Presented by Claire Dienes at the Annual Conference of the Visual Resources Association, April 18th - April 21st, 2012, in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Session: Archival Collections Case Studies
The digitization of historic archival collections can present a daunting array of challenges. Often archives were collected with poor documentation and little information about the creators or contributors to the collection. The processing of these archival collections sometimes requires special subject area expertise due to the content or special staffing considerations due to the sheer size of the project. This session focuses on three cases in which archival collections are being processed. Each presenter will discuss the special challenges within their own institutions’ collection and the solutions they have developed in such areas as copyright, workflow, cataloging, and assembling expert teams.
MODERATOR: Heather Lowe, California State University San Bernardino
PRESENTERS:
• Trevor Alvord, James Madison University
“Delivering oral histories”
• Claire Dienes, Metropolitan Museum of Art
“A 35mm collection assessment & digitization initiative at The Metropolitan Museum of Art”
• Shalimar Fojas White, Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection
“The Artamonoff Business: Using Collections Research for Outreach and Strategic Communication"
VRA 2012, Archival Collections Case Studies, 35mm Assessment & Digitization
1. Digital Media
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Special Exhibition Galleries Views 1970-2004:
an assessment and preservation initiative
Claire Dienes
Digital Media Department
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
VRA Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, April 2012
6. Project Scope and Goals
• To digitize a collection of original color 35mm photography
documenting Met special exhibition gallery views 1970-2004
• To fully catalogue the resulting digital collection
• To make digital collection available for educational purposes
through the ARTstor Digital Library and other on-line platforms,
including the Museum’s website
• To preserve, via proper housing and storage, the original film
collection
7. Project Responsibilities
MET
•Selection of slides
• establish specific selection criteria and selection of physical slides
•Physical preservation of slides in preparation for scanning
• clean, re-house and re-label film
•Inventorying and packaging of slides for scanning
• prepare slides and accompanying spreadsheet for scanner to include
assignment of digital image file name to each slide
•Cataloguing
• apply descriptive, source and rights metadata to all digital assets and identify
metadata to deliver to ARTstor
•Archiving of analog collection
• ensure proper storage of slides in archival binders
8. Project Responsibilities
Third-party, off-site
•Digitization
• Digitize slides in both jpeg and tiff formats and deliver on hard drive
• Minimum resolution specifications for tiffs: 4,000 pixels, 48-bit RGB generating
approximately 50-60 MB files
•Quality control
• Crop and tonally adjust each image as necessary
9. Project Parameters
• Limited year span (representing a fraction of available material)
• Limited to 5,000 views (representing a fraction of available
material)
• Representation across all 17 curatorial departments in the Museum
• Equal representation across 3+ decades of 1970-2004
• Exclude all gallery views that already existed in digital format
10. Selection Criteria
SOURCE OF PHOTOGRAPHY
•Confirmed Met photography or photography where Museum can
claim copyright
11. Selection Criteria
EXHIBITION TITLES
•Exhibitions whose titles include the name of a living or recently
deceased artist, or artists whose estates are particularly active, or
in which the name of an artist still under copyright, were excluded
•Exhibitions whose titles include the names of private collections or
collectors (unless collection would later become part of the Met's
collection or the collector was long deceased) were excluded.
•Exhibitions that are “known” to have copyright issues (Pictures
Generation) were excluded
14. Selection Criteria
INDIVIDUAL VIEWS
•Definition of gallery view
• Must show the space in which the objects are installed
• Must contain two or more objects
• No close-ups/case-shots
•Duplicate/near duplicate views were excluded
•Shots with recognizable people were excluded
18. Project Timeline
Sep 10 Oct 10 Nov 10 Dec 10 Jan 11 Feb 11 Mar 11 Apr 11
Batch cleaned/ pre- jpegs slides/tifs catalog’ing slides
1 inventoried catalog- returned to returned due refiled
slides due ing Met to Met (internal (internal
to scanner begins deadline) deadline)
Batch cleaned/ pre- jpegs slides/tifs catalog’ing slides
2 inventoried catalog- returned to returned due refiled
slides due ing Met to Met (internal (internal
to scanner begins deadline) deadline)
Batch cleaned/ pre- jpegs slides/tifs
3 inventoried catalog- returned returned
slides due ing to Met to Met
to scanner begins
Batch cleaned/ pre-
4 inventoried catalog-
slides due ing
to scanner begins
→
etc.
19. Project Timeline
Dec 11 Jan 12 Feb 12 Mar 12 Apr 12 May 12 Jun 12 Jul 12
Batch slides/tifs catalog’ing slides ALL
7 returned due refiled
to Met (internal (internal
META
deadline) deadline) DATA
DUE
Batch pre- jpegs slides/tifs catalog’ing slides
8 catalog- returned returned due refiled
ing begins to Met to Met (internal (internal
deadline) deadline)
Batch cleaned/ pre- jpegs slides/tifs catalog’ing slides
9 inventoried catalog- returned returned due refiled
slides due ing to Met to Met (internal (internal
to scanner begins deadline) deadline)
Batch cleaned/ pre- jpegs slides/tifs catalog’
10 inventoried catalog- returned returned ing due
slides due ing to Met to Met (internal
to scanner begins deadline
24. Digital Media
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Special Exhibition Galleries Views 1970-2004:
an assessment and preservation initiative
Claire Dienes
Digital Media Department
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
VRA Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, April 2012