Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Secas conceptual org 20130716 edvjh5
1. SECAS Structure Exercise
Purpose: Consider SECAS from the perspective of 3 audiences and
review a draft model of how SECAS can serve to bridge the
perspectives of these audiences. Your feedback will be used to
shape our August workshop agenda.
Step 1: Review the following presentation
Step 2: Use MeetingSphere to provide input and improvements to
the draft conceptual model
2. Overview of Exercise
• The perspectives of key SECAS audiences are presented to
show the relationships and points of connection that SECAS is
seeking to bridge over the next year.
• A draft model of how SECAS can serve to bridge the
perspectives of these audiences.
• Please review and share your questions, edits and
improvements.
3. • More big picture tools
• Better understanding of Impacts from other agency efforts
Support Executive Committee
• Increase efficiencies of existing adaptive partnerships
• Simplify complexity of existing adaption efforts
Coordinate POC and LCC
Communication
• More useful products, collaboratively developed and funded
• Leverage the resources of partners
Coordinate integration of adaptive
planning efforts in the Region
• Broader dialogue with organizations impacting the landscape and conservation
• Proactive impact on emerging issues/regs
Coordinate efforts for Regional
adaptive outreach
A State Director’s
Perspective
State
Agency
Federal
Agencies
POCs
LCCs
Internal
Adaptive Efforts
External
Adaptive Efforts
JVs
Employee Participation
SWAP
4. • Better understanding of Impacts from other agency efforts
• SECAS provides multi-state coordination opportunity
Support Executive Committee
• Better understanding of what’s up within own agency
• Increase efficiencies of existing adaptive partnerships
Coordinate POC and LCC
Communication
•More utilization of products that were collaboratively developed and funded
•Fill data gaps in both directions by better alignment with State efforts
Coordinate integration of adaptive
planning efforts in the Region
•Broader dialogue with organizations impacting the landscape and conservation
•Greater certainty in project planning and need to remove barriers to execution up front
Coordinate efforts for Regional
adaptive outreach
A Federal Agency’s
Perspective
State
Agency
Federal
Agencies
POCs
LCCs
Internal
Adaptive Efforts
External
Adaptive Efforts
JVs
Employee Participation
5. • Reinforce support for adaptive efforts by agency leadership
• Smooth integration of existing adaptive efforts (e.g., states, JVs, SARP)
Support Executive Committee
• Better awareness, use, and integration of adaptive efforts
• Increase efficiencies of existing adaptive partnerships
Coordinate POC and LCC
Communication
•Utilization and adaptation of products that were collaboratively developed and funded
•Ensure collaboration at the LCC borders
Coordinate integration of adaptive
planning efforts in the Region
•Broader dialogue with organizations impacting the landscape and conservation
•Linking efforts for outreach to larger entities with span broader than a single LCC
Coordinate efforts for Regional
adaptive outreach
An LCC’s
View
State
Agency
Federal
Agencies
POCs
LCCs
Internal
Adaptive Efforts
External
Adaptive Efforts
JVs
Internal Agency Coordination
of effort
6. SECAS Audience Points of Connection
• Connecting with broader audience
LCC Coordinators
• Catalog of efforts underway/overview of tools/project linkages
Decision-makers
• Resources available/efforts underway
Data Information Tool Seekers
• Enhance tool utilization with wider audience by cataloging efforts
Data Information Tool Providers
• Point of entry to SECAS and adaptive efforts
Non-Traditional Groups seeking Information
• Catalog of efforts with easy access to descriptions and products
Partners Seeking Solutions
8. Governance Level Participants
• Sponsorship Level: SEAFWA and SENRLG chair and vice chair
• Guiding Coalition: LCC Coordinators, Steering Committee chair,
representing their respective Cooperatives. (will require coordination
with each LCC staff/steering committees)
• Project management: Full time SECAS project manager
• Technical guidance: LCC Science Coordinators
• Science support: LCC Technical Committees and CSCs
• Technical teams: LCC staff and partners
9. Governance Components
• Sponsorship – Key agencies and organizations that set high level
expectations and support. (SEAFWA/SENRLG)
• Guiding Coalition – Provides next level sponsorship, oversight, capacity
and details for meeting expectations. (LCC Steering Committee/Staff)
• Project management – Provides day to day management capacity and
support to deliver project plans, coordination, and communications
needed to accomplish project. (Project manager w/support)
10. Next Steps
• Use MeetingSphere to provide us with your edits and comments on the
conceptual model presented. Your engagement will help us to better
prepare the workshop exercises.
https://eu10.meetingsphere.com/groupsolutions/secas
• We will collect your feedback and utilize it to help us better structure
and design SECAS and improve our understanding and coordination
efforts.
Hinweis der Redaktion
From an expectations perspective, State executives on SEAFWA have this view of the benefits of SECAS.
From an expectations perspective, Federal executives on SENRLG have this view of the benefits of SECAS.
LCC’s have these benefits from SECAS.
Here a potential points of connection for all potential consumers of SECAS products.
Here is a greatly simplified version of how SECAS can connect the efforts of the SEAFWA States, Federal Partners, and the LCCs to produce broader regional benefits.
This chart provides definitions of the terms on “white model” above.Your input on this is greatly appreciated and will be provided in the exercise that follows.
Additional definitions of elements of the white model.
Please provide us input on your understanding and preferences for an operational model. The model provided was to stimulate your thinking on the points of connection.
