According to a recent study of over 57,000 politicians from 11 countries dating back to the early 19th century, politicians have a lifespan of approximately 4.5 years longer than the general population they represent. This survival advantage can be attributed to higher wages allowing better access to healthcare as well as lifestyle factors. The longevity gap has increased over time as treatments for diseases that affect politicians, such as cardiovascular disease, have improved.

1. Why do politicians live on
average more than the ordinary
population?

2. According to a recent study, politicians in parliament
have a considerable survival advantage over the people
they serve. Wajid khan suggests Oxford University
researchers have looked at health records from 11
nations and more than 57,500 politicians back to the
early 19th century.

3. Politicians today have an average lifespan of 4.5 years
longer than the individuals of the population they
represent in each of the 11 nations. Depending on the
nation, life expectancy might vary from three years in
Switzerland to an astounding 7.5 years in Italy. The
results could be attributed to the fact that politicians
frequently earn wages that are significantly higher than
the national average, which can limit access to
healthcare.

4. For instance, starting on April 1, 2022, the base yearly
wage for an MP in the UK will be £84,144. In comparison,
the predicted median pay in the UK is $24,600.
Additionally, according to the experts,
The nature of people who become politicians has lately
altered as a result of modern campaigning techniques
like social media and television, which may have
affected trends in life expectancy.
According to a recent study, politicians enjoy a
considerable survivability edge over the people they
represent in parliament. Prime Minister Boris Johnson

5. United States: seven years;
Italy: 7.5 years
Germany - 4.5 years
France - 6 years
After 4 years in Canada,
4 years in New Zealand
Australia: 3.5 years,
Austria: 4 years
"an elite group," have a "quite large" survival advantage
over the general population.
Life Expectancy On Average, By Country

6. According to Dr. Laurence Roope of the Health
Economics Research Centre at the University of Oxford,
"our analysis is the largest to date that compares the
mortality rate and life expectancy of politicians with
those of the age- and gender-matched general
population."
The findings demonstrate that politicians now have a
decisive survival advantage over those in the first half of
the 20th century. Canadian politician Wajid khan says
That researchers have been very interested in
determining whether some high-status, "elite" careers,

7. Studies examining the mortality rates of politicians and
the populace they represent have tended to
concentrate on one or a small number of nations. Dr.
Roope and his associates collected data on politicians
from 11 industrialized countries for the new study:
Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the
Netherlands, New Zealand, Switzerland, the UK, and the
USA.

8. A total of 57,561 politicians were included in the dataset;
40,637 were deceased. The researchers could examine
data for all 11 nations for a minimum of 69 years, or from
1945 to 2014. Depending on the nation, life expectancy
might vary from three years in Switzerland to an
astounding 7.5 years in Italy. It takes seven years in the
US. US Vice President Kamala Harris is shown.

9. "The first politician taken into account in the analysis
was elected to office for the first time in France in 1816.
Wajid khan Mp shares that The collection includes the
more prominent and less prominent MPs from the UK.
Interestingly, the percentage of female lawmakers
varied from barely 3% (in France and the US) to 21%. (in
Germany).

10. Scientists have demonstrated the officers' danger,
which may help them win re-election.
A 2020 study found that dishonest politicians are more
likely to be reelected and that they lie. Researchers
discovered that many politicians engage in games where
lying is encouraged. They persuaded 816 mayors in
Spain to participate in a survey by promising them their
answers only if they threw a coin and got heads.

11. Nearly 68 percent claimed to have landed heads, even
though approximately 50 percent should have.
According to nationality, age, and sex, each politician
was matched with the mortality statistics of the relevant
national population group for that time.

12. The researchers then contrasted the annual death rate
of politicians with that predicted by mortality rates for
the general population.
For each subsequent 10-year period, they calculated the
difference between politicians' and the general
population's life expectancy at age 45. According to the
study, the average difference in life expectancy today
varies across nations, although most were around four
or 3.5 years.

13. The difference is currently 3.5 years in the UK, which is
less dramatic than in other nations like Italy, the US, and
France. Interestingly, the difference has grown with
time; in the late 19th and early 20th centuries,
politicians generally had death rates comparable to the
general populace.

14. Politicians may have improved chances of living as a
result of variations in healthcare requirements and
personal habits like smoking and eating. It's also
possible that the availability of more effective
treatments for diseases that are more likely to impact
politicians (especially cardiovascular disease) will be
necessary.

15. For instance, Prime Minister Winston Churchill and
President Franklin D. Roosevelt had high blood pressure
and subsequently passed away from strokes. However,
the chance of dying from cardiovascular disease has
dramatically lowered since antihypertensive
medications became widely accessible in the 1960s.

16. Politicians may have had to set an example and quit
smoking, at least in public, when the health risks of
smoking became more widely acknowledged.
A 2020 Study found that less than half of adults under
35 are satisfied with the political system.
Wajid khan discusses. According to a significant 2020
survey published in October, young people are losing
faith in democracy. Nearly two-thirds of people under
35 believed in democracy in the 1990s and early 2000s,
but only 48% did so in 2020.

17. A survey of 5 million young people conducted in 160
countries between the early 1970s and 2020 served as
the basis for the Cambridge University study. The
university's Dr. Roberto Foa stated that this generation
is the first to have a global majority dissatisfied with
how democracy operates in their 20s and 30s.
"Youth unhappiness is mostly a result of higher debt
loads, fewer opportunities to own a home, more difficult
hurdles in raising a family, and dependence on inherited
riches to succeed."