). Businesses will
bear the brunt of the burden, losing close to $150 million within that time span.
Water scarcity will also have a significant impact on the food and beverage industry. Water
scarcity can lead to the increased price of several food commodity inputs and animal and crop
yields will be negatively impacted if the water that is essential to these industries becomes more
expensive to acquire. Also, water scarcity creates operational disruptions, as it is a base ingredient
in food production processes, in addition to its other crucial roles in production. Thus, the most
financially significant impacts to this industry due to water scarcity will be increased input prices
and higher processing costs. As with utility companies, the risk investors face due to water scarcity
is not communicated as firmly as it should be.
Both of these industries are extremely sensitive to the level of water supply and availability.
As such, both analysts and investors must take steps to lay out groundwork to navigate the complex
problem of water scarcity. Analysts should look to explore the potential financial impacts on water-
reliant industries and include these findings in their reports. Municipal bond ratings, such as the
ones that fund utilities, are determined by ratings agencies such as Moody’s and Standard and
Poor’s. To better understand a company’s sensitivity to water risk, ratings agencies must
implement water-risk stress tests, rewarding companies that use strategies to mitigate this risk.

11. 10
Political & Political Financial Implications:
Throughout history, the Republican Party has been a powerhouse of a political party, and
has produced many presidents throughout its 150-plus year history. It has survived many problems
over the years, and a few periods of playing second fiddle to the Democrats. However, the
Republican Party is in a bad way right now, and it could be enough to send it over the edge. The
recent Tea Party movement has caused a split between the smaller but much more radical Tea
Party and the more conservative GOP. The Tea Party may be substantially smaller, but they have
a lot more capital, which compensates for their smaller population. In fact, the Times said that
right-wing conservatives are spending more money to attack Republicans than Democrats are (Van
Howe 1). The recent government shutdown was caused largely in part by the desire of the Tea
Party to get their way and the rest of the government trying to stop them, including the GOP. If a
Republican candidate does not agree with Tea Party policies, they will threaten to kick them out
of office. Even the party’s most favorable candidate, Chris Christie, criticized his own party’s
“toxic internal politics” (Peoples 1). If the Republican Party continues down this path, the situation
will not get any better for them. It could cause them to lose power over the next few years. For
the party as a whole, it could be a much larger problem. They seem to be at war with the Democrats
during every single election year, and they cannot afford to be fighting amongst themselves. It is
a very bad situation for the party if they have to side with members of the opposing party in order
to keep certain members of their party from gaining any form of political office. Voters are being
urged to vote in favor of any candidate that is not being endorsed or funded by the Tea Party (Van
Howe 1). If the Democrats gain control of the government, the Republicans will not be happy for
a very long time.

12. 11
The Tea Party is known to be strong-willed and inflexible on issues they are passionate
about. This combination of attributes can lead them to do whatever it takes to get what they want,
and they have the funds to do just that. When a stubborn group of rich people does not get what
they want, they have not been known to go down without a fight. In a world where money is
power, it would seem that the Tea Party could gain quite a bit of clout among congress. In fact,
the last Government shutdown was largely in part due to the “Tea Partyers” playing hardball to
get their way. There is nothing stopping them from doing it again. If they continue to shut down
the government whenever they do not get their way, the entire country, and the world, could suffer.
The financial services industry could be very negatively affected by this issue if it
continues. For starters, if the government is shut down, then the Small Business Administration
will stop providing loans crucial to small businesses just starting up. Without small businesses
opening, borrowing on a large scale and many small-town economies would suffer. According to
a survey of small business owners, a long government shutdown would cause them to pull back
on hiring plans (Plumer 1). A really long shutdown would cause some small businesses to close.
Small businesses are an integral part of the American economy, especially in smaller towns where
larger businesses do not operate. In addition to the loss of small businesses, shutting down the
government is expensive. The government shutdown cost the country around $24 billion in total
(Dockterman 1). That was for a shutdown lasting 16 days. That comes out to $1.5 billion per day.
What happens if the Tea Party decides to shut down the Government again, but this time, for even
longer? Another long shutdown without time for recovery could be crippling for the nation, and
the world. If the Government keeps shutting down, then the U.S. will keep losing money, and if
the problems continue for a long time, it could cause problems for the entire world. If the U.S.
loses enough money, they might have to default on their loans. If that happens, then the country’s

13. 12
credit rating will fall, and cause the US to lose their status as an economic superpower. If that
happens, then a worldwide superpower would falter, causing a state of panic around whole world.
The fracturing of the Republican Party has already caused problems all over the country, and has
the potential to cause more problems, for a very long time. If it is not taken care of soon, the Tea
Party will continue to grow in power to get what they want. If that happens, the government could
be shut down again and again.

14. 13
Infographic Analysis:

15. 14
Conclusion:
Given all of the above predictions, our group predicts a violent, sicker, poorer, darker future.
Socially, our privacy will have declined in an increasingly globalized and interconnected world.
Technologically, we will make great breakthroughs in the field of wearable technology, but this
technology is likely to be prohibitively expensive and available only for the upper-class, further
widening the gulf between rich and poor and helping to create a two-class system in America, as
per our Economic prediction. Environmentally, we will live in an age of scarcity, with wars and
infighting over such precious resources as water, which will also entail a great many business
disruptions. Politically, we will become more polarized, more partisan, and more extreme. This
will lead to the fracturing of the Republican Party, as detailed in our above analysis. Gridlock,
ineffectiveness, and disintegration will ensue. In all of this, the financial industry will continue to
primarily benefit the rich, further lending credence to our Economic prediction, and the various
other ways in which the financial industry will be impacted by STEEP are described above. All
of the things will build to a perfect storm of uncertainty with all of the ills described above. With
little hope going forward, the future appears decidedly less bright then it did not so long ago.

16. 15
Works Cited
(ASCE) American Society of Civil Engineers. 2013 report Card for America's Infrastructure
(2013, March). In Infrastructure Report Card. Retrieved November 14, 2013, from
http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/a/#p/drinking-water/overview
Dockterman, E. (2013, October 17). Here’s How Much the Government Shutdown Cost the
Economy. In Time Swampland. Retrieved November 15, 2013, from
http://swampland.time.com/2013/10/17/heres-what-the-government-shutdown-cost-the-
economy/
Economic Development Research Group, Inc. Failure to Act: The Economic Impact of Current
Investment Trends in Water and Waste Treatment Infrastructure [Electronic version].
(2011). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 1-38.
Calo, R. (2012, March 8). Drones, Dogs and the Future of Privacy. In WIRED. Retrieved
November 14, 2013, from http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/opinion-calo-
drones-dogs-privacy/
Epstein, Z. (2013, October 31). Another big barrier blocking widespread wearable tech adoption
emerges. In Boy Genius Report (BGR). Retrieved November 14, 2013, from
http://bgr.com/2013/10/31/wearable-technology-adoption-price-barrier-gfk/
Flamant, J. (2012, May 11). CONSENT AND COOKIES: HOW WILL THE EPRIVACY
DIRECTIVE CHANGE ONLINE BUSINESS PRACTICES?. In Future of Privacy.
Retrieved November 14, 2013, from http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2012/05/11/consent-
and-cookies-how-will-the-eprivacy-directive-change-online-business-practices/

17. 16
Krechowicz, D., Venugopal, S., Sauer, A., Somani, S., & Pandey, S. (2010, April). WEEDING
RISK: Financial Impacts of Climate Change and Water Scarcity on Asia’s Food and
Beverage Sector. In World Resources Institute. Retrieved November 14, 2013, from
http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/pdf/weeding_risk_asia.pdf
Lahiff, K. A. (2013, October 24). The Stock Set to Benefit Most from Wearable Technology. In
The Street. Retrieved November 14, 2013, from
http://www.thestreet.com/story/12080182/1/the-stock-set-to-benefit-most-from-wearable-
technology.html
Lai, R. (2012, October 2). Tokyo University of Science shows off robotic suit powered by
pneumatic artificial muscles. In Engadget. Retrieved November 14, 2013, from
http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/02/tokyo-university-of-science-pneumatic-muscle-
suit/
Lardner, J. (2013, October 11). “The Engine of American Inequality”: The Consequences Of A
Free Wheeling, Unchecked Financial Industry. In mykeystrokes.com. Retrieved
November 8, 2013, from http://mykeystrokes.com/2013/10/12/the-engine-of-american-
inequality-the-consequences-of-a-free-wheeling-unchecked-financial-industry/
Newman, R. (2013, October 29). How Americans Will Adapt to Lower Living Standards. In
Yahoo Finance. Retrieved November 8, 2013, from http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-
ticker/americans-adapt-lower-living-standards-170507936.html
Peoples, S. (2013, January 5). Republican Party Seems As Divided, Angry As Ever. In The
Huffington Post. Retrieved November 15, 2013, from
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/05/republican-party_n_2415552.html

18. 17
Plumer, B. (2013, October 3). The nine most painful impacts of a government shutdown. In The
Washington Post. Retrieved November 15, 2013, from
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/10/01/the-nine-most-painful-
consequences-of-a-government-shutdown/
Privacy Concerns on Cookies (n.d.). In All about Cookies. Retrieved November 14, 2013, from
http://www.allaboutcookies.org/privacy-concerns/
Quick, D. (2013, October 24). Wristify thermoelectric bracelet makes heating and cooling
personal. In Gizmag. Retrieved November 14, 2013, from
http://www.gizmag.com/wristify-thermoelectric-bracelet/29543/
Schreiner, B. (2013, September 2). SIGMO Portable Language Translator @ Indiegogo.
In Engineering. Retrieved November 14, 2013, from
http://www.engineering.com/ElectronicsDesign/ElectronicsDesignArticles/ArticleID/626
1/SIGMO-Portable-Language-Translator
Wearable Technology Market Suited for Rapid Growth (2012, September 11). In IHS. Retrieved
November 14, 2013, from http://press.ihs.com/press-release/design-supply-
chain/wearable-technology-market-suited-rapid-growth
"This Map Will Show You The Staggering Growth In Income Inequality Over The Past 40 Years."
The Huffington Post. The Huffington post, 20 Sept. 2013. Web. 8 Nov. 2013.
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/20/income-inequality-
map_n_3963382.html?utm_hp_ref=income-inequality>.

19. 18
This Map Will Show You The Staggering Growth In Income Inequality Over The Past 40 Years
(2013, September 20). In The Huffington Post. Retrieved November 8, 2013, from
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/20/income-inequality-
map_n_3963382.html?utm_hp_ref=income-inequality
The United Nations World Water Development Report 4: Managing Water under Uncertainty
and Risk (2012). In (UNESCO) United Nations Educational, Cultural, and Scientific
Organization. Retrieved November 14, 2013, from
http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/WWDR4%20Volume
%201-Managing%20Water%20under%20Uncertainty%20and%20Risk.pdf
Van Howe, T. (n.d.). Tea party's one goal starts to fracture the GOP . In WWMT. Retrieved
November 15, 2013, from http://www.wwmt.com/template/cgi-
bin/archived.pl?type=basic&file=/news/features/featured/stories/archive/2013/09/q5Z9E8
f5.xml#.UobOPfnrzeJ
Why Privacy Matters (n.d.). In The Futures Company. Retrieved November 14, 2013, from
http://thefuturescompany.com/free-thinking/privacy/
Wolff, R. D. (2010, February 4). Rising Income Inequality in the US: Divisive, Depressing, and
Dangerous. In Professor Richard D. Wolff. Retrieved November 8, 2013, from
http://rdwolff.com/content/rising-income-inequality-us-divisive-depressing-and-
dangerous

20. 19
Works Cited for Infographic Analysis
Jonsson, P. (2013, September 17). US poverty rate steady at 15 percent, but 'lower class' is
booming. In The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved November 18, 2013, from
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2013/0917/US-poverty-rate-steady-at-15-
percent-but-lower-class-is-booming
Kamp, K. (2013, September 20). By the Numbers: The Incredibly Shrinking American Middle
Class. In Bill Moyers. Retrieved November 18, 2013, from
http://billmoyers.com/2013/09/20/by-the-numbers-the-incredibly-shrinking-american-
middle-class/