2. My background
GP and trainer in Redditch
Fellow NICE 2015-2018
RCGP Clinical Advisor on Nutrition and
chair of RCGP Nutrition Group
Author Weight Matters for Children and
Weight Matters for Young People, Radcliffe
Publishing
Author many e-learning sessions on obesity
and malnutrition in children and adults
Member of consensus panel that
developed Managing Adult Malnutrition in
the Community document and pathway
3. Declaration of interests
I have had funding from Nutricia for speaking
about malnutrition in the past and for helping to
develop the Managing malnutrition in the
community resource.
I have not had any commercial funding to attend
today
4. Aims of session
To explore how malnutrition is viewed in
primary care
To examine the benefits of improved care
within the community
How does malnutrition link across other
primary care priorities?
To reflect on how primary care can be
supported in improving malnutrition
awareness and management in the future
6. Surveys indicate
Up to 10% of people registered with GP surgeries1
46% of patients admitted to hospital from a nursing
home2
41% of patients admitted to hospital from a
residential home2
How big a problem is
malnutrition in the UK?
7. More than 3 million individuals
are estimated to be at risk of
malnutrition in the UK, of whom
about 93% live in the
community1
The number of over 65s set to
increase by 64% over the next
20 years
Malnutrition is a primary care
problem in every sense - But
are we in primary care on
board?
A community problem
8. Poorer clinical outcomes
Impaired immune system
Delayed wound healing
Reduced muscle strength/falls
risk
Increased healthcare use (14)
more GP visits (68.8% vs 59.3%
with low risk malnutrition)
Increased admission and
readmission rate
Longer hospital stay
Costly to health economy
Impact of Malnutrition - both a
cause and consequence of ill
health 3,4,5
9. Malnutrition is an ‘exemplar
health risk’
Whilst complex co-morbidity management
may dwarf relevance of malnutrition,
prioritising nutritional care can drive
improvements in wider co-morbidities –
skittle effect
Diagnosis involves clinical judgment as tests
are non-specific. No biochemical marker
perfectly assesses general nutritional status
Multiple micronutrient deficiencies are not
uncommon
No ‘Quality and Outcomes Framework’
points exist for malnutrition, but focusing on
malnutrition would benefit other QOF
domains e.g. chronic kidney disease, COPD
Co-morbidity
Malnutrition
10. Sarcopenic obesity
Risk factors change over time with
multimorbidity : Initial risk is
commonly obesity but disease-
related debility may allow risk of
malnutrition to emerge
Sarcopenia = Loss of muscle mass
and hence reduced physical
strength and function
In Sarcopenic obesity muscle loss
may be veiled behind an
apparently normal BMI
Test informally using gait speed e.g.
time taken to answer the door or to
walk from the waiting room
11. Malnutrition as prognostic
indicator: COPD
Malnutrition can predate decline in
COPD. Addressing malnutrition at all
stages of COPD slows predictable decline
Malnutrition in COPD has a poor prognosis
(15) because it reduces
resilience to infection
respiratory muscle force
exercise tolerance/quality of life.
Weight loss should always trigger
consideration of underlying cancer;
around a fifth of patients with COPD will
die from lung cancer whilst around half of
lung cancer patients will also have COPD
Is there evidence to use weight loss to
screen for cancer risk?
Lung
cancer
COPD
Around 50% with lung
cancer have COPD :
20% with COPD will
get lung cancer
12. Current attitudes in
primary care
Weight loss is well recognised as a
red flag of active disease, e.g.
cancer: We ask, we register, we
investigate – but do we treat?
Deficiencies e.g. iron, B12, folate, vit
D, are commonly viewed
independently of a possible
nutritional component
Weight loss and malnutrition are
accepted as normal parts of
ageing
It remains unclear who is responsible
for managing the social
determinants of malnutrition
13. Opportunities (and challenges!) to
engage primary care
NICE Multimorbidity guideline –
Sept 2016 encourages holistic care
Assess frailty and falls risk
Identify high risk groups eg those
prescribed over 10 medications
Consider shared risk factors more
than each disease in isolation
Electronic frailty scores on some
GP systems
Enhanced service payments for
admission prevention schemes,
including creating care plans and
risk stratification
14. Assessment should include biopsychosocial not just
biochemical aspects
Social issues important – Affordability/Availability/Will to
eat/drink
Substantial health gains can arise from addressing the
psychosocial determinants of malnutrition
Red flag: If not managing to eat sufficiently, a person may
also be neglecting other basic aspects of health
Holistic risk
15. Physical
assessment
•BMI /MUST score
•Underlying disease
• Dental check
• Swallow
• Vision assessment
•Drug interactions/side effects
Psychological
risks
• Alcohol intake
• Mental state
examination
• Bereavement
• Presence of
multi-morbidity
Social factors
• Poverty
• Functional ability
• Isolation
• Family support
Malnutrition
Risk
16. Nutrition and hydration
are uniquely inter-related
The same patients risk both
conditions
The same patients benefit from
simple interventions to address both,
i.e.
Recognition of risk
Assessment of barriers to self-efficacy,
e.g. continence problems that
encourage patients to fluid restrict
Help in addressing those barriers, e.g.
practical and emotional support at
mealtimes, social support to help with
food and fluid provision
Addressing hydration protects renal
health and reduces risk of acute
kidney injury
17. The healthy eating ‘low-fat’ agenda risks
unintended consequences including
malnourished patients inappropriately
choosing or being given low fat, low calorie
foods by carers
Traffic light food labelling discourages high
fat/high calorie foods but does not indicate
who this information is targeted at
Over-emphasis on lowering cholesterol in
elderly people may be contributing to
malnutrition
Reduced dairy intake risks reducing protein
and fat soluble vitamin intake
‘Healthy eating’ means different
things to different people
19. Calorie contents
Calories per gram
Protein 4
Carbohydrate 4
Fat 9
Alcohol 7
Fibre = carbohydrate but
insoluble fibre is poorly absorbed.
It helps retain gut moisture and
can trigger fullness despite low
energy uptake
Cals per 100mls
Full fat milk 64
Semi-skimmed 50
Skimmed 35
Double cream 467
Single cream 194
20. Groups at risk of malnutrition 3
Chronic disease COPD, cancer, inflammatory bowel
disease, GI disease, renal or liver disease
Chronic progressive
disease
Dementia, neurological conditions
(Parkinson’s disease, MND) arthritis
Acute illness No food for more than 5 days (e.g. post-
operative)
Debility Frailty, immobility, old age, depression,
convalescence
Social issues Poor support, housebound, inability to shop
or cook, poverty, bereavement
Assess malnutrition risk using MUST screening tool
21. Screening - ‘MUST’ ‘Malnutrition
Universal Screening
Tool’
MUST is validated for
primary and secondary
care settings 6
It asks:
Are you skinny
anyway?
Have you lost weight?
Have you stopped
eating due to illness?
Image - Courtesy of BAPEN
22. What should GPs do?
First line
Assess causes – isolation, dentures, food
availability, intercurrent illness, poverty
Give ‘Food Fortification’ advice for those at
low to medium risk and arrange review.
Unpick conflicting ‘healthy eating’ ideas
Self-care advice is under-utilised, as shown
by low carer confidence (8)
Link printable resources to GP computers
Avoid superficial advice to simply increase
calories without addressing essential
protein and micronutrient requirements
Evidence shows improvements in muscle
mass and hand grip strength with dietary
advice10
23. Food fortification
Increasing energy density: increase nutritional
content of meals without a significant increase
in food volume, to accommodate poor
appetite.
Texture modification, such as softer choices,
fork mashable or thick puree foods
Ensuring adequate protein and micronutrient
intake, without over-reliance on low-nutrient
sugary foods such as cakes and
confectionery.
Address potentially conflicting health
messages (such as the common health
message to eat low fat) do not apply to
patients who are malnourished.
Advise about alternative options such as over-
the-counter nutritional supplements
Review progress to detect whether prescribed
oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are
becoming appropriate
24. Second line community
management – ONS prescribing
Historically, ONS has been haphazardly
prescribed without clear goals or
appropriate monitoring
Inappropriate prescribing has led to
‘blanket bans’ of ONS prescribing in some
CCG localities
Clear pathways improve monitoring and
structured care
Consider ONS prescribing according to
local pathways or Managing Malnutrition in
the Community guidelines7
www.malnutritionpathway.co.uk
Issue ‘starter pack’ to check taste
preferences
25. ONS prescribing goals
in community
Consider ONS prescribing for high risk patients especially if disease-
related or prior to surgery
Consider changing energy requirements - may increase during
rehabilitation programmes due to increased physical activity
Ensure social and practical barriers have been addressed
Agree goals with patient and or carer E.g. Improve weight, function,
quality of life (e.g. strength), reduce exacerbations, risk of admission
Plan review to ensure appropriate prescribing – including when to
start and stop ONS
Evidence demonstrates a range of clinical and health economic
benefits11, 13
26. Improved nutrition helps wound healing,
reduces length of hospital stay and rates
of hospital readmission3,4,5,14, plus quality of
life measures
Uncertainties around addressing
malnutrition are heightened when
patients are dying. Withdraw ONS once
symptomatic benefits cease
Whilst malnutrition should not be
considered a normal part of ageing, it is
commonly an acceptable part of dying
Guidance re: nutritional support in lung
cancer is at
www.lungcancernutrition.com
Review aims of nutritional
interventions over time
28. Recommendations for
ONS Prescribing
Acute illness/recent hospital
discharge?
Short term prescribing may be required
– 1-3 ONS per day in addition to oral
intake7
Chronic conditions ?
2 ONS per day in addition to oral intake
with regular review7
Terminal conditions – palliative care,
progressive neurological conditions,
advance illness; consider whether ONS
would give symptomatic support and
slow down weight loss and functional
decline
29. Consider malnutrition in the context of multimorbidity and
as a shared risk factor across an array of conditions
Inquire, investigate AND treat malnutrition
Use a validated screening tool – ‘MUST’
Malnutrition is not a normal part of ageing, but may be an
accepted part of dying
Assess hydration in addition to malnutrition
Ensure that malnutrition treatment in the elderly is driven by
genuine goals to promote quality of life rather than just to
postpone death
Follow your local malnutrition pathway re food fortification
and prescribing
Visit www.malnutritionpathway.co.uk for evidence based
guidance
Summary points for
primary care
30. For guidance on screening, (including use of
‘Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool’), dietary
advice and appropriate community prescribing
of ONS www.malnutritionpathway.co.uk
CG32 Nutrition support in adults: quick reference
guide, 20 February 2006.
http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG32/QuickRefGuid
e/pdf/English
RCGP Nutrition webpages - search on ‘RCGP
Nutrition’ http://www.rcgp.org.uk/clinical-and-
research/clinical-resources/nutrition.aspx
RCGP Obesity and malnutrition e-learning
modules
http://elearning.rcgp.org.uk/course/info.php?id=
147&popup=0
Resources
31. 1. Elia M, Russell C. Combating Malnutrition: Recommendations for Action. Report from
the advisory group on malnutrition, led by BAPEN. 2009.
2. Russell CA and Elia M. Nutrition Screening Survey in the UK and Republic of Ireland in
2011. A report by BAPEN. 2012.
3. Stratton RJ, Green CJ, Elia M. Disease-related malnutrition: an evidence-based
approach to treatment. Oxford: CABI publishing; 2003.
4. Elia M. Nutrition and health economics. Nutrition 2006; 22(5):576-578.
5. Guest JF et al. Health Economic impact of managing patients following a community-
based diagnosis of malnutrition in the UK. Clin Nutr 2011; 30(4): 422-429.
6. The "MUST" report. Nutritional screening for adults: a multidisciplinary responsibility. Elia
M, editor. 2003. Redditch, UK, BAPEN.
7. Multi-professional consensus panel. Managing Adult Malnutrition in the Community.
2012.
8. http://www.bapen.org.uk/pdfs/nutritional-care-and-the-patient-voice.pdf
9. Manual of Dietetic Practice. 5th ed. Wiley Blackwell; 2014.
10. Baldwin C, Weekes CE. Dietary advice with or without oral nutritional supplements for
disease related malnutrition in adults (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews. 2011.
11. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Nutrition support in adults:
oral nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition. Clinical Guideline
32. 2006.
12. BMJ Group And Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. British National
Formulary; 2011.
13. Stratton RJ, Elia M. A review of reviews: a look at the evidence for oral nutritional
supplements. Clin Nutr Supp 2007; 2, 5-23.
14. McGurk P, Cawood A, Walters E et al. The burden of malnutrition in general practice
http://gut.bmj.com/content/61/Suppl_2/A18.2
15. A study of correlation between body mass index and GOLD staging of chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Mrinmoy Mitra et al. DOI: 10.4103/2320-
8775.123217
References