SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 38
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
AEG Annual Meeting – Kona, Hawaii, Sept. 22, 2016
Technical Session #6
William Godwin, CEG – Lettis Consultants Intl
Mike Turner, CEG - AECOM
Justin Pearce, CEG – Infraterra (now USACE)
Holly Nichols, CEG - CA Dept Water Resources
Perris Dam Seismic Remediation –
Geologic Observations from
CDSM Foundation Treatment
Perris Dam-Presentation Topics
 Introduction
 History of Perris Dam
 Physical and Geologic Setting
 Seismic Remediation Design Elements
 Cement Deep Soil Mixing
 Venting Observations
 Questions
INTRODUCTION
Owner
California Dept of
Water Resources
QC
Laboratory
Inspectors
AECOM
LCI
InfraTerra
DWR
Specialty Sub
Jensen
Drilling Co.
Specialty
Sub
JAFEC USA
General
Contractor
Pulice, Inc.
Bd of
Consultants
INTRODUCTION
HISTORY OF DAM
HISTORY OF DAM
• Terminal end of
California Aqueduct
• Zoned Earth
Embankment, L=
2.2mi., H = 128ft
• Partial core and
foundation over-ex
(<6ft)
• Construction
Completed in 1973
• Capacity – 131,450af
• Currently lowered 25ft
to allow 37ft freeboard
Perris Dam Geologic Setting
USGS OFR 99-172, 2004
San Jacinto FZ
Geologic Profile – Left Reach
ReservoirA
YA
CPT transect, upstream
SPT transect, upstream
Profile location
Approx
Bdrk
?
Sample Cross-Section, Left Reach
(Friesen and Balakrishan, 2012)
Seismic Remediation Design Elements
Seismic Remediation Design Elements
Foundation Treatment and Stability Berm
Cement Deep Soil Mixing - CDSM
 Objective: Strengthen the foundation and
along with the stability berm to limit the
deformation of the dam to the acceptable
level during a strong seismic event
 DWR decided against removal and
replacement because of shallow groundwater
in granular soils… judged they couldn’t
dewater sufficiently.
Seismic Remediation Design Elements
Foundation Treatment
Typical Cell Layout
Downstream
Longitudinal Wall
Segments, Typ.
Transverse
Walls, Typ.
Deep Cell PlanShallow Cell Plan
A A Section A-A
Transverse Walls
CDSM Mixing
Rig
CDSM Predrilling
 Homogenize alluvial soils by loosening dense
zones, cemented layers and prepare for
optimal mixing
 Use same equipment as that used in mixing
 Inject water and air to facilitate advance
 Advance rate <8ft/min
 Withdrawal rate <20ft/min
 Primary/Secondary Installation Sequence
CDSM – Grout Mixing
 Introduce cementitious grout to soils at a mix
dosage of 210 kg/m3 and W:C ration of 0.9
 Advance rate <4ft/min
 Withdrawal rate <9ft/min
 Primary/Secondary Installation Sequence
 Remix bottom 10ft and other zones
Required Work Flow – Pre-drill/Mixing
CDSM – Verification Coring
The recovered samples are checked for recovery and uniformity.
• Recovery Criteria:
– The recovery from each 5 foot core run should be at least 85
percent.
– Continuous core recovery should be at least 90 percent when
averaged over all core runs within a single boring.
• Uniformity Criteria:
– Within a single core run, the sum length of unmixed or poorly
mixed soil regions or lumps that extend entirely across the cross
section of the core sample (minimum of 2.5 inches) is not to
exceed 15% of the core length.
– All lengths of unrecovered core shall be assumed to be
unimproved soil.
Verification Coring
Inspectors Role
 Serve as DWR representatives
 Observe CDSM activities, noting geologic
anomalies or variations.
 Document whether or not construction is
proceeding according to specifications
 Log element coreholes
 Choose core samples for cutting
 Prepare Daily Inspection Reports
Design Validation Using Geologic Data
 Review Databases from Contractor and Inspectors and
analyze using GIS
 Preliminary Analysis
Venting – Preferential channel, influence of dewatering
 Analysis in Progress
Element Advance Rates
Speed with Depth
Drilling Resistance – Correlation to Young Alluvium or lower
SPT blow Counts
Refusals & Restrokes – Correlation with Higher Bedrock and
Alluvial Stiffness
Venting
 Where did it occur?
– In relief wells upstream and downstream of CDSM
pad
– On pad surface
– Adjacent to and up to 75ft from predrilling
 Preferential alignment upstream and
downstream. Distances of venting from predrill were
generally less in the cross-valley direction. Possibly
occurring along channels
Mostly Venting Less VentingNo Data
Blue = No Venting Noted
Venting
 When did it occur?
– During and after Predrilling; not mixing
– Could linger after predrilling paddles removed
 Why did it occur?
– Excessive air and/or water pressure
– Bottom line is that we don’t really understand
exactly how the pressures were being
transmitted from the column being predrilled
Ground Venting – Monitoring Wells (video)
Ground Venting – Ground Surface (video)
Venting
 WHAT was the concern?
– Possible hydrofracturing of foundation soils
– Possible grout migration. Would be a
particular problem if it contaminated the
blanket drain for dam.
– Possible hydrofracturing of CDSM columns as
they were curing
Venting Mitigation – RFI 117
 Working air pressures during predrilling will be
monitored and regulated to remain <120 psi.
 Given the concern that air may damage the dam,
no isolated elements will be predrilled within the
length of two (2) elements of the upstream side of
the CDSM working platform.
 For this purpose, isolated elements are those
elements which are more than 12 feet from the
nearest predrilled element. This is based on the
observation that neighboring predrilled elements
will serve as vents.
Venting – Conditional Acceptance RFI117
 Provided DWR and DSOD are able to monitor air
pressures during predrilling
 Contractor has the ability to effectively control
and adjust air pressures as required during pre-
drilling
 Significant venting conditions (such as soil
erosion) caused by water and pressurized air are
avoided during pre-drilling
 Engineers has right to halt work if significant
venting is observed
Venting Analysis: Compare with
Channel Structure
Venting Analysis:
 Overall pattern may correlate with large
channel structure
 Prominent ‘No Venting’ patches (Cells 34 and
45) within ‘Mostly Venting’ central part of
CDSM layout
Blue = No Venting NotedGreen = Venting Noted
Cell 34 Cell 45
Green venting noted Blue venting not noted
Venting Analysis: Dewatering
Observations
 Observed at Construction Observation Wells
 COW-15 through COW-25 are located along CDSM
footprint
Dewatering Observations
1450
1455
1460
1465
1470
1475
1480
1485
1490
1495
Magnitude of Lowering During This Time Period
For gray well (COW 22)
=21 ft
Maximum Dewatering Moderate Dewatering
21 ft
Venting: During Dewatering Period
 Larger channel structure may contribute to
venting locations
 Dewatering time periods may correlate with
lack of venting
 We are still refining the venting/no venting
dataset
Conclusions
 CDSM operation completed on May 24, 2016
 All cores passed the acceptance criteria and the
percentage of recovery and uniformity rates
 Venting was most common in the center of the
paleo valley where
– Groundwater was shallowest
– Highest concentration of coarse grained
deposits exist
 Venting was much less common in cells
constructed towards the end of the project where
groundwater was deeper (south end of the dam)
Acknowledgements
 Michael Driller, GE and Grace Chen, PE –
DWR Geotechnical Engineers
 Joan Weber, PE – DWR Resident Engineer
 Hans Abrahamson-Ward, CEG – LCI Principal
Geologist
 Stephanie Briggs, PhD, PG – LCI Sr. Project
Geologist
Questions

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Phased Sequential Soil Gas Investigation
Phased Sequential Soil Gas InvestigationPhased Sequential Soil Gas Investigation
Phased Sequential Soil Gas InvestigationHarryONeill
 
Thriving in a Lower for Longer Environment - Mary Van Domelen
Thriving in a Lower for Longer Environment - Mary Van DomelenThriving in a Lower for Longer Environment - Mary Van Domelen
Thriving in a Lower for Longer Environment - Mary Van DomelenSociety of Petroleum Engineers
 
Breaking Down Conventional Barriers With Managed Pressure Drilling
Breaking Down Conventional Barriers With Managed Pressure DrillingBreaking Down Conventional Barriers With Managed Pressure Drilling
Breaking Down Conventional Barriers With Managed Pressure DrillingSociety of Petroleum Engineers
 
Deepwater horizon accident_investigation_static_presentation
Deepwater horizon accident_investigation_static_presentationDeepwater horizon accident_investigation_static_presentation
Deepwater horizon accident_investigation_static_presentationGustavo Solorzano
 
Proposed Methodology Shore Approach
Proposed Methodology  Shore ApproachProposed Methodology  Shore Approach
Proposed Methodology Shore ApproachMohd Zaini Baharum
 
Manifold design, verification,_and_validation
Manifold design, verification,_and_validationManifold design, verification,_and_validation
Manifold design, verification,_and_validationjpegd
 
Supervision of piling works, ACES, 2011, Singapore
Supervision of piling works, ACES, 2011, SingaporeSupervision of piling works, ACES, 2011, Singapore
Supervision of piling works, ACES, 2011, SingaporeTong Seng Chua
 
Trenchless technologies comparing thrust boring with horizontal directional ...
Trenchless technologies  comparing thrust boring with horizontal directional ...Trenchless technologies  comparing thrust boring with horizontal directional ...
Trenchless technologies comparing thrust boring with horizontal directional ...Tobiloba Omitola
 
Subsea Field Development for an ideal Green field.
Subsea Field Development for an ideal Green field.Subsea Field Development for an ideal Green field.
Subsea Field Development for an ideal Green field.Emeka Ngwobia
 
Hydrotest REPORT FOR 4'' 158m Line.
Hydrotest REPORT FOR 4'' 158m Line.Hydrotest REPORT FOR 4'' 158m Line.
Hydrotest REPORT FOR 4'' 158m Line.Emeka Ngwobia
 
Ship dry docking
Ship dry dockingShip dry docking
Ship dry dockingJishnu Saji
 
ASCE PL Div 2001 40574-017-002
ASCE PL Div 2001 40574-017-002ASCE PL Div 2001 40574-017-002
ASCE PL Div 2001 40574-017-002William Godwin
 
GeoSS,18SEAGS,CTS,04062013, A
GeoSS,18SEAGS,CTS,04062013, AGeoSS,18SEAGS,CTS,04062013, A
GeoSS,18SEAGS,CTS,04062013, ATong Seng Chua
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Emma maersk
Emma  maerskEmma  maersk
Emma maersk
 
Phased Sequential Soil Gas Investigation
Phased Sequential Soil Gas InvestigationPhased Sequential Soil Gas Investigation
Phased Sequential Soil Gas Investigation
 
Thriving in a Lower for Longer Environment - Mary Van Domelen
Thriving in a Lower for Longer Environment - Mary Van DomelenThriving in a Lower for Longer Environment - Mary Van Domelen
Thriving in a Lower for Longer Environment - Mary Van Domelen
 
Breaking Down Conventional Barriers With Managed Pressure Drilling
Breaking Down Conventional Barriers With Managed Pressure DrillingBreaking Down Conventional Barriers With Managed Pressure Drilling
Breaking Down Conventional Barriers With Managed Pressure Drilling
 
Deepwater horizon accident_investigation_static_presentation
Deepwater horizon accident_investigation_static_presentationDeepwater horizon accident_investigation_static_presentation
Deepwater horizon accident_investigation_static_presentation
 
Proposed Methodology Shore Approach
Proposed Methodology  Shore ApproachProposed Methodology  Shore Approach
Proposed Methodology Shore Approach
 
Manifold design, verification,_and_validation
Manifold design, verification,_and_validationManifold design, verification,_and_validation
Manifold design, verification,_and_validation
 
SPE WVS-593.
SPE WVS-593. SPE WVS-593.
SPE WVS-593.
 
Supervision of piling works, ACES, 2011, Singapore
Supervision of piling works, ACES, 2011, SingaporeSupervision of piling works, ACES, 2011, Singapore
Supervision of piling works, ACES, 2011, Singapore
 
INIO2014 Presentation
INIO2014 PresentationINIO2014 Presentation
INIO2014 Presentation
 
Trenchless technologies comparing thrust boring with horizontal directional ...
Trenchless technologies  comparing thrust boring with horizontal directional ...Trenchless technologies  comparing thrust boring with horizontal directional ...
Trenchless technologies comparing thrust boring with horizontal directional ...
 
Subsea Field Development for an ideal Green field.
Subsea Field Development for an ideal Green field.Subsea Field Development for an ideal Green field.
Subsea Field Development for an ideal Green field.
 
Napesco Geotechnical Service Profile
Napesco Geotechnical Service ProfileNapesco Geotechnical Service Profile
Napesco Geotechnical Service Profile
 
Hydrotest REPORT FOR 4'' 158m Line.
Hydrotest REPORT FOR 4'' 158m Line.Hydrotest REPORT FOR 4'' 158m Line.
Hydrotest REPORT FOR 4'' 158m Line.
 
Ship dry docking
Ship dry dockingShip dry docking
Ship dry docking
 
ASCE PL Div 2001 40574-017-002
ASCE PL Div 2001 40574-017-002ASCE PL Div 2001 40574-017-002
ASCE PL Div 2001 40574-017-002
 
Copy of HARDENBERGH JOBS
Copy of HARDENBERGH JOBSCopy of HARDENBERGH JOBS
Copy of HARDENBERGH JOBS
 
GeoSS,18SEAGS,CTS,04062013, A
GeoSS,18SEAGS,CTS,04062013, AGeoSS,18SEAGS,CTS,04062013, A
GeoSS,18SEAGS,CTS,04062013, A
 
CO2 in the Subsurface - From EOR to Storage
CO2 in the Subsurface - From EOR to StorageCO2 in the Subsurface - From EOR to Storage
CO2 in the Subsurface - From EOR to Storage
 
Shale gas presentation
Shale gas presentationShale gas presentation
Shale gas presentation
 

Andere mochten auch

ナパリタンキング事業計画書
ナパリタンキング事業計画書ナパリタンキング事業計画書
ナパリタンキング事業計画書克彦 荒井
 
Whitepaper werkstress-juiste-interventies-op-juiste-moment
Whitepaper werkstress-juiste-interventies-op-juiste-momentWhitepaper werkstress-juiste-interventies-op-juiste-moment
Whitepaper werkstress-juiste-interventies-op-juiste-momentLianne Vermaes
 
2015 0710 東京鯱光会月例会_公開用.pptx
2015 0710 東京鯱光会月例会_公開用.pptx2015 0710 東京鯱光会月例会_公開用.pptx
2015 0710 東京鯱光会月例会_公開用.pptxOsamu Sugiura
 
Los derechos humanos como límites del poder
Los derechos humanos como límites del poderLos derechos humanos como límites del poder
Los derechos humanos como límites del poderVanessa Infanzon Arriola
 
これだけは知っておけ!はじめてのAndroidアプリデザイン〜ActionBar編 先生:秋葉 ちひろ
これだけは知っておけ!はじめてのAndroidアプリデザイン〜ActionBar編 先生:秋葉 ちひろこれだけは知っておけ!はじめてのAndroidアプリデザイン〜ActionBar編 先生:秋葉 ちひろ
これだけは知っておけ!はじめてのAndroidアプリデザイン〜ActionBar編 先生:秋葉 ちひろschoowebcampus
 
アメブロ集客マニュアル 1 濃い読者を集めるための戦略と設定
アメブロ集客マニュアル 1 濃い読者を集めるための戦略と設定アメブロ集客マニュアル 1 濃い読者を集めるための戦略と設定
アメブロ集客マニュアル 1 濃い読者を集めるための戦略と設定wombase
 
事業計画 経営企画概要
事業計画 経営企画概要事業計画 経営企画概要
事業計画 経営企画概要Kenichi Takeuchi
 
ACE Startups Awards Ceremony
ACE Startups Awards CeremonyACE Startups Awards Ceremony
ACE Startups Awards CeremonySiow Wee Tan
 

Andere mochten auch (12)

PNL SL cg_clase
PNL SL cg_clasePNL SL cg_clase
PNL SL cg_clase
 
ナパリタンキング事業計画書
ナパリタンキング事業計画書ナパリタンキング事業計画書
ナパリタンキング事業計画書
 
Whitepaper werkstress-juiste-interventies-op-juiste-moment
Whitepaper werkstress-juiste-interventies-op-juiste-momentWhitepaper werkstress-juiste-interventies-op-juiste-moment
Whitepaper werkstress-juiste-interventies-op-juiste-moment
 
2015 0710 東京鯱光会月例会_公開用.pptx
2015 0710 東京鯱光会月例会_公開用.pptx2015 0710 東京鯱光会月例会_公開用.pptx
2015 0710 東京鯱光会月例会_公開用.pptx
 
Los derechos humanos como límites del poder
Los derechos humanos como límites del poderLos derechos humanos como límites del poder
Los derechos humanos como límites del poder
 
これだけは知っておけ!はじめてのAndroidアプリデザイン〜ActionBar編 先生:秋葉 ちひろ
これだけは知っておけ!はじめてのAndroidアプリデザイン〜ActionBar編 先生:秋葉 ちひろこれだけは知っておけ!はじめてのAndroidアプリデザイン〜ActionBar編 先生:秋葉 ちひろ
これだけは知っておけ!はじめてのAndroidアプリデザイン〜ActionBar編 先生:秋葉 ちひろ
 
Higiene y seguridad
Higiene y seguridadHigiene y seguridad
Higiene y seguridad
 
Ed270
Ed270Ed270
Ed270
 
アメブロ集客マニュアル 1 濃い読者を集めるための戦略と設定
アメブロ集客マニュアル 1 濃い読者を集めるための戦略と設定アメブロ集客マニュアル 1 濃い読者を集めるための戦略と設定
アメブロ集客マニュアル 1 濃い読者を集めるための戦略と設定
 
事業計画 経営企画概要
事業計画 経営企画概要事業計画 経営企画概要
事業計画 経営企画概要
 
Oscar pinango
Oscar pinangoOscar pinango
Oscar pinango
 
ACE Startups Awards Ceremony
ACE Startups Awards CeremonyACE Startups Awards Ceremony
ACE Startups Awards Ceremony
 

Ähnlich wie perris dam_Godwin et al AEG conf fnl(3)

26-grover-john-draft
26-grover-john-draft26-grover-john-draft
26-grover-john-draftJohn Grover
 
Key aspects of reservoir evaluation for deep water reservoirs
Key aspects of reservoir evaluation for deep water reservoirsKey aspects of reservoir evaluation for deep water reservoirs
Key aspects of reservoir evaluation for deep water reservoirsM.T.H Group
 
Groundwater Control Techniques for Tunnelling and Shaft Sinking
Groundwater Control Techniques for Tunnelling and Shaft SinkingGroundwater Control Techniques for Tunnelling and Shaft Sinking
Groundwater Control Techniques for Tunnelling and Shaft SinkingMartin Preene
 
Ground improvement techniques
Ground improvement techniquesGround improvement techniques
Ground improvement techniquesSravan Muguda
 
PENNGLEN FIELD Development Plan (GULF of MEXICO)
PENNGLEN FIELD Development Plan (GULF of MEXICO)PENNGLEN FIELD Development Plan (GULF of MEXICO)
PENNGLEN FIELD Development Plan (GULF of MEXICO)PaulOkafor6
 
Pradipta Banik- Buet 1204012- thesis presentation
Pradipta Banik- Buet 1204012- thesis presentationPradipta Banik- Buet 1204012- thesis presentation
Pradipta Banik- Buet 1204012- thesis presentationPradipta Banik
 
Low Density Cellular Concrete
Low Density Cellular ConcreteLow Density Cellular Concrete
Low Density Cellular ConcreteJill Reeves
 
Mudlogging-Operations -Full presentation.ppt
Mudlogging-Operations -Full presentation.pptMudlogging-Operations -Full presentation.ppt
Mudlogging-Operations -Full presentation.pptssuser10407d
 
Presentation on Full Depth Rehabilitation
Presentation on Full Depth RehabilitationPresentation on Full Depth Rehabilitation
Presentation on Full Depth Rehabilitationhsiengineering
 
GROUP_6_YOUNGMAN_L_ANNEX_15-16
GROUP_6_YOUNGMAN_L_ANNEX_15-16GROUP_6_YOUNGMAN_L_ANNEX_15-16
GROUP_6_YOUNGMAN_L_ANNEX_15-16Leo Youngman
 
Stormwater Management Awareness Training 4
Stormwater Management Awareness Training 4Stormwater Management Awareness Training 4
Stormwater Management Awareness Training 4Fairfax County
 
Paper 43 - OPT 2015_BHI 9_2_15
Paper 43 - OPT 2015_BHI 9_2_15Paper 43 - OPT 2015_BHI 9_2_15
Paper 43 - OPT 2015_BHI 9_2_15John Grover
 
Drilling geohazards in oil & gas industry
Drilling geohazards in oil & gas industryDrilling geohazards in oil & gas industry
Drilling geohazards in oil & gas industryFarida Ismayilova
 
Sne closure turf presentation combined
Sne closure turf presentation combinedSne closure turf presentation combined
Sne closure turf presentation combinedMassRecycle .
 
Contractor Awareness Training Above Ground Facilities Part 2 2016
Contractor Awareness Training Above Ground Facilities Part 2 2016Contractor Awareness Training Above Ground Facilities Part 2 2016
Contractor Awareness Training Above Ground Facilities Part 2 2016Fairfax County
 

Ähnlich wie perris dam_Godwin et al AEG conf fnl(3) (20)

26-grover-john-draft
26-grover-john-draft26-grover-john-draft
26-grover-john-draft
 
Key aspects of reservoir evaluation for deep water reservoirs
Key aspects of reservoir evaluation for deep water reservoirsKey aspects of reservoir evaluation for deep water reservoirs
Key aspects of reservoir evaluation for deep water reservoirs
 
Groundwater Control Techniques for Tunnelling and Shaft Sinking
Groundwater Control Techniques for Tunnelling and Shaft SinkingGroundwater Control Techniques for Tunnelling and Shaft Sinking
Groundwater Control Techniques for Tunnelling and Shaft Sinking
 
Ground improvement techniques
Ground improvement techniquesGround improvement techniques
Ground improvement techniques
 
PENNGLEN FIELD Development Plan (GULF of MEXICO)
PENNGLEN FIELD Development Plan (GULF of MEXICO)PENNGLEN FIELD Development Plan (GULF of MEXICO)
PENNGLEN FIELD Development Plan (GULF of MEXICO)
 
Pradipta Banik- Buet 1204012- thesis presentation
Pradipta Banik- Buet 1204012- thesis presentationPradipta Banik- Buet 1204012- thesis presentation
Pradipta Banik- Buet 1204012- thesis presentation
 
Low Density Cellular Concrete
Low Density Cellular ConcreteLow Density Cellular Concrete
Low Density Cellular Concrete
 
Mudlogging-Operations -Full presentation.ppt
Mudlogging-Operations -Full presentation.pptMudlogging-Operations -Full presentation.ppt
Mudlogging-Operations -Full presentation.ppt
 
Well Hydraulics
Well HydraulicsWell Hydraulics
Well Hydraulics
 
Presentation on Full Depth Rehabilitation
Presentation on Full Depth RehabilitationPresentation on Full Depth Rehabilitation
Presentation on Full Depth Rehabilitation
 
GROUP_6_YOUNGMAN_L_ANNEX_15-16
GROUP_6_YOUNGMAN_L_ANNEX_15-16GROUP_6_YOUNGMAN_L_ANNEX_15-16
GROUP_6_YOUNGMAN_L_ANNEX_15-16
 
Subsea Separation presentation
Subsea Separation presentationSubsea Separation presentation
Subsea Separation presentation
 
Stormwater Management Awareness Training 4
Stormwater Management Awareness Training 4Stormwater Management Awareness Training 4
Stormwater Management Awareness Training 4
 
Paper 43 - OPT 2015_BHI 9_2_15
Paper 43 - OPT 2015_BHI 9_2_15Paper 43 - OPT 2015_BHI 9_2_15
Paper 43 - OPT 2015_BHI 9_2_15
 
Drilling geohazards in oil & gas industry
Drilling geohazards in oil & gas industryDrilling geohazards in oil & gas industry
Drilling geohazards in oil & gas industry
 
addition consideration in pile
addition consideration in pileaddition consideration in pile
addition consideration in pile
 
DECOMVILLE (EL MUNDO PERDIDO DE KUMANNG)
DECOMVILLE (EL MUNDO PERDIDO DE KUMANNG)DECOMVILLE (EL MUNDO PERDIDO DE KUMANNG)
DECOMVILLE (EL MUNDO PERDIDO DE KUMANNG)
 
Sne closure turf presentation combined
Sne closure turf presentation combinedSne closure turf presentation combined
Sne closure turf presentation combined
 
PE etraining mtg
PE etraining mtgPE etraining mtg
PE etraining mtg
 
Contractor Awareness Training Above Ground Facilities Part 2 2016
Contractor Awareness Training Above Ground Facilities Part 2 2016Contractor Awareness Training Above Ground Facilities Part 2 2016
Contractor Awareness Training Above Ground Facilities Part 2 2016
 

Mehr von William Godwin

Mehr von William Godwin (7)

Cadiz et al 1998 pg 3597
Cadiz et al 1998 pg 3597Cadiz et al 1998 pg 3597
Cadiz et al 1998 pg 3597
 
2006 AEG Godwin presentation
2006 AEG Godwin presentation2006 AEG Godwin presentation
2006 AEG Godwin presentation
 
T7-IAEG2014_023
T7-IAEG2014_023T7-IAEG2014_023
T7-IAEG2014_023
 
Webb et al 1978
Webb et al 1978Webb et al 1978
Webb et al 1978
 
CRRSDR AEG 2016
CRRSDR AEG 2016CRRSDR AEG 2016
CRRSDR AEG 2016
 
SAGEEP_202 NSGL paper 202_final_(2)
SAGEEP_202 NSGL paper 202_final_(2)SAGEEP_202 NSGL paper 202_final_(2)
SAGEEP_202 NSGL paper 202_final_(2)
 
GSA presentation
GSA presentationGSA presentation
GSA presentation
 

perris dam_Godwin et al AEG conf fnl(3)

  • 1. AEG Annual Meeting – Kona, Hawaii, Sept. 22, 2016 Technical Session #6 William Godwin, CEG – Lettis Consultants Intl Mike Turner, CEG - AECOM Justin Pearce, CEG – Infraterra (now USACE) Holly Nichols, CEG - CA Dept Water Resources Perris Dam Seismic Remediation – Geologic Observations from CDSM Foundation Treatment
  • 2. Perris Dam-Presentation Topics  Introduction  History of Perris Dam  Physical and Geologic Setting  Seismic Remediation Design Elements  Cement Deep Soil Mixing  Venting Observations  Questions
  • 3. INTRODUCTION Owner California Dept of Water Resources QC Laboratory Inspectors AECOM LCI InfraTerra DWR Specialty Sub Jensen Drilling Co. Specialty Sub JAFEC USA General Contractor Pulice, Inc. Bd of Consultants
  • 6. HISTORY OF DAM • Terminal end of California Aqueduct • Zoned Earth Embankment, L= 2.2mi., H = 128ft • Partial core and foundation over-ex (<6ft) • Construction Completed in 1973 • Capacity – 131,450af • Currently lowered 25ft to allow 37ft freeboard
  • 7. Perris Dam Geologic Setting USGS OFR 99-172, 2004 San Jacinto FZ
  • 8. Geologic Profile – Left Reach ReservoirA YA CPT transect, upstream SPT transect, upstream Profile location Approx Bdrk ?
  • 9. Sample Cross-Section, Left Reach (Friesen and Balakrishan, 2012)
  • 11. Seismic Remediation Design Elements Foundation Treatment and Stability Berm
  • 12. Cement Deep Soil Mixing - CDSM  Objective: Strengthen the foundation and along with the stability berm to limit the deformation of the dam to the acceptable level during a strong seismic event  DWR decided against removal and replacement because of shallow groundwater in granular soils… judged they couldn’t dewater sufficiently.
  • 13. Seismic Remediation Design Elements Foundation Treatment
  • 14. Typical Cell Layout Downstream Longitudinal Wall Segments, Typ. Transverse Walls, Typ. Deep Cell PlanShallow Cell Plan A A Section A-A Transverse Walls
  • 16. CDSM Predrilling  Homogenize alluvial soils by loosening dense zones, cemented layers and prepare for optimal mixing  Use same equipment as that used in mixing  Inject water and air to facilitate advance  Advance rate <8ft/min  Withdrawal rate <20ft/min  Primary/Secondary Installation Sequence
  • 17. CDSM – Grout Mixing  Introduce cementitious grout to soils at a mix dosage of 210 kg/m3 and W:C ration of 0.9  Advance rate <4ft/min  Withdrawal rate <9ft/min  Primary/Secondary Installation Sequence  Remix bottom 10ft and other zones
  • 18. Required Work Flow – Pre-drill/Mixing
  • 19. CDSM – Verification Coring The recovered samples are checked for recovery and uniformity. • Recovery Criteria: – The recovery from each 5 foot core run should be at least 85 percent. – Continuous core recovery should be at least 90 percent when averaged over all core runs within a single boring. • Uniformity Criteria: – Within a single core run, the sum length of unmixed or poorly mixed soil regions or lumps that extend entirely across the cross section of the core sample (minimum of 2.5 inches) is not to exceed 15% of the core length. – All lengths of unrecovered core shall be assumed to be unimproved soil.
  • 21.
  • 22. Inspectors Role  Serve as DWR representatives  Observe CDSM activities, noting geologic anomalies or variations.  Document whether or not construction is proceeding according to specifications  Log element coreholes  Choose core samples for cutting  Prepare Daily Inspection Reports
  • 23. Design Validation Using Geologic Data  Review Databases from Contractor and Inspectors and analyze using GIS  Preliminary Analysis Venting – Preferential channel, influence of dewatering  Analysis in Progress Element Advance Rates Speed with Depth Drilling Resistance – Correlation to Young Alluvium or lower SPT blow Counts Refusals & Restrokes – Correlation with Higher Bedrock and Alluvial Stiffness
  • 24. Venting  Where did it occur? – In relief wells upstream and downstream of CDSM pad – On pad surface – Adjacent to and up to 75ft from predrilling  Preferential alignment upstream and downstream. Distances of venting from predrill were generally less in the cross-valley direction. Possibly occurring along channels Mostly Venting Less VentingNo Data Blue = No Venting Noted
  • 25. Venting  When did it occur? – During and after Predrilling; not mixing – Could linger after predrilling paddles removed  Why did it occur? – Excessive air and/or water pressure – Bottom line is that we don’t really understand exactly how the pressures were being transmitted from the column being predrilled
  • 26. Ground Venting – Monitoring Wells (video)
  • 27. Ground Venting – Ground Surface (video)
  • 28. Venting  WHAT was the concern? – Possible hydrofracturing of foundation soils – Possible grout migration. Would be a particular problem if it contaminated the blanket drain for dam. – Possible hydrofracturing of CDSM columns as they were curing
  • 29. Venting Mitigation – RFI 117  Working air pressures during predrilling will be monitored and regulated to remain <120 psi.  Given the concern that air may damage the dam, no isolated elements will be predrilled within the length of two (2) elements of the upstream side of the CDSM working platform.  For this purpose, isolated elements are those elements which are more than 12 feet from the nearest predrilled element. This is based on the observation that neighboring predrilled elements will serve as vents.
  • 30. Venting – Conditional Acceptance RFI117  Provided DWR and DSOD are able to monitor air pressures during predrilling  Contractor has the ability to effectively control and adjust air pressures as required during pre- drilling  Significant venting conditions (such as soil erosion) caused by water and pressurized air are avoided during pre-drilling  Engineers has right to halt work if significant venting is observed
  • 31. Venting Analysis: Compare with Channel Structure
  • 32. Venting Analysis:  Overall pattern may correlate with large channel structure  Prominent ‘No Venting’ patches (Cells 34 and 45) within ‘Mostly Venting’ central part of CDSM layout Blue = No Venting NotedGreen = Venting Noted Cell 34 Cell 45 Green venting noted Blue venting not noted
  • 33. Venting Analysis: Dewatering Observations  Observed at Construction Observation Wells  COW-15 through COW-25 are located along CDSM footprint
  • 34. Dewatering Observations 1450 1455 1460 1465 1470 1475 1480 1485 1490 1495 Magnitude of Lowering During This Time Period For gray well (COW 22) =21 ft Maximum Dewatering Moderate Dewatering 21 ft
  • 35. Venting: During Dewatering Period  Larger channel structure may contribute to venting locations  Dewatering time periods may correlate with lack of venting  We are still refining the venting/no venting dataset
  • 36. Conclusions  CDSM operation completed on May 24, 2016  All cores passed the acceptance criteria and the percentage of recovery and uniformity rates  Venting was most common in the center of the paleo valley where – Groundwater was shallowest – Highest concentration of coarse grained deposits exist  Venting was much less common in cells constructed towards the end of the project where groundwater was deeper (south end of the dam)
  • 37. Acknowledgements  Michael Driller, GE and Grace Chen, PE – DWR Geotechnical Engineers  Joan Weber, PE – DWR Resident Engineer  Hans Abrahamson-Ward, CEG – LCI Principal Geologist  Stephanie Briggs, PhD, PG – LCI Sr. Project Geologist