8. What would a Metro Internet look like if it were
designed to support:
- Internet of Things (IoT)?
- Billions of wireless devices?
- Industrial Internet?
- Low-cost endpoints? (close digital divide)
Roll that out in cities across the U.S. and
globally and use it to leverage innovative
applications and services.
16. Benefits for Participating Cities
• A fully interconnected metro gigabit Internet
• Smart city brain + smart city applications
• IoT
• Industrial Internet (digital manufacturing)
• Cyberphysical systems
• Attract entrepreneurs and economic development and tech jobs
• Gigabit innovation and ecosystem of gigabit applications
• Growing your initial metro gigabit Internet and smart city brain
• Nonpartisan rallying point for business-government-education
collaboration
• Digitally self-sufficient communities
• Bridge digital divide
• Federal seed money
• National recognition as a Smart Gigabit Community
17. A Few Details
• 3 year NSF grant ends September 2018
• But it only plants the seed –
we expect sustainable community investment
• Grant provides for 3 more communities in the last year
• Accepting additional self-funded communities
• Interim results at Application Summits – June 13-15, Austin
• Community
• Steering group
• Support the new metro Internet architecture & apps
• Activate the local tech community for sustainable growth
• Technical
• Digital Town Square
• Smart City Brain
19. Digital Town
Square
Interconnect your
islands of gigabit
Google Fiber
CenturyLink
Local K-12
Network
Slice Controller
Local
datacenter w/
Docker
containers
GENI Rack
Local University
Large Local Employer
Local WISP
Internet 2
20. GENI Rack or equivalent
Interconnected with other communities
Privacy-protected slices
Transition to commercial infrastructure
Smart City Brain
21. 21
SMART GIGABIT COMMUNITIES
SGCGigabit Apps
Gigabit Infrastructure
Gigabit Community Activities
More resilient city
Economic growth
Bridge digital divide
Civic pride
Innovation
24. Digital Town
Square
Interconnect your
islands of gigabit
Google Fiber
CenturyLink
Local K-12
Network
Slice Controller
Local
datacenter w/
Docker
containers
GENI Rack
Local University
Large Local Employer
Local WISP
Internet 2
25. Home or Business SDX – Paradrop.io
Chute
Chute
Via carrier to
digital town square
Chute
Chute
OpenWRT with Paradrop
27. Connectivity Options
A wide variety is possible
1.You have a GENI rack in your community – you’re already
connected
2.US Ignite provides a GENI rack or equivalent
a)State or regional education network
b)Internet2
29. What are the new applications and what do they need?
G = Gigabit to end user; I = slice Isolation for privacy/security; R=
engineered deterministic response time and reliability
• Cloud-based Home Medical Monitoring (I, R, sometimes G)
• Cloud-based Control of Home Medical Devices (I, R, sometimes G)
• Cloud-based virtual reality headsets for experiential education (G, R)
• Stream complex apps from a local cloud to close digital divide (G, R)
• Helping a child of immigrants learn to read by listening / correcting
(I, R)
• Visualizing large databases (e.g., pollution sources, transit services,
a patient’s own medical scans) (G, R, sometimes I)
30. What are the new applications and what do they need?
G = Gigabit to end user; I = slice Isolation for privacy/security; R=
engineered deterministic response time and reliability
• Coordinating peak energy uses across buildings (R, sometimes I)
• Real-time infrastructure for continuous-motion vehicles (V2I) (I, R)
• Consumer-based GIS systems (G, R, sometimes I)
• Realtime license plate scanning (I, R)
• Continuous health monitoring and response (e.g., smart underwear,
embedded sensors) (I, R)
• Reduced-cost low-latency Telepresence (G, I, R)
• Many more at us-ignite.org and globalcityteams.org
32. 32
SMART GIGABIT COMMUNITIES
SGCGigabit Apps
Gigabit Infrastructure
Gigabit Community Activities
More resilient city
Economic growth
Bridge digital divide
Civic pride
Innovation
34. Technical Observations
• Metro access capacity growing much faster than backbone capacity
• Much of the new traffic from the Internet of Things and
Cyberphysical Systems can be acted on locally (within the city)
• For latency and reliability purposes, much of that new traffic should
be acted upon locally (within the city)
• Slicing (GENI style or multi-tenant style) would aid in security by
isolating traffic
• Wireless is as important as wired (or fibered)
What Metropolitan Internet design would best support the above?
35. Metropolitan Internet Design Objectives
• Keep local traffic local: Locavore / edge
• Implies dispersing the cloud for local-only processing
• Keep sensitive traffic isolated: Slicing / orchestration
• Leverage bandwidth in the local gigabit access networks
• Improve perceived quality of service for current customers
• Leverage a city’s natural soft organizational infrastructure (mayor, office
of economic development, chamber of commerce, university expertise
and student availability, etc.)
• Work with tech corporations to achieve their objectives (local + nat’l)
• Focus on win-win actions to keep maximum constituency
36. Metropolitan Internet Design Advantages
• Any design that meets the previous page also:
• Makes a city more resilient (less prone to problems caused by natural
disasters elsewhere)
• Attracts new economic development around smart cities, IoT,
cyberphysical systems, entrepreneurs
• Establishes a basis for university / city partnerships
• Fosters civic pride
• Encourages competition in providing local services
37. Draft: Intended Progression of Digital Town Square
1. Traditional layer 3 exchange point
IP adressing; no flow identification
2. Software-defined layer 2 flow identification / switching
Flows explicitly identified with their desired handling
Applications negotiate w/controllers for their desired flow handling
(also needed for incremental billing)
Deterministic handling may mean many things including:
Priority
Drop or queue
When to re-negotiate
When to notify application about actual packet handling
Flow isolation for security
Etc.